On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Ricardo Jesus
wrote:
> Espartano wrote:
>>
>> Hi folk, sorry for my bat english, i have a question:
>>
>> there is any initiative to implements limits (like cpu limits, memory
>> limits) inside a jail ?
>>
>> or al
Espartano wrote:
Hi folk, sorry for my bat english, i have a question:
there is any initiative to implements limits (like cpu limits, memory
limits) inside a jail ?
or already exists anything to do it ?
thanks a lot.
You can check sysctl MIB entries for security.jail.*
Using
Hi folk, sorry for my bat english, i have a question:
there is any initiative to implements limits (like cpu limits, memory
limits) inside a jail ?
or already exists anything to do it ?
thanks a lot.
--
"Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX"
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Dave wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get cPanel installed on my host, and to run it from jail.
> The
> installer script that cPanel provides, however, seems to be confused by the
> fact that it cannot test the daemons it has instal
Hi all,
I'm trying to get cPanel installed on my host, and to run it from jail. The
installer script that cPanel provides, however, seems to be confused by the
fact that it cannot test the daemons it has installed by checking if they
are listening on localhost. Is there any way to
Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I only want sendmail in a jail to do one thing: forward nightly reports from
> r...@localhost to a real account on another
> machine. What's the proper way to configure this?
Edit /etc/mail/aliases. All reports are pointed to root. But you can
point it any
Kirk Strauser wrote:
I only want sendmail in a jail to do one thing: forward nightly reports from r...@localhost to a real account on another
machine. What's the proper way to configure this? By default, sendmail_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf still gives a
running sendmail th
On Friday 27 February 2009 10:49:22 am Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I only want sendmail in a jail to do one thing: forward nightly reports
> from r...@localhost to a real account on another machine. What's the
> proper way to configure this? By default, sendmail_enable="NO"
I only want sendmail in a jail to do one thing: forward nightly reports from
r...@localhost to a real account on another
machine. What's the proper way to configure this? By default,
sendmail_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf still gives a
running sendmail that accepts mail from
.conf file...
You should repeat this to yourself, about 10-20 times, daily, so you don't
forget ;)
devfs.conf is for devices available at boot time, but devfs.rules rule after
Ergo, making changes to devfs.conf does nothing till the next boot.
> I also tried creating a device rul
I then created (again, on the host) /etc/devfs.rules, and added the
following to it...
[devfsrules_jail_pearl=5]
add include $devfsrules_hide_all
add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic
add include $devfsrules_unhide_login
add path 'lpt*' unhide
These changes successfully made the lpt0 (an
Jasvinder S. Bahra wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup CUPS (in a jail) using an old parallel port
printer on my server machine.
I used ezjail to create a jail and then installed CUPS. I've got it
up and running, and I can access the administration website.
However, as far as I can
Hi,
I'm trying to setup CUPS (in a jail) using an old parallel port printer on
my server machine.
I used ezjail to create a jail and then installed CUPS. I've got it up and
running, and I can access the administration website.
However, as far as I can tell, the admin website do
ange licensing error
(there is no license for the free edition).
Before I bang my head on this much longer, has anyone else gotten
Nomachine's version 3 server working on FreeBSD 7? How about in a jail?
How does one mount linprocfs in a jail?
Mark
__
It appeared to work after rule apply unhide. Will find out more. Just how to
delete or view the ruleset? Thanks.
Seem to get on it. Looks like it's not very obvious. The cure was:
===
devfs -m /jailpath/dev rule -s 5 add type tty unhide
===
the unobvious for me was to put -s in the right place.
am doing the portupgrade inside my jail.
M> > I see that script(1) have no permission on openpty.
M> > I deleted all the devfs rules on tha jail's /dev both by hand and by
M> > deleting the ruleset string in master's rc.conf. So i stopped jail and
M> > mounted devfs
d
===
Same as with script(1) by hand now.
I do all this in chroot. No difference if under gnu screen or in ttyv4.
2009/01/25 17:08:14 -0900 Mel => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
M> On Sunday 25 January 2009 02:25:17 Peter Vereshagin wrote:
M> > Hello,
M> >
M> > I
s rules.
And so it did not resolve by provided meaningful part ( e. g., 'example' ) of
ruleset name only. Thanks!
2009/01/25 17:06:15 -0900 Mel => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
M> Something else is wrong. Set rc_debug="YES" in /etc/rc.conf then
M> /etc/rc.d/jai
t; > I am doing the portupgrade inside my jail.
