On 2/28/07, Sean Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools
to
C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to
C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks along the way). Most of the ruby
files are over 400
David Gilbert wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote::
Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed. I want to run portmaster -a, but when it finds tund
(and I assume it would also stop for xsysinfo), it stops. I put a
David Gilbert wrote:
I have 734 ports installed on my laptop right now. I'm pretty sure,
at times, I've had over 1000 ports on my laptop.
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to have
50 to 200 ports), portupgrade takes a moderate amount of time to start
work. On
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes
far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is
awfull too.
Regarding make index: try make fetchindex right after the
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:17:58AM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
The problem is the so called topological sorting of a DAG which is of
order (n+m) where n is the number of nodes and m the number of arrows in
the DAG. In my python program pkgupgrade, i perform this sorting for
the whole set of
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes
far too long now... and make index each time I upgrade my ports is
awfull too.
As a tentative solution to the problem in the subject, i have corrected
still more bugs in my program pkguprade. The last version is at
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/pkgupgrade
I had observed on my own machine two problems, one being that the
topological sort was scrambled, this i have
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:52:29 +0100
Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a tentative solution to the problem in the subject, i have corrected
still more bugs in my program pkguprade. The last version is at
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/pkgupgrade
I had observed on my own machine two
On 2/15/07, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes
far too long now... and make
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port takes
far too long now... and make index each
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to
C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks along the way). Most of the ruby
files are over 400 lines long, sparsely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to portupgrade, pkg_add a new port
takes
far too
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
A lot of things that I think are half right.
I think that porting portupgrade to C++ would be time spent in vain. In
my opinion, some of the basic ideas of portupgrade are deeply flawed,
and as much as one polishes the algorithms it will not gain much.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On 2/15/07, Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Coleman Kane wrote:
On 2/15/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Olivier Warin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 14 Feb 2007
19:54:09 +0100):
This issue is not only related to
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=
Pros:
=
-It's written in python (portable).
Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller?
-It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from source, not
binary package installation.
Michel Talon wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Well, the complexity is somewhere in the area of O(nm) with m being
small. I strongly suggest some basic bucket hashing if it is not done
already. For the pkgsrc bulk build (which has similiar problems) it
reduced the time to around 3 minutes to
David Gilbert wrote:
Jeremy == Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeremy Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed.
What do you mean by no longer supported?
I want to run portmaster -a, but when it
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:54:29 -0600, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gilbert wrote:
Jeremy == Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeremy Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed.
What do you mean
I have 734 ports installed on my laptop right now. I'm pretty sure,
at times, I've had over 1000 ports on my laptop.
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to have
50 to 200 ports), portupgrade takes a moderate amount of time to start
work. On machines like my laptop,
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:41, David Gilbert wrote:
I have 734 ports installed on my laptop right now. I'm pretty sure,
at times, I've had over 1000 ports on my laptop.
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to have
50 to 200 ports), portupgrade takes a moderate
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:41:33PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to have
50 to 200 ports), portupgrade takes a moderate amount of time to start
work. On machines like my laptop, portupgrade seems to take much more
time to run. I
On 2/14/07, John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:41, David Gilbert wrote:
I have 734 ports installed on my laptop right now. I'm pretty sure,
at times, I've had over 1000 ports on my laptop.
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ % pkg_info | wc -l
-[19:49]-
917
Really portupgrade becomes clearly not so usable for me after I
switch to Xorg 7.2RC which install 300 more packages, my workstation
is a xSeries 226 with a Xeon 2,8Ghz 1Go DDR2. So I can imagine
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:41:33 -0600, David Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 734 ports installed on my laptop right now. I'm pretty sure,
at times, I've had over 1000 ports on my laptop.
On machine with moderate numbers of ports (most servers seem to have
50 to 200 ports), portupgrade
Jeremy == Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeremy Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try.
I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported
ports installed. I want to run portmaster -a, but when it finds tund
(and I assume it would also stop for xsysinfo), it stops. I
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Well, the complexity is somewhere in the area of O(nm) with m being
small. I strongly suggest some basic bucket hashing if it is not done
already. For the pkgsrc bulk build (which has similiar problems) it
reduced the time to around 3 minutes to resolve all
Michel Talon wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Well, the complexity is somewhere in the area of O(nm) with m being
small. I strongly suggest some basic bucket hashing if it is not done
already. For the pkgsrc bulk build (which has similiar problems) it
reduced the time to around 3 minutes to
29 matches
Mail list logo
