On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:45:03 -0800
Darren Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy Pratt wrote:
> > Darren wrote:
> >>Andrew wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Asker wrote:
> >>>
> The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the
> connection with my Internet Servis
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:59:18AM +, P. U. Kruppa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a well working user ppp configuration, which I run
> manually by
> # ppp -nat -ddial adsl
> What is the simpliest way to start this automatically on boot up?
By adding the following lines into your /etc/rc.conf:
p
Hello,
i am newbie in freebsd. I have adaptec 2400A pci raid.
My freebsd 4.7 sucessful find it. I have da0 and da1
but have partitions on OpenBSD because before i
install freebsd i have openbsd. I can mount
da0s0c (first part of da0) and da1s0c (first part of
da1) but i unable to mount seconds par
Hi, I'm trying to install an additional lpt using PCI parallel port card NetMos
Nm9805CV.
The 4.7 kernel reports:
pci0: (vendor=0x9710, dev=0x9805) at 20.0 irq 11
How can I use it?
Thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the
malcolm kay wrote:
Finarfin wrote:
I have a 'virgin' install of 4.7. When I boot, all the text mode stuff
I want runs fine. I would like to show some stuff to others using X,
but it won't start.
In my /etc/ttys file, I had the following line installed by the
installation process:
ttyv8 "/u
Randy Pratt wrote:
Darren wrote:
Andrew wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Asker wrote:
The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the
connection with my Internet Servise Provider.
Well if the modem does PPPoE itself (and preusmably NAT) then you need no
speical support fr
Hi!
I have a well working user ppp configuration, which I run
manually by
# ppp -nat -ddial adsl
What is the simpliest way to start this automatically on boot up?
Thanks,
Uli.
*---*
*Peter Ulrich Kruppa*
* - Wuppertal - *
*
Darren wrote:
>Andrew wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Asker wrote:
>>>The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the
>>>connection with my Internet Servise Provider.
>>
>> Well if the modem does PPPoE itself (and preusmably NAT) then you need no
>> speical support from the
Hello,
I am having some difficulties moving FreeBSD to another machine. I moved
the hard drive from a machine with a normal (NE2000) nic to a machine with
a D-Link USB to Ethernet adapter. First I ran /stand/sysinstall to set up
the aue interface (and then had to remove the old interface from r
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:03:48PM -0700, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
>
> > Several weeks ago someone posted the location of a spam
> > list for sendmail's /etc/mail/access file. I understand
> > the file was large... but that makes no difference!
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 23:50, Daniel Schrock wrote:
> Dmitrii PapaGeorgio wrote:
> > Running FreeBSD 4.7 - I configured etc/ttys to point to GDM but the
> > screen says it can't find the config file when it first boots. Am I
> > missing something here?
> >
> > Thanks-
> >
>
> yea, don't use /et
| Bloated in the sense of complexity. My script is one file; I install it by
| changing one line in /etc/mail/aliases. Procmail cannot compete with that.
It's . . . an illusory simplicity, I suspect. But that's okay; it's something
everyone has to learn once in a while. :) Procmail has some r
Dmitrii PapaGeorgio wrote:
Running FreeBSD 4.7 - I configured etc/ttys to point to GDM but the
screen says it can't find the config file when it first boots. Am I
missing something here?
Thanks-
yea, don't use /etc/ttys for this.
cd /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d
cp gdm.sh.sample gdm.sh
ls -la #verify
> Someone from the Netherlands sent me a pps file. Anyone know what
> type of file that is?
Microsoft Power point?
Rick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Someone from the Netherlands sent me a pps file. Anyone know what
type of file that is?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Mxsmanic wrote:
> *** There's nothing wrong with reinventing procmail like this, but I'm
> curious why you consider it "bloated"--it's under 64K on my system. ***
>
> Bloated in the sense of complexity. My script is one file; I install it by
> changing one line in /etc/mail/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven Lake
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cups vulnerability (ala Slashdot)
>
>
> Hi all. Just checking in with the experts. Read about
> t
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Gary D Kline wrote:
> Several weeks ago someone posted the location of a spam
> list for sendmail's /etc/mail/access file. I understand
> the file was large... but that makes no difference! I'd
> just like to filter out most of the spam I've been get
tis a good reason to use one of the pppoe speaking routers/nat boxes.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Pilgrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: FTP installation from the floppie
Andrew wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Asker wrote:
The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the
connection with my Internet Servise Provider.