M> > I see that script(1) have no permission on openpty.
M> > I deleted all the devfs rules on tha jail's /dev both by hand and by
M> > deleting the ruleset string in master's rc.conf. So i stopped jail and
M> >
On Sunday 25 January 2009 02:25:17 Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am doing the portupgrade inside my jail.
> I see that script(1) have no permission on openpty.
> I deleted all the devfs rules on tha jail's /dev both by hand and by
> deleting the ruleset string in
On Sunday 25 January 2009 02:35:16 Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I always try to set up the devfs ruleset in rc.conf. So my question is
> about this in /etc/defaults/rc.conf: ===
> #jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to
> ja
Hello,
I always try to set up the devfs ruleset in rc.conf. So my question is about
this in /etc/defaults/rc.conf:
===
#jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail
===
It appears not to work in /etc/rc.conf without this rc.subr patch:
===
$ di
Hello,
I am doing the portupgrade inside my jail.
I see that script(1) have no permission on openpty.
I deleted all the devfs rules on tha jail's /dev both by hand and by deleting
the ruleset string in master's rc.conf.
So i stopped jail and mounted devfs by hand. Started jail. It
Hi!
> I've a problem with check_ping.
>
> [r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w 3000.0,80% -c
> 5000.0,100% -p 5
> CRITICAL - You need more args!!!
> Could not open pipe:
> Anyone have succefully install a nagios server in a jail ?
Y
Andy Greenwood wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all.
I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
I've a problem with check_ping.
only thing I see on mine is I have ipv6 disabled:
(also, with_fping, with_netsnmp, with_m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
>
> I've a problem with check_ping.
>
> [r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w
3000.0,80% -c 5000.0,100% -p 5
What plugin versions are you running? Im running latest also.
pkg_info | grep nagios
Albert Shih wrote:
Le 18/12/2008 à 05:46:18-0500, Michael Scheidell a écrit
Try nagios 3.03.
I think they will do the trick.
I'm using nagios 3.06 ... and it's not working.
--
Michael Scheid
Works here (tm).
doublecheck these sysctl's:
security.jail.socket_unixiproute_only: 1
security.jail.enforce_statfs: 2
security.jail.allow_raw_sockets: 1
Albert Shih wrote:
Le 18/12/2008 à 05:46:18-0500, Michael Scheidell a écrit
Try nagios 3.03.
I think they will do the trick.
I'
Le 17/12/2008 à 21:28:12+, Bjoern A. Zeeb a écrit
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Albert Shih wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
> >
> > I've a problem with check_ping.
> >
> > [r...@]# /usr/local/lib
Le 18/12/2008 à 05:46:18-0500, Michael Scheidell a écrit
> Try nagios 3.03.
>
> I think they will do the trick.
I'm using nagios 3.06 ... and it's not working.
Thanks for your answer.
Regards.
JAS
--
Albert SHIH
SIO batiment 15
Observatoire de Paris Meudon
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon
Try nagios 3.03.
I think they will do the trick.
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certifi
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
>
> I've a problem with check_ping.
>
> [r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w 3000.0,80% -c
> 5000.0,100% -p 5
> CRITICA
hmm we have it working, let me see how.
Albert Shih wrote:
Hi all.
I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* King of Spam Filters, SC
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Albert Shih wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
I've a problem with check_ping.
[r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w 3000.0,80% -c
5000.0,100% -p 5
CRITICAL - You need more args!!!
Could not open pipe:
So I
Hi all.
I'm trying to install a nagios server in a jail.
I've a problem with check_ping.
[r...@]# /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_ping -H some_host -w 3000.0,80% -c
5000.0,100% -p 5
CRITICAL - You need more args!!!
Could not open pipe:
So I think it's become the «ping pro
Hi all,
Running 7.0-RELEASE-p2, I set up a jail from which to perform NMAP and
Nessus scans. I set the sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1,
which I expected to prevent any problems. Unfortunately, I'm getting
this whenever I try to NMAP:
$ sudo nmap -P0 localhost
Starting Nmap 4.76 (
On Thursday 02 October 2008 19:38:21 kalin m wrote:
> hi all...
>
> i have openssh 5. i want to jail the users to their home directories so
> they can go down but not up.
>
> i didn't see a directive that does that in the man or in the sshd_config.
On RELENG_7 (aka -sta
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See ftp-proxy(8).
