Carlos A. M. dos Santos writes:
> BTW, I strongly believe that we, FreeBSD users, would be doing
> ourselves a big favour by using -- and helping to improve -- open
> source software that run natively on FreeBSD. Foreign options may
> work here and there but using them will ever be playing ca
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Frank Jahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:53 +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
>> On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
>> >> Peter Jeremy <
On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
>> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Recentry, wine is good solution for using Flash.
>
> I use this too.
So you use wine + windows_firef
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:53 +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
> On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
> >> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Recentry, wine is good solution for usin
On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recentry, wine is good solution for using Flash.
I use this too.
I'm going to cut the rest of the comment about whether lpw can be saved
or no
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> >linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
> Unfortuna
On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
>linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper is not a general replacement for
linuxpluginwrapper - it is mi
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:00 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
>
I agree, and have been using nspw for quite some time. Still, if lpw
remains in the ports tree, it ought
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Frank Jahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I updated my ports tree today, and a portsdb failed owing to
> linuxpluginwrapper. This seems to be because acroread7 is no longer in
> the ports tree, so the update fails. acroread7 is indeed in the
> makefile. You may w
I updated my ports tree today, and a portsdb failed owing to
linuxpluginwrapper. This seems to be because acroread7 is no longer in
the ports tree, so the update fails. acroread7 is indeed in the
makefile. You may wish to update the port for lpw.
Thanks for you attention!
Frank Jahnke
___
Hello,
I apologize for emailing you directly but we are
looking for a solution to the problem we are having.
When we attempt to build the port:
/usr/ports/java/jai
which depends on:
/usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper
we get the error:
newpdc# make install
===> Installing for jai-1.1.2_2
==
11 matches
Mail list logo
