Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:18:01 +0100 "O. Hartmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I complain about the dramatic performance drainage of FreeBSD and > would also say, that my main purpose for an UNIX driven box isn't the > service for network like routing, DNS and others. But I'm frightened by >

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread O. Hartmann
Mark Bucciarelli wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: Mark Bucciarelli wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:52:47AM -0200, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: The results were discussed in the following threads: I see the speed differences are major, but don't have a

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread Mark Bucciarelli
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > Mark Bucciarelli wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:52:47AM -0200, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > > > > > > The results were discussed in the following threads: > > > > > > > I see the speed differences are major, but don't h

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread O. Hartmann
Mark Bucciarelli wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:52:47AM -0200, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: The results were discussed in the following threads: I see the speed differences are major, but don't have a good idea of what 15,000 DNS queries per second means. Is the following interpretati

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread Dave
On Nov 18, 2006, at 7:52 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: FYI: In response to feedback from ISC, there are UDP transmit optimizations in FreeBSD 7.x. These have a relatively minor performance impact for single-threaded applications, but in the special case of BIND

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread Mark Bucciarelli
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:52:47AM -0200, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: > > The results were discussed in the following threads: > I see the speed differences are major, but don't have a good idea of what 15,000 DNS queries per second means. Is the following interpretation correct? 15,000 D

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread O. Hartmann
Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote: On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:52:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: These results looks very puzzling to me. As far as I know, multithreading and/or multiprocessors should perform better anyway than a single threaded application within other applications on an UP box.

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-11-22 Thread Marcelo Gardini do Amaral
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:52:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > These results looks very puzzling to me. > As far as I know, multithreading and/or multiprocessors should perform > better anyway than a single threaded application within other > applications on an UP box. Strange results ...And more

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-22 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 08:09 AM 11/22/2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hi Mike, Thank you for spending that much time for benchmarking, this is really interesting. Hi, More to come, and if you can think of other tests let me know. Next is VLAN performance. Though this is a little bit off topic, I'm quite

Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-22 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi Mike, Thank you for spending that much time for benchmarking, this is really interesting. Though this is a little bit off topic, I'm quite puzzled by the fact that having filtering rules on Linux or not doesn't change the result much. NetFitler keeps track of *all* connections even if there a