Re: DNS

2005-02-03 Thread Loren M. Lang
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:48:36AM +0300, Zaid Dashti wrote: > hello > i created a dns server, but it works only on my local network. > how can i make it for global ? Do you have a registered domain name? If so, then tell whoever you registered it with to point it to your name server. > > NOT

Re: DNS

2005-01-25 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 07:43:10PM +0300, Zaid Dashti wrote: [...] > but i got a problem, when i use nslookup then i change the server to my DNS > machine IP local network (by using another computer in the local network), > it works fine, but when i use the IP of my internet account, i got time-

Re: DNS

2005-01-25 Thread Zaid Dashti
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zaid Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 9:06 PM Subject: Re: DNS On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 07:43:10PM +0300, Zaid Dashti wrote: [...] but i got a problem, when i use nslookup then i change the server to my DNS machi

Re: DNS

2005-01-25 Thread cpghost
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:25:54PM +0300, Zaid Dashti wrote: > my firewall rules is only 2 rules : > add 1 allow ip from any to any > add 2 allow tcp from any to any What about udp? DNS sends and receives UDP datagrams, so you need to punch yet another hole in your firewall. > i didn't a

Re: DNS

2005-01-25 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
"Zaid Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i bought a domain, and i'm trying to host it using my machine in my home > (just for learning how to host and DNS) First thing to check for: has the domain been properly delegated to you? What kind of response do you get from say, $ dig domaininquest

Re: DNS

2005-01-29 Thread Thomas Foster
Does it have a publically accessible interface that can be accessed via an internet connection, or is it behind a Firewall/NAT/Router? Is UDP port 53 accessible if it is behind a Router? Are you hosting a publically resolvable domain name? T - Original Message - From: "ZaiD Dashti" <

Re: DNS

2005-01-29 Thread Chris
ZaiD Dashti wrote: hello i have finished of installing my freebsd, and i ran a DNS server (named) my DNS server listens only to my local network and it does not listens to real world (i mean for resolving). how can i make it to listen to the real world? thanks 1. Purchase the O'Reilly book on Bind

Re: DNS

2005-01-29 Thread ZaiD Dashti
DNS server, cuz i want to host my domain (just for learning how to host) From: "Thomas Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ZaiD Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: Re: DNS Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:20:37 -0800 Does it have a publically accessible interface that c

Re: DNS

2005-01-29 Thread Chris
From: "Thomas Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ZaiD Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: Re: DNS Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:20:37 -0800 Does it have a publically accessible interface that can be accessed via an internet connection, or is it behind a Firew

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote: > > Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my > domain > Hi Daniel, You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND. Basic process - Install and con

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 12:51:42PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis > wrote: > > > > > Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my > > domain > > > > > Hi Daniel, > > You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns >

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Robert Huff
Waitman Gobble writes: > > Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to > > support my domain > > You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns BIND is part of the base system. > I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND. Agreed.

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Robert Huff
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes: > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I > was not able to automatically update in the system with my > scripts each time a new customer purchased a service. It would > be

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes: > > > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same > > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I > > was not able to automatically update in the system with my > > scri

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:54:59PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes: > > > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same > > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I > > was not able to automatically update in the system with my

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:24:59PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff wrote: > > > > > Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes: > > > > > Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same > > > machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thi

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Waitman Gobble
> > > Sure, like you say, it is possible "running" BIND and Apache. > But, is it possible|convenient that the name server "reside" in > the same machine that host (with apache) the domain names served > by it? Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I > am lost :-). > > Or to simplify

Re: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Robert Huff
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes: > Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I am > lost :-). Where you are now, so once were most of us. :-) > Sure, like you say, it is possible "running" BIND and Apache. > But, is it possible|convenient that the name server "reside" i

RE: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Kevin Zheng
Hello, I've been using FreeBSD as a local nameserver (with my own .local domains!) for quite some time. FreeBSD comes with a name server already installed; you don't need to get it from the ports, although I'm not sure what difference it makes. The one that comes with FreeBSD can be enabled with n

RE: DNS

2012-01-01 Thread Robert Huff
Kevin Zheng writes: > FreeBSD comes with a name server already installed; you don't > need to get it from the ports, although I'm not sure what > difference it makes. The version in ports is a later issue in te BIND 9.* series. If the difference is important to you, you probably aren'

Re: DNS

2012-01-02 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net - > ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different > than DOMAIN whois) on http://www.internic.net/whois.html) and also for each T

Re: DNS

2012-01-02 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Yes, you can run BIND on the same FreeBSD machine as your web server. > You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net - > ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different > than D

