; dependent on which shell you use.
>
> exactly. this does not happen if I run this program from tcsh
> (but does if I run from bash 1.14.7(1) built from ports
> thanks!
No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything anymore. If you're
interested in testing whe
P processes and 50 SMTPD processes
> simulatenously, 256 meg RAM.
Small processes.
> On the postfix list, it seems someone has heard from several FreeBSD
> "experts" that FreeBSD should not be run at above maxusers = 128,
> while somebody else said they were running
style
disagreements) in bash 2, they should be reported to the maintainer, who
actively responds to and fixes reported problems.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ents of the new
> kernel thread.
>
> Do you think it's possible and that it won't cause some portability problems ?
Also, select() works on more descriptors than kqueue/kevent() does
currently (i.e. NFS).
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTE
s.
3. Try to boot the box; watch BTX die in the same place every time.
The Adaptec BIOS is doing something really fugly when it doesn't find
proper partition tables on the disks.
It does it if ANY of the disks are done 'dangerously dedicated.'
The easy solu
mtftp-tmout code 4 = unsigned integer 8;
>option PXE.mtftp-delay code 5 = unsigned integer 8;
Problem #2: This is not required, and is in fact wrong. tftp != mtftp.
Unless you have an MTFTP server around ...
I highly suggest doing it the old fashioned way with boot-file. PXE wi
| 70M Active, 34M Inactive, 75M Wired, ~9M Cache, 29M Buf, ~6M Free
|
| Does anyone have any suggestions on how to debug this?
No, but going back to 4.2 RELEASE kernel fixed it for me. Start from
there and move forward until you find out which commit broke it.
Doug A.
To Unsubscribe:
up a name -> address or address -> name
mapping, 'host' provides everything you need, and then some. If you are
doing serious DNS debugging, you have to learn dig, period.
HTH,
Doug
--
So what I want to know is, where does the RED brick road go?
Do YOU Yahoo!?
T
driver. I
Well you are sort-of right ... look at -current and it's there.
Patches for stable are at http://www.ambrisko.com/doug/an.patch.wep3
for the latest greatest stuff.
Several people have this code in use for a while. I've been collecting
patches and posting diff's at my website
is desperately in need of client side NFS
locks, so I'm highly motivated to test this out if it can be ported to
either -stable or -current.
Doug
--
"The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing
and
to watch someone else do it wrong without comment.&qu
natsemi0
instead of fxp0 (for an Intel card)...
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On my previous message, please ignore the designation I gave for the
card. The card I'm messing with is a Bay Netgear FA311, based on the
National Semiconductor DP83815. My pasting ability was somewhat hampered
during the last composition.
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
o know what PXE version you were using and
on what device.
For newer PXE revs (2.X), you want build 082 or later. Everything before
is broken in some way. The 0.99c version of the Boot Agent (on older fxp
cards) is fine, however.
The Intel 810 firmware is quite broken; a fixed one will be ava
lf, I don't think your proposed changes are a
good idea, which is why I refrained from offering any suggestions on how
you can test them.
Just so you wouldn't think you were being ignored,
Doug
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
s this nasty bad habit of broadcasting
ARPs on all interfaces. For this reason multihomed Linux boxes should be
banned.
We got tired of it at my previous job and patched around it on the linux
machine.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.or
te debugging or ddb)?
kld debugging is a bit tricky. Take a look at the debugging macros and
bits that Greg Lehey put together for vinum for a starting point. You have
to calculate the appropriate offset to get to the KLD code in gdb.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[
yscalls
have to be translated, otherwise if you were running as root and loaded a
linux lib into a freebsd binary, then that lib called fcntl(), your system
would reboot :)
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Doug White wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
> > runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
> > to attach to the proc
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
> [ this message is no personal affront against you, Doug, but an
> expression of what feeling this kind of behaviour causes for
> those who want to share and find themselves ignored ]
Actually, I wouldn't care if it were, but thanks for the c
ou could review his patch dfr, that would be appreciated.
>
> This is an issue in current as well.
The patch looks good to me.
--
Doug Rabson Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Director, Qube Software Ltd. Phone: +44 20 7431 9995
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> Hello there!
