Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Mike Meyer writes: > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:24:32 -0700 > George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There were a couple of threads about using kqueue or other FreeBSD > > tools to build something like Mac OS X's Time Machine. R1soft's > > software sounds very similar. > > Time machine

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> Actually, right back at you. You didn't fathom the meaning in my >> statement. While your post was vague, I read the company's website to >> > > While Hammer might be doing a similar job, it

Re: kgdb debugging

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 alan yang wrote: | hi, there, | | wonder people can shed some lights on remote debugging. i have | freebsd7 configured with option DDB / KDB / GDB but after entering the | db on the target system the command gdb gives "the remote GDB backend | coul

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: Actually, right back at you. You didn't fathom the meaning in my statement. While your post was vague, I read the company's website to I am sorry what was vague since I wrote 'continuous backup' in my post? The whole idea is such a basic idea that if you put this to

kgdb debugging

hi, there, wonder people can shed some lights on remote debugging. i have freebsd7 configured with option DDB / KDB / GDB but after entering the db on the target system the command gdb gives "the remote GDB backend could not be selected". i browsed through the mailing list, and do find 1 similar

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:24:32 -0700 George Hartzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There were a couple of threads about using kqueue or other FreeBSD > tools to build something like Mac OS X's Time Machine. R1soft's > software sounds very similar. Time machine doesn't do continuous backups, it does t

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> [regarding r1soft.com , ...] >> >>I am not saying it is impossible.

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Volker wrote: On 12/23/-58 20:59, Evren Yurtesen wrote: Hello, As far as I can see, there is no continuous backup solution for FreeBSD at the moment. I talked with R1Soft and they seem to not be able to support FreeBSD and need help. Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Pleas

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Sean Bruno wrote: Evren Yurtesen wrote: Hello, As far as I can see, there is no continuous backup solution for FreeBSD at the moment. I talked with R1Soft and they seem to not be able to support FreeBSD and need help. Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: http:/

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Bakul Shah writes: > On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:09:06 +0300 "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bob Bishop wrote: > > > > > >>> Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: > > >>> http:/

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Forgot to say: Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > OK, I had implemented both '-o' option to pkg_audit and the usage of the > local INDEX file. The latter can be activated by writing something like - portaudit_pkg_index="file:///usr/ports/INDEX-%d" - to the /u

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:30:29PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > OK, fine. I will implement the usage of the local INDEX file in some > days. OK, I had implemented both '-o' option to pkg_audit and the usage of the local INDEX file. I had reworked pkg_audit and portaudit a bit further, mostly fi

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: [regarding r1soft.com , ...] I am not saying it is impossible. They just need somebody to put them to right track I guess. I personally c

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Vlad GALU wrote: On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bob Bishop wrote: Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: http://forum.r1soft.com/showpost.php?p=3414&postcount=9 Should be possible to do this with a geom(4) class? I am no

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:09:06 +0300 "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bob Bishop wrote: > > > >>> Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: > >>> http://forum.r1soft.com/showpost.php?p=3414

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On 12/23/-58 20:59, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Hello, > > As far as I can see, there is no continuous backup solution for FreeBSD > at the moment. I talked with R1Soft and they seem to not be able to > support FreeBSD and need help. > > Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please s

Re: touch screen recommendation?

On 12/23/-58 20:59, Chuck Robey wrote: > I was wondering if anyone here had a recommendation for a touch screen, > specifically to run on FreeBSD? Any user report? I am wondering how this belongs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now the real answer: It depends. Touchscreen != Touchscreen, as there are dif

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [regarding r1soft.com, ...] > I am not saying it is impossible. They just need somebody to put them to > right track I guess. I personally cant do that. It would be nice if somebody > who has knowledge in this area contac

Re: bad NFS/UDP performance

> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > at the moment, the best I can do is run it on a different hardware that has > > if_em, the results are in > > ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/lock.prof/7.1-1000.em the > > benchmark ran better with the Intel NIC, averaged UDP 54MB/s, TC

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Bishop wrote: > >>> Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: >>> http://forum.r1soft.com/showpost.php?p=3414&postcount=9 >> >> Should be possible to do this with a geom(4) class? >> > > I am no

