O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3 (openoffice.org-3.0.0.b_1)
does build with
Chris Whitehouse wrote the following, On 06/16/08 14:20:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3
did well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this
sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to
I think your best bet (if you want to use OO) is to use PC-BSD. There is
a PBI package already available for it.
Just my two cents,
Bono Vince Malum
--
-Camilo
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:44:55 +
From: O. Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenOffice 2.4.1: still getting compilation
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
In case it's any use to you, openoffice.org-3
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
Regards,
Oliver
rm -f ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/check_libvcl680fx.so
mv ../unxfbsdx.pro/lib/libvcl680fx.so
O. Hartmann wrote:
Hello,
I still get this error since OO 2.4 was offered via ports (OO 2.3 did
well). I was wondering if someone has no solution to this sticky error.
Can anyone help?
I am not able tohelp but just to confirm this is due to libxml2 not
being found right (note to
I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native'
Tim Kellers writes:
I can confirm the error. I tried rebuilding everything I could think of
in my installed ports, but the error remains the same:
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOH680_m17/vcl/util
dmake: Error code 1, while
Hi,
When I try to install OO from the ports I get the message Environment
error: JAVA_HOME should not be defined.
Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
Thanks,
Marco
--
Alas, I am dying beyond my means.
-- Oscar Wilde [as he sipped champagne on his deathbed]
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 20:16:09 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
When I try to install OO from the ports I get the message Environment
error: JAVA_HOME should not be defined.
Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
Thanks,
Marco
unset JAVA_HOME
make install
--
Mario Lobo
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:47 -0300
Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unset JAVA_HOME
make install
Yes, this seems to work. Thanks.
Marco
--
If the weather is extremely bad, church attendance will be down.
If the weather is extremely good, church attendance will be down.
If the bulletin
.
Of course, if you have an up-to-date ports tree, you should probably
report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i had an up-to-date ports tree at the time of installation.
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7
Hi,
I mistakenly forgot to add the errors i get. I can open any OO program, but
as soon as i open a document, i get this
errors on starting up scalc
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
I18N: Operating system doesn't support locale en_US
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not
:-GLib-GObject-CRITICAL-td13904374.html
Of course, if you have an up-to-date ports tree, you should probably
report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editors/
-- have you
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/editor
s/
-- have you considered trying them?)
I tried this about a week ago without much success. I could get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:18:57 +
Mike Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
(BTW, there are pre-built packages for all OpenOffice versions:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386
On Thursday 27 March 2008, Nikola Lečić wrote:
According to what can be read on the page I sent with my previous
mail, it seems to be a GTK-related issue. I confirm that all 7-stable
OpenOffice packages (including 2.3.1_1) work perfectly on my plain
7.0-RELEASE/i386 install, but with *up
Hi,
Apologies for not responding sooner, i have been away since last week.
Eduardo, i installed if from ports
Which gcc version do you use? I recall that someone described similar
symptoms on FreeBSD/amd64 with OpenOffice.org compiled using gcc-4.1.
It was a bug in gcc-4.1; recompiling with
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am
experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice.
Every time i open a document/spreadsheet or try to save a
document/spreadsheet, OpenOffice hangs.
When i open a spreadsheet, i get a warning message about macros, when i
click
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:55:56 +0300
Mike Barnard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0 Pre-Release on an HP 6720s Laptop. I am
experiencing a strange problem with OpenOffice.
Every time i open a document/spreadsheet
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 at 21:45 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
No I have tried to manually download the package for openoffice, which barfed
since dependencies where not present.
pkg_add -r didn't work since there was no package where it should have been
on the site to download.
I
Andreas Davour wrote:
No I have tried to manually download the package for openoffice, which
barfed since dependencies where not present.
pkg_add -r didn't work since there was no package where it should have
been on the site to download.