Well if the modem does PPPoE itself (and preusmably NAT) then you need no
speical support from the OS. From its poitn of view yo
Hi People,
Several weeks ago someone posted the location of a spam
list for sendmail's /etc/mail/access file. I understand
the file was large... but that makes no difference! I'd
just like to filter out most of the spam I've been getting.
Does a
Hi all. Just checking in with the experts. Read about this
potential root exploit vulnerability on slashdot about the CUPS printing
system in unix and wanted to see if it was anything to worry about or no.
Here's the advisory: http://www.idefense.com/advisory/12.19.02.txt
Just
*** There's nothing wrong with reinventing procmail like this, but I'm
curious why you consider it "bloated"--it's under 64K on my system. ***
Bloated in the sense of complexity. My script is one file; I install it by
changing one line in /etc/mail/aliases. Procmail cannot compete with that.
I
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Mxsmanic wrote:
> I finally got it to work by piping to sendmail. Seems to be adequate for
> what I want to do.
>
> Now all I have to do is design my patented, foolproof methodology for
> distinguishing spam from real mail so that I can encode the rules in the
> script. The
these cards seem like piecesosheeyat, on linux the ne2000 driver works, but
I still wouldnt do it.
Bri
- Original Message -
From: "BigBrother (BigB3)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: Slow network - ed driver, Realtek 8
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: denied packet, where?
Thanks for the quick reply!
> > How quaint! Today, one of the (standard) daily security scripts
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:02:56PM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Is there a cure for the upgrade of Bison failing for some time now, at
> least on my 4.6.2 boxes?
Upgrade to a later version, or manually install the new texinfo
version upon which bison depends.
Kris
msg12668/pgp0.pgp
> How quaint! Today, one of the (standard) daily security scripts returned
> this:
>
> test-server denied packets:
> test-server kernel log messages:
> > 1 READY ad6: 39205MB [79656/16/63] at ata3-master
> UDMA133
>
> I take it that had to go to /var/log/messages? Which would mean I a
How quaint! Today, one of the (standard) daily security scripts returned
this:
test-server denied packets:
test-server kernel log messages:
> 1 READY ad6: 39205MB [79656/16/63] at ata3-master
UDMA133
I take it that had to go to /var/log/messages? Which would mean I am
inadvertently
Probably intended for the list
-Forwarded Message-
>
> For the purpose of answering my own question if someone is reading
> through the old posts the unprivileged port because of NAT was solved by
> adding the -n option to mountd.
>
> Although I find it kind of interesting that the docu
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 03:59, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> Does nfs_reserved_port_only really make NFS that much more secure? Or is
> this more of a depricated option.
Doesn't really help. It's slightly more secure in an environment where
you don't fully trust your users, but all it does is require the
co
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 07:07:49PM +, William Palfreman wrote:
> How can I allow Xfree86 to listen for network connections again? I
> certainly used to have no problem doing this, and I don't see anything
> about this specific and probably very simple problem in the handbook or
> googling.
>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:30:42PM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
> Using pserver in cvs for local software projects between multiple
> FreeBSD machines. All of recent to most-recent -stable. Have noticed
> the past 6 months a number of runaway CVS processes sucking 100% CPU
> time if they could get it.
On 2002-12-19 16:19, "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:59 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> >Quick fix:
> >> > # chmod 0750 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh
> >>
> >> Pardon moir for chiming in here, but I have noticed 3 different posts about
> >> the proper ch
>
> Please help
>
> I want to move my /var dir on to another file system but when I try to
> remove the /var dir all other dirs are deleted but the /var/empty dir
> will not delete. I am new at this but have tried to use the chmod
> commands but can still not remove this dir please help
Probably
Please help
I want to move my /var dir on to another file system but when I try to
remove the /var dir all other dirs are deleted but the /var/empty dir
will not delete. I am new at this but have tried to use the chmod
commands but can still not remove this dir please help
To Unsubscribe: send m
At 11:59 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>On 2002-12-19 15:45, "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> >> Local Package Initialization : (skipping smbfsstartup.sh, not
>> >> executable).