>
> Note that active works with the ruleset you provided (due to the "pass out
> keep state"-rule), but there is obviously a firewall problem on the client
> preventing that.
>
Nevermind, I think the "Tra
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See ftp-proxy(8).
>
> Note that active works with the ruleset you provided (due to the "pass out
> keep state"-rule), but there is obviously a firewall problem on the client
> preventing that.
>
Are you sure I need ftp-proxy
On Friday 03 October 2008 11:11:57 Redd Vinylene wrote:
> Greetings ladies and gentlemen!
>
> Why does the below pf.conf (run from box1) give me
> "getpeername(control_sock): Transport endpoint is not connected,
> Socket error (Connection refused) - reconnecting" when trying to log
> onto box3 via
Greetings ladies and gentlemen!
Why does the below pf.conf (run from box1) give me
"getpeername(control_sock): Transport endpoint is not connected,
Socket error (Connection refused) - reconnecting" when trying to log
onto box3 via passive FTP? Active FTP gives me "425 Can't build data
connection:
thanks.. i'll look at the patches
Matthew Seaman wrote:
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i have openssh 5. i want to jail the users to their home directories
so they can go down but not up.
i didn't see a directive that does that in the man or in the
sshd_config.
how do
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i have openssh 5. i want to jail the users to their home directories so
they can go down but not up.
i didn't see a directive that does that in the man or in the sshd_config.
how do i do that?
You need a specially patched version of OpenSSH. You can downloa
hi all...
i have openssh 5. i want to jail the users to their home directories so
they can go down but not up.
i didn't see a directive that does that in the man or in the sshd_config.
how do i do that?
thanks...
___
freebsd-questions@freebs
s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: freebsd 7.0 and jail
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "free bsd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "freebsd general questions"
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 1:51 AM
> Make sure your buildworld /usr/obj is updated.
gt;
> Stop in /usr/src/lib.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> ///
>
> looks like the code of jail i
code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> ///
>
> looks like the code of jail is broken, did anyone have similar problem?
>
> I am working in an environment that is able to use "freebsd-update" script.
Check your d
Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
///
looks like the code of jail is broken, did anyone have similar problem?
I am working in an environment that is able to use "freebsd-upd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simple enough, has anyone been able to get either to run successfully in a jail?
- --
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED
the problem is already here "at the host system (not in the jail)" i wasnt
able to get rid of jail and can't access to device in jail
somehow i must access mdconfig and mount but i shouldnt stop jail.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Olli Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i
> want
> to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
>
> #mdconfig -a -t vnode -f big_bcbcv.iso
> #mdconfig: open(/dev/mdctl): No such file or directory
>
> you can't
>
> j
İ see, i should extract this iso image (not using tar) may i close this
jail? and can i restart correctly? i am hesitate since squid in running on
jail? process is like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc]# ps ax -o pid,jid,args
PIDJID COMMAND
8415 0 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -k start
10414 0
In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i want
to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
#mdconfig -a -t vnode -f big_bcbcv.iso
#mdconfig: open(/dev/mdctl): No such file or directory
you can't
jail doesn'
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, tethys ocean wrote:
In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i want
to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
You are correct that direct manipulation of md(4) devices is not allowed in
jail. However, you may be running on a
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:08:31AM +0300, tethys ocean wrote:
> Hi all
>
> In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i want
> to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
>
> #mdconfig -a -t vnode -f big_bcbcv.iso
> #mdconfig: open
Hi all
In server jail and squid is running on it as lots of another packet. i want
to extract iso image in this server. But i havent do it.
#mdconfig -a -t vnode -f big_bcbcv.iso
#mdconfig: open(/dev/mdctl): No such file or directory
#ls -l /dev/md*
#ls -ls /dev/mdctl
ls: /dev/mdctl: No such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason C. Wells wrote:
> I currently use a separate machine to make world and to make and archive
> ports and packages. I would like to retire that machine and move that
> functionality into a jail. I am due to switch to 7.1 from 6.3 soo
I currently use a separate machine to make world and to make and archive
ports and packages. I would like to retire that machine and move that
functionality into a jail. I am due to switch to 7.1 from 6.3 soon.
I understand that I cannot run divergent kernels in the jails.
I could still make
can it be done?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The only common between the jail and the hosted system are the kernel and
its drivers.