I have tried to build from source as well
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:53 PM, D Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 at 21:45 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
No I have tried to manually download the package for openoffice, which
barfed
since dependencies where not present.
pkg_add -r didn't work since
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 at 15:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:53 PM, D Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 at 21:45 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
No I have tried to manually download the package for openoffice, which barfed
since
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 at 22:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Andreas Davour wrote:
No I have tried to manually download the package for openoffice, which
barfed since dependencies where not present.
pkg_add -r didn't work since
D Hill wrote:
It only took my computer just over four hours to install with 2x3Ghz dual
core and 8Gb RAM.
Sigh. When shall we get a modular OO. Sigh again.
--
Tore
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I got a problem in connecting a BASE Client (OpenOffice DB Client) to a
remote, SSL-secured PostgreSQL server. Both, client and server, running
FreeBSD 7.0, but this does only matter for the OO client side. With OO
under Windows it is either with ODBC or JDBC possible to connect via SSL
Montgomery-Smith
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with OpenOffice 2.3.1 on FreeBSD
Le Mar 1 jan 08 à 21:21:43 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
My personal wish list is that opencascade builds on FreeBSD-7 with the
new
]
Subject: Re: Problems with OpenOffice 2.3.1 on FreeBSD
Le Mar 1 jan 08 à 21:21:43 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
My personal wish list is that opencascade builds on FreeBSD-7 with the
new stlport, and that octave-forge not be in its current
IGNORE state.
But I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically
I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it
to pdf and since I have used LyX before want to move the document
there since it does esport math correctly.
On 2008-01-25 00:15, Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically
I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it
to pdf and since I have used LyX before want to move the document
there since it does
On Jan 24, 2008 9:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically
I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it
to pdf and since I have used LyX
Hello!
I would like to ask you for help with this issue. I obtain the following
error:
cp -f ./unxfbsdi.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/defaults/pref/browser-prefs.js
./unxfbsdi.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/defaults/pref/browser-prefs.js
cp -f
[Follow-ups set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zbigniew Komarnicki writes:
I would like to ask you for help with this issue. I obtain the
following error:
Invalid argument
/usr/local/bin/gcp: preserving permissions for `./unxfbsdi.pro/inc/xuldoc':
Invalid argument
Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2008 14:15:40 schrieb O. Hartmann:
I use OpenOffice 2.3.1 on several hardwareplatforms running FreeBSD
7.0-PRE/AMD64 and since I upgraded OpenOffice from OO 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 I
have massive problems, rendering OO unusuable! Before doing a PR I
Folks:
If there's a problem with OpenOffice - and there surely is -
complaining here may feel good.
Complaining on [EMAIL PROTECTED], however, is _much_
more likely to get the attention necessary to get things fixed.
(Which may still take a while, but hopefully a shorter
I use OpenOffice 2.3.1 on several hardwareplatforms running FreeBSD
7.0-PRE/AMD64 and since I upgraded OpenOffice from OO 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 I
have massive problems, rendering OO unusuable! Before doing a PR I would
like to aks whethere there is a solution out.
Whenever I try to save a document
on the
openoffice@ list. A message from Peter Jeremy on December 14
contains both information about the cause and a patch.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
O. Hartmann wrote:
[...]
Whenever I try to save a document in OO writer, OO gets stuck and I have
to kill it. The document gets saved, but I never can load it again
without rendering OO unusuable. Opening M$ Word docs or OO docs doesn't
matter.
I have similar problems with OpenOffice 2.3.1
with OpenOffice 2.3.1 on FreeBSD/i386 (I'm
running 7.0-PRE as of Dec 23). It's possible to save documents but
exiting OOo hangs and I need to kill it. Firing up OOo once again,
there's this recovery stuff which hangs also and eats up CPU time.
Only way out: kill -9 $PID
Opening a document via 'File
two weeks on the
openoffice@ list. A message from Peter Jeremy on December 14
contains both information about the cause and a patch.
Robert Huff
___
I am not an OpenOffice user but my 2c about the topic
have similar problems with OpenOffice 2.3.1 on FreeBSD/i386 (I'm
running 7.0-PRE as of Dec 23). It's possible to save documents but
exiting OOo hangs and I need to kill it. Firing up OOo once again,
there's this recovery stuff which hangs also and eats up CPU time.