Re: DNS

2012-01-02 Thread Waitman Gobble
Now after refreshing my memory (it happened one year ago) I > could remember that I did register the nameservers. I found the > option in my registar to add to some domain i.e. mydomain.com > the entries ns1.mydomain.com, etc. I think that the problem I > had was related with the IPs. The VPS p

Re: DNS

2012-01-02 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:06:39AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hello, > > You /can/ have a nameserver with same IP as www. And you /can/ multihome > your NIC with multiple IP on same machine, > > ie, > www.example.com 192.168.0.131 and 192.168.0.132 (if you want, optional > extra address for w

Re: dns

2002-12-30 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-29 22:19:08 -0700: > Hello all. I have a freebsd box I'm using as a router for my subnet. I have > this freebsd router doing nat and dhcp assinging internal ip addresses for > the computers on the network (i.e. 192.168.x.x). This box is also a web > server for a

Re: DNS virgin

2005-02-10 Thread Mark A. Garcia
kilim wrote: Now that I've registered a certain domain through godaddy.com I wish to set up my own DNS server. In the Godaddy's web interface there is a way to set two new DNS server. Can I just put one of the server to be my DNS primary leaving out the secondary ? Or can I leave their se

Re: DNS virgin

2005-02-10 Thread Kevin Kinsey
kilim wrote: Hello, being a DNS virgin I deceided to post this after reading through Dns & Bind book and various on/off-line documentation. I have loads of questions even though I've read through this stuff. And I'm hoping that you can help me clarify them. Thanks in advance ! Now that I've regis

Re: DNS virgin

2005-02-11 Thread kilim
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:41:52PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > kilim wrote: > > > Now that I've registered a certain domain through godaddy.com I > > wish to set up my own DNS server. In the Godaddy's web interface > > there is a way to set two new DNS server. Can I just put one of the > > s

Re: DNS virgin

2005-02-11 Thread Vince Hoffman
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, kilim wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:41:52PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: kilim wrote: Now that I've registered a certain domain through godaddy.com I wish to set up my own DNS server. In the Godaddy's web interface there is a way to set two new DNS server. Can I just put

Re: DNS virgin

2005-02-11 Thread kilim
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:00:11PM +, Vince Hoffman wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, kilim wrote: > > >On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:41:52PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > >>kilim wrote: > >> > > > >>> Now that I've registered a certain domain through godaddy.com I > >>> wish to set up my own DNS s

Re: DNS refresh

2005-12-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Sorry for the novice question, > > How does one go about refreshing a dns record on BSD box (without rebooting), > it is NOT a DNS server. Most BSD networks do not have dynamic DNS updating enabled on their nameservers, but that is the capability you seem to be asking a

RE: DNS refresh

2005-12-12 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 3:06 PM To: Jean-Paul Natola Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS refresh Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Sorry for the novice question, > >

Re: DNS refresh

2005-12-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > I'm in windows environment mainly, I recently setup a BSD box (static IP, and > DNS pointing to the windows DNS server) > > With Exim, SA and CLAM_AV > > All has been running relatively well (3 months give or take) > > Till today I started getting this: > > milter# fr

RE: DNS refresh

2005-12-12 Thread Derek Ragona
At 02:32 PM 12/12/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Swiger Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 3:06 PM To: Jean-Paul Natola Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS refresh Jean-Paul Natola wrote

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread cpghost
Sean Dicks wrote: I can ping both NS servers but when it comes to pinging my domain it doesn't ping. Ideas on what could be wrong? You probably didn't configure the resolver library correctly. In /etc/resolv.conf, you need to add the name server entries: /etc/resolv.conf: domain example.com na

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Sean Dicks
I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in /etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.org" I see right nameservers on it. Doesn't that mean it

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Eric Crist
On Sunday 11 July 2004 12:35, Sean Dicks wrote: > I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in > /etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete > the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain > today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread cpghost
Sean Dicks wrote: I am only using dns forwarding. I already have default values in /etc/resolv.conf from my ISP, do I have to add my 2 others and delete the ones from the ISP or just leave it as is. I registered the domain today when I "whois rimouski-undernet.org" I see right nameservers on it. Do

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Len Conrad
No, it doesn't. I can successfully perform a whois from here on your domain, but an nslookup/dig both fail. Give it 72 hours to propagate across the net. propagation is a bogus idea when applied to DNS. Like WMD and "immediate threat" when applied to Iraq. As soon as the delegation and glue d

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Eric Crist
On Sunday 11 July 2004 13:12, cpghost wrote: > Just give it some time to propagate. > > % dig rimouski-undernet.org > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> rimouski-undernet.org > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; res_nsend: Operation timed out > > Yep, not yet visible here... > > -cpghost. Something

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Len Conrad
Perhaps you need to do some research on the subject. perhaps you need to clarify your vagary There are a series of DNS systems ??? For a public domain.tld, the only two servers involved are : 1. the servers authoritative for .tld to publish the delegation and glue records for domain.tld. 2.