You may use entirely different ports in the base system and into the
jailed enviroment. So you may keep your jailed ports up to date without
any concern as long as they do not conflict with the base system
> Will i encounter problems if i just upgrade my ports using portsnap and
> portmaster? or will those tools be aware of the version my base system
> is and only use ports that are made for this version?
The components of your jail are totally seperate from the host. You
can use portsnap,
Hello List,
i have a jail hosted on a 6-2 RELEASE machine i don't have access to. As
i don't have access, i can't upgrade the base system. But i would like
to keep the ports i use up to date.
Will i encounter problems if i just upgrade my ports using portsnap and
portmaster
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote:
I cannot seem to make identd work on a jail with multiple IPs (Bjoern
Zeeb's patch):
So do you have any kind of error message? packet traces or anything to
further isolate the problem rather than "does not work"?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Greetings!
I cannot seem to make identd work on a jail with multiple IPs (Bjoern
Zeeb's patch):
jail # cat /etc/inetd.conf
auth stream tcp nowait root internal auth -r -f -n -o UNKNOWN -t 30
-
jail # grep inetd /etc/rc.conf
inetd_enable="YES"
-
host # grep jail /etc/rc.co
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 01:02 +0500, Jo Pesko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 7.0 version and expecting some problems with jail.
> /etc/rc.d/jail script hangs when it try to map jail's interface to alias
> address of my nic. Script successfully starting if i rem
#x27;ve created a jail where only nessus lives in, the jail is working very
> nicely but nessus keeps on crashing.
>
> Here is what I see from the nessus.core file
> (gdb) core nessusd.core
> Core was generated by `nessusd'.
> Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
Hi
I've created a jail where only nessus lives in, the jail is working very
nicely but nessus keeps on crashing.
Here is what I see from the nessus.core file
(gdb) core nessusd.core
Core was generated by `nessusd'.
Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
#0 0x2
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.0 version and expecting some problems with jail.
/etc/rc.d/jail script hangs when it try to map jail's interface to alias
address of my nic. Script successfully starting if i removing alias
address from rc.conf(or manually via ifconfig). Any info will b
AFAIK all special hylafax needs is serial port acces for modem.
you have to use
#jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to jail
in rc.conf and make rule for devfs for your jail - like normal jail
rule+needed serial port.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Nej
Hello,
anyone tried running HylaFAX in a FreeBSD jail? Does it work?
Thanks,
Nejc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Vince Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've managed to get the i386 jail to start by nullfs mounts of /libexec
> and /usr/lib32 as per the instructions here
> [http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-03/msg02216.html]
> (It wouldnt start before, compl
Hi all,
I've managed to get the i386 jail to start by nullfs mounts of /libexec
and /usr/lib32 as per the instructions here
[http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2008-03/msg02216.html]
(It wouldnt start before, complaining about missing libs even though I
had d
>> Hey,
>>
>>> ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>>>
>>> the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
>>> I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
>>>
>>> ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>Can you explain why it
Hey,
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0"
the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255"
I tried with 24 bits - it doesn't work one way o
w="YES"
jail_socket_unixiproute_only="NO"
#= Jails ---=#
jail_list="samba"
#=--=#
jail_samba_rootdir="/usr/jail/samba"
jail_samba_hostname=
What does your ifconfig line read from /etc/rc.conf (the alias line)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, April 23, 2008 18:16, Nejc Å koberne wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This is nota n issue with samba it is a name resolve issue.
>
> Then why is Samba replying to NetBIOS broadcasts very nicely when I put
> it outside jail (with the same configuration)? As far as I understand
d I didn't read it all) or b) enable raw sockets in
jails ( security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 ).
Let me know if b) works, I plan to setup a samba server on ZFS inside
a jail when I return home from my travels.
a) I have no firewall whatsoever running.
b) FreeBSDhost# sysctl -
it all) or b) enable raw sockets in jails
( security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 ).
Let me know if b) works, I plan to setup a samba server on ZFS inside a
jail when I return home from my travels.
a) I have no firewall whatsoever running.
b) FreeBSDhost# sysctl -a | grep raw_sockets
security.ja
Hi,
This is nota n issue with samba it is a name resolve issue.
Then why is Samba replying to NetBIOS broadcasts very nicely when I put
it outside jail (with the same configuration)? As far as I understand
Samba also provides resolving - NetBIOS resolving via its nmbd.
If you add in c
>> OK.. if it is running inside your jail it doesnt respond to WINS
>> broadcasts (request for NETBIOS Names.. oi, who is Machine on this
>> subnet???), if it is not running in your jail, it is.