Only way out: kill -9 $PID
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:41:57AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
This has been discussed within the last two weeks on the
openoffice@ list. A message from Peter Jeremy on December 14
contains both information about the cause and a patch.
My patch was for a different problem - related to OOo
Le Mar 1 jan 08 à 21:21:43 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
My personal wish list is that opencascade builds on FreeBSD-7 with the
new stlport, and that octave-forge not be in its current IGNORE state.
But I fully appreciate that I must either wait, or help
Peter Jeremy writes:
This has been discussed within the last two weeks on the
openoffice@ list. A message from Peter Jeremy on December 14
contains both information about the cause and a patch.
My patch was for a different problem - related to OOo not opening
any files. I'm
O. Hartmann wrote:
I use OpenOffice 2.3.1 on several hardwareplatforms running FreeBSD
7.0-PRE/AMD64 and since I upgraded OpenOffice from OO 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 I
have massive problems, rendering OO unusuable! Before doing a PR I would
like to aks whethere there is a solution out.
Whenever I try
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2008 14:15:40 schrieb O. Hartmann:
I use OpenOffice 2.3.1 on several hardwareplatforms running FreeBSD
7.0-PRE/AMD64 and since I upgraded OpenOffice from OO 2.3.0 to 2.3.1 I
have massive problems, rendering OO unusuable! Before doing a PR I would
like to aks whethere
Dear Freebeasties,
I am trying to install openoffice.
The dependency jdk-1.5 tells me as follows:
Please open http://download.java.net/tiger/
in a web browser. Download the
Update 13 Source, jdk-1_5_0_13-fcs-src-b05-jrl-25_sep_2007.jar and the
Source Binaries, jdk-1_5_0_13-fcs-bin-b05-jrl
In response to Tino Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear Freebeasties,
I am trying to install openoffice.
The dependency jdk-1.5 tells me as follows:
Please open http://download.java.net/tiger/
in a web browser. Download the
Update 13 Source, jdk-1_5_0_13-fcs-src-b05-jrl-25_sep_2007.jar
Save me! The wife can't print, so I've been spooled to the couch!
Originally installed OO around 2.0. Wouldn't print. Finally found
some esoteric blog somewhere that said link /usr/local/bin/lpd to
/usr/local/sbin/lpd - voila! prints.
When I upgraded X to 7.3, OO got upgraded to 2.3, and it
Doug Poland writes:
I believe you need to specify the WITH_CUPS tunable when you build OO
Does everyone just know that, or does no one use cups on freebsd?
I use both CUPS and OO on FreeBSD, that's how I know :) I probably
stumbled across this googling and searching the email
Steve Franks wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 8:15 AM, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Franks wrote:
Save me! The wife can't print, so I've been spooled to the couch!
Originally installed OO around 2.0. Wouldn't print. Finally found
some esoteric blog somewhere that said link
Frank Jahnke wrote:
From what little experience I have with PS and *roff the idea of
hacking inline embedded languages just for typesetting sounds stupid
beyond belief
You have to learn one of the troff macro packages. -ms is the easiest,
but I agree that a wysiwyg document
icantthinkofone wrote:
Frank Jahnke wrote:
From what little experience I have with PS and *roff the idea of
hacking inline embedded languages just for typesetting sounds stupid
beyond belief
You have to learn one of the troff macro packages. -ms is the easiest,
but I agree that a
Hello!
How I can install Polish dictionary in OpenOffice?
I go to the folder:
/usr/local/openoffice.org-2.3.0/share/dict/ooo
and then click on file
/usr/local/openoffice.org-2.3.0/share/dict/ooo/DicOOo.sxw
Then run the OpenOffice and the macro, then click Polish and than I click on
the button
Can you explain the difference between troff and groff. I thought
groff is the more useable troff, or do I have that backwards, or is
that only a fbsd replacement?
troff is the old Unix utility that drove a C/A/T typesetter. That was a
real liability -- not everyone has a typesetter -- so it
And another thing, how do you choose whether to use TeX or troff?