>> >
>> >Quick fix:
>> >
>> >#
I've got a FreeBSD machine at home with a 4mm tape drive that I have tar'd
files as follows:
tar cvf /dev/sa0 /usr/home/me/project
and it works just fine as you might expect. I also have an Win2k machine at
work that I perform the same operation on,
tar cvf /dev/st0 /usr/home/me/project
and it
=
Best regards
Hyun J. Sohn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Is there a cure for the upgrade of Bison failing for some time now, at
least on my 4.6.2 boxes?
Thanks,
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On 2002-12-19 15:45, "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> Local Package Initialization : (skipping smbfsstartup.sh, not
> >> executable).
> >
> >Quick fix:
> >
> > # chmod 0750 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh
>
> Pardon moi
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2002-12-19 08:59, Adam Lofstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
before the
At 07:25 PM 12.19.2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>On 2002-12-19 08:59, Adam Lofstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
>> have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
>> before the network is initi
Using pserver in cvs for local software projects between multiple
FreeBSD machines. All of recent to most-recent -stable. Have noticed
the past 6 months a number of runaway CVS processes sucking 100% CPU
time if they could get it. Never knew how to create this situation
until recently.
"cvs update
On 2002-12-19 08:59, Adam Lofstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
> have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
> before the network is initialized), I have created a startup script
> (smbfsstartup.sh
On 2002-12-19 02:50, Aaron Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an application that simply logs in as another user and runs
> "screen -x". The problem I am having with the followin code is that
> the results of execution is a message from (I am guessing the shell)
> saying that I dont have acc
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:50:15PM +0200, Juha Erkkila wrote:
> it seems i can't send mail to anyone locally. shouldn't
> sendmail do this?
>
Do you have ^Cw localhost in sendmail.cf? If not, that may be
an issue. (Remember to kill -HUP sendmail.pid before retrying.
g
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:35:42PM +1030, Rob wrote:
>
> I've only used ipfw for a little while, but there's a few things I can
> suggest here.
>
> * A good diagnostic for your rules is
>
> ipfw list
>
> Run this after adding a list of rules, and it shows you how they were
> translat
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fernando
> Gleiser
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: Dennis Mathiasen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Dedicated Mail Server
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Dennis Mathiasen wrote:
>
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Dennis Mathiasen wrote:
> I'm looking at setting up a dedicated mail server with lots
> of virtual domains and users.
>
> It's looking like qmail + vpopmail might work ok. Does
> anyone have experience using these in a heavy load
> environment with good / bad results?
Define
Please ...
- Give a meaningful Subject: field, if you don't want people to delete
your message before reading it.
- Don't top post replies..put replies at the end of a message or
interspersed in the text if appropriate. As in life things generally go
beginning, middle, end .. and not vice-versa
How can I allow Xfree86 to listen for network connections again? I
certainly used to have no problem doing this, and I don't see anything
about this specific and probably very simple problem in the handbook or
googling.
I'm running an X server on my workstation (Xfree86 4.1) on my
workstation (Fr
I mean nfs_privport="YES" and vfs.nfs.nfs_privport=1
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 12:30, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> I'm attempting to mount an NFS share between a commputer and a virtual
> machine running on another computer on the network (with vmware). The
> trouble is the vm is running over briged network
I'm attempting to mount an NFS share between a commputer and a virtual
machine running on another computer on the network (with vmware). The
trouble is the vm is running over briged networking with the NAT in
vmware. I think this is causing the problem where I am seeing
Dec 19 12:14:02 lobo mount
this should do it :
# $FreeBSD: ports/net/isc-dhcp3/files/rc.isc-dhcpd.conf.sample,v 1.1
2001/10/15 13:33:15 roam Exp $
#
# isc-dhcpd startup configuration file.
#
dhcpd_options=""; # command option(s)
dhcpd_ifaces="dc0"; # ethernet interfa
I'm looking at setting up a dedicated mail server with lots
of virtual domains and users.
