Re: Unable to build: graphics/libGLU

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > There is a checksum problem with the graphics/libGLU port. Even using > the "NO_CHECKSUM=yes" flag does not help. I then receive an error that > the libGLU-7.4.2.1" file is corrupt. You were likely fetching from garr.dl.sourceforge.net which

Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: &g

Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:29:45AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:44:41 +0200 > Rene Ladan wrote: > > >2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the > >> python upgrade. I intend

Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:26:40PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > >> > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the

Re: Python 2.6 update with portmaster

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/10 Wesley Shields : > > Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python > > upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks > > up. I'll also be

Python 2.6 update with portmaster

Here's a patch[1] that allows you to use portmaster when doing the python upgrade. I intend to commit this tomorrow morning unless someone speaks up. I'll also be adding the instructions to the UPDATING entry. Once applied you should be able to use: cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-

Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.python.mk ports/biology/pymol Makefile pkg-plist ports/cad/pythoncad Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/gadfly Makefile pkg-plist ports/databases/skytools M

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2009/6/9 Martin Wilke : > > miwi2009-06-08 22:30:55 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > >.UPDATING > [...] > > Log: > > - Update lang/python26 and make Python 2.6.2 to the de

Re: ports/134929

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:33:14PM +0400, Alexander Kriventsov wrote: > Hello > ?an anybody commit this > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134929 ? > Thanks I'll take care of it shortly. Sorry for the delay. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.or

Re: finding where a make variable is set

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:04:49PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Given: > > huff@>> pd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 /var/db/pkg > huff@>> make -V CP > /bin/cp > > how do I track down where CP gets set? It isn't in the > Makefile itself;

Re: [CFT] FreeBSD python25 move to python26 as default version.

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:58:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Kelly Hays wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > >>Once the installed Python has been updated to 2.6, by using one of the > >>methods above, it is required to run the upgrade-site-packages target in

Re: ports/133166: www/wml port fix

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:48:39PM +0200, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm the www/wml port mantainer and about 1 month ago > I submited a patch to fix the port (broken). > The PR was taken by someone, but unfortunatly for now > is still open and I have no feedback from the respon

Re: [RFC] NO_INSTALL in meta-ports considered harmful

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:28:34PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki > > wrote: > >> They will be installed since they are run dependencies. > >> > >>From what I can tell (from several meta

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote: > > >David O'Brien wrote: > >> I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one > >> had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port. > >By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always witho

Re: FreeBSD Port: quagga-0.99.11_2

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:55:57PM +0200, Bc. Radek Krejca wrote: > Hi, > > > WS> I'm currently working with the maintainer to get this addressed. The > WS> patch in (ports/134108) has been approved by the maintainer but it > WS> appears it breaks during runtime on i386. I will continue to work w

Re: FreeBSD Port: quagga-0.99.11_2

On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Bc. Radek Krejca wrote: > Hi, > > Oh thank you, I am awaing for port, I got a lot of messages > > > May 3 19:15:36 gw bgpd[7225]: Assertion `len < str_size' failed in file > bgp_aspath.c, line 619, function aspath_make_str_count > May 3 19:15:

Re: FreeBSD Port: bacula-client-3.0.0_1

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:17:10PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Hughes wrote: > > Where did the 2.x series ports go? We currently use bacula-dir v. 2.4.4 > > on a linux host to backup our fbsd file servers, but some web research > > and o

Re: MaraDNS outdated port

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:49:07PM +0200, Jan Sebosik wrote: > Hi all > > why is in ports collection MaraDNS 1.2, if we have 1.3 out there for > some time? This port is not maintained. If you would like to see it updated the best way is to update it yourself and submit it as a PR. It is also a g

Re: Nagios segfault on startup when embedded perl is enabled on 7.1-stable/i386

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:16:42AM +0930, Jarrod Sayers wrote: > On 25/04/2009, at 5:23 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: > > There is a PR about this issue (ports/131993) but the maintainer is > > reluctant to approve the patch listed there. The maintainer has asked > > for system in