What's the diff?
They are different programs that do the same thing. A good comparison
might be comparing different compilers, like C and Fortran. Not that
one is more like C than the other, just that they have a different
If you know neither and want to learn one well, choose TeX. That is
what is used more commonly. There's nothing wrong with troff, and the
support is still quite good, but all the major journals, for example,
accept TeX code but not troff. It is still a good idea to know enough
troff to do
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:33 +, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
If you know neither and want to learn one well, choose TeX.
I think the only place *roff is still is used is for man pages.
Well, that's an overstatement. I still use it, and there is quite an
active community on the groff support
Frank Jahnke wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:33 +, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
If you know neither and want to learn one well, choose TeX.
I think the only place *roff is still is used is for man pages.
Well, that's an overstatement. I still use it, and there is quite an
From what little experience I have with PS and *roff the idea of
hacking inline embedded languages just for typesetting sounds stupid
beyond belief
You have to learn one of the troff macro packages. -ms is the easiest,
but I agree that a wysiwyg document processor is just easier for this
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
--
What George Washington did for us was to throw out the British, so
that we wouldn't have a fat, insensitive government running our
country. Nice try anyway,
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did gcc 4.2 get
uninstalled after build?
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:08:28 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
But libstdc++.so.6 isn't under /usr/local, it's under
/usr/compat/linux/usr/lib.
what's the output of:
ls /var/db/pkg|grep gcc
gcc-4.2.2_20070905
gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gccmakedep-1.0.2
and:
find /usr/local -name 'libstdc++*'
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 18:20:44 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Mel wrote:
Q: Do you have linux-jdk installed rather then diablo-jdk?
No, the FreeBSD jdk15 is installed.
Ah, it uses GCC 4.2, which has libstdc++ v6. -stable has v5. Did
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:01:51 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Strange, there seem to be more instances of libstdc++.so.6 than when I
search for the file with locate.
For future ref: locate uses a cache, built weekly using periodic(8). Find
searches the disk live, so locate is faster but can be
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by pagein
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
Marco Beishuizen writes:
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
Compiling and installation went fine. Also, libstdc++.so.6 is on
my system, in
program.
Or have I missed something?
I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
went ok.
--
The person who's taking you to lunch has no intention of paying
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
went ok.
How did you do that?
Regards,
Chris
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Christian Baer wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Marco Beishuizen wrote:
I don't want openoffice to use this library but it seems that openoffice
needs it for something. I only upgraded the port and that whole process
went ok.
How did you do
On Sunday 23 September 2007 22:43:39 Marco Beishuizen wrote:
After a portupgrade from OO 2.2.1 to 2.3.0, OO doesn't run anymore with
this messages:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found, required
by javaldx
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libstdc++.so.6 not found,
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside. But the files listed on the screen are not listed on the sites
given
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside. But the files listed
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
I would like to know where the download files for OpenOffice 1.1 are
located now. I downloaded OpenOffice from FreeBSD site and it gives
error 1 when finished saying you have to install 3 or 4 files from
outside
NetOpsCenter writes:
Bill Moran wrote:
Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
finishes its part.
1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/wincent]$ locale
LANG=zh_CN.GBK
LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.GBK
LC_COLLATE=zh_CN.GBK
LC_TIME=zh_CN.GBK
LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN.GBK
LC_MONETARY=zh_CN.GBK
LC_MESSAGES=zh_CN.GBK
LC_ALL=
When I start the OOs, I can input Chinese correctly unless I set
export LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 before I
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The time to
crash crash changes depending on what is done:
- Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds)
- Calc dies right away
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official packager.
The time to crash crash changes depending on what is done:
- Writer
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:16:03 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using
2.2, installed from packages downloaded from the official
Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The time to
crash crash changes depending on what is done:
- Writer seems to work the longest (by a few seconds
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:17 +0200
Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the same combination (Xfce4 + OO) daily on RELEASE, _never_
experienced a crash with openoffice 2.2 (sporadically with 2.1).
