> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > If you insist on writing a patch, then please make it
> > default off.
>
> rink@ just provided one, and it does default to off. I fully agree with
> defaulting it to off as well; those of us that want it on can set it as
> such
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:46:31AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'll try out said patch this weekend. Assuming it works, and does get
> committed, I'll be more than happy to submit a PR along with a patch to
> update the loader.8 manpage, documenting kern.ignore_old_msgbuf.
Sounds good to me.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> If you insist on writing a patch, then please make it
> default off.
rink@ just provided one, and it does default to off. I fully agree with
defaulting it to off as well; those of us that want it on can set it as
such in loader.conf
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > [...]
> Either way, it's a feature with major security implications. So, for
> those of us who are concerned about master.passwd changes via
> mergemaster being stuffed into msgbuf, how do we disable said feature?
> (Before answering, see bel
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:09:24AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Maybe I should look into writing a patch that does in fact clear the
> buffer immediately before reboot, and tie it to a sysctl.
I suggest just making a loader tunable to do this. I think the following
should do it (untested):
---
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:52:54AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Upon a reboot, the kernel is usually loaded to the same
> > > physical addresses in RAM where it was before, so the
> > > dmesg buffer will be at the same location, too (unless
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Upon a reboot, the kernel is usually loaded to the same
> > physical addresses in RAM where it was before, so the
> > dmesg buffer will be at the same location, too (unless
> > you built a new kernel, of course). So all the contents
> > from
On Feb 22, 2008, at 02:25 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
Interesting tidbit: We have one production machine which when booted
into single-user via serial console for a world install, retains all
of
the output from that single-user session even once rebooted and
brought
back into multi-use
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:28:35AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> > taken to administer.
> > What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel
> buffer
> > that is taken rig
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> taken to administer.
> What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel buffer
> that is taken right after file system(s) are mounted.
> Lately i have found that one router
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:29:40PM +0100, Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
> taken to administer.
> What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel buffer
> that is taken right after file system(s) are m
Hi,
I have found quite interesting feature on one of router that lately i have
taken to administer.
What i knew was that file /var/run/dmesg.boot holds data from kernel buffer
that is taken right after file system(s) are mounted.
Lately i have found that one router writes to this file data from
I also fixed a bug that didnt let it run in cron, because I wasnt using
full paths (doh!)...so it should work fine from cron now
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, Timour Ezeev wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
>
> > I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
> > htt
Thanks! Merged into release.
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, Timour Ezeev wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
>
> > I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
> > http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
> >
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
-Julio
I think you have a small problem with cvs release entry, i.e. when you
run your program you get
*default release=cvs tag==cvs tag=.
instead o
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Julio Capote wrote:
I guess the list doesnt like attachments, here's a link:
http://wonderland.hopto.org/~capotej/portsync.pl
-Julio
I think you have a small problem with cvs release entry, i.e. when you
run your program you get
*default release=cvs tag==cvs tag=.
instead o
-- Original Message -
> From: "Julio Capote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 1:44 AM
> Subject: Cool script to update ports in cron..
>
>
> > Hey guys, over the past week I've been working on a nifty script to
> > update y
Hey guys, over the past week I've been working on a nifty script to
update your ports tree periodically. I attached the script to this
message, notable features:
*logging
*supfile-independant
*easy configuration
Hope you guys find it as useful as i did. =)
- Julio
___
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:18:31PM -0800, Sean Hamilton wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> After setting hw.acpi.cpu.performance_speed to 1, a dmesg of
>
> acpi_cpu0: set speed to 6.2%
>
> and a dog slow system, I am still finding my CPU pumping out heat. It's an
> AMD 1333 with an A7V board. Is this typic
Greetings,
After setting hw.acpi.cpu.performance_speed to 1, a dmesg of
acpi_cpu0: set speed to 6.2%
and a dog slow system, I am still finding my CPU pumping out heat. It's an
AMD 1333 with an A7V board. Is this typical behaviour? If so, I'll just
underclock the CPU in the bios. I was hoping to
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 22:39:07, 520066542279-0001 (Harold Gutch) wrote about "Re: ssh
password cracker - now this *is* cool!":
> Dug Song and Solar Designer held a talk on this topic at HAL 2001,
> where they stated that backspaces could be detected, as a
> backspace act
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 06:32:56AM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote:
>
> The issue I believe is passwords you type after logging in (e.g.
> changing your password or logging into another machine), not the
> password you actually use to log in...
