Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor wrote:
Different OS's? Marketshare...
any idea how many major OS's are out there today and what market share
they have?
i think
WIN 70%
Lin 20%
Apple 5%
Where did you get these numbers?
so who is the other 5 % ???
Well, other than *BSD, nam
Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor skrev:
Different OS's? Marketshare...
any idea how many major OS's are out there today and what market share
they have?
i think
WIN 70%
Lin 20%
Apple 5%
so who is the other 5 % ???
Well. First of all "windows" is NOT an operatingsystem, it'
bicle! (SM)
---Shalo
-;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernt Hansson
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:02 AM
To: FreeBSD mailinglist
Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspo
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:01:44PM +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor skrev:
> >Different OS's? Marketshare...
> >
> >any idea how many major OS's are out there today and what market share
> >they have?
> >
> >i think
> >
> >WIN 70%
> >Lin 20%
> >A
Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor writes:
> any idea how many major OS's are out there today and what market share
> they have?
Fresh stats from my Web server:
Windows . . . . . . . . . . 93.5118 %
Macintosh . . . . . . . . . 4.7794 %
Unknown . . . . . . . . . . 1.2731 %
Web
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor writes:
> any idea how many major OS's are out there today a
---
-Original Message-
From: Wood, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:07 PM
To: bob wifi hotspot n evdo wireless internet guy
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Different OS's? Marketshare
Here is a link to some stats for WebServers
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
> Atkielski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:59 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
>
>
> Robert Kim, Wirel
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Kim,
> Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:49 AM
> To: List Free Bsd
> Subject: Different OS's? Marketshare
>
>
> Different OS's? Marketshare...
>
> any id
inal Message -
From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Kim, Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "List Free Bsd"
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:30 AM
Subject: RE: Different OS's? Marketshare
>
>
>
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> What website is this exactly?
My own.
> Would you like the stats to show different?
I don't care what they show, as long as they are accurate.
> If your site is targeted to Windows users I would expect it
> to have a high percentage of hits from Windows.
It's not ta
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> Note that Linux is doing much better against these measuring sticks
> because the Linux community, for all their loud proclamations about
> being GPL, has been steadily making Linux less and less
> distinguishable from the commercial OSs. When for example was the last
>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:30:35 -0800
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Kim,
> > Wireless Internet / Wifi Hotspot Advisor
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:49 AM
> > To: Li
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:21:06 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
>
> > Note that Linux is doing much better against these measuring sticks
> > because the Linux community, for all their loud proclamations about
> > being GPL, has been steadily making Linu
Jacob S writes:
> You must be looking at a different Linux community than the one I'm
> familiar with. I thought boxed sets of Linux had gone out of retail
> stores years ago.
I bought a copy of Mandrake Linux in a retail store yesterday. I saw
SuSE in the store, too. Computer stores have a wid
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
There have been a few exceptions. The Slackware site looked pretty
spartan compared to most of the others.
I was converted to FreeBSD from Slackware. If you want to go Linux and
maintain the "freedom of configuration" you have with FreeBSD (ie, just
edit the text file
Laurence Sanford writes:
> I was converted to FreeBSD from Slackware. If you want to go Linux and
> maintain the "freedom of configuration" you have with FreeBSD (ie, just
> edit the text file, which is in a sensable spot) and get ...whatever it
> is you hope to get from linux - don't get me wrong
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:49:55 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob S writes:
>
> > You must be looking at a different Linux community than the one I'm
> > familiar with. I thought boxed sets of Linux had gone out of retail
> > stores years ago.
>
> I bought a copy of Mandrak
Jacob S writes:
> You obviously didn't look at Debian then.
Yes, I did.
> As to which will suit your purposes better; why not do a dual boot
> between Linux and FreeBSD? They can co-exist happily.
I can't even successfully install a single OS on this machine, much less
two.
I tried to install
Jacob S writes:
> Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
> computer store still gets to see an alternative once in a while.
I'm pretty sure I've seen Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat, Fedora, and a couple
of other Linux versions in computer stores.
A few years ago, I bought my f
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 01:28 pm, you wrote:
>
> I can't even successfully install a single OS on this machine,
> much less two.
>
What kind of problems are you having with FreeBSD? There was a
non-specific mention of errors regarding your hard drive, but
said everything was working ok.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob S writes:
>
> > Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
> > computer store still gets to see an alternative once in a while.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've seen Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat, Fed
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacob S writes:
Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
computer store still gets to see an alternative once in a while.