Re: Nagios segfault on startup when embedded perl is enabled on 7.1-stable/i386

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:57:14PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm running Nagios 3.0.6 on: > > > > FreeBSD aubsr096.us.add 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #0: Tue > > Mar 17 19:59:50 EDT 2009 > > r...@aubsr096.us.ad

Re: Error upgrading 'libpcap-0.9.7_1' to 'libpcap-1.0.0' (net/libpcap)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 05:33:48PM +0300, Andrei V. Lavreniyuk wrote: > > > ---> Upgrading 'libpcap-0.9.7_1' to 'libpcap-1.0.0' (net/libpcap) > ---> Building '/usr/ports/net/libpcap' > ===> Cleaning for libpcap-1.0.0 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => libpcap-1.0.0.t

Re: FreeBSD Port: libspf2-1.0.4_1

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:12:12AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:44:31AM +0200, Pavel Hlub?k wrote: > > Hi , > > > > sorry for disturbing you. > > > > The port is still broken so I can't install the `postfix-policyd-spf` &g

Re: FreeBSD Port: libspf2-1.0.4_1

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:44:31AM +0200, Pavel Hlub?k wrote: > Hi , > > sorry for disturbing you. > > The port is still broken so I can't install the `postfix-policyd-spf` > because it depends on the libspf2-10. > > ===> libspf2-1.0.4_1 has known vulnerabilities: > => libspf2 -- Buffer overf

Re: ports/132800: vuxml submission for net-im/ejabberd

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:38:12AM -0700, Mark Foster wrote: > I'm following up regarding this apparent maintainer timeout. It's not my > intention to place blame, but to me it is unacceptable that important > security (vuxml) updates are sometimes blocked by unresponsive > maintainers. It is no

Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > 2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg : > > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco: > > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco. > > > > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco > > make install > > ... > > (i have

Re: PR for devel/jsmin not answered by maintainer

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:00:51PM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: > Hello, > > Almost a month ago I filed a PR for jsmin, which is not building > because teh distfile(a .c file) was modified upstram for a new version, > so fails checksum rendering the port effectively broken. > > It was automatically

Re: Collecting pkg-message files [was: ansi colors in ports]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Why does freebsd ports not use ansi colors? This would be so nice :-) > Eg. ECHO_MSG would be so much more visible within the compilation > soup. Gentoo uses colors too! I have no comment on using ANSI colors, but I'd like to poi

Re: [FreeBSD] / ports / net-p2p / deluge

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:37:51PM +0100, dan wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the offer. But I don't think I am able to maintain it : > deluge talks "python" and I dont know it. Maybe I should start from any > "C port". Is there a list of orphan ports ? Yes, there was a rather long thread on thi

Re: [FreeBSD] / ports / net-p2p / deluge

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:11:02PM +0100, dan wrote: > Hi, > > Today I tried to compile "deluge" . I had a stop in the make process . > The error I discovered is the same as : > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353897 . I applied the same > suggested temporary fix . > > Would you n

Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Two days ago, I have checked in probably most requested feature of last > > few years. Ports framework now systematically supports building ports on > > multiple processing cores. It is achieved by passing -jX fl

Re: mtools vs X11 (Re: FreeBSD Port: syslinux-3.72)

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:35:15PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote: > Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote: > >> Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install of mtools brings > >> up a configuration menu in which the WITHOUT_X11 option can be set? I > >>

Re: Question about ports....

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:38:52AM +0200, Mika Veijonsuo wrote: > On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:33 +0100 > Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > > > PySolFC-1.1! Comparison failed > > wine-1.1.16,1 < needs updating (index has 1.1.17,1) > > > > > > My first question is

Re: FreeBSD Port: lighttpd-1.4.21_2

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 04:59:06PM +0800, ilang wrote: > lighttpd has been updated to 1.4.22 I just submitted http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=132582, which will shortly be viewable on the web. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: request for a new port review [memtest86+]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:49:27PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Guys, > > could you please review the below port for correctness, style and > general approach taken by me. This is a port of memtest86+. Unlike > existing sysutils/memtest86 this port is not a > download/extraction/version-tracki