I just knew I was going to wind up tasting the sole of m
James Snow wrote:
> I'm just looking at packet dumps, not source, but it looks to me like
> OpenSSH sends passwords all in one shot, not character by character.
The issue I believe is passwords you type after logging in (e.g.
changing your password or logging into another machine), not the
passw
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:39:07PM +0200, Harold Gutch wrote:
> > :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
> > :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
> > :>
> > :> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
>
> Dug Song a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Harold Gutch writes:
: Dug Song and Solar Designer held a talk on this topic at HAL 2001,
: where they stated that backspaces could be detected, as a
: backspace actually translated to
: thus sending 3 characters at a time instead of only 1.
Not if echo was turned
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Gutch writes:
> >On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> >> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
> >> :&g
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Gutch writes:
>On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
>> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
>> :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
>> :>
>> :>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
> :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
> :>
> :>http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
> :
> :Interesting, I guess one coul
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
| * Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 19:46] wrote:
| > Matt Dillon wrote:
| > | This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
| > |
| > | http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
| >
| > The real research might be interesting, but the infor
* Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 20:00] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:10:16PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > > Several people on other mailing lists have pointed out that Nagle
> > > should make this much harder, although it's unclear how Nagle and
> > > ssh interact. So far that
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:10:16PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > Several people on other mailing lists have pointed out that Nagle
> > should make this much harder, although it's unclear how Nagle and
> > ssh interact. So far that has resulted in a number of degenerating
> > discussions of how t
* Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 19:46] wrote:
> Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> | This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
> |
> | http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
>
> The real research might be interesting, but the information in
> the article se
Matt Dillon wrote:
| This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
|
| http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
The real research might be interesting, but the information in
the article seems to be wrong. It says:
Each keystroke from a user is immediately sent to the target
ma
If memory serves me right, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:30:30PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> > http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
>
> Several people on other mailing lists have pointed out that Nagle
> should make this much harder, although it's unclear how Nagle and
> ssh
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:30:30PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
Several people on other mailing lists have pointed out that Nagle
should make this much harder, although it's unclear how Nagle and
ssh interact. So far that has resulted in a number of degene
>
> Yah, and typing backspaces also ought to work. 12345bb45bb45678b8
>
How about some control-Q's? :-)
Later
Mark Hittinger
Earthlink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
:
:* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
:> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
:>
:> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
:
:Interesting, I guess one could work around it by periodically
:sending bogus empty packets in the middle of activity.
* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote:
> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
>
> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
Interesting, I guess one could work around it by periodically
sending bogus empty packets in the middle of activity.
--
This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter.
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Ben Smithurst wrote:
>
> Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> > I looks to me like Julian's machine has the configuration problem.
> > The dhcp client cannot get enough bpf's.
>
> So why did tcpdump work? Both dhclient and tcpdump need one bpf, no? I
> initially thought the same as you but then ask
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> I looks to me like Julian's machine has the configuration problem.
> The dhcp client cannot get enough bpf's.
So why did tcpdump work? Both dhclient and tcpdump need one bpf, no? I
initially thought the same as you but then asked myself that question.
--
Ben Smit
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>
> On Wednesday, 14 June 2000 at 1:00:27 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > So, if you are in the Singapore Changi international airport,
> > the internet center in the transit area will
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Wednesday, 14 June 2000 at 1:00:27 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> So, if you are in the Singapore Changi international airport,
> the internet center in the transit area will loan you for FREE,
> a wavelan PC-CARD.
>
> So
So, if you are in the Singapore Changi international airport,
the internet center in the transit area will loan you for FREE,
a wavelan PC-CARD.
So here I am waiting for my next flight and I'm on the net!
(well they hold your passport in exchange but that's ok)
I couldn;t get teh DHCP client to
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Matthew Reimer wrote:
> The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
> (http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
> back-ordered.
And I hate to reply twice, but the switch I bought (EZXS55W) is listed at
$76.95. Hmm. :)
- alex
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Matthew Reimer wrote:
> The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
> (http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
> back-ordered.
Sure, but these were in stock. :^)
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
The Netgear FS105 five-port 100BaseTX switch is $84.95 at buy.com
(http://www.buy.com/comp/product.asp?SKU=10221960), though they are
back-ordered.
Matt
Alex Zepeda wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> > I have a good reason to revive this thread. I thought anyone who followe
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> I have a good reason to revive this thread. I thought anyone who followed
> this conversation might want to know that one of the switches we dicussed,
> the Netgear FS-105, is on a special at CompUSA right now -- THROUGH TOMORROW.
