On 0, David McNett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23-Mar-2001, Michael Aronsen wrote:
Has anyone been working on or know of any work being done on getting any
fingerprint gadgets working in FreeBSD?
This is mostly off-topic, but I wanted to take the opportunity to point
out an excellent
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:36:30AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Shouldn't the FreeBSD project issue a press release welcoming
Apple's MacOS X ?
Good idea, write one :-)
Kris
PGP signature
Hi
I am modifying FreeBSD 4.1 kernel. I am hacking all UDP packets in
ip_input, changing some headers and finding the udp checksum
using in_pseudo() and setting the packet header csum_flags to
CSUM_UDP (I know this is a dirty way of doing it.. but, had to do it
for efficiency reasons). When I
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 05:10:04PM +0530, Madhavi Suram wrote:
Hi
I am modifying FreeBSD 4.1 kernel. I am hacking all UDP packets in
ip_input, changing some headers and finding the udp checksum
using in_pseudo() and setting the packet header csum_flags to
CSUM_UDP (I know this is a
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:11:03PM +0100, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A while back I started running through the undocumented sysctls and
documenting them. I didn't get through all of them, and the main reason
I stopped was because there wasn't a nifty way to extract the sysctls
short of writing a
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:36:30AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Shouldn't the FreeBSD project issue a press release welcoming
Apple's MacOS X ?
Good idea, write one :-)
To be a really effective press release, it should be joint released
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:36:30AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Shouldn't the FreeBSD project issue a press release welcoming
Apple's MacOS X ?
Good idea, write one :-)
To be a really
1 - Give a select group of people the docs under NDA
2 - If there are any specific features Intel wants avoided, get them to
identify
them up front.
3 - Let them write a driver that uses whatever features that are useful, with
header files that define the register bits etc that
At 05:04 PM 11/18/2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:33:29 -0500, Dennis wrote:
At 04:28 PM 11/17/2000, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:
I just heard that Intel doesn't supply documentation on ther chipset
and the
FreeBSD and Linux support is quiet bad. The Netgear GA620
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have read the thread for a while, and i wonder:
why in the world someone should go through the effort and
responsibility of SIGNING THE NDA _and_ negotiating with Intel
for getting permissions to redistribute the code ?
Because NDAs come as a
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have read the thread for a while, and i wonder:
why in the world someone should go through the effort and
responsibility of SIGNING THE NDA _and_ negotiating with Intel
for getting permissions to redistribute the code ?
I do not see how this is
:Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: So you would be able to create approximately four 17GB swap partitions.
: If you reduce NSWAP to 2 you would be able to create approximately
: two 34GB swap partitions. If you reduce NSWAP to 1 you would be able
: to create approximately
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have read the thread for a while, and i wonder:
why in the world someone should go through the effort and
responsibility of SIGNING THE NDA _and_ negotiating with Intel
for getting permissions to redistribute the code ?
sleep deprived venting
I think you can assume that Jordan will veto me writing anything even
remotely like a press-release for the project. I just thought it was
a very good opportunity to beat the drum...
I don't think you can assume any such thing - I say go for it! :)
One of the things that makes the Linux
At 01:33 PM 03/24/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have read the thread for a while, and i wonder:
why in the world someone should go through the effort and
responsibility of SIGNING THE NDA _and_ negotiating with Intel
for getting permissions to
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
For many (most?) people that may be practical. But what about
those of us with a 1RU system using fxp on the motherboard and
NEED the single PCI slot for something else? I suspect that
there are
Hi,
Here is a patch to select the modules you want and don't want.
The patch is for /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile from RELENG_4.
Then you have to put variables in make.conf (i'm writing the patch
for defaults/make.conf) like this :
NO_KMOD_FPU=true
NO_KMOD_GNUFPU=true
...
Thanks for
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes:
I think you can assume that Jordan will veto me writing anything even
remotely like a press-release for the project. I just thought it was
a very good opportunity to beat the drum...
I don't think you can assume any such thing - I say go
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:49:14PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
You use the term "our developers" as if you are some sort of closed cult.
They have something in common, and it's not a cult. It's called being
an "open source developer".
I have NEVER complained about Intel not releasing full
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:31:05 -0500, Dennis wrote:
At 05:04 PM 11/18/2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 11:33:29 -0500, Dennis wrote:
At 04:28 PM 11/17/2000, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:
I just heard that Intel doesn't supply documentation on ther chipset
and the
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
Thanks for the tip on the XL driver. Over the years, I have seen
many questions about which driver/card was the best, and all the
answers were pretty vague, or suggested that Intel had the edge.
Yes. It's currently my understanding that the
If the if_wx driver sucks, why not fix it rather than trying to coerce a
mega-companies with a deep political structure to change is policies? But
if youre not going to maintain it, dont do it at all. You cant stick it to
users by deciding later that you dont want to support it anymore.
At 02:45 PM 03/24/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
Thanks for the tip on the XL driver. Over the years, I have seen
many questions about which driver/card was the best, and all the
answers were pretty vague, or suggested that Intel had the edge.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
Most drivers are written without full docs. Intel supplied drivers for
linux are available for both eepro100 and gigabit cards. The info is out
there. Cobbling together the info to produce a driver...THATS what open
source is all
At 03:12 PM 03/24/2001, Will Andrews wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
Most drivers are written without full docs. Intel supplied drivers for
linux are available for both eepro100 and gigabit cards. The info is out
there. Cobbling together the info to produce a
On 24 Mar 2001, at 16:12, Dennis wrote:
And why does all of your email have that stupid attachment? Whats the
matter, cant figure out how to use an open-source mailer? :-)
It's called a PGP signature.