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Len Conrad wrote: > >a domain needs to be added to before it will function correctly. > >This is known as propagation. > > the misnomer propagation is used by people who think DNS data needs time to > be available, to "propagate", over several days or a

Re: DNS server

2004-07-11 Thread Kevin Stevens
On Jul 11, 2004, at 12:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Len Conrad wrote: a domain needs to be added to before it will function correctly. This is known as propagation. the misnomer propagation is used by people who think DNS data needs time to be available, to

Re: dns timeouts

2005-01-07 Thread Kevin Kinsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am new to FREEBSD and trying 5.3 on my compaq presario 2190US laptop. After a fight I got the CD and everything running. Now my dns resolutions keep timing out. I do not see anything on the errata, can someone point me in a direction to do some light reading or to a

Re: DNS problems

2005-01-08 Thread Matt Emmerton
> gentle people, > apologies if this question should have been posted in the newbies > list, but i saw a similar question in the archives of this mailing > list, which did not quite answer my question. > > i'm trying to install FreeBSD for the first time. i'm installing it on > my desktop. > > the

Re: DNS problems

2005-01-09 Thread ryanv
I am no expert by any means, but the problem I was having sounds simular. I had a fresh install on friday, I could get to the web but dns resolutions were incredibly, slow and timing out most of the time. But my box is now working perfectly. #1 you dns nameservers addresses need to be in /etc/

Re: dns question

2005-01-20 Thread Dick Davies
* Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0157 12:57]: > Not really a freebsdquestion specifically. > > My company uses >ns.foo.com and ns1.foo.com for primay/secondary dns, about 200 > domains rely on these. > > We want a new physical machine , in a different location, with a > different IP to

Re: dns question

2005-01-20 Thread Jeff MacDonald
I think it depends upon the registrar. Of the 200 domains, they are probably registered across 2 or 3 registrars. Some ask for just the host name, while others ask for both hostname and IP. Jeff. On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:14:01 +, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Jeff MacDonald <[EMA

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-24 Thread gabriel
They could be negative cached by your isp's dns servers. Personally I run dnscache to avoid that issue, I don't trust my isp with _ANYTHING_, but the connection. Cheers! On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:49:18 +1000, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im having trouble getting some webpages due to my DNS

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread Warren
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:54 pm, gabriel wrote: > They could be negative cached by your isp's dns servers. Personally I > run dnscache to avoid that issue, I don't trust my isp with > _ANYTHING_, but the connection. > > Cheers! I ended up changing the name server addy form the dns server to the actua

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread gabriel
Very cool. :) On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:04:15 +1000, Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:54 pm, gabriel wrote: > > They could be negative cached by your isp's dns servers. Personally I > > run dnscache to avoid that issue, I don't trust my isp with > > _ANYTHING_, but the conne

Re: DNS Prob

2005-01-25 Thread Warren
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:27 pm, Warren wrote: > ok i changed the IP in the resolv.conf on the primry machine holding the > connection to the ent and on this local machine to the ns server .. yet for > some reason the IP dosent change on this machien but does on the other .. > what am i missing ? Ok

Re: DNS Prob

2005-01-25 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:27 pm, Warren wrote: > > ok i changed the IP in the resolv.conf on the primry machine holding the > > connection to the ent and on this local machine to the ns server .. yet for > > some reason the IP dosent change on this machien but doe

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread Thomas Foster
I am not quite sure of your name server setup, or even your registrant for your domain name.. but I do have a few questions Is this DNS server behind a firewall? Is this DNS server master for your zone? What is your zone name? Does your Domian registration include this server as primary for your

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread ZaiD Dashti
No there is no firewall Yes my DNS is the master of my zone my zone name is: zdashi.com Does your Domian registration include this server as primary for your domain name? yes From: "Thomas Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ZaiD Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread ZaiD Dashti
i think my ISP blocking port 53, i will call them thanks From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ZaiD Dashti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DNS problem Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:39:52 +0100 On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:45:22PM +, ZaiD Dashti wrote: > hello >

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-25 Thread Thomas Foster
Creation Date: 2004-10-04 Expiration Date: 2005-10-04 - Original Message - From: "ZaiD Dashti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:03 AM Subject: Re: DNS problem i think my ISP blocking port 53, i will call th

Re: DNS problem

2005-01-26 Thread cpghost
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:45:22PM +, ZaiD Dashti wrote: > hello > > i have a problem with my DNS server. > > first, i have a registered domain name and i want to change its NS server > to my server to host it in my home (just for learning about DNS) If you have a domain, you must setup at

RE: DNS problem?

