David Ehrmann wrote:
Does FreeBSD currently support cryptographic acceleration for AES on the
Core i5 CPU? I searched, but couldn't find anything, and the crypto(4)
manpage only lists these divers in "see also:"
no, but if you write a driver for it we will... :-)
(most things in open source h
Does FreeBSD currently support cryptographic acceleration for AES on the
Core i5 CPU? I searched, but couldn't find anything, and the crypto(4)
manpage only lists these divers in "see also:"
glxsb(4),hifn(4), ipsec(4), padlock(4), safe(4), ubsec(4)
_
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:41:40AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message , Robert
>> Watso n writes:
>>> Doing that kind of rearrangement [...] would be a nightmare for anyone
>>> with large [...] patches, so I'd say we could pretty much rule tha
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:01:30PM +0100, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
> Oh, so because a lot of the programmers behind it receive wages, and the
> project itself won't commit ritual suicide by basically blocking the
> companies using FreeBSD from returning improvements they make to the
>
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:28:24AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> FWIW, NetBSD's charter has been to run their OS on a number of
> architectures, not just a primary set of architectures; OpenBSD's
> charter differs -- if we all were NetBSD or OpenBSD, then we'd all be
> using the same thing. B
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:16:41AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
> I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this
> discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the same
> way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the
> consequences fo
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:14 -0800, Weongyo Jeong w
Finally I managed to understand how Rx checksum offloading works on
Yukon II controllers. The patch at the following URL will add Rx
checksum offloading support to msk(4) controllers.
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/msk/msk.csum.patch
The patch was generated against HEAD.
Controllers(Yukon Extr
Alex Keda writes:
> Let's wait another 10 years, and, coming at last to understand
> that this must be done, and do it was 20 times harder.
First, all architectures are not equal in FreeBSD's eyes. Look
for "Tier 1 architectures" in the docs and mailing lists.
Second, if you w
I tried ndisgen to convert BCMWL564.SYS using FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT
FEB-2010(x86).
The files I had were :
It gave an error stating BCM43XX64.CAT(unrequired),
BCM43XX.CAT(unrequired), bcmwl5.inf and BCMWL564.SYS
I had successfully compiled the 32-bit and 64-bit driver on FreeBSD 8.0
(the 64-BIT cou
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, paradox wrote:
> so, I really do not understand why it is so difficult to move a few folders
> in the shared folder is a big problem
> as is done in openbsd and netbsd
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/?only_with_tag=MAIN
> http://www.openbsd.org/
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> There are two chief problems with a large-scale reorg of our src tree:
>
> - There are many companies who use FreeBSD as part of their business.
> In the case of ISPs or companies who use FreeBSD as a base of their
> products, this would
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Giovanni Trematerra
wrote:
> Instead of this patch people can use kern.cam.boot_delay
> Just set a delay in ms.
> That works on 8-STABLE too.
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sometimes the USB sticks won't get detected in
13 matches
Mail list logo
