On 04/10/16 20:22, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate
What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a
real port, there are numerous tools to deal with just this sort o
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Or set the (g)make variable 'MAKE' to gmake & let it propogate
What you are doing is, in effect, creating a port. If you create a real
port, there are numerous tools to deal with just this sort of problem,
like USES=gmake.
The Porte
Dear Customer,
Your parcel has arrived at April 08. Courier was unable to deliver the parcel
to you.
Please, open email attachment to print shipment label.
Yours trully,
Patrick Parsons,
FedEx Operation Manager.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l
On 04/10/16 19:05, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be
On 04/10/16 19:09, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
> wrote:
>
> > On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >
> >> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III" <
> w...@hiwaay.net>
> >> wro
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
> On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
>>> be a bunch of linuxisms in condition
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III
wrote:
> On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
>> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
>>> be a bunch of linuxisms in condition
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile.
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:55:30 +0200
Jan Beich wrote:
> Erich Dollansky writes:
>
> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206980
> [...]
> > Before I have been able to built firefox without WRKDIRPREFIX in the
> > same shell. The same error happens in a fresh shell. If it ma
On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile.
On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III"
wrote:
>configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
>be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for
>different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile.
Have you tried using gmake, rather th
I downloaded the AMD Open64 compiler suite & am attempting to build it
to compile some in-house code under FreeBSD. I unpacked the tarball &
began following directions in the INSTALL file, which I attach. The
configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to
be a bunch
Erich Dollansky writes:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206980
[...]
> Before I have been able to built firefox without WRKDIRPREFIX in the
> same shell. The same error happens in a fresh shell. If it matters, I
> believe that 37 was the last version I could built with WRKDIR
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
15 matches
Mail list logo