I'm pretty sure I've seen M
Mike Hauber writes:
> What kind of problems are you having with FreeBSD? There was a
> non-specific mention of errors regarding your hard drive, but
> said everything was working ok.
I mentioned the main error in a separate thread: After successfully
installing the OS, I simply cannot persuade
Jacob S writes:
> So, FreeBSD is vulnerable to this same hypocrasy; where it is sold in
> stores but still hailed as a "free" OS?
The FreeBSD was at an unbeatable price--I think it was only $10 or so,
just a bit more than the packaging cost. That's not the case for Linux,
which I see going for p
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:32:50 -0700
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Jacob S wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
> > Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jacob S writes:
> >>
> >>> Good. I'm glad to see the avera
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Feb 23, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Jacob S wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:46:47 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jacob S writes:
Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
computer store still gets t
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 12:46 pm, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Jacob S writes:
> > Good. I'm glad to see the average Windows user looking around the
> > computer store still gets to see an alternative once in a while.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've seen Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat, Fedora, and a
> couple
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Does that include X and KDE? I'm getting wild SCSI errors on FreeBSD
trying to install stuff, and I don't really know what that means, but it
doesn't appear to be corrupting anything, and it seems to be installing
software.
Well, I don't use KDE because I don't particul
Andrew L. Gould writes:
> You can still find FreeBSD at Fry's Electronics and MicroCenter. I
> don't know if CompUSA still carries it. I have mixed feelings about
> FreeBSD 5.0-5.2.1 being sold in the retail market.
How so? Seems like it would be a good idea to me.
I see that one can still o
Laurence Sanford writes:
> Well, I don't use KDE because I don't particularly like heavyweight
> software unless I need it ...
Heavyweight in the sense of resources required, or complexity, or what?
I got the impression that KDE was the one that everyone used.
Which window manager most closely
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:39:08 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob S writes:
>
> > So, FreeBSD is vulnerable to this same hypocrasy; where it is sold
> > in stores but still hailed as a "free" OS?
>
> The FreeBSD was at an unbeatable price--I think it was only $10 or so,
> j
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Laurence Sanford writes:
Well, I don't use KDE because I don't particularly like heavyweight
software unless I need it ...
Heavyweight in the sense of resources required, or complexity, or what?
I got the impression that KDE was the one that everyone used.
Which win
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:24:36 +0100
Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew L. Gould writes:
> > Fourth, I appreciate all the hard work that goes into developing and
> > packaging an operating system and its related applications. I am
> > happy to pay for the convenience of an opera
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 02:24 pm, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Andrew L. Gould writes:
> > You can still find FreeBSD at Fry's Electronics and MicroCenter. I
> > don't know if CompUSA still carries it. I have mixed feelings
> > about FreeBSD 5.0-5.2.1 being sold in the retail market.
>
> How
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
I'm still quite ambivalent about it. I keep wondering if Linux is
different enough and useful enough to be worth dedicating this machine
to it ... or if I should just continue with FreeBSD and install X on the
machine (and KDE, probably, since it seems to be popular, altho
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 02:34 pm, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Mike Hauber writes:
> > What kind of problems are you having with FreeBSD? There was
> > a non-specific mention of errors regarding your hard drive,
> > but said everything was working ok.
>
> I mentioned the main error in a separa
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Laurence Sanford writes:
Well, I don't use KDE because I don't particularly like heavyweight
software unless I need it ...
Heavyweight in the sense of resources required, or complexity, or what?
I got the impression that KDE was the one that everyone used.
Hmm, n
> >Is it possible to install multiple X servers on the same machine so that
> >one can fire up whichever one strikes one's fancy at a given time?
>
> I don't see why not, although it'd probably be more common to simply
> kill one wm session and start another to save resources. Maybe it's
> possib
markzero wrote:
Is it possible to install multiple X servers on the same machine so that
one can fire up whichever one strikes one's fancy at a given time?
I don't see why not, although it'd probably be more common to simply
kill one wm session and start another to save resources. Maybe it'
> >This is certainly possible. You need to start X via something other than
> >startx as you must manually set DISPLAY vars. I have run two X servers on
> >my machine many times - one running a local desktop environment and the
> >other running a WM from a remote box over SSH (for no particular rea
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
[...] I keep wondering if [...] I should just continue with FreeBSD
and install X on the machine (and KDE, probably, since it seems to be