Re: Bump libsndfile port to 1.0.19

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 03:56:51PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hello all, > > Not long after we bumped the libsndfile port to 1.0.18, it turned out > there was an undisclosed security vulnerability. The author decided to > release a new version, 1.0.19. An advantage of this version is that it > al

Re: Looking for a distfile mirror

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Tobias Rehbein wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm maintainer of the audio/ogg2mp3 port. This port isn't supported upstream > anymore, > but I'm trying to keep it in a usable state. > > Since a few weeks the MASTERSITE of the port disappeared. I contacted the > au

Re: Perl from ports

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 09:45:05PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > The perl5.8 ports after update to > > # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/perl5.8/Makefile,v 1.102 2009/03/03 16:21:02 # > skv Exp $ > > work fine on my latptop and all my old server. > > But on a fresh install FreeBSD I got

Re: Configuring 'RUN_DEPENDS'

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:38:14PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:47:15 +0300 > Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > >As far as I understand, that won't work with clamav-devel. > >RUN_DEPENDS= clamav>=0.94.2:${PORTSDIR}/security/clamav > >makes a port depend not on installed file but on speci

Re: Configuring 'RUN_DEPENDS'

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:29:36AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > A port I am creating has a RUN_DEPENDS of either 'curl' or 'wget'. I > have tried several times to write some sort of test in the make file to > determine if one or the other were installed, and if neither then to > install 'curl'. I suppose

Re: Installing 'config' file with port

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:58:57PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Jerry wrote: > > I am creating a port that will install a 'config' file in the > > "/usr/local/etc" directory. Reading through the 'Porters Handbook", I > > cam across this example. > >

Re: [headsup] call for assistance with ports broken on -current

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 04:52:28PM +0100, Lars Engels wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 06:45:39PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > FYI, here's what I posted to ports@ yesterday. Any help fixing these > > would be appreciated. (We've already knocked off several of the ones > > I initially posted.) >

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:51:03PM +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up? > > audio/aureal-kmod please. Done. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailin

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:45:40AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I guess I could take these ports: > > /usr/ports/cad/gmsh > /usr/ports/cad/netgen > /usr/ports/graphics/opendx > /usr/ports/graphics/plotutils > /usr/ports/math/GiNaC > /usr/ports/math/arpack > /usr/ports/math/bamg > /usr/

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:03:32PM +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > El jueves 12 de febrero a las 18:32:13 CET, Thomas Abthorpe escribi?: > > > The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up? > > I will take mail/mairix, as I am using that port. > > Best regards.

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 09:30:45AM -0500, Jim Trigg wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:15:50PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > > The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it > > > up? > > I'll take x11/xclip in addition to what I currently maint

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:24:21PM -0500, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On February 12, 2009 02:26:46 pm Paul Schmehl wrote: > > How about providing a list of the ports that need maintainers? ?I already > > have 15. ?I might take some more, but not un

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10:28PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > * Paul Schmehl [2009-02-12 13:26:46 -0600]: > > > --On Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:32:13 -0600 Thomas Abthorpe > > wrote: > > > >> > >> The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up? > >> > > > >

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:37:15PM -0500, Andy Greenwood wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > > > The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up? > I will! > > Pr submitted to take over dns/py-dnspython. Committed.

Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:39:15PM +0100, Marius N?nnerich wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Thomas Abthorpe > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This topic came up in IRC, and I was encouraged to go out, and find some new > > maintainers. > > > > At any

Re: Lend FreeBSD 7 or 8 access for ports upgrade?

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:30:45PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.02.2009, 11:44 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Andree : > > > Contact me off-list with offers (if I don't reply, I'm swamped with > > offers > > ;-)). > > I have received some offers, thanks a lot to everybody who offered help. > >

Re: A plea or sanity in port options menu

On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 03:39:25PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Warren Block : > > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > How about: > > > > > > Options for port-fu > > > [ ] BRG Bernstein Riggs Guillotine parsing > > > [X] QFZ Quantum Freeze Zulu rending > > > >

Re: Terracotta Port

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:56:47PM -0800, Brian Gardner wrote: > I've just created my first port for a product called Terracotta > (http://www.terracotta.org). I believe this port is ready for review > and hopefully inclusion but couldn't figure out what the next step is. > NOTE: I am not sub

Re: RT 3.8?

