"Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's in the release notes and in UPDATING...I have the feeling that if
> people won't read it in either of those two places, they won't read it
> in the errata either. :-p
How 'bout putting it some place folks are likely to stumble upon it,
like as a
Now I can play with ULE, Thanks for your quick response. I should've
checked release notes before posting my question, my fault.
-mpf
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
Compiled fine with thi
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:04:59PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> IPFILTER now relies on the PFIL_HOOKS kernel option; this is something
> that is somewhat poorly documented, and we should add it to the errate I
> suspect. If you add "options PFIL_HOOKS" to your kernel config, it should
> work.
> "Robert" == Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Yes; we to make it so that ipfw will also rely on PFIL_HOOKS to
Robert> integrate with the IP stack, greatly reducing the quantity of
Robert> #ifdef FOO in ip_input() and ip_output().
Ok, thanks for your clear answer.
Regards
If memory serves me right, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
>
> > Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
> > Compiled fine with this setup. I need ipfilter as it's doing my source
> > routing for ipv6 (multiple transits) since ip
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Eric Masson wrote:
> > "Robert" == Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> Moving to PFIL_HOOKS for all the "funky IP input/ouput"
>
> Will all available packet filters, including ipfw rely on PFIL_HOOKS or
> not ?
Yes; we to make it so that ipfw will a
> "Robert" == Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
Robert> Moving to PFIL_HOOKS for all the "funky IP input/ouput"
Will all available packet filters, including ipfw rely on PFIL_HOOKS or
not ?
Regards
Eric Masson
--
C'est pas avec la censure que tu vas censurer les censeurs
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Matt Freitag wrote:
> Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
> Compiled fine with this setup. I need ipfilter as it's doing my source
> routing for ipv6 (multiple transits) since ip6fw doesn't support fwd. (I
> just use ip6fw for filtering,
Building 5.2-RELEASE from 5.1-RELEASE-p10 w/ipf+ipfw+ipfw6+dummynet, 5.1
Compiled fine with this setup.
I need ipfilter as it's doing my source routing for ipv6 (multiple
transits) since ip6fw doesn't support fwd. (I just use ip6fw for
filtering, and ipf for forwarding to the correct interface a
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:22:57PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2003-12-28 at 14:51:42 Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
>
> >>> Included is my dmesg output from the 5.1 kernel and my kernel config
> >>> file SAMSON for the 5.1 kernel. Any help would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> You need "device atarai
On 2003-12-28 at 14:51:42 Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
>>> Included is my dmesg output from the 5.1 kernel and my kernel config
>>> file SAMSON for the 5.1 kernel. Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> You need "device ataraid" in your config file..
> Thanks. That worked great. For some reason I m
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:53:57AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
> > I have a Promise FastTrak SATA150 controller with two 120 GB drives
> > that are mirrored. Using 5.1-RELEASE-p10 with sources from Nov 3.
> >
> > I tried to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2-RC today and
It seems Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
> I have a Promise FastTrak SATA150 controller with two 120 GB drives
> that are mirrored. Using 5.1-RELEASE-p10 with sources from Nov 3.
>
> I tried to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2-RC today and the new kernel couldn't
> mount my root partition (/dev/ar0s1a) after doi
I have a Promise FastTrak SATA150 controller with two 120 GB drives
that are mirrored. Using 5.1-RELEASE-p10 with sources from Nov 3.
I tried to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2-RC today and the new kernel couldn't
mount my root partition (/dev/ar0s1a) after doing make installkernel
and rebooting into sin
I have a Promise FastTrak SATA150 controller with two 120 GB drives
that are mirrored. Using 5.1-RELEASE-p10 with sources from Nov 3.
I tried to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2-RC today and the new kernel couldn't
mount my root partition (/dev/ar0s1a) after doing make installkernel
and rebooting into sin
15 matches
Mail list logo