Could you two kids please take this pissing contest off -hackers? Thanks.
--
Dan
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:12:34PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
For your info, Bub, what makes the BSD license attractive is its usability
by commercial vendors, so maybe you should go play in Linuxland because
you are the one in the wrong camp, not me. the ability to take code, fix it
and
This patch allows cvs diff to diff a date range on a branch.
e.g.:
cvs -d /home/ncvs diff -j RELENG_4:2/15/01 -j RELENG_4:3/06/01
I'm not quite sure what to do with it yet... I suppose submit it
to the cvs maintainers since its in contrib. The patch is fairly
Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'd like to see is `mount -v' printing
vexpert:/files5 on /.amd_mnt/vexpert/files5 (nfs: v3, udp)
instead of
vexpert:/files5 on /.amd_mnt/vexpert/files5 (nfs)
I don't think you can assume any such thing - I say go for it! :)
Well, how soon we forget history :-)
I have no idea what this means.
Right, I fully agree. Chart me up in the "kernel architecture" category
and lets find somebody else do the PR writing...
Right. Can we see a show of
Hello there!
I just read FAQ on making release and have one question. FAQ says I must
be having full CVS source tree (or be able to access it via CVSROOT), but
I'm behind modem connection. So I'm curious why it is not enough to have
a cvsupped src-all/doc-all/ports-all collections? And is there
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:31:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
2) even if you have hardware with an "fxp" on board, adding a second
supported card is cheap and easy -- nothing like having to put
in a second video card;
Many, many U1-form-factor systems have two fxp on-board NICs.
No room
Matthew Jacob wrote:
1 - Give a select group of people the docs under NDA
2 - If there are any specific features Intel wants avoided, get them to
identify
them up front.
3 - Let them write a driver that uses whatever features that are useful, wi
th
header files that
At 04:19 PM 03/24/2001, Will Andrews wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 04:12:34PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
For your info, Bub, what makes the BSD license attractive is its usability
by commercial vendors, so maybe you should go play in Linuxland because
you are the one in the wrong camp, not me.
At 04:07 PM 03/24/2001, Dan Langille wrote:
On 24 Mar 2001, at 16:12, Dennis wrote:
And why does all of your email have that stupid attachment? Whats the
matter, cant figure out how to use an open-source mailer? :-)
It's called a PGP signature.
Could you two kids please take this pissing
Yes, I agree. We should delete the rest of this thread.
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
At 04:07 PM 03/24/2001, Dan Langille wrote:
On 24 Mar 2001, at 16:12, Dennis wrote:
And why does all of your email have that stupid attachment? Whats the
matter, cant figure out how to use an
On 24 Mar 2001, at 19:59, Dennis wrote:
the only thing more annoying the 2 people having a discussion is a third
person telling them to stop. Feel free not to read any more messages in
this thread.
Feel free to read the list charter. You two are in a pissing contest
unreleated to this
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:50:51AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
One thing that comes to mind is that you can smarthost your outgoing
email to another host so the queues don't build up. This should
greatly reduce mail load. In fact, I would recommend offloading email
entirely if
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
Most drivers are written without full docs.
Feh. *EVERY* wpaul written Ethernet driver was written _with_ having the
full docs. wpaul will not write a driver otherwise.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Implementing the above functionality in mount(8) isn't actually that
hard. We would need to export the filesystem-specific fs_args
structures (e.g., nfs_args, ffs_args) to the userland. If we do that,
mount(8) will be able to display all kinds of
At 8:36 AM +0100 3/24/01, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Shouldn't the FreeBSD project issue a press release welcoming
Apple's MacOS X ?
For what it's worth, the Red Herring article on MacOS 10, at:
http://www.redherring.com/index.asp?layout=storychannel=2002doc_id=1380018338
Mentions that:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote:
I tried to export this stuff in struct statfs, but ran into a problem:
I'd need the complete definitions of fs_args in sys/mount.h, but I
can't include, e.g., nfs/nfs.h because the latter includes the
former (sys/mount.h)!
mount.h used to know too
As a part-time journalist, I receive a fair number of press releases.
Most get tossed, unopened, in an effort to simplify my life. When I
do open a release, it all too frequently contains news of some VP of
paper clips who has gotten promoted to Senior VP of office supplies.
I have considered
I have a CTX EzBook 800 series on which I have used FreeBSD version
2.2.8 since that version was current. At the time I had to use some of
the
PAO stuff to get the pcmcia enet to work, but everything else seemed to
work fine.
I just bought a new disk, and figured i'd install 4.2. The
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 1 Apr 2000
SEATTLE - The FreeBSD Project, Inc. officially welcomed today the
introduction of Apple Computer's Mac OS X. The next-generation operating
system uses the TCP/IP stack of an obsolete version of FreeBSD's flagship
product, and is otherwise completely unrelated.
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0103242148060.89919-10@localhost, Dan Feldman wr
ites:
under the moniker "Public Source," after refusing to comply with Open
Source Foundation rules for using the Open Source trademark. OS X ships
with such industry-standard sofware as the Z shell and the Apache Web
You're right, there's no need to pick fights. But I'm just pointing out
that there's no reason FreeBSD should work particularly hard to create the
appearance of an alliance with Apple, when all they've done is use the
source of some kernel components and a number of utilities for a
commercial
47 matches
Mail list logo