>I wouldn't say "WINS broadcasts" but NetBIOS broadcasts, yes.
Hey,
OK.. if it is running inside your jail it doesnt respond to WINS
broadcasts (request for NETBIOS Names.. oi, who is Machine on this
subnet???), if it is not running in your jail, it is.
I wouldn't say "WINS broadcasts" but NetBIOS broadcasts, yes. "Machine"
is
Hey Johan,
Well i use ezjail for my jails, i leave everything else standard, but have the
same sysctl value's
This is my smb.conf (it is a fileserver as member of a domain for my domain).
[global]
...
wins server = hz2-serv.mydomain.local
This is why it works for you. You use external WINS
her box
> to
> the jailed Samba. If I put the Samba out of the jail (same version, same
> config)
> it works as it should. I have this in my rc.conf:
OK.. if it is running inside your jail it doesnt respond to WINS
broadcasts (request for NETBIOS Names.. oi, who is Machine on this
subnet
Hey Johan,
I think you will need to remove 127.0.0.1
Just use 192.168.1.2/24
There is no 127.0.0.1 on a jailed system
I have done so - I still can't do "smbclient //machine" from another box to
the jailed Samba. If I put the Samba out of the jail (same version, same config)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Moran wrote:
|
| I couldn't get it to work. The primary problem being that OpenVPN needs
| to create a tun device, and you can't do that inside a jail.
|
| Someone more clever than I may have figured out a way to pull it off ..
In response to Rek Jed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to run an openvpn server inside of a FreeBSD jail?
I couldn't get it to work. The primary problem being that OpenVPN needs
to create a tun device, and you can't do that inside a jail.
Someone mo
Hi,
Is it possible to run an openvpn server inside of a FreeBSD jail?
Cheers,
Rek.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
on the main host (which runs the jail).
How can i run a new process inside the jail with a known JID w/o ssh-ing into
that jail or doing a lot of strange
manupulations?
I am asking, because i have about 20 jails running and each has a running
special control daemon which
changes a lot and
>> I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail
>> environment. I happen
>> to have problems with "visibility" of the Samba server on the network -
>> I cannot connect
>> to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to
Hey again,
I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail
environment. I happen
to have problems with "visibility" of the Samba server on the network -
I cannot connect
to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to use the
"interfaces"
p
Try `jexec JID 'command'`
man jexec for more details...
You can obtain the JID of your jails with the command `jls`
Martin
Artem Kuchin a écrit :
For example, i have an already runing jail with some JID and i am
logged in on the main host (which runs the jail).
How can i run a n
> For example, i have an already runing jail with some JID and i am logged
> in on the main host (which runs the jail).
> How can i run a new process inside the jail with a known JID w/o ssh-ing
> into that jail or doing a lot of strange
> manupulations?
>
> I am asking, be
For example, i have an already runing jail with some JID and i am logged
in on the main host (which runs the jail).
How can i run a new process inside the jail with a known JID w/o ssh-ing
into that jail or doing a lot of strange
manupulations?
I am asking, because i have about 20 jails
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Wojciech Puchar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone interested in my jail configuring How-To?
>
> it's very different from "standard" method, uses shared programs and - i
> think - is much easier to administer.
>
> but for
anyone interested in my jail configuring How-To?
it's very different from "standard" method, uses shared programs and - i
think - is much easier to administer.
but for sure there are bugs in it, so it should be reviewed by others :)
Hello,
I am trying to get latest Samba running under FreeBSD 7.0 jail environment. I
happen
to have problems with "visibility" of the Samba server on the network - I
cannot connect
to it using its NetBIOS name. To be able to run nmbd, I have to use the
"interfaces"
parame
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mark Moellering wrote:
I have been trying to install an i386 jail on an amd64 install. I
added Target=i386 to the command line in the make buildworld and
installworld commands. I keep getting the following (or similar)
error
'Target' does nothing, there is no suc
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mark Moellering wrote:
I have been trying to install an i386 jail on an amd64 install. I
added Target=i386 to the command line in the make buildworld and
installworld commands. I keep getting the following (or similar) error
'Target' does nothing, there
:
> >>>>> On Friday 28 March 2008 06:23:49 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>>>>> Mark Moellering wrote:
> >>>>>>> I have been trying to install an i386 jail on an amd64 install. I
> >>>>>>> added Target=i386 to the
501 - 600 of 1377 matches
Mail list logo