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Consider the following. We are in the spring and DST is "springing
> > forward" at 2am. We have a job scheduled
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
> [ citing from Doug's message in the "OT: silence ..." subthread
> to keep the technical discussion in the "how to test" subthread ]
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2001 at 14:45 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > You stated in an
slightly less flexible
system used in 4.x. You need to rebuild the driver, using makeobjops.pl
instead of makedevops.pl.
--
Doug Rabson Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +44 20 8348 6160
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
>
> On Tue 2001-01-09 (02:14), Doug Barton wrote:
> > Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > You're blowing the significance of this part of your argument WAY out
> > of proportion. After long discussion we've picked times for the periodic
; Again, this change is from OpenBSD. We will synchronise with their
> changes, and perhaps offer them back a patch to ignore what "ultra leet
> sysadmins who rely on broken behaviour because people who don't are
> simply stupid and shouldn't be running FreeBSD anyway!&quo
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 2001-01-09 (02:14), Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > The point I'm trying (obviously in vain) t
opposition to the algorithm used,
> which has been explained.
What you are seeing is opposition to the idea itself. I'm not
going to waste time analyzing the implementation of what I think is a bad
idea. :)
Doug
--
"The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to
John Polstra wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've got a Belkin OmniView Pro 8-Port KVM switch which thinks it's
> > much smarter than it really is. When I try to use the mouse through
> > it with FreeBSD (-current from around Christma
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:14 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > >
> > > It's not that I want to talk you into something you don't
> > > want.
> >
> > But that's exactly what you
Could you guys remove my name from the Cc: list on this thread please?
I've already made my position quite clear.
Thanks,
Doug
--
"The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing and
to watch someone else do it wrong witho
Personally, I had a lot of sympathy with the
idea of the proponents making a port of the new cron, but I could live with
the idea of a command line option, defaulting to the old behavior.
In either case, you need to back that commit out. Your actions were
premature and indefensable.
Dou
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> > This needs to be backed out immediately. This isn't even close to what was
> > discussed in -hackers. After LONG, often pointless discussion, the
> > following points were agreed to the
ment your solution, though ... from
the sounds of it, you can only have one concurrent connection to your
authentication server via this library, which sounds extremely lame. Do
the clients just sit around forever until the server returns? The
serialization this library forces isn&#
ou have any!
Also, your proprietary library has to be threadsafe too. Particularly if
it blocks... it'll probably block the whole process instead of the
individual thread. Unless we figured out a way to fix that :)
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL
gt; logs and such.
Sudden network outages during periods of high activity will cause mbuf
cluser consumption to increase.
'netstat -m' is your friend.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
rent,
> > stable and from other BSD project such OpenBSD to pick all
> > the good stuffs.
> > I'm a happy 2.2.x user.
> >
> I think Yahoo! is using still on 2.2.8.
Don't let your imagination run away with you. :)
Doug
--
"Pain heals. Chicks dig scar
; should be submitted to gcc developers and the changes will get into
> our tree on next gcc source import?
I believe there is a -fformat-extensions flag that gets around this
problem. Check out the kernel build for the actual flag as it's used
there.
Doug White
using the previous syscall(2) interface? They
die horribly? That's not acceptable.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
h boxes.
>
> i labeled the disks with:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rda0 bs=1k count=1
> disklabel -Brw da0 auto
This is a bug in the adaptec BIOS. Don't do this for boot disks. Use
fdisk/real slices instead.
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL
a standard off the shelf motherboard. Also CMOS memory is
increasing and that could be used for some configuration info to be
used as non-flash persistant storage such as IP address and such. Also
having a small BIOS image like General Software would help save space.
Doug A.
To Unsubscribe: send
2001] [alert] Child 777 returned a Fatal error...
> Apache is exiting!
> httpd in free(): warning: page is already free.
>
>
> anyone seen this before?
> i do have some things on nfs apache accesses..
Don't put the scoreboard & lock file on NFS. The Apache docs say this i
ould think this would be a good starting point and
since the emulator is open source it should be easier to figure out
how the machine works.
Doug A.
Standard disclaimer applies
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
You might also consider using/installing 8.2.3 and see if you get
the same results. In any case, please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with your answer.
Doug
--
"Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory . . . lasts forever."
