I tried to find a place to report a wishlist bug against pdftk on
http://www.freshports.org/print/pdftk/>, but failed. Trying an
email here instead. Please forward it to a more appropriate location
if needed.
I'm a user on a amd64 FreeBSD machine, and in need of the pdftk
program. Trying to bu
On 2007-Mar-28 16:03:46 -0500, Corey Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ramblings of a long time FreeBSD user:
>
>* Use the pkg_* tools to manage the system binaries too:
>
>Imagine if installing the man pages would be as easy as:
>
>pkg_add -r freebsd-6.1-man
As a general principal, this sounds go
Hi,
I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The (web-)installation
completed successfully but nothing happens when I click on any link at the
webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...).
Pebkac?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-ports@fre
Hi,
[2007/3/27, bf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Building WITH_GSL=yes on my machine, the first hunk of
the math/asymptote/files/patch-Makefile.in fails,
probably because of the 1.23 source Makefile.in's line
9,
It has been fixed, thanks.
Also, when generating the asymptote
documentation/examples, th
Hi
Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile so as ro
be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a chosen directory for
a number of virtual hosts.
Thanks in advance
david
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
From: "Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The
(web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I
click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...).
Pebkac?
PEBKAC. I swear I removed the install di
Hi,
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> From: "Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> I installed phpbb-2.0.22_1 and compiled it with php5. The
>> (web-)installation completed successfully but nothing happens when I
>> click on any link at the webpage (e.g. Search, Register, Login, ...).
>>
>> Pebkac
How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port?
For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for
multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this?
How about upgrades?
david
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.or
Vizion wrote:
> How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port?
>
> For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for
> multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this?
>
> How about upgrades?
> david
Can't do that with ports (unless you make yo
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile
> so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a
> chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts.
Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head yesterday), but isn't that
exact
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garrett Cooper
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:21 AM
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports installation location
>
> Vizion wrote:
> > How does one specify a non-standard location
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile
> so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a
> chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts.
Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my head yesterday), but isn't that
exact
>>> -Original Message-
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts
>>>
>>> Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Just
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote:
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote:
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just wonder if anyone is able to suggest a way of modify the Makefile
so as ro be able to install joomla, from /ports/www/joomla/, into a
chosen directory for a number of virtual hosts.
Maybe I'm confused (I did bang my hea
On 3/29/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does one specify a non-standard location for installing a port?
For example I want to have multiple instances of www/joomla installed for
multiple virtual hosts. How can I best go about this?
I haven't tried this, but looking at the ports Mak
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:46 AM
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Vizion wrote
Hi:
I'm on this machine:
FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36
PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./magick -I./wand -I./ltdl -I./ltdl
Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts
Viz
Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''.
Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but
``portmanager -s'' still reports a load as MISSING, but they aren't; the
directories are in /var/db/pkg and the apps work.
portmanager(1) builds and
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:41:37 -0800
Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm on this machine:
>
> FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23
> 13:04:36 PDT 2006
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386
>
> /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:36:53PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -Original Message-
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 8:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Clint Olsen wrote:
Hi:
I'm on this machine:
FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23 13:04:36
PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc
-DHAVE_CONFI
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''.
> Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but
> ``portmanager -s'' still reports a load as MISSING, but they aren't; the
> directories are i
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:41:37 -0800
Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi:
I'm on this machine:
FreeBSD belle.0lsen.net 5.5-STABLE FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Mon Oct 23
13:04:36 PDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELLE i386
/bin/sh /us
The problem is that graphviz is listed as a RUN_DEPENDS, and doesn't
get installed before the build stage. It needs to be changed to a
LIB_DEPENDS, and the path to libgvc.* needs to be added to LDFLAGS.
PR 111018 submitted to fix this probem.
Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while se
Robert Noland wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''.
Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but
``portmanager -s'' still reports a load as MISSING, but they aren't; the
di
On Thursday, 29. March 2007, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> The problem is that graphviz is listed as a RUN_DEPENDS, and doesn't
> get installed before the build stage. It needs to be changed to a
> LIB_DEPENDS, and the path to libgvc.* needs to be added to LDFLAGS.
