Hello all!
I'm testing setting lower MTU on loopback interfaces to avoid some MTU
problems with IPSEC in a path of traffic.
ifconfig lo1 create
ifconfig lo1 mtu 1300
ifconfig lo1 5.5.5.5/32
# ifconfig lo1
lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 1300
inet 5.5.5.5 netmask 0x
#ifconfig em0
em
I am trying to connect my FreeBSD 8.1 system to a FreeNAS server
hosting an iSCSI drive. I can successfully connect if I disable header
and data digests, but can't seem to get a connection using header and
data digests to succeed. I know the FreeNAS side is correct because I
was able to conn
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
Recently I noticed that somehow I am on apr-0.9.19.0.9.19. On my old
box, I was on apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db47-1.4.2.1.3.10.
See the 20100518 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Well, the apr one,
anyway.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
2011/2/24 Warren Block :
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
Is FreeBSD now "HAL" free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
activated via "/etc/rc.conf" If it is not needed, I would be happy to
remove the entry.
It's not a requirement. Yo
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
>>> http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensof
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
>>
>> --
>> Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
>> http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com
>>
>
> btw, would you stop
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:23PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> >
>> > it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
>> >
>> > if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the same p
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:23PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> >
> > it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
> >
> > if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the same person
>
> I see. Suggesting that slinging insults makes
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:57:08PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> > >
> > > That wasn't me. I could make some insulting references to failings
> > > of yours that resulted in this mistake on your part, but I really
> > > do not think that's necessa
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> You are naught but a troll. Killfiled.
actually im the only person that bothered explaining the 2 noobs at
the start of the thread how shell works
then a buncha jokers started talking about tcsh
you are the trolls that aren't contributing e
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>
> it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
>
> if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the same person
I see. Suggesting that slinging insults makes him retarded.
You are naught but a troll. Killfiled.
--
Chad Perrin [ o
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> >
> > That wasn't me. I could make some insulting references to failings of
> > yours that resulted in this mistake on your part, but I really do not
> > think that's necessary. It is much more fun to just watch you
> > self-destruct.
>
> it d
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:36:53PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
>> wrote:
>> > Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
>> >
>> > [snip]
>> >>
>> >> no, let's start by looking at the SOU
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:09:21PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> >>
>> >> the author of vi, who is also the author of c
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:36:53PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> > Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> >
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of
> >> WIKIPEDIA you DROOLING BUF
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:14:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a
> > lot of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a
> > point via logical argument and p
On 24 February 2011 17:39, Chip Camden wrote:
. . .
> Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
> would prefer that the standard shell be at least Bourne-compatible. I
> use csh for root for all the reasons that you shouldn't change your root
> shell. I suppose I coul
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:09:21PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> >>
> >> the author of vi, who is also the author of csh regards it as poor code
> >
> > Good for him.
>
> let's
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of WIKIPEDIA
>> you DROOLING BUFFOON
>>
> [snip]
>
>> if you disagree then you are retarded and the exchange co
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
[snip]
>
> no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of WIKIPEDIA
> you DROOLING BUFFOON
>
[snip]
> if you disagree then you are retarded and the exchange concludes
>
[snip]
Resorting to personal insults doesn't help ma
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a lot
> of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a point via
> logical argument and presentation of evidence:
>
> Start with the Wikipedia page comparing comma
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> >
>> > So far, your complaints translate to "Well, sure, for every concrete
>> > (t)csh problem I've identified, mksh has
I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a lot
of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a point via
logical argument and presentation of evidence:
Start with the Wikipedia page comparing command shells [0]. Look through
the various tables there -- feel
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > So far, your complaints translate to "Well, sure, for every concrete
> > (t)csh problem I've identified, mksh has similar problems, but it's
> > better because I like it."
>
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:15:22 -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> funny how you point out trivialities and go on to mention one yourself
For an interactive command line shell, it's the "trivialities"
that count - for _me_, which indicates that other persons may
have very different preferences and requir
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten wrote:
>> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period.
>> It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
>> It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% sec
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> > Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> > >
> > > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It
> > > does everything you can possibly think of today an
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backtick versus $()
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:00:11PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten wrote:
>> > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does
>> > everything you can possibly think of today a
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten wrote:
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period.
> It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
> It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure.
> It doesn't use any memory or other resources, $
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> >
> > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It
> > does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It
> > doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:00:11PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten wrote:
> > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does
> > everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
> > require any upgrades, ever.
Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does
> everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't require
> any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any memory or other
> resources, $hit,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten wrote:
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does
> everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
> require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any
> memory or other resources, $hit
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:18:03PM -0600, Gary Gatten wrote:
>
> Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does
> everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
> require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any
> memory or other reso
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:42:18PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
>
> mksh is better than tcsh for everything
Thank you for your opinion, but it's just an opinion with no explanation,
logic, or evi
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Polytropon
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:13 PM
To: Chad Perrin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backtick versus $()
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:54:25 -0700
Hello Andres Perera,
Am 2011-02-20 22:19:49, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> that's not true
:-D
> echo `echo 1\`echo 2\\\`echo 3\\\`echo 4\\\`\\\`\``
Backslash Orgies!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:54:25 -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I've read it before. Who hasn't?
> >
> > I haven't. :-)
>
> While reading it, just keep this in mind:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
mksh is better than tcsh for everything
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer
> wrote:
> >
> > I've read it before. Who hasn't?
>
> I haven't. :-)
While reading it, just keep this in mind:
It's about "programming" in csh. It's not about using csh as an
interact
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:58:34 -0800, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Thanks for that -- though I'll go with:
>
> set -o vi
>
> TYVM. I didn't know /bin/sh supported those modes.
It's hardly known as /bin/sh is _not_ used for interactive
comunication regularly, as it's basically the system's
standard sc
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:39:24PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> >
> > What we have not yet determined is:
> >
> > 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
>
> Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
> would prefer tha
Quoth Matthew Seaman on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
> On 24/02/2011 22:39, Chip Camden wrote:
> > I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't even
> > have command recall.
>
> set -o emacs
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
> --
> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
On 24/02/2011 22:39, Chip Camden wrote:
> I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't even
> have command recall.
set -o emacs
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:34:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Chad Perrin apotheon.com> writes:
> >
> > 1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct.
>
> No.
Why do you substitute others' email messages for an actual, direct
response to my question, then?
> >
> >
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer wrote:
> (New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
> tcsh, so it is a good idea to be compatible when posting stuff to the
> mailing lists, etc. if possible. There was something on the ports@
> list a while back, about PRs fo
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
>
> What we have not yet determined is:
>
> 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
>
> --
> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
would pr
Chad Perrin apotheon.com> writes:
> 1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct.
No.
> 2. You don't like (t)csh.
No. I just point out it’s not a suitable scripting shell.
> 3. You think your opinions are so self-evident that everybody will just
> immediately underst
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:59:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Chad Perrin apotheon.com> writes:
>
> > > That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
> > > did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
> >
> > What exactly is "the sensible thing"?
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb
Chad Perrin apotheon.com> writes:
> > That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
> > did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
>
> What exactly is "the sensible thing"?
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/user/
user.c.diff?r1=1.116&r2=1.117&only_with_tag=MAIN
http://
On 24 February 2011 16:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Rob Farmer predatorlabs.net> writes:
>
>> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
>
> tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
> interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered
> at that, but…
>
>
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:36:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Rob Farmer dixit:
> >
> >(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
> >tcsh
>
> That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
> did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
What exactly is "the sen
Gentlemen,
I think I have it!
https://www.antagonism.org/web/squid-proxy.shtml
The key is to add:
cache_peer localhost parent 8118 0 default no-query no-digest no-netdb-exchange
never_direct allow all
to the squid.conf file (/usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf) and have
squid re-read its .conf file
Rob Farmer dixit:
>(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
>tcsh
That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
Even then, I tend to disagree here. There’s the common use of
‘% ’ and ‘$ ’ (and ‘# ’ but we use sudo(8)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Rob Farmer predatorlabs.net> writes:
>
>> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
>
> tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
> interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered
> at that, but
can "sticky keys" (SHIFT. ALT and CTRL hold until the next key is pressed) be
enabled in x11-input.fdi? I wish to enable this accessibility option without
resorting to KDE or GNOME.
==
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:02:22 -0800
> Rob Farmer articulated:
>
>> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
>>
>> [rfarmer@sapphire] ~> echo $(date )
>> Illegal variable name.
>
> Since I use Bash as my default shell, I never suffer f
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:02:22 -0800
Rob Farmer articulated:
> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
>
> [rfarmer@sapphire] ~> echo $(date )
> Illegal variable name.
Since I use Bash as my default shell, I never suffer from that problem.
I was wondering if anyone had ever files
Rob Farmer predatorlabs.net> writes:
> Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered
at that, but…
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
bye,
//mirab
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Andres Perera zoho.com> writes:
>
>> "mandated by posix" and reality usually aren't in sync, as i'm sure you know
> by
>
> In this case, closely enough.
>
>> now since you pointed out solaris
>
> It’s just /bin/sh on long outdated version
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:09:04 -0800
Ed Flecko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
> I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
> fine.
>
...