-- Keanu Reeves as Shane Falco in "The Rep
rable in my entirely non-scientific comparison to the
old X 3 + Mesa performance. I never installed utah-glx with X 3.
Doug
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
simply because they are t
back the effort to make this product
compile clean on freebsd.
Thanks,
Doug
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
simply because they are their opinions.
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscr
gt;
> What (maybe not) causes troubles:
>
> okey# make clean
> ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4_1
> rm: /usr/ports/devel/m4/work: Directory not empty
> *** Error code 1
Try rebooting to single user mode and running 'fsck -y'. That may help.
Good luck,
Doug
--
Kip Macy writes:
| IIRC lack of per instance cdevs also limits Freebsd to one vmware instance.
Really? Don't tell my vmware multiple instances! I used to run 10 on
one FreeBSD host.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Kip Macy writes:
| WOW THATS GREAT DOUG! \0/ - it didn't work for me.
This was with the last patched driver for vmware 2. I'm not sure if
it every made it into the port.
http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/changes
28 Jan 01 Version 0.99-1-0.22
Support for multi
esented would have value in other
areas if they were implemented, so at best I would deem your
characterization to be slanted. You may wish to consider if perhaps it is
not also inaccurate.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
__
aggressive spider went after sites on our systems. Restarting Apache
was usually all it took to set things right again.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
John Von Essen wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Did some googling and I did find a connection between excessive
> CLOSED_WAITS, and hanging apache, and webbots. Some of the IP's I saw in
> my netstat were bots too. The problem has something to do with the bot
> no longer acceptin
rtable
> (and thus preferable) way:
>
> cd /from; find -d . | cpio -dumpl /to
While I don't want to stifle anyone's creativity, I agree with Oliver (and
other posters) on this one. The Unix way of doing things is small programs
that do their jobs well, tied together to accomplish
the ipmi(4) driver. It gets the IPMI HW info via SMBIOS.
There is also and smbios driver as well.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Niclas Zeising wrote:
> The periodic.conf in 7-CURRENT is still set to use the INDEX-6 ports
> index file, instead of INDEX-7 which is the default on 7-CURRENT. This
> should, I think, be changed.
Done. Next time please consider using send-pr for this type of thing.
Doug
--
Yuan, Jue wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Could I change the kernel version tag manually?
/sys/conf/newvers.sh
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
er? If so, the effect you saw might be due to file system
caching.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
atch. If there are no objections I'll do it
myself if no one gets to it first.
In any case I think that this is a good addition to the code, and I'm
glad that this issue was raised.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
uggestions didn't make it through on
this message. Please feel free to post them for review and send the
URL to the list.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
on where the pre-recent-patch
behavior (overwriting the actual file when using -P on a hard link) is
the expected outcome.
It's all well and good to say, "tough luck," but I don't think that's
what our users expect.
Doug
--
This
Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>> Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>>> Personally I think rm should do what you ask it to do - if you ask it
>>> to overwrite a file which has multiple links, well... though luck.
&
ess it via the web management
| console, I just can not get the kernel driver to work with it. Any help
| and/or references would be greatly appreciated.
Could you try it static in the kernel and then with and without ACPI
enabled?
Doug A.
___
freebsd-h
7;t easily get a serial console
up and running, your earlier suggestion of putting the box back to the
last known good 5.x release is a good one. At least that can help rule
out hardware _failure_, as opposed to hardware-used-differently issues.
hth,
Doug
--
ly interested in boot-time issues, and this sounds like an
interesting problem.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
ded value to justify the pain of
the change.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Vulpes Velox wrote:
>>> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
>>> though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I
config (and
> may be written by entirely different config management tools -- e.g.
> system config management vs. application deployment/management), and the
> /etc/periodic functionality is not flexible enough to cover all cases.
That's not a bad idea, but you'll have t
the overall rcorder at
boot time, so all you have to do is make a port of your project and
you're good to go.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
>>> would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
>>
>> Good news for you, we already suppo
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's not documented, but the code is there in /etc/rc.subr:
>>
>> grep 'rc.conf\.d' /etc/rc.subr
>>if [ -f /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_name" ]; then
&
nsible person for the PR
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
c. I don't
know of any communities where those attitudes are well supported, but
I do know that you won't get very far in this community that way.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
o
ignore these ports (with no skeleton) is probably a good idea for the
long run anyway, so if anyone has an idea besides what I suggested
above, speak up. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
ch with the
latest HEAD, and run 'make universe' with the latest HEAD?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscr
en releases.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Steven Hartland wrote:
Given that it sounds like a potential workaround is to use the machines
IP instead of name until this is fixed, thanks for the info guys.
