Due to troubles on my notebook PC:-), I was unable to show you
the last dozen of slides to you at the event. I made the slides
available at:
http://www.itojun.org/diary/19991019/
It will also be included into to-appear freebsdcon proceedings webpage.
At 01:25 AM 10/21/99 +, you wrote:
On 20 Oct 1999 17:42:58 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers you wrote:
Running a late 3.2-stable, im getting
fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 0, addr = 0
the card has a GD82559 Intel part on it
Is there an updated version of the driver
I, for one, like what was suggested a long time ago, by someone who I
cannot really remember. It separated driver "classes" in /modules
subdirectories. For instance, we could have a "net" for the if_foo
drivers, "storage" for CAM/ATA/RAID/Vinum/CCD/etc., "periph" for
various esoteric
check how the netatalk code expands a range in to teh minumm set of
netmasks needed to cover that range.
(somewhere in /sys/netatalk).
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Chuck Youse wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
The real advantage is being able to do somethine like this:
I have a 3.3-stable machine that I use as a news router (running diablo). The
fxp0 interface averages 10-15 Mbps bandwidth continously.
About once a week the machine crashes reboots. We enabled the debugger this time
and captured the following debug output:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while
I made some days ago UNILOAD v.1.2, the main feature of this version is
the ability to load system from beyond 1024 cylinder mark. Here it is
list
of some changes:
--
Changes in version 1.2
- UNILOAD uses IBM/MS INT 0x13
Let me guess...your system has an Intel N440BX motherboard, right? If so,
then it's a known problem with no solution yet.
-DG
David Greenman
Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
Creator of high-performance Internet servers -
Hi David -- What if I install a *real* EtherExpress Pro-100B (or
whatever it's known as today) in the PCI slot, and use it instead
of the on-board (N440BX motherboard) fxp0 interface?
Judging that you probably know the nature of the problem, do you
think this might circumvent it?
Regards,
Lew
I am using FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE, and it is running on a single processor PII 400.
At first, I thought the problem was due to the network driver, so I swapped network
cards. But, the problem still continues to occur. At first, I used a DEC (de0) NIC.
Then, I switched to an Intel EtherExpress Pro
Hi David -- What if I install a *real* EtherExpress Pro-100B (or
whatever it's known as today) in the PCI slot, and use it instead
of the on-board (N440BX motherboard) fxp0 interface?
Judging that you probably know the nature of the problem, do you
think this might circumvent it?
I think it
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Steve Bishop wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE, and it is running on a single processor PII 400.
At first, I thought the problem was due to the network driver, so I swapped network
cards. But, the problem still continues to occur. At first, I used a DEC (de0) NIC.
For the sake of experimentation, I'll throw in a *real* Pro-100B card
and see if it happens again (it takes 8 days for the panic to happen).
I can also measure the consistency of this "8 day" phenomena.
As an aside, there's not much SCSI activity on this system. I've had
very good results with
Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
Thanks,
Chuck Robey| Interests include C programming, Electronics,
213 Lakeside Dr.
Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
Thanks,
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
The Xt callbacks are C based, so you typically can't directly call a
C++ method.
But,
On 27-Oct-99 Thomas David Rivers wrote:
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
Or you could just use a toolkit written for C++ or with C++ shims already.. ie
Qt or GTK..
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software -
On 27-Oct-99 Thomas David Rivers wrote:
And, wasn't there a freely available C++ shim for motif floating around
at one time?
I don't know.. My X experience begins and ends with Tk :)
(Don't like Motif either ;)
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software -
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
extern "C" {
void
callback_function(arg1)
void *arg1;
{
/* Call the method */
myclass::mymethod(arg1);
As far as I've seen, you can't directly call a class method
without an
Thomas David Rivers writes:
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
[...]
You're approach would probably work, but there's an easier way.
See topic 28 in the Xt FAQ.
ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/faqs/FAQ-Xt
It's not name mangling causing problems, it's lack of
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Does anyone (anyone, that is, who's coded X11 applications) know how you
handle X11 callbacks to C++ object methods?
Thanks,
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
The Xt callbacks are C based, so
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 27-Oct-99 Thomas David Rivers wrote:
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
Or you could just use a toolkit written for C++ or with C++ shims already.. ie
Qt or GTK..
If I wanted to just get X11 done, I
Then you just stick a C wrapper function around every C++ callback you
want to register, is that it? Seems a bit inelegant, but I suppose, if
the ultimate test of elegance is that "it's the only one that works", then
it's perhaps elegant *enough*.
I believe someone posted a better
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers writes:
If you mean Xt (and possibly Motif) - the answer is "very carefully."
[...]
You're approach would probably work, but there's an easier way.
See topic 28 in the Xt FAQ.
ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/faqs/FAQ-Xt
Allow me add something to what the FAQ-Xt says.
I find it more convenient to immediately call a non-static
function as shown below (using a slightly modified example
from the FAQ).
class Icon {
public:
Icon(Widget*);
private:
static void
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Bakul Shah wrote:
Allow me add something to what the FAQ-Xt says.
I find it more convenient to immediately call a non-static
function as shown below (using a slightly modified example
from the FAQ).
Just got out of the shower, where I was wondering why they didn't
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
extern "C" {
void
callback_function(arg1)
void *arg1;
{
/* Call the method */
myclass::mymethod(arg1);
As far as I've seen,
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Steve Bishop wrote:
The scripts are designed to use the database a lot, and they also use a significant
amount
of network resources. The scripts sometimes can have up to 900 open tcp connections,
and consistently use almost 600. I have increased the number of mbuf
26 matches
Mail list logo