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Bob Bishop wrote: Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: http://forum.r1soft.com/showpost.php?p=3414&postcount=9 Should be possible to do this with a geom(4) class? I am not saying it is impossible. They just need somebody to put them to right track I guess. I p

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Mel, Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 02:40:48PM +0200, Mel wrote: > What I meant is the '-o' flag in pkg_audit, so I can figure out myself whether > it's new or not and my buildserver can prioritize it's builds based on > vulnerable packages it's clients have installed. The origin is the unique key > that

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

On Monday 06 October 2008 14:22:13 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Mel, > > Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:07:51PM +0200, Mel wrote: > > On Monday 06 October 2008 12:28:48 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > Once you have the origin of the port, you can: > > - make -C $PORTSDIR/$origin -V PKGNAME > > - get the matching

Re: continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Hi, On 6 Oct 2008, at 11:00, Evren Yurtesen wrote: As far as I can see, there is no continuous backup solution for FreeBSD at the moment. I talked with R1Soft and they seem to not be able to support FreeBSD and need help. Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: ht

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Mel, Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:07:51PM +0200, Mel wrote: > On Monday 06 October 2008 12:28:48 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Once you have the origin of the port, you can: > - make -C $PORTSDIR/$origin -V PKGNAME > - get the matching origin(s) out of ${INDEXDIR}/${INDEXFILE} > - get the matching origin(s

continuous backup solution for FreeBSD

Hello, As far as I can see, there is no continuous backup solution for FreeBSD at the moment. I talked with R1Soft and they seem to not be able to support FreeBSD and need help. Does anybody have free time and skills to give a hand? Please see: http://forum.r1soft.com/showpost.php?p=3414&post

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Miroslav, good day. Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:41:05AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: I am busy these days, but it is nice to read about your progress. I hope I will get some time to test all of these large patches in a few days and I will report back my experiences! F

RE: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not calledformycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID

static devclass_t My_devclass; DRIVER_MODULE(My, pci, My_driver, My_devclass, 0, 0); With Regards, Bagavathy kumar .M -Original Message- From: Warner Losh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:56 PM To: Bagavathy Kumar Mahendran Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hacke

RE: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not calledformycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID

static int My_probe(device_t dev) { uint32_t progif; uint32_t subclass; uint32_t class; device_printf(dev, " Probe\n Vendor ID : 0x%x\n Device ID : 0x%x\n",pci_get_vendor(dev), pci_get_device(dev)); class = pci_get_class(dev); subclass = pci_get_

RE: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not called formycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID

Dear Warner, My probe is getting called for the parent bridge devices .but Not for my pci Card. I have tested this by printing the Device ID and Vendor ID of the corresponding device_t in my probe. You are trying to say even cbb probes for my device and return BUS_PROBE_DEFAULT sti

RE: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not called for mycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID

Dear Warner, Thanks for your support. my probe is getting called for all the bridges not for my pci device. so please provide the fix . OR Is any other way available for making my driver to override the probe of cbb driver for my corresponding device (With out changing cbb driver).

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

On Monday 06 October 2008 12:28:48 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Mel, good day. > > Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Mel wrote: > > On Monday 06 October 2008 07:23:37 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > But downloading the INDEX file from the central server seemed to be the > > > best way, since it alm

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Miroslav, Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:59:46AM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I have '/usr/sbin/portsnap cron' and '/usr/sbin/portsnap -I update' in > my crontab, so I get INDEX updated every night before nightly security > e-mail is generated. Ah, I see. Thanks! > > But downloading the INDEX fi

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Mel, good day. Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Mel wrote: > On Monday 06 October 2008 07:23:37 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > But downloading the INDEX file from the central server seemed to be the > > best way, since it almost always gives one the latest port versions, so > > I had implemente

Re: ports/126853: ports-mgmt/portaudit: speed up audit of installed packages

Hello, On Monday 06 October 2008 07:23:37 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > But downloading the INDEX file from the central server seemed to be the > best way, since it almost always gives one the latest port versions, so > I had implemented this in a first place. I've been following this, but I don't a

Re: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not called formycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID

From: "Bagavathy Kumar Mahendran " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: i386/127710: My driver PCI probe is not called formycorrespondingdevice ID and Vendor ID Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:36:44 +0530 > Dear Warner, > > My probe is getting called for the parent bridge devices > .but > N