For as long as I can remember, it's been a Best Practice to have
entries for critical NFS servers in /etc/hosts.
see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90863 for an interesting
related discussion.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hack
7;s working. libkse
will be a lot harder IMHO. David's stuff in -current just works.
I routinely run 32bit thread stuff on 64bit hosts using the
libmap32.conf trick to switch from kse to libthr.
Thanks to David for making it work in -current.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
times on -current systems both pre and post the gcc + symver
+ version bump eras, and didn't have the problems you're seeing. What
I don't have though is zfs, so that may be a place to look. One way to
check is if you're not doing it already, use an mfs /tmp and
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> (Over 2GBs of RAM + Swap being used). It does this consistently when it
>>> tries to compile xf86PciScan.c (hope thats the right file).
>> May not be the answer you want to hear, but I built all the xorg stuff
>> multip
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Not disputing your answer, but I'm curious. Why would it cause
problems on some systems but not others? I haven't done anything with
my cflags ...
It depends on how much RAM + Swap do you have. I know people with 1.5Gb
that have such p
then do "make package", then +CONTENTS can be a bit messed up for the
> package. This is because the creation of other ports might disturb
> _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS and might put in some extra entries in +CONTENTS.
"Doctor, it hurts when I do THIS."
"Well, don&#
em but I think that might have been a joke.
Systems that have IPMI version 2 are nice since that means they are
supposed to support Serial Over Lan (SOL) via the standard :-)
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
, for what that's
worth.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the better for you. We've given you
the code, do what you will with it.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
ing at this from the other direction, what would be the benefit to
having plain stop act in the absence of an _enable variable for that
service?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.o
rests of
the majority of FreeBSD users.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Assuming that lack of an affirmative _enable variable is a constant, the
only way that a service can be started is with either onestart or
forcestart. The symmetry here would be to stop it the same way.
This may be symmetrical, but I
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Jin Guojun wrote:
> By looking through _pthread_create() code and find it uses a magic
> cookie -- TLS -- created
> by rtld_allocate_tls(), and passed into kernel by sysarch() via
> _tcb_set() / _kcb_set().
>
> The information seems to be set by rtld (ld-elf.so
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
em to run when the machine is hung up. I type in the command, but it does
not run until the machine springs back to life. I'm not sure how this will
affect measurements.
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/sysctl-a
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/psauxl
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/systat-v
On 10/17/07, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
> >
> > Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
> > one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
> >
this again for a while I'd update to 7.0 when it
is released.
The other alternative is to bribe someone who is local to do the
installation for you, which all things considered would probably be easier
all around.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your prote
27; or 'top' to see if you might possibly benefit from
more ram by reducing paging.
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Running out of memory and having to continually swap things in and out
of ram degrades performance, yes. Page faults are simply how the
virtual memory subsystem gets things done, like pulling things out of
swap.
--Doug
On Nov 7, 2007 7:48 PM, binto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw
>
very
common, but fortunately the answer is simple.
If you need any help with the DNS side of the equation feel free to
contact me directly.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
ge!
>> Basically my program runs about twice as fast when I run two threads as
>> opposed to one - I cannot see doing any better than that!
>
> pure computation does not need kernel operations most of the time.. ie.
> multi-threading kernel wont help much ;)
It has an
linux and not only did it
suck potatoes, it was frequently the cause of that server crashing. I
would stay completely away from it.
Thanks,
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
have to be from scratch. A pretty big
> task.
I reviewed the NFSv4 specs recently and came to the same conclusion. To do
it right will be quite a bit of work and would include a decent kernel
side implementation of rpc and gssapi.
--
Doug Rabson Mail: [EMAIL P
volunteer" ? :-)
Not with my current workload :-(.
--
Doug Rabson Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
301 - 400 of 1212 matches
Mail list logo