It's looking like qmail + vpopmail might work ok. Does
anyone have experience using these in a heavy load
environment with good / bad results?
Dennis Mathiasen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does nfs_reserved_port_only really make NFS that much more secure? Or is
this more of a depricated option.
Ryan
--
Ryan "leadZERO" Sommers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 1019590 AIM/MSN: leadZERO
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the
Hi
My dhcpd config file is as follows:
greeneville# vi /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf
# $FreeBSD: ports/net/isc-dhcp3/files/rc.isc-dhcpd.conf.sample,v 1.1
2001/10/15 13:33:15 roam Exp $
#
# isc-dhcpd startup configuration file.
#
dhcpd_options=""; # command option(s)
dh
>
> Is your script executable?
Doh!! No it wasn't. That did the trick, thanks a lot!
>
> Try:
>
> chown root:wheel /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh
> chmod 744 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smbfsstartup.sh
>
> - Barry
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebs
Thanks Shane I think you may be right, I am on a budget and am using the
original cd drive forma dell pentium 2, I will try a new drive and if
that doesnt fix it then I will try the secondary IDE channel then the
ide adapter if that still causes errors then I will just go buy th dual
pentium 3 boar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think that I have seen problems like this before as well, unrelated to
the software. Typiclly when something has not worked in the install, it
was due to faluty or broken hardware. Is your system pretty old? Maybe
the CDROM is flaky?
I have just
I installed the last box the same way.
I selecte d preconfigured package even and I get the same error , my cd
works becasue I used it on the last machine too?
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Roman Neuhauser
wrote:
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:09:51 +0100
> From: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mark
G D McKee wrote:
Hi
I have been running this for a while and I get the following error every
time I start dhcpd as below. If I hit enter at the password if goes past
and dies. If I kill it off at boot I can do a dhcpd and the server starts
up fine. How can I resolve this - it is a pain when I
Hi
I have been running this for a while and I get the following error every
time I start dhcpd as below. If I hit enter at the password if goes past
and dies. If I kill it off at boot I can do a dhcpd and the server starts
up fine. How can I resolve this - it is a pain when I reboot the box and
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:59, Adam Lofstedt wrote:
> Hello wise ones,
>
> I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
> have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
> before the network is initialized), I have created a startup script
> (smbf
Adam Lofstedt wrote:
Hello wise ones,
I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
before the network is initialized),
i have not used smbfs, but nfs filesystems mount just fine from
/etc/fstab
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Lofstedt
> I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
> have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
> before the network is initialized), I
Hello wise ones,
I am trying to mount a windows share at boot with mount_smbfs. Since I
have to use the noauto option in fstab (filesystems in fstab are mounted
before the network is initialized), I have created a startup script
(smbfsstartup.sh) and placed it in /usr/local/etc/rc.d:
case "$1" i
>
> > > I dont know what this option means - does this matter?
> > >
> > > -B Install the `boot0' boot manager. This option causes MBR
> > > code to
> > > be replaced, without affecting the embedded slice table.
> >
> > Sounds like just what you said you wanted.
>
>
>
>
Sorry if this was verified before but this output from the boot0cfg
command - looks okay right?
typhoon# boot0cfg -B -v -b /mnt/ad2-root/boot/boot0 /dev/ad2
# flag start chs type end chs offset size
1 0x80 0: 1: 1 0xa5464: 15:63 63150136497
> > I dont know what this option means - does this matter?
> >
> > -B Install the `boot0' boot manager. This option causes MBR
> > code to
> > be replaced, without affecting the embedded slice table.
>
> Sounds like just what you said you wanted.
Hi Jerry,
What does "wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Juha Erkkila wrote:
> hello again,
>
> i installed FreeBSD 4.7, and it seems i can't get a ppp connection
> to my ISP to work.