> The special is a $20 m
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> BTW, Kudos to the KAME folk, the ipv6 and ipsec stuff looks like it's
> going to turn into a winner! IPSEC is going to be one really good reason
> for needing ever-faster cpu's :-).
Maybe Intel should have been approached for financial as
:We attacked Rich's switch in the lab. We plugged ports 1-4 into 4 10/100
:ports on a SmartBits 2000 test chassis and banged it with full-duplex bi-
:directional streams between ports 1<->2 and 3<->4. I am happy to report
:that it passed 100% of traffic at all packet sizes except 64 bytes, whe
Pete Mckenna wrote:
>
> Wes,
> Have you managed to test the switch and if so how did it do ? I have a
> FS-108 on order.
Yes. I bought two FS-105's, one for me and one for a co-worker. CompUSA
had a $20 rebate on them from 12/26 - 1/1, making them $99.
We attacked Rich's switch in the lab. W
Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> I don't think that you realy need a switch to achieve
> this speed on an empty network. With two machines
> connected to a 3Com 24-port 100Mbps hub (simplex)
> I had no problems achieving ~8MB/s on one FTP transfer
> and over 4MB/s on each of two FTP transfers running
> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
> without any complaints..
>
> Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
I don't think that you realy need a switch to achieve
this speed on an empty network. With two machines
connected to a
I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
without any complaints..
Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > get r
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> when running saturation tests and never able to figure out what
> was causing it.
I have a good reason to revive thi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Louis A. Mamakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
>(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
[...]
>In a "what the hell" move, I powered up the ethernet Netgear Ethernet switch
>with it's
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
> >
> >Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at
At 12:45 AM -0700 12/21/99, Wes Peters wrote:
>Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > [...] but I was wondering how much one has to fork out before you
> > get extra options like a port-mirroring capability...
>
>Lots more, in terms of dollars. For this, you need at least a managed
>switch, and probably a
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
> >
> > Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> > ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
>
> Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly.
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 10:46:37PM -0600, Tim Tsai wrote:
>
> Best bang for the buck category: HP ProCurve 4000M. 40 switched 10/100
> ports (that's with the chassis half filled).
Note that HP's pricing on additional cards is silly. It's cheaper
to buy 2 4000Ms and throw the second chassi
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> > At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> > >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal wit
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Tim Tsai wrote:
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
> >Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> > > when running saturation tests
On the topic of switches...
Does anyone have experience (good or bad) with the CNet
CNSH-1601 or CNSH-2401? Those are unmanaged 19" switches
(10/100) with 16 and 24 ports, respectively, and a
100BaseFX (fibre) uplink port. And they're suspiciously
cheap over here [1].
We might get one of those
> something like this (which is fine...), but I was wondering how
> much one has to fork out before you get extra options like a
> port-mirroring capability...
You usually find this capability on managed switches (fairly obvious,
since you need a management interface to configure port mirroring
At 11:18 PM -0700 12/18/99, Wes Peters wrote:
>Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Prices have fallen a lot in the last year. I'm happy to be able to
> > get rid of my HUBs, I was constantly having to deal with packet loss
> > when running saturation tests and never able to figure out what
> >
:Yes. The nice thing about modern swithcing power supplies are that if
:you DO hear any vibration, you know you have big problems and are
:courting disaster. At least that's my experience in homebrewing a 12V
:-> 16V converter for my Sony VAIO 505TS. The original magnetics I
:chose easily over
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes:
: :or higher, which makes things a whole lot easier. No 60Hz humm, no
: :vibration - hell, you can even run the frequency up past 100 MHz and
:
: Needless to say I
:or higher, which makes things a whole lot easier. No 60Hz humm, no
:vibration - hell, you can even run the frequency up past 100 MHz and
Needless to say I meant 100 KHz here, not 100 MHz.
:> :"everyone" here).
:>
:> This is not true at all.
:
:Oh, and how many products have you passed through FCC/EC/Japanese environmental
:certification? None, apparently.
Four in the last 15 years. I've been involved with in-home electronic
management systems and believe me, all t
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> I really hate these switching regulated DC wall plugs. They always use
> :> cheap caps in them to save money and then don't bother adding any
> :> protection to the motherboard. I prefer AC wall plugs or unregulated DC
> :> wall plugs and then a smal
:> I really hate these switching regulated DC wall plugs. They always use
:> cheap caps in them to save money and then don't bother adding any
:> protection to the motherboard. I prefer AC wall plugs or unregulated DC
:> wall plugs and then a small switching regulator on the mot
; should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including the LNE100TX v2.0.