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:32:59PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:05:50PM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > > > On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Arnold Cavazos Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to install

Re: RT 3.8?

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:05:50PM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Arnold Cavazos Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > I am trying to install the rt38 port in the tree on a fresh 7.1-STABLE > > build. The Makefile's id is: > > > > # $FreeBSD: ports/www/rt38/Makefile,v 1.6 2009/

Re: [www/sams] why did commiter bump PORTREVISION ? Now it's broken.

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:48:30PM +0400, Yuriy Grishin wrote: > Hello > I'm the maintainer of the port www/sams. > > In early of December 2008 the developer released new version of SAMS -- > 1.0.4 > I tried to take most of users comments and sent pr > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=

Re: problem installing games/gtkpool

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:07:11AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > h...@jerusalem>> make install > ===> Installing for gtkpool-0.5.0_4 > ===> gtkpool-0.5.0_4 depends on executable: pkg-config - found > ===> gtkpool-0.5.0_4 depends on shared library: glib-12.3 - found > ===> gtkpool-0.5.0_4 d

Re: pkg_info confusion (and configure.kde3)

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 15/01/2009 15:29 matt donovan said the following: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon > > wrote: > > > > > > I am reading pkg_info(1), I see that pkg_info can be executed witho

Re: cgiwrap version 4.1

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Vineyard.NET Administration wrote: > I've got a PCI compliance firm breathing down my neck about my version > of cgiwrap. Any plans to update the port to version 4.1? Would it be > helpful if I supplied the patch? In case you missed it, I updated this port

Re: mono port

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:14:20PM +0200, Ott K?stner wrote: > Hello List, > > What is the status of FreeBSD mono port? > > Current version of lang/mono port is 1.2.5.1_1. However the latest Mono > release is 2.0.1 already. > > It has been reported, that Mono 1.2.5 has a number of critical bu

Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote: > "Janky Jay, III" wrote: > > > By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail > > to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring > > a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly de

Re: cgiwrap version 4.1

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Vineyard.NET Administration wrote: > I've got a PCI compliance firm breathing down my neck about my version > of cgiwrap. Any plans to update the port to version 4.1? Would it be > helpful if I supplied the patch? The port is currently unmaintained (hence

Re: FreeBSD Port: devel/php5-spl

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:21:03AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: > There seems to be a problem compiling this port. > > --- > ===> Building for php5-spl-5.2.8 > /bin/sh /usr/ports/devel/php5-spl/work/php-5.2.8/ext/spl/libtool > --mode=compile cc -I. -I/usr/ports/devel/php5-spl/work/php-5.2.8/ext/sp

Re: RT 3.8?

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:46:04PM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Wesley Shields wrote: > >> There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to > >> have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree... > > > > Philip (pgollucci@)

Re: RT 3.8?

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:11:51AM -0800, Chris Meyer wrote: > Anyone out there working on a port of RT 3.8? > > The latest version in the tree is rt-3.6.7_1. > > There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to > have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree... P

Re: What happened to devel/php5-pcre?

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 02:25:38PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > I updated my ports tree today and pkg_version tells me: > > php5-pcre-5.2.6_2 > succeeds index (index has 5.2.5) > > Which was caused by an out-of-date index. When I run make index: > > Generating INDEX-6 - pl

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:12:34PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * G. Paul Ziemba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I, too, am happy with the idea of an administrator-specifiable parallel > > tree that would have the same structure as /usr/ports. So this approach > > involves, for the administra

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:14:20AM +, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Marshall) writes: > > >On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, 21:07 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > >> I think the most convenient way of implementing this is having > >> a directory hierarchy (either two level ${CATEGORY}/${

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 03:16:10PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:07:43PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > * G. Paul Ziemba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > In hopes of stimulating some discussion, I propose a new variable, >

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:07:43PM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * G. Paul Ziemba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > In hopes of stimulating some discussion, I propose a new variable, > > LOCAL_PATCHES (or maybe SITE_PATCHES), that would behave just like > > EXTRA_PATCHES, except that it would be

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:31:35PM +, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I sometimes have local patches that I need to apply to ports. For > various reasons, these patches are not available in the ports tree > (e.g., bug fixes could be still propagating, or I'm trying out a > bug fix locall

Re: Boost 1.37 released!

