I did have an IP address assigned to my ethernet interface( using the
ifconfig command) but I'm unable to ping anybody in my LAN.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:38 AM, आशीष Ashish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
,--[ On Tuesday 29 Jan 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
| On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari
,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
| I did have an IP address assigned to my ethernet interface( using the
| ifconfig command) but I'm unable to ping anybody in my LAN.
In the 'ifconfig -a' output you posted earlier, the 'em0' (your desired
interface) interface neither
ifconfig em0 up also doesnt help ping my LAN.
the ifconfig -a output now reads the IP I just added, as well as the
net-mask the 100 Mbps active linnk.
quick question :
I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.should this be done everytime I restart
my application, is it some kind of a temporary
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.should this be done everytime I restart
my application, is it some kind of a temporary address assignment, bcos
whatever I assigned was not visible today when I re-booted and I had to do
it again, probably I should set this in the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
ifconfig em0 up also doesnt help ping my LAN.
the ifconfig -a output now reads the IP I just added, as well as the
net-mask the 100 Mbps active linnk.
quick question :
I did an ifconfig em0 1.1.1.2 yday.should
with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
the rc.conf script.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:19:33PM -0500,
Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
I see so when i use the netstat command
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it
work and ping my LAN
An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route devd with their
pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account the
new chages I've done restarts the network.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it a cause of
ok the local LAN ping works now
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 1:52 PM, आशीष Ashish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
| with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it
work
| and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't
,--[ On Wednesday 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
| with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
| and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
| the rc.conf script.
BtW, what is your network prefix and subnet mask ? Also
Written by Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar on 01/30/08 13:02
ok the local LAN ping works now
FYI, the handbook is very helpful.
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config-network-setup.html)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:35:03 +0100, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route devd with
their
pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account
the
new chages I've done restarts the network.
Try
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
ok the local LAN ping works now
At the risk of being obvious: please be so smart as to write down
the settings (and try to understand exactly why they are the way they
are) so you don't have to reinvent the wheel next time around.
Alphons
--
VISTA - Viruses
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57:59PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
the rc.conf script.
I am not quite sure what you are asking here, but
oh yes, I did use the right IP, netmask and interface to be configured.
Now thankfully the LAN pings work, the thing I have to find out now is how
to make ftp work which still keeps saying that hostname or servname not
known
Thanks a lot
Bhuvana
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:57:59PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
with the above assigned IP address and net-mask I'm reading to make it work
and ping my LAN successfully ( which it doesn't now) before I put them in
the rc.conf script.
I should mention that the line changes if you are
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:35:03PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
An explicit call to /etc/netstart tells me that the route devd with their
pids are already running - though I dont know if this takes into account the
new chages I've done restarts the network.
You will have to do a
strangely my /etc has no resolv.conf file at all !
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:01:18PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
I see so when i use the
i got my ISP's IP address from some webpage. i am at home
running DSL here is what my file looks like
kv_bsd#
kv_bsd# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 192.168.0.1
kv_bsd#
i just had to create that file
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
strangely my /etc has no
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:01:18PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
Is it a cause of concern if I dont have any route marked as default ?
I see so when i use the netstat command
Yes. You need a default router specified because that is the
address that becomes your gateway to the rest of
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:09:00PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
strangely my /etc has no resolv.conf file at all !
It will only have one if you make one by setting up networking.
sysinstall makes one if you set up a static IP. I think DHCP makes
it if you do dynamic, but I don't have
no mine is not dynamic and I have the resolv.conf file set-up. It works fine
now.
I had some issues with FTP ing and some address conflict message for
ssh/tcp. I sysinstalled and disabled SSH there, I guess probably cos inetd
takes care of it and ftp also works fine now, i guess after etc/rc.conf
Jerry McAllister wrote:
[/etc/resolv.conf]
I think DHCP makes it if you do dynamic
It did so in 6.1-RELEASE and it's not likely that this has changed.
In fact, I had to explicitly config DHCP to not overwrite my resolv.conf
(because I wanted my own DNS server to be queried before the ISP's).
On 2008-01-30 22:07, Alphons Fonz van Werven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry McAllister wrote:
[/etc/resolv.conf]
I think DHCP makes it if you do dynamic
It did so in 6.1-RELEASE and it's not likely that this has changed.
In fact, I had to explicitly config DHCP to not overwrite my
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[ in dhclient.conf ]
interface ath0 {
prepend domain-name-servers 196.168.1.1;
}
Neat. I used another workaround (don't remember exactly what) back then,
but this sure looks tidier.
Something to remember...