2005-06-08 Thread John Brooks
> I am running a FreeBSD server behind a Linksys Wireless Access > Point / Router (BEFW11S4). Its local address is 192.168.1.1. The > Linksys is attached to a DSL modem. In my /etc/rc.conf file I have > defaultrouter=192.168.1.1 > which works most of the time. However occasionally, all network > t

Re: DNS problem?

2005-06-09 Thread Alan Curtis
On 6/8/05, John Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am running a FreeBSD server behind a Linksys Wireless Access > > Point / Router (BEFW11S4). Its local address is 192.168.1.1. The > > Linksys is attached to a DSL modem. In my /etc/rc.conf file I have > > defaultrouter=192.168.1.1 > > which w

RE: DNS problem?

2005-06-09 Thread John Brooks
are the dns servers of the other computers the SAME as the freebsd server? what are the contents of /etc/resolv.conf? -- John Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank you John. > > I will try this series of pings the next time my server freezes. I did > try something similiar, if not so methodical

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Casey Scott
If you are just looking to be able to resolve DNS internally, you can very easily setup your FBSD box to be a forwarding DNS server, and point all your other machines at it for DNS resolution. There are many howtos covering this subject. Casey > I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys W

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:07:41 -0400 Alan Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys Wireless Access > Point and Firewall and a DSL modem. My ISP assigns me a dynamic IP > address which changes on a regular basis and the root domain and > Domain Name Se

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Alan Curtis
On Jul 3, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Leon Messner wrote: On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:07:41AM -0400, Alan Curtis wrote: I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys Wireless Access Point and Firewall and a DSL modem. My ISP assigns me a dynamic IP address which changes on a regular basis and the roo

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Alan Curtis
On Jul 3, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Alejandro Pulver wrote: On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:07:41 -0400 Alan Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys Wireless Access Point and Firewall and a DSL modem. My ISP assigns me a dynamic IP address which changes on a regular

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Alejandro Pulver
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:23:31 -0400 Alan Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:07:41 -0400 > > Alan Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE behind a Linksys Wireless Access > >>

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Alan Curtis
On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Alejandro Pulver wrote: If you want examples I can provide you some. Then let me know if you want option 1) or 2) so I can help you with the next step. 1) Have an independent DNS server on each machine (there is one for Windows called TreeWalk - free -, that

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Ken Ebling
On Jul 3, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Alan Curtis wrote: I do need some clear instructions. I tried djbdns without success (see another post) and also the instructions under 'Domain Name System (DNS)' in the FreeBSD Handbook. I added named_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf. Used the default configurat

Re: DNS setup

2005-07-03 Thread Ken Ebling
On Jul 3, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Alan Curtis wrote: On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:01 PM, Alejandro Pulver wrote: If you want examples I can provide you some. Then let me know if you want option 1) or 2) so I can help you with the next step. 1) Have an independent DNS server on each machine (there is

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Matthew Seaman
DAve wrote: Good morning. I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME. The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to have

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread DAve
Sean Cavanaugh wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400 > From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: DNS Question > > Good morning. > > I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A > record for new domains we host instead

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Len Conrad
> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue >was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as >this. > >example.com CNAME otherdomain.com >www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com > >I was taught this was not good form worse, it's illegal. ,

RE: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Len Conrad
>> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue >> >was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as >> >this. >> > >> >example.com CNAME otherdomain.com >> >www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com >> > >> >I was taught this was not good form >> >>

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: worse, it's illegal. how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if i had control ov

RE: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
> >how is this illegal? > > CNAME rule: > > a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records. > > for the node domain.tld: > > domain.tld. soa ... > domain.tld. ns ... > domain.tld. cname otherdomain.tld. > > this node has a CNAME and "other data", so it's illegal, no matter what you >

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Matthew Seaman
Chuck Swiger wrote: Hi-- On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: worse, it's illegal. how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's; in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are supposed to be using the canonical name ra

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread xSAPPYx
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail on all these domains, use A records On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote: > >> >how is this illegal? >> >> CNAME rule: >> >> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records. >> >> for the node domain.tld