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 02:04:22AM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Hi folks! > > This is a status update on porting boost-1.37. It is finished. Port builds, > installs and deinstalls correctly. Currently I have a patch and port > tarball. Files can be downloaded from: > > boost-port-1_37_0.tar

Re: games/traindirector: Help reproduce problem on AMD

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:21:36PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:06:22PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:46:11 +0100 > [...] > > As usual...I forgot the attachment, sorry, here it is. This fixes it for me. I'll go ahead and commit this tonight.

Re: games/traindirector: Help reproduce problem on AMD

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:06:22PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > Download the package that should contain it from the link I gave you > > and verify if it is where it should be then. > > > > > The test machine I build is a very

Re: games/traindirector: Help reproduce problem on AMD

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:07:41 +0100 > Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > QAT reported me a problem with my port on AMD64. > > >

Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:38:52PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Wesley Shields wrote on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:36:23PM -0500: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should h

Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:30:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > >>> While we are talking, how do you guys thing I should handle this > > >>> problem: it's a binary port. There are different binaries for > > >>> FreeBSD-6.x, 7.x, 8.x > > >>> http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/relea

Re: How do conditionalize plist on $NOPORTDOCS (was: lang/cmucl - fails: install_error)

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > The problem mailed to me below is caused by NOPORTDOCS=yes > > The port's Makefile properly conditionalizes on it, but pkg-plist does not. > > How do I conditionalize ppk-list on NOPORTDOCS=yes? > > Makefile: > .if !defined(NOPOR

Re: ports/128754: [port infrastructure] implement master sites randomization

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:19:03PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:35:54PM +0100, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 03:23:50AM +, RW wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:56:16 +0300 (MSK) > > > I think it would be sensible to seed srand from a hash of som

Re: [www/sams] What's wrong with my patch?

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 11:14:16AM +0400, Yuriy Grishin wrote: > Hello, > > More than 2 weeks ago I tried to take maintainership of www/sams because > it hasn't been updated for a long time. > Current state : feedback. (but I've sent the file) > Could somebody please explain me what wrong with th

Re: devel/libcheck - fails: mtree

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:07:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > > The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on > 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" > and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the

Re: ports missing their packages.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:17:22AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00:50PM +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > > Presumably the 6.x series wlll be retired before 8.x is released... :) > > No, there will be an overlap. See > http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html#supported-br

Re: getting a game into the ports collection

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:08:08PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Haroon Khalid wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am working on a game which uses Ruby,Rubygame and SDL. If this game was a > > good demonstration of these applications and many people like it, how would > > I go about getting inf

Re: new reconfig-recursive target for ports

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:48PM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > > Seems like a rare case where someone would want to re-visit (in this > > manner) options they have already set. That said, it may come in handy. > > Yeah, I figured it can't *hurt* and might come in handy in a few > circumstances.

Re: new reconfig-recursive target for ports

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:28:43AM -0400, Josh Carroll wrote: > All, > > Note: I'm not currently subscribed to ports@, please cc: me on replies. > > I was wondering what peoples' thoughts are on a "reconfig-recursive" > target for ports? Basically, the same as config-recursive, but instead > of u

Re: www/vee

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:23:36PM -0500, B. Estrade wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:26:31PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:58:08AM -0500, B. Estrade wrote: > > > I am the author of www/vee, and when checking to see if it's been > > >