Alphons
--
VISTA -
,--[ On Tuesday 29 Jan 2008, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
| On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
| Hmmm. There seems to be something very 'odd' about your interfaces.
|
| * There is no `lo0' loopback interface, which commonly uses the
| 127.0.0.1
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and
any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or any external
network,
ping dosent work ( nor ftp or dig)
When I try
Hi,
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or any external network,
ping dosent work ( nor ftp or dig)
When I try to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:29:49PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:29:49PM -0500, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the
ifconfig -a
em0: flags ...lot of data .
status: active
( I'm guessing this is the ethernet interface)
netstat -rn
routing tables:
Internet :
127.0.0.1 ..followed by some IPs, flags(UH), etc ..
Internet6
expire followed by some hex-values and flags
would this do or
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
RTFM
begin with
/usr/share/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/handbook.txt (or html what
you prefer)
Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie FreeBSD user, I've just installed the 5.5 version.
I know this is a very silly question but I've searched the archives and any
suggestions are welcome.
I think my system is not connected to the internet or any external network,
ping dosent work (
I'm guessing it does detect the interface, network-device all that, bcos
my ifconfig says the ethernet status is active. But still I'm unable to do
any kind of networking at all, even pings from other PCs to this one remain
unreachable. I'm wondering if I should configure something else in the
I configured the ethernet interface in the post-install config with my IP
and net-mask, though I didnt know the gateway then. It gave me a warning
that I might not be able to access remote machines, but that still dosent
explain why it wont even ping the next node in my LAN. The rc.conf file does
At 05:38 PM 1/28/2008, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar wrote:
I'm guessing it does detect the interface, network-device all that, bcos
my ifconfig says the ethernet status is active. But still I'm unable to do
any kind of networking at all, even pings from other PCs to this one remain
unreachable. I'm
On 2008-01-28 18:18, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Christopher Cowart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send the list the output of the following commands:
# ifconfig -a
# netstat -rn
With that info, we can probably help you out better.
ifconfig -a
em0: flags ...lot of data .
status: active
( I'm guessing this is the ethernet interface)
lo0: similar stuff as em0
and my var/log/messages has a lot of data in it, I dont know if I'm
identifying a boot message accurately but there is a line that specifies
ok here u go, the exact output of the the commands:
#ifconfig -a
em0: flags=8802BROADCAST, SIMPLEX, MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXSCUM, TXSCUM, VLAN_MTU
ether :0d:56:f0:f1:ba
media:Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
plip0:flags=108810POINTTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
the netstat reads:
#netstat -nr
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags REfs Use Netif Expire
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH041 lo0
Internet 6
Destination Gateway Flags Netif
Expire
::1::1 UH
On 2008-01-28 21:03, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok here u go, the exact output of the the commands:
Excellent! Thank you :-)
#ifconfig -a
em0: flags=8802BROADCAST, SIMPLEX, MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXSCUM, TXSCUM, VLAN_MTU
ether :0d:56:f0:f1:ba
media:Ethernet
Giorgos,
Thanks a lot for the excellent reply, yes I do have some questions about
this but before that:
the unplumb operation for pilp0 doesnt work.
ifconfig: SIOCIFDESTROY: Invalid argument
is the message I get for this.
Sincerely,
Bhuvana
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
ok down works but delete dosent
I guess the 1st one is for disabling the plip interface and the second for
completely removing it , or let me know if I'm getting this wrong here.
ifconfig: 10ctl(SIOCDIFADDR) : cant assign requested address
is this bcos of the down I did before this command ?
On 2008-01-28 22:33, Bhuvaneswari Ramkumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos,
Thanks a lot for the excellent reply, yes I do have some questions about
this but before that:
the unplumb operation for pilp0 doesnt work.
ifconfig: SIOCIFDESTROY: Invalid argument
is the message I get for
You need to set the default gateway in /etc/rc.conf. Without a
default gateway, you will need to add a default route with the
route command.
Without a route your machine will only be able to ping itself.
Unless something has changed dramatically -- and fairly recently --
a machine that
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but don't know how to
Miguel Cardenas wrote:
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but
On 8 Jul 2004 at 1:52, Miguel Cardenas wrote:
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
When you got to the HD partitioning in the beginning of setup you should have deleted
Miguel Cardenas wrote:
Hello
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but
Am new to FreeBSD... just installed it for 2nd time today, but don't
know what
I did that it didn't ask me for the network configuration (ip, domain,
etc)... once installed, is there a command to perform that task?
I'm linux user, so am familiar to *nix systems, but don't know how to
50 matches
Mail list logo
