!
- Original Message -
From: Derrick T. Woolworth
To: OxY
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: enabling hyper-threading on intel dual-core
Huge performance advantage and difference between i386 and amd64 kernel.
i386 is 32-bit and amd64 is obviously 64-bit, but
930 is perfect, fast enough, no need to spend more money, thanks :)
- Original Message -
From: "Achim Patzner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ;
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: enabling hyper-threading on intel dua
hi!
i just bought an Intel Pentium D-930 (3ghz dual-core)
and wonder why i just only have CPU0 and CPU1, when i compile with SMP...
sysctl says:
machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 0
is it right or i should see CPU 2 and 3 starting during the boot?
thanks for your help!
ps: i even compiled this option in ke
i decided to give up, can't get rid of packet loss...
thank you all for your help!
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lucas Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD
OxY wrote:
what kind of details should i attach? to analyze the problem?
Host and peer packet statistics, cabling specs.
What measures have you taken to exclude cable, peer or duplex mismatch
problems?
cable, peer and duplex problems are excluded, because i measure 0% drop,
when apache is
what kind of details should i attach? to analyze the problem?
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucas Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Mailing Lists"
;
hi guys!
well, i changed my motherboard and CPU from the
asus a7v8x+amd 2000+ xp to
the abit be7 + p4 2.4 (533fsb) and the packet loss fell down from 8% to 2%, but
still have loss...
loss coming when i have load.. i guess it decreased because of the bigger
resources.
still waiting for tipps, h
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
OxY wrote:
- Original Message - F
i changed sk to em.
how could i measure speed or benchmark the network performance?
- Original Message -
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: packet drop with
okay, i will try it in a couple days
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ;
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
On Mar 18, 2006,
- Original Message -
From: "Sten Spans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Arne Woerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
On
out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 2.193038 secs (478138497 bytes/sec)
- Original Message -
From: "Arne Woerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / ma
but the udp drop came out (10-15%) when i stopped apache (all tcp traffic)
and initiated a local disk-to-disk file copy to make some load.
- Original Message -
From: "Arne Woerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, Ma
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Guojun (VFFS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabi
have 0% packet drop, when my
machine is totally idle.
- Original Message -
From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:49 AM
Subject: Re:
Message -
From: "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit
OxY wrote:
i increased hz from 2000 to 5000, now the packet loss i
i increased hz from 2000 to 5000, now the packet loss is decreased
from 5-6% to 0.6-0,8% !!!
huge improve!
should i increase hz more?
- Original Message -
From: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, Ma
16384 129622061 0 129622061 0
0
netstat -s is here:
http://field.hu/netstat.txt
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 1:37 PM
Subjec
yeah, i googled these settings, but i put them back to default then!
i measured iperf performance, and it showed that the packet drop is
depending
on the system load..
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PR
hi!
i had the packet drop problem with the marwell yukon gigabitcard:
(system is an amd 2000+xp, 512mb ram, fbsd 6.0-p5)
when the apache ran, with no http, just used to share files and the traffic was
2-2,5MB/S i had 14-17% packet drop on the gigabit interface..
with the sysctl i succesfully pull
ginal Message -
From: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 9:22 AM
Subject: em0 and tunnel performance problem
hi!
i have an intel etherexpress gigabit card on 100mbit port and fbsd
6.0-p1..
my box is a proxy, it's traffic is 100/100mbit
hi!
i have an intel etherexpress gigabit card on 100mbit port and fbsd 6.0-p1..
my box is a proxy, it's traffic is 100/100mbit constant..
unfortunately i have to use tunnel and that is the source of my problem.
when i enable the tunnel and the packages are going through it the
performance is poo
gives poor performance again 1M/s..
what's wrong?
- Original Message -
From: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:45 PM
Subject: xl driver bug
hi!
i have some trouble with xl driver (3Com 905c-TX) in 6.0-release..
after i upg
!
OxY
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
hi!
i am writing you to give me please some hints & tricks to
improve my stock mysql performance..
i know there was a topic about fbsd vs linux mysql perf, but
what i need is just a few compile and .cnf options to improve the stuff
as much as possible, not to chase linux..
thanks guys!
_
25 matches
Mail list logo
