Re: strange output in /var/log/messages

"freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org " -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-h

Re: If not the force, what should I use? (Was: FreeBSD in Business (was Re: Idea for FreeBSD))

e there is a number of folders (for every run level) populated with links to the real rc scripts which are in /etc/init.d/ and when you type /etc/init.d/script start it will be started but the boot up rc.scripts will never do start on /etc/init.d/ itself only on the folder w

Re: Idea for FreeBSD

Adrian Penisoara wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First let me reiterate a few things. I started in FreeBSD and it will always be my first love. Second, keep in mind that Solaris is a commercial product and must be viewed a

Re: Idea for FreeBSD

_ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___

Re: Laptop suggestions?

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:13:03AM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Matt Olander wrote: On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:34:32 -0500, Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My old Dell Inspiron 51

Re: Laptop suggestions?

driver. I know Intel video cards are very pro-open source, but the driver for those cards is not better then nvidia's. Also I guess some time will pass before we see those laptops in Europe? -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-h

Re: Announcement: PmcTools callchain capture for RELENG_7

be, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. Bounty established...

y/paste from wine app to native apps does not work. Ideas how to workaround this? -Mark C. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC

53 ECONNABORTED Software caused connection abort. A connection abort was caused internal to your host machine.

(socklen_t *)&clnt_length)) < 0) { logmsg(LOG_WARNING, "HTTP accept: %s", strerror(errno)); ... Any ideas where should I look to understand better the error message and why errno 53 was returned? -- B

Re: MODULES_OVERRIDE magic needed

freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org

Re: Network Throughput between jail and base system

Greetings, Ilias Marinos wrote: > Hello all, > I have a jail to my FreeBSD-STABLE, in which I run some > uname -a will be more helpful then "FreeBSD-STABLE". > services.I have configured and setup this jail using ezjail-admin. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ jls >JID IP Address Hostname

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Fixing all of the above I can send at about 13MB/sec (timecounter is not relevant any more). The CPU is spending about 75% of the time in the kernel, so that is the next place to look. [hit

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Ivan Voras wrote: On 04/02/2008, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kris if you do not mind I'll write to hping developers to adopt this patch, and if no response from them I can try to reach the port maintainer, so we have this patched in ports? As we&#

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

ested with twice smaller buffer and do not see performance lost. Kris if you do not mind I'll write to hping developers to adopt this patch, and if no response from them I can try to reach the port maintainer, so we have this patched in ports? -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: It is the socket buffer that is filling up. Either the application is not increasing it to large enough size or the default maximum is too low (Linux may set a larger default). Try increasing

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Xfast_syscall [4] 2.5 304458.00 34124.000 100.00% bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg [5] 2.3 335825.00 31367.000 100.00% uma_zalloc_arg [6] P.S. my desktop PC i single core, but I think I'll find old server with 2x intel p4 CPUs. -- B

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

shes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: It is the socket buffer that is filling up. Either the application is not increasing it to large enough size or the default maximum is too low (Linux may set a larger default). Try increasing kern.ipc.maxsockbuf and confirming with the

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Hi Kris, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi Kris, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: You should use hwpmc to verify where the application is really spending time, since gettimeofday doesn't seem to account for it all.

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greets, Kris Kennaway wrote: Ivan Voras wrote: On 23/01/2008, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greets, Now I have final results with Linux and FreeBSD on the same hardware CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3070 @ 2.66GHz - dual core Lan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0:0: class=0x02000

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

sters: 25600 sysctl -a kern.ipc.maxsockbuf ? No, this doesn't change things. with timecounter=TSC it's easily reproduced on on 6.3. -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http:

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

rep devbuf devbuf 5214 42780K - 6390 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 42MB memory allocated for devbuf ? Is this ok ? This is the only thing that 'eat' more then 1-2MB memory reported by vmstat -m. -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 _

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Hi, Ivan Voras wrote: On 23/01/2008, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greets, Now I have final results with Linux and FreeBSD on the same hardware CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3070 @ 2.66GHz - dual core Lan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x10bc8086 chip=0x10bc80

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

I start hping with timecounter=TSC and it is harder to reproduce with ACPI-fast and HPET. -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Hi Kris, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: You should use hwpmc to verify where the application is really spending time, since gettimeofday doesn't seem to account for it all. pmc: Unknown Intel CPU. module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: How much can Linux handle? Will install ubuntu on the same machine and let you know, but my experience shows that FreeBSD + TSC have the same performance as Linux With which timecounter? On my colleague laptop which is little slower

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: How much can Linux handle? Will install ubuntu on the same machine and let you know, but my experience shows that FreeBSD + TSC have the same performance as Linux With which timecounter? I guess the default as it is not set anywhere (in linux it

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: You should use hwpmc to verify where the application is really spending time, since gettimeofday doesn't seem to account for it all. pmc: Unknown Intel CPU. module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (hwpmc, 0x8029906d, 0x8054c500) err

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Hi, Ivan Voras wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: I do not have HEPT on the servers that I test, but simple test on my laptop shows that hping can generate with ACPI-fast ~4MB/s traffic, 5MB/s with HPET and 8MB/s with TSC. How much can Linux handle? Will install ubuntu on the same machine and

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Kris Kennaway wrote: Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I tested all different combination. The performance change is almost invisible (100-200KB/s), and can't be compared with the performance boost that TS

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Hi, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I tested all different combination. The performance change is almost invisible (100-200KB/s), and can't be compared with the performance boost that TSC gain over ACPI-fast timecounter. Unfortunately TSC d

Re: gettimeofday() in hping

Greetings, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I tried clock_gettime() (using CLOCK_REALTIME for clock_id), but this yield worse performance. Try CLOCK_MONOTONIC instead. I fo

gettimeofday() in hping

worse performance. Of course changing timecounter to TSC make hping almost twice faster, but I'm wandering if I can optimize things more? -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: Nvidia Driver w/RELENG_7

__ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freeb

Re: Wine compatibility and performance on FreeBSD 7

quot;[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: iSCSI Target and raw devices

. I think the interesting part is to have support for raw devices :) Thanks, Craig ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --

Re: GSSAPI Key Exchange in sshd?

any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: linuxolator problem on amd64

SoC project :) -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: i386 with PAE or AMD64 on PowerEdge with 4G RAM

with PAE kernel! Thanks a lot for your advice, Martin ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Wishes, Ste

Re: Updated Driver for 3945ABG Intel 3945ABG Wireless LAN controller

I added them on CC -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"