> aot# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> cat: /etc/resolv.conf: No such file or directory
I'm certainly no exper
On Thursday 19 December 2002 18:28, Brian Henning wrote:
> i am in the process of making a new cd out of another cd that bootable. The
> problem is that i want to make the new cd bootable just like the old one.
> Using dd how can i copy the boot section of the bootable cd and write it to
> the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>I'm having a problem with slow transfers to my FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE box
>using a D-Link 528CT
>(Realtek 8029 chipset). When I try to upload files to this machine from a
>windowsXP box, I only
>get about 30KB/s on the 10BaseT cat 5 network. This ident
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:17:37PM +0200, Patrick Holahan wrote:
> Hey Barry,
>
> > > Hi guys & gals..
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get cvs to work on my BSD 4.6-RELEASE system.. and
> > > I'd like to
> > > make it easier to use for the clients loggin on.
> > > So what I'd like to do is set the CVSRO
At 09:59 AM 12.19.2002 -0500, John Straiton wrote:
>Yeah thanks for the suggestions! I just wish I could figure out why it
>is that on my existing machine it keeps giving me an error of "Root web
>owned by priviledged user" even though it's all owned by "www" with a
>userid/groupid of 80, which is
i am in the process of making a new cd out of another cd that bootable. The
problem is that i want to make the new cd bootable just like the old one.
Using dd how can i copy the boot section of the bootable cd and write it to
the new iso image? can i use dd for this or is there another way of doing
Hey Barry,
> > Hi guys & gals..
> >
> > I'm trying to get cvs to work on my BSD 4.6-RELEASE system.. and
> > I'd like to
> > make it easier to use for the clients loggin on.
> > So what I'd like to do is set the CVSROOT variable to /usr/local/cvsroot
> >
> > However, when I try set this in .profil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Holahan
> Hi guys & gals..
>
> I'm trying to get cvs to work on my BSD 4.6-RELEASE system.. and
> I'd like to
> make it easier to use for the clients loggin on.
> So what I'd like to do is se
Hi guys & gals..
I'm trying to get cvs to work on my BSD 4.6-RELEASE system.. and I'd like to
make it easier to use for the clients loggin on.
So what I'd like to do is set the CVSROOT variable to /usr/local/cvsroot
However, when I try set this in .profile like so:
CVSROOT=/usr/local/cvsroot; ex
At 09:28 AM 12.19.2002 -0500, John Straiton wrote:
>Search the mailing list. It was just last week that I was running a
>thread on this.
>
>I couldn't find a way to get mod_frontpage hacked into my existing
>setup. I tried several times. Even going so far as to deinstall
>everything, then rm -r the
Search the mailing list. It was just last week that I was running a
thread on this.
I couldn't find a way to get mod_frontpage hacked into my existing
setup. I tried several times. Even going so far as to deinstall
everything, then rm -r the directories, then reinstalling and only
copying over my
it seems i can't send mail to anyone locally. shouldn't
sendmail do this?
aot% date
Thu Dec 19 14:46:26 EET 2002
aot% mail -s test je@localhost
i think this should work, but it doesn't. no mail for me!
EOT
aot% mail
No mail for je
aot% su
Password:
aot# mailq -Ac
/var/spool/clien
hello again,
i installed FreeBSD 4.7, and it seems i can't get a ppp connection
to my ISP to work. i didn't have this problem with FreeBSD 4.3,
(and don't have in linux), so i guess i must have done something
differently this time :-/ here's some info on my configuration:
aot# hostname
aot
aot
hello there,
just installed FreeBSD 4.7, and i appear to have a problem with my
sound card. playing CDs through it with cdcontrol works fine, and
i can use a mixer progran (`mixer'), but if i try to use /dev/dsp
in any way, i get this:
aot% play one_hand_clapping.wav
pcm0:play:0: play interrupt
There seems to be archive posts already on the subject, the most
informative of them is here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1093170+1102546+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010923.freebsd-stable
Did this issue got solved somehow? More specifically, how the size of the
FFS
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-17 18:37:34 -0800:
>
> Here is the end of the output from 'ipfw show':
>
> 04000 0 0 deny log ip from any to any
> 65535 91 8227 deny ip from any to any
>
> Can anyone explain why the last rule is getting hit? I was under the
> impression that the rules
provide a better (more descriptive and specific) subject, please.
