> Ah. I installed the vmware2 port, *then* the vmware3 rpm (using rpm2cpio).
> This just used the existing vmmon module. I assume more tweaking will
> be necessary as was the case for vmware2.
Does vmware3 really work with 'vmmon' version2?
---
VMware Workstation Error:
Could not get vmmon module
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 04:30:30PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > This is purely speculation as to how USB devices might be handled.
>
> Maybe someone more in the know can port the usbdevfs (as an aside, is
> that a Linuxism? Why not use a standard devfs?)
usbdevfs is a Linuxism. devfs's semantic
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:54:06PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > You have it running?! I'm still struggling to get a vmmon module, without
> [snip]
>
> Ah. I installed the vmware2 port, *then* the vmware3 rpm (using rpm2cpio).
> Th
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> You have it running?! I'm still struggling to get a vmmon module, without
[snip]
Ah. I installed the vmware2 port, *then* the vmware3 rpm (using rpm2cpio).
This just used the existing vmmon module. I assume more tweaking will
be necess
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:23:51PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > > Having said that though, I have had 3.0 running as well as 2.0, under
> >
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > Having said that though, I have had 3.0 running as well as 2.0, under
>^^
> Can you elaborate a bit more please? Pr
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Having said that though, I have had 3.0 running as well as 2.0, under
^^
Can you elaborate a bit more please? Probably your definition of 'running'
is less strict than mine.
Mark
--
Of course we run Vmware 2 under emulation. So vmware 3 MUST be run under
emulation.
As has been said before, it probably runs but the setup
program looks for too many linux specifics and doesn't generate a good
config file.
It just takes someone to figure out what it needs.
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:09:57AM -0400, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> The VMWare documentation for even version 3.1 indicates FreeBSD support
> as a client OS only.
If you check the small print, that's what it says.
Having said that though, I have had 3.0 running as well as 2.0, under
-STABLE, us
You might get it to run under Linux emulation... I've never tried it
though.
The VMWare documentation for even version 3.1 indicates FreeBSD support
as a client OS only.
I assume you knew that, but I wanted to save you the trouble of a
possible "wild-goose-chase" id you didn't.
Good luck!
-Ric
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sent this to -questions a week ago, got no response, so I'm asking
> again here: is it possible to run VMware 3 on -STABLE? If so, how?
> I noticed there is no port like there is for VMware 2, so that's
> why I'm asking.
>
It
Hi,
sent this to -questions a week ago, got no response, so I'm asking
again here: is it possible to run VMware 3 on -STABLE? If so, how?
I noticed there is no port like there is for VMware 2, so that's
why I'm asking.
Thanks,
--Stijn
--
Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply.
msg3
12 matches
Mail list logo