>
> PR 111018 submitted to fix this probe
# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/
# make install clean
===> fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_3 requires the Kernel source to be installed. Set
SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src.
I'm new to freebsd and ports. Is there not a port that will fetch the
Kernel source I need?
If not, could someone please direct m
Nevermind, I found this "If there is *not* a /usr/src/sys directory on your
system, then the kernel source has not been installed. The easiest way to do
this is by running sysinstall as root, choosing Configure, then
Distributions, then src, then base and sys."
at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> Robert Noland wrote:
> >On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> >>Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager -u''.
> >>Numerous failures, conflicts etc. as usual. Got most of them sorted but
> >>`
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:52 -0500, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
Robert Noland wrote:
>On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
>>Tried updating all my ports - all 439 of them - sing ``portmanager
-u''.
>>Numer
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 17:15 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:52 -0500, Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> >> Robert Noland wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Ovens wrote:
> >> >>T
Hi All.
I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about
one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
Building everything from ports is ok, on a quick machine, but even on a quick
mach
Hi All.
I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for about
one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
Building everything from ports is ok, on a quick machine, but even on a quick
mach
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:41:03 +0200
From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:26:03 -0500
Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:45:30 -0800
Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> > Hi All.
> >
> > I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
> > about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keepin
On Friday 30 March 2007 00:07:32 Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
> about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third
> party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
First important thing is
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
> about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
> ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
>
> Building
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I understand 4.11 is dead, but I've still got about 20 odd boxes to take
care of for the next few months until we can figure out what breaks in 6.x
for us.
I saw that it's recommended to use the "RELEASE_4_EOL" tag
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:15:19 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you guys should stop use portmanager. I personal don't trust it.
Something tells me, that that doesn't come from an exhaustive
walkthrough of the source code.
All of the upgrade tools have significant faults
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:46:34 +0200
Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers
> for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping
> third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:07:32 +0200
Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers
> for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping
> third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers
> for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping
> third party ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
>
> Building e
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:05:45 +0100
RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:07:32 +0200
> Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All.
> >
> > I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers
> > for about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! B
> Maybe you guys should stop use portmanager. I personal don't trust it.
I'm not familiar with portmanager or portmaster. I use portupgrade and the
standard pkg-* and ports' "make foo" utilities but I don't think that this is
a proper way to talk about a tool that someone has made to make life e
Good day
I would like to improve the audio/libvorbis port by optionally patching
in the aoTuV psychoacoustics, which are considered to be superior to
stock libvorbis. However, the patch file that does this is ~170kB in
size. I am wondering whether it is OK to put such a large file directly
in
On 30/03/2007, at 12:19 PM, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
Good day
I would like to improve the audio/libvorbis port by optionally
patching in the aoTuV psychoacoustics, which are considered to be
superior to stock libvorbis. However, the patch file that does this
is ~170kB in size. I am won
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 00:07 +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
> about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
> ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
>
> Building everyt
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
> about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
> ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
>
> Building
Hi,
Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make
package-recursive in the resulting package file?
I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine, and
when i installed the package it worked, but the program didn't load
properly
(xorg + xfce4). It worked on the o
Hi,
I appologise if this has been submitted multiple times, but I can't
seem to send to the mailing list, i hope this works.
Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make
package-recursive in the resulting package file?
I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine,
Andrew:
Thank you for your reply.
> Be sure to backup your data before every update if you use twiki from
> ports. It (the port) doesn't support updates, only the first time
> install. Personally, I maintain my twiki installation manually.
> Twiki is quite complicated to make a good port out of i
On 3/30/07, David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew:
Thank you for your reply.
> Be sure to backup your data before every update if you use twiki from
> ports. It (the port) doesn't support updates, only the first time
> install. Personally, I maintain my twiki installation manually
54 matches
Mail list logo