:
:-Bill
Works like a charm! Cool stuff!
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> :At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100
Matthew> switched :hub. It works fine except that it hangs
Matthew> occasionally (can be :reset by power-cycling). So we
Matthew> don't buy them any more.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
> :I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
> :(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
> :
> :It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD moni
:>
:> I'll try adding 'dc' in. If it works, can I add a comment about
:> 'LNE100TX' cards to the comments in LINT for 'dc'?
:
:Sure, if you like, however note that "man 4 dc" should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including the LNE100TX v2.0.
:
:-Bill
Yup, but that assumes y
:with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
:I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
:(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
:
:It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD monitor don't work.
:Ethernet switch
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
> :Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
> :of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
> :conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip
:I have a D-Link DSH-5 5-port 10/100 dualspeed hub here at home,
:and I'm reasonably happy with it. It certainly doesn't hang. One
:of the machines here has trouble negotiating a working 100Mbit/s
:link, but that's just as likely a problem of the Linux tulip driver.
:...
:Christian "naddy" Weisge
:Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
:of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
:conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip is on them? If it's
:the LC82C115 then these are the LNE100TX Version 2.0 with Wake On LAN,
:and they *are* supp
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
> :At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
> :hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> :reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Al
Tim Tsai wrote:
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply they generally hold up
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
> hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
> at my pre-previous employer we had small 8-port 10Mpbs hubs
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
> CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
> DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
Warehouse.com sells the Netgear FS105 for $99.9
> > hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> > reset by power-cycling).
>
> Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
> power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
> power supply they generally hold up a lot better.
>
> hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
> reset by power-cycling).
Most of these can be attributed to the crappy wall wart they call a
power supply. If it's plugged into an UPS or replace it with your own DC
power supply they generally hold up a lot better.
I have a N
:At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
:hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
:reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
:at my pre-previous employer we had small 8-port 10Mpbs hubs from
:D-Link and they had the same problem, s
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
> CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
> DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
>
> It appears to operate quite nicely. I
I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
It appears to operate quite nicely. I can run all 5 ports at
100Base
:> My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
:> well.
:>
:> I've included the patch again for reference. (Note: I didn't write
:> this patch, refer back to the thread for that info).
:>
:> -Matt
:
:any perci
:> My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
:> well.
:>
:> I've included the patch again for reference. (Note: I didn't write
:> this patch, refer back to the thread for that info).
:>
:> -Matt
:
:any perc
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Now on to the NFSv2 fhlen patch testing. I haven't run v2 in several
> :months, hopefully it still works :-)
>
> My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
> well.
>
> I've included the patch again for ref
:Now on to the NFSv2 fhlen patch testing. I haven't run v2 in several
:months, hopefully it still works :-)
My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
well.
I've included the patch again for reference. (Note: I didn't write
this patch, refer bac
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Now on to the NFSv2 fhlen patch testing. I haven't run v2 in several
> :months, hopefully it still works :-)
>
> My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
> well.
>
> I've included the patch again for re
:Now on to the NFSv2 fhlen patch testing. I haven't run v2 in several
:months, hopefully it still works :-)
My buildworld using the NFSv2 file handle length patch succeeded as
well.
I've included the patch again for reference. (Note: I didn't write
this patch, refer ba
On 2 Aug 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein writes:
> > DES: can you elaborate? you think it may cause problems with amd
> > since it's like an NFS buffer isn't it and would work over the
> > loopback...
>
> I used loopback mounts to test NFS make worlds a while ago
H
:Matthew Dillon writes:
:> Ok, then there is a real good chance localhost mounts will work now.
:
:I'm happy to hear that, since NFSv3 is significantly faster than NFSv2
:on loopback mounts :)
:
:> I'm running a buildworld test right now with /usr/src and /usr/obj both
:> on NFSv3 loca
On 2 Aug 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > DES: can you elaborate? you think it may cause problems with amd
> > since it's like an NFS buffer isn't it and would work over the
> > loopback...
>
> I used loopback mounts to test NFS make worlds a
:Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> Ok, then there is a real good chance localhost mounts will work now.
:
:I'm happy to hear that, since NFSv3 is significantly faster than NFSv2
:on loopback mounts :)
:
:> I'm running a buildworld test right now with /usr/src and /usr/obj both
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