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread RW
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:07 -0700 xSAPPYx wrote: > Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail > on all these domains, use A records You can use the domains for mail provided that that they share MX servers, if example.com has a CNAME pointing to example.net then mai

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-28 Thread DAve
Chuck Swiger wrote: On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's; in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are supposed to be using the

Re: dns woes

2009-03-17 Thread Tim Judd
Replies interspersed On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:15 -0400, David Banning wrote: > I have had my dns server working fine in the past but now it seems > to be down and I can't locate the reason. > > Here are some details; > > # dig @127.0.0.1 mylocaldomain.com Is this a real registered .com or so

Re: DNS Resolution

2010-11-19 Thread Gary Gatten
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing NAT. Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the DNS ALG to fix the "problem". If your ns is behind a NATing device, start

Re: DNS Resolution

2010-11-19 Thread Jay Hall
On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote: > I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing > NAT. Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on > DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the > DNS ALG t

Re: DNS configuration

2007-03-15 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:16:46 -1200 "neo neo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ? Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The internet depends on it. -- Dick

Re: DNS configuration

2007-03-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ? Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The internet depends on it. exactly. it's quite easy to make domains not synchronize to slaves right etc. w

Re: DNS configuration

2007-03-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:56:31 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ? > > > > Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly > > book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. > > The

Re: DNS configuration

2007-03-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:16:46AM -1200, neo neo wrote: > hi > > For NAT ; > > i already configure internal and external ip . And also finished gateway. > > but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ? Will you be doing your own DNS or will that be done by your ISP? > > by the way , " r

Re: DNS Setting

2007-01-02 Thread N.J. Mann
On Tuesday, 2 January, 2007 at 13:22:15 +0330, Mohamad Babaei wrote: > > I want to put my web server (ex. www.mysite.com) on a FreeBSD server and my > mail server on another server (ex. mail.mysite.com), would you tell me how > should i set my DNS setting & how my DNS files should look like ? whe

Re: DNS Setting

2007-01-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Mohamad Babaei wrote: Hi, I want to put my web server (ex. www.mysite.com) on a FreeBSD server and my mail server on another server (ex. mail.mysite.com), would you tell me how should i set my DNS setting & how my DNS files should look like ? where should i set my MX records ? Maybe start here

Re: DNS Question

2008-03-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 国徽 wrote: > Hello, > > I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script > "/etc/namedb/make-localhost" used in the document, So I can't go on > now? Please tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!> > Unfortunately the docume

Re: DNS Question

2008-03-05 Thread David Alanis
Hi Erik: I don't recall the how-to explaining the usage of this script. I too, just recently setup a DNS server for a couple domains. My recommendation is to familiarize yourself with the Administrators Reference Manual (ARM) on BIND's website: http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/arm93/

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread Christer Hermansson
Ruel Luchavez wrote: when i resume it to its current configuration "Obtain DBS server automatically" the problem is back, is this a problem in my DNS server? I'm using the FreeBSD 6.2 version... I already restarted the DNS Server "/etc/rc.d/named restart" but nothing happens the problem is still

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread Ruel Luchavez
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's inside of it domain name On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Christer Hermansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ruel Luchavez wrote: > > > when i resume it to its current configuration > > "Obtain DBS server automatically" th

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread Ruel Luchavez
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's inside of it domain name myplace.com.ph name server 101.1.21.1 name server192.168.1.62 could it be my firewall blocking it? but i didn't change any configuration from it.. Thanks in advance for your help..:( > >

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread D Hill
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's inside of it domain name myplace.com.ph name server 101.1.21.1 name server192.168.1.62 According to the resolver(5) documentation, it should loo

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread Ruel Luchavez
Ok..I have follow your post D Hill, but it doesn't solve the problem Please HELP... Thanks..:( On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:45 AM, D Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: > > before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote: > before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's > inside of it > > domain name myplace.com.ph > name server 101.1.21.1 > name server192.168.1.62 > The problems with what you've just posted are:

Re: DNS Problem

2008-05-01 Thread D Hill
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 15:35 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote: before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's inside of it domain name myplace.com.ph name server 101.1.21.1 name server192.168.

Re: DNS troubles

2008-07-21 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS > requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net, > but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why). > > I have a machine with two buil

Re: DNS troubles

2008-07-21 Thread Patrick Mahan
Jim presented these words - circa 7/21/08 6:30 PM-> I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net, but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why). I have a machine with two built in NICs on the mot

  1   2   3   4   >