> and I've added:
>
> listen-address 127.0.0.1:8118
>
> and
>
> forwar
On 02/24/2011 10:09 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for
On 02/24/2011 10:09 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for
Thanks Berk,
Nope...no dice, that won't work either.
More suggestions???
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@f
Andres Perera zoho.com> writes:
> "mandated by posix" and reality usually aren't in sync, as i'm sure you know
by
In this case, closely enough.
> now since you pointed out solaris
It’s just /bin/sh on long outdated versions (newer ones, both
from Horracle and not, have AT&T ksh93 there instea
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> Sounded like a good idea to me but ;)
>
> pkg_deinstall hal-0.5.14_12
> ---> Deinstalling 'hal-0.5.14_12'
> pkg_delete: package 'hal-0.5.14_12' is required by these other packages
That list is recursive - kdelibs4 depends on hal, then o
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Andres Perera zoho.com> writes:
>
>> > Nowadays all shells supports $() so I advise you to use it :).
>>
>> no, not all shells support $()
>
> They do, it’s mandated by POSIX. There’s no reason to support the
> accidentally non-combining a
Gary Kline thought.org> writes:
> For instance, say that my xterm/console/"Konsole" is 80x53 lines.
> My text file is around 200 lines long and I want to use more or less
> or some GUI pager to display only 15 lines at one time. Tapping the
> space bar would display another 15 lines and so on u
Andres Perera zoho.com> writes:
> > Nowadays all shells supports $() so I advise you to use it :).
>
> no, not all shells support $()
They do, it’s mandated by POSIX. There’s no reason to support the
accidentally non-combining accent gravis (so-called “backtick”¹)
any more, unless you specifica
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for each request Privoxy let through.
debug 1
Through the years I have become accustomed to having to have a hardware
modem. 7.2 sio correctly identifies my modem as a 3-COM PCI FAX/MODEM
and correct identifies the chip as 16550A.
In 8.1 uart calls the same device an unstandard ns8250 uart. Nonetheless,
tun0 can fireup at boot. But it is
2011/2/24 Warren Block :
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
>
>> Is FreeBSD now "HAL" free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
>> activated via "/etc/rc.conf" If it is not needed, I would be happy to
>> remove the entry.
>
> It's not a requirement. You can build xorg-server without it,
Thank you all, for your timely reply..
To answer Niko's question: Just i'm doing some performance/stress testing of
a freebsd router.. :-)
-Sumi
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
>>
>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Bill Tillman wrote:
> Yes, but in the good ol' USA it's all about the money. They will not let me do
> anything like this unless I pay more to upgrade my service. The wierd thing is
> that once in a blue moon my IP address will change. Then I can send e-mail
> for
On 24 February 2011 11:09, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
> I recently moved my server to a new box and in the process of doing
> that, I upgraded from FreeBSD 7.3 to 8.1.
>
> When I say I moved, I mean I backed up all my personal data (databases,
> config values, etc.), made a list of all packages, an
On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in freeB
I recently moved my server to a new box and in the process of doing
that, I upgraded from FreeBSD 7.3 to 8.1.
When I say I moved, I mean I backed up all my personal data (databases,
config values, etc.), made a list of all packages, and installed an
identical box with the same pacakges.
Recently
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
Is FreeBSD now "HAL" free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
activated via "/etc/rc.conf" If it is not needed, I would be happy to
remove the entry.
It's not a requirement. You can build xorg-server without it, and there
are other mechanisms avail
Sysctl -a lists "all" options. This MAY be what you want:
net.inet.ip.rtmaxcache
- Upper limit on dynamically learned routes
http://people.freebsd.org/~hmp/utilities/satbl/sysctl-net.html
HTH
Gary
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-que
Excerpt from freedesktop.org mailing list:
Also, "is going away" is a bit of an understatement, it's really quite
dead. GNOME switched over a year ago, KDE and XFCE finished the
transition a couple of months back (see [1]). The major distros don't
even install it by default any more, or at least
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
> Hi,
> Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
> be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
> In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
> parameter in freeBSD?
>
> Your earliest reply in this r
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in freeBSD?
Your earliest reply in this regard is much appreciated.
Thanks for any inputs
On 02/24/11 06:05, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[Snip mergemaster options discussion.]
Doing this certainly works for me -- frequently the only file I get
asked about is /etc/motd
And if you don't care about updating /etc/motd (the first line is
automagically updated every boot anyway) add
IGNORE_
On 24/02/2011 07:05, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 23/02/2011 22:14, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
David Demelier writes:
I also noticed that even with the -F flag, mergemaster still asks for
files that only differs by CVS id, see :
-# $FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc,v 1.37.2.2.2.1
2010/06/14
85 matches
Mail list logo
