Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote: In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between the two. More to the point, that using the

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/1/2015 3:28 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure >> this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or >> everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > The change that was made was having the default packages on releases point to > quarterly branch of the ports tree. This was noted in the release note. Yes, but that really only helps people who already understand version control. I'll try to come

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Roger Marquis
For the vast majority of ports and packages it won't make any difference whether they are installed are from head, quarterly and/or archives (in my experience, options dependencies aside). Isn't the issue here a dependency on the version of 'pkg' being enforced by 'pkg'? If so shouldn't this be

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Roger Marquis" writes: > For the vast majority of ports and packages it won't make any difference > whether they are installed are from head, quarterly and/or archives (in my > experience, options dependencies aside). Isn't the issue here a dependency on > the version of

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
I just went to svnweb.freebsd.org with Firefox web browser, and see the difference with branches of ports and base. I clicked on ports, then branches, then 2015Q3, then ports-mgmt, and see that the version of pkg is 1.5.6. But I use only the head branch. Quarterly ports branches are

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-28 21:31, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, make errors out with: ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 09/29/2015 02:12 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-28 21:31, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim >> wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to build and install

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Roger Marquis
Matthew Seaman wrote: > To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch > with ports compiled from head? If you use ports/pkgs from a consistent > source then you won't suffer from this problem. There are many reasons to use ports and many to use packages. These reasons are

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-29 08:24, Janky Jay, III wrote: I ran into this exact same issue using SVN and portmaster to upgrade 'git'. Upgrading 'pkg' using portmaster (portmaster -d 'pkg-1.5.6') before running 'portmaster -ad' fixed the issue. Generally, though, portmaster usually updates pkg first and

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/09/2015 21:34, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > The ports system was changed to make mandatory a version of pkg that was > not available by the default method. That's a POLA violation, but it > appears no one wants to talk about it. To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:34:23PM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-29 08:24, Janky Jay, III wrote: > > I ran into this exact same issue using SVN and portmaster to upgrade > > 'git'. Upgrading 'pkg' using portmaster (portmaster -d 'pkg-1.5.6') > > before running 'portmaster -ad' fixed

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, > make errors out with: > > ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater, > but you have 1.5.6. You must

Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-28 Thread Mel Pilgrim
I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, make errors out with: ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater, but you have 1.5.6. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port first. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in