Re: www/vee

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:58:08AM -0500, B. Estrade wrote: > I am the author of www/vee, and when checking to see if it's been > upgraded to the latest I found out that there was no longer a > maintainer for this port. > > http://www.freshports.org/www/?page=19 > > I am interested in getting the

Re: Curious problem with MASTER_SITE_GOOGLE_CODE

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:28:56PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:52:25PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Peter Pentchev wrote: > >> > >>> That's... kinda weird. With what I see in bsd.sites.mk (rev. 1.455)

Re: pkg_add feature proposal

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:48:06AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 02:37:16PM +0300, Anton - Valqk wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> I've just got an Idea (maybe othe

Re: MOVED has extra blank line, breaks portupdate-scan

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:43:35AM -0500, Alex Stangl wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:38:34AM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > > > /usr/ports/MOVED picked up an extra blank line on the end, > > > > apparently in v1.1647. This breaks portupdate-scan, and maybe > > > > other things that process th

Re: ports/125452

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:16:48PM +0300, Vasiliy P. Melnik wrote: > Plees commit port sysutils/ldap-account-manager > > ports/125452 The PR was submitted on Wed, 9 Jul 2008. Please give lippe time to test it out and get it committed. Given that this is a volunteer effort and he may have other

Re: cvsup after upgrade to 6.3 coredump

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:20:40AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: > Can anyone help me out here.. > > Obviously I have missed something in the upgrade to 6.3 from 6.1 > > I seem to have a working system but cvsup is falling down. > Mail is working fine, so is kde. > > After upgrade from 6.1 to 6.

Re: ports from sourceforge

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:12:09AM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > At this moment fetching ports from sourceforge.net is very slow. (+/- > > 4000 Bps) > > Setting MASTER_SORT in /etc/make.conf might help. Have a look at > ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk. > > Since I'm living in Switzerland I use the followi

Re: please commit 124993 for cfengine-2.2.7

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:25:24PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:48:42AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > > cfengine hasn't had any updates for over a year now, as the maintainer > > is AWOL.I keep submitting patches but nobody commits them. > &g

Re: please commit 124993 for cfengine-2.2.7

On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 11:48:42AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > cfengine hasn't had any updates for over a year now, as the maintainer > is AWOL.I keep submitting patches but nobody commits them. > > The last update to 124993 contains a clean single patch from the > current ports tree to 2.2.7

Re: FreeBSD Port: nagios-3.0.2_1

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:03:38PM -0400, Frank Tavenner wrote: > Hello Jarrod, > > > When I read the long description from freebsd.org it said Nagios 3.0.2_1 > was here "Port description for net-mgmt/nagios-devel" but when I went > there on my freebsd 7.0 and installed it, I ended up with Nagio

Re: split the quagga ports to remove unstable patches from quagga port

o request that the port be split into two ports -- one with > >> a stock quagga installation, and the other with the MD5 checksum > >> patches, due to the instability and constant work on said patches > >> making the port unstable. (and being unavailable right now holds up > &

Re: split the quagga ports to remove unstable patches from quagga port

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:38:00AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > The current maintainer has indicated that he is holding up the quagga > 0.99.10 port until an unknown time when the TCP MD5 checksum patches > are again working in the tree. I don't think that this is the right > thing to do, as the

Re: regression-test

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:54:17AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > ... > > In particular, running tests of what duration would be considered > > appropriate? E.g., building audio/flac takes a minute here, running > > the tests sixteen, which I suspect would be exces

Re: regression-test

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:08:54PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > So I just learned that pointyhat tries to run a target regression-test > as part of the build. (Somebody asked me to use that target in a > port.) > > Is this documented somewhere? Not anywhere I know of, and it may be somet

Re: FreeBSD Port: squid_radius_auth-1.0.8

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:28:05PM +0200, Verbeek, Maarten wrote: > Hi, > > The 1.0.8 version is currently out of date and contains a bug. > could this be updated to the current version if you are still > maintaining the code? I was recently told that the current maintainers address bounces by s

Re: Commiting new ports

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote: > Hi, > > I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently > commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first > one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second > ma

<    1   2   3   4   5   >