Notably, I don't use libmap.conf; deinstall linuxpluginwrapper and try.
I attached my
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:13:52 +0200
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norberto Meijome wrote:
Hi all,
all of the sudden, i'm having problems with openoffice. I'm using 2.2,
installed from packages downloaded from the official packager. The time to
crash crash changes depending
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:46:52 +
dhaneshk k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please open http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
in a web browser and follow the Download link for
JDK US DST Timezone Update Tool - 1.1.0 to obtain the
time zone update file, tzupdater-1.1.0-2007c.zip.
Do you
On 6/5/07, dhaneshk k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody ,
I tried to install Openoffice in my FreeBSD 6.0 Intel p4 desktop
gnome2.18
But I am getting errors as follows
don# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
don# ls
Makefilefiles pkg-plist
distinfopkg
. Or is this some other strange java that openoffice
requires...
this should work just fine - i have OO2.2 (from package) using diablo-jdk (from
package) with no problem at all.
(and, for what is worth, linux-jdk-blackdown for linux-firefox G No conflicts
between them at all).
B
Hi everybody ,
I tried to install Openoffice in my FreeBSD 6.0 Intel p4 desktop
gnome2.18
But I am getting errors as follows
don# cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
don# ls
Makefilefiles pkg-plist
distinfopkg-descr work
don# make config
3:47 PM
To: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: printing a very long-line files with openoffice
using letter pages
People,
I have in mind putting, say 6, 8.5x11-inch pages to create
a Large page 25.5x11 on which something would be printed.
Whatever
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kline
Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2007 3:47 PM
To: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: printing a very long-line files with openoffice
using letter pages
People,
I have in mind putting, say 6, 8.5x11-inch pages
of one
of my personal meditations or a Shakespearian sonnet or the
Gettysburg address. I need to know if openoffice has the printer
settings to do this.
Whenever I try to write something in a large font on a letter
sized page, the lines wrap; this is not what
Hello list ,
I've installed the latest 2.2 Openoffice package from
ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.2/i386/ , so far so
good.
Now, I've also want the solver, which I believe is the file
OOo_2.2.0_FreeBSD62Intel_solver.tar.bz2 in that same URL. But once I have the
file
Everytime I go to install openoffice.org-2 from ports I get this error:
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOE680_m6/odk/pack/gendocu
dmake: Executing shell macro: $(FIND) $(INCLUDETOPDIRLIST) -type d -print
dmake: Executing shell macro: $(FIND) $(INCLUDETOPDIRLIST) -type f !
$(QOB) -name
] Okay, I've got it working now.
I had to specify the path of the CUPS lp command (/usr/local/bin). Because,
yes, I've been doing lots of updates, while upgrading this system, and
buildworld hasn't just happened once, but several times.
Next question: How to get OpenOffice to recognize all
Using:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=
produces this:
openoffice.org-2.0.3! Comparison failed
I was told this is because OpenOffice has moved in the 'ports tree'. My
question is other than reinstalling it, how do I proceed to correct it?
--
Gerard
[EMAIL
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 06:26, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Using:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=
produces this:
openoffice.org-2.0.3! Comparison failed
I was told this is because OpenOffice has moved in the 'ports tree'. My
question is other than reinstalling
Hy gents,
why do I get this error when I try to upgrade
openoffice?
The system is a amd64 machine running freebsd 6.1.
The error message I get is:
= unowinreg.dll doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.0.
= Attempting to fetch from
http://tools.openoffice.org
Requested Range Not Satisfiable
[...]
local modification time does not match remote
These errors indicate that there is an incomplete distfile on your
system and fetch is unable to complete it. Simple delete
/usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.0/unowinreg.dll and try building
again. Fetch will
Hi list,
Anyone got openoffice to display portuguese characters?
like ç á à ã â ?
I have these chars in X (KDE) and in the ttys.
I've messed with all the language options in
OO, searched for some language packages, but i was unable to.
TIA
Cheers
--
Alexandre Vieira - [EMAIL PROTECTED
101 - 200 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