you'll greatly improve your chances of getting a reply.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-19 06:22:55 +:
> I am trying to install BSD 4.6(power pak retail version)
> I select the custom feature form the standard instalation
# Inside Interface (ipfw)
[IPFW] add 200 allow tcp from any to any out xmit via dc0 keep-state
[IPFW] add 200 allow icmp from any to any out xmit via dc0 keep-state
[IPFW] add deny ip from any to any out xmit via dc0
[IPFW] add 200 allow tcp from any to any in recv via dc0 keep-state
[IPFW] add
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you wrote:
> Here is the end of the output from 'ipfw show':
> 04000 0 0 deny log ip from any to any
> 65535 91 8227 deny ip from any to any
> Can anyone explain why the last rule is getting hit? I was under the
> impression that the rules are travers
Ronan Lucio wrote:
There are some kind of packets that isn´t IP packets.
I don´t known exactly whichs, but a good read in
man tcpdump
man ipfw
man bridge
will make you make you undestand it better
Ronan
I don't know how it's in ipfw, but ipf uses the last matching rule if no
"quick" keyword
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mxsmanic
> I finally got it to work by piping to sendmail. Seems to be adequate for
> what I want to do.
>
> Now all I have to do is design my patented, foolproof methodology for
> distinguishing spa
I finally got it to work by piping to sendmail. Seems to be adequate for
what I want to do.
Now all I have to do is design my patented, foolproof methodology for
distinguishing spam from real mail so that I can encode the rules in the
script. There must be a way! Also, this may allow me to do s
[InternetShortcut]
URL=http://empal.empas.com/kr/attachfile_down3.tsp/%C7%F6%B4%EB%C4%AB%B5%E52.htm?sid=3DF45635&skey=592F2C55&usn=hCyKlBNzUwOTYyM&up=R__cUiMTA-IjA1PiE5Mz4hMDAw&msn=zcRHlgeGBsY&asn=2&name=%C7%F6%B4%EB%C4%AB%B5%E52.htm
Modified=A037DD6A5E9FC201DE
__
There are some kind of packets that isn´t IP packets.
I don´t known exactly whichs, but a good read in
man tcpdump
man ipfw
man bridge
will make you make you undestand it better
Ronan
>
> Here is the end of the output from 'ipfw show':
>
> 04000 0 0 deny log ip from any to any
> 65535 91
Steven,
I suggest you Postfix + SMTP AUTH
You will find the howto´s in Postfix homepage at http://www.postfix.org
Ronan
> Hi. Got a slight problem. I'd like to do an SMTP system that
> allows up to 100 users a second to authenticate to the system using the
> simplest means possible. I'd like
jn Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:43:13AM -0800, Matthew E. Boyce wrote:
>Well here is the problem: I downloaded the
> OpenOffice1.0 for FreeBSD (it might be 1.0.1 but it doesn't seem to think
> so) and ran the installer... so far so good... it installs with a pretty
> installer ( a so very wind
Hello list
I have an application that simply logs in as another user
and runs "screen -x". The problem I am having with the
followin code is that the results of execution is a message
from (I am guessing the shell) saying that I dont have access
to the "/dev/ttyp?" where ? is the current virtual t
On 4.7-STABLE, cvsup as of 4 Dec 02, with the ports updated, I build
openldap2 and try and start it. Nothing happens. Couple of hours of poking
around, checking man pages and the OpenLDAP project web site and still
nothing. Then I cd to /usr/ports/net/openldap2/work/openldap-2.0.25/tests
and make t
Hi,
Despite the increased KVA space (2G now) and the perfect patch of the
pthreads mechanism made by David, the server's lock-ups persist.
Comparing this server's vmstat output with some other's which doesn't have
the similar problem, I noticed that the FFS node value seems to be
abnormally high -
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo