On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:41:34 -0700 Brian Somers br...@awfulhak.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:55:03 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:13:45 -0700 Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
Try this:
Index: sys/net/flowtable.c
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello!
When I good know, no common interface exisit in current freebsd
kernel, but some other sysctl interfece exisit: coretemp, aiboost ...
~ sysctl dev.coretemp
dev.coretemp.0.%desc: CPU On-Die Thermal Sensors
Aurélien Méré wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeBSD for years in all my servers, but I'm facing a big
problem today. All servers are under monitoring using a couple of
applications and scripts. Monitored items for each server especially are
CPU/mobo/UPS/HDD temperatures, CPU load, memory use,
Am 22.08.2009 um 08:03 schrieb Gonzalo Nemmi:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Oliver Pinter
oliver.p...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello!
When I good know, no common interface exisit in current freebsd
kernel, but some other sysctl interfece exisit: coretemp, aiboost ...
~ sysctl dev.coretemp
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:23:13 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:41:34 -0700 Brian Somers br...@awfulhak.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:55:03 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:13:45 -0700 Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au (from Thu, 20 Aug
2009
17:13:07 +0930):
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au (from Wed, 19 Aug
2009
23:31:33 +0930):
Content-Type:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:55:03 -0700 Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:13:45 -0700 Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
Try this:
Index: sys/net/flowtable.c
===
--- sys/net/flowtable.c (revision
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Marc Balmer wrote:
I was looking for the same info a time ago .. something that would allow me
to gather all the info from the same place, but the only thing I came up
with was the very same discussion about the sensors framework port and
nothing else.
Any info on any
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:50:23 +0200 Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch wrote:
The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
exceeded. And it propbably was used for things that it better had
This assumes the
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
unsupported devices.
You forgot to tell that now nobody wants to touch this subject
Am 22.08.2009 um 18:29 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:50:23 +0200 Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch wrote:
The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
exceeded. And it propbably was used
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
unsupported
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47
Hi folks,
Today I was doing some cleanups to our kernel message/debug console code
and I noticed we have only one driver in the tree that does some really
spooky things with its console device, namely the Xen console driver. I
did some cleanups and basically fixed the following:
- It now uses
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized
The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
exceeded. And it propbably was used for things that it better had
This assumes the kernel is monitoring the device periodically (in the
general case, as
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by
As terribly clever as you all are, can you please restrict the
political commentary/humor/whatever to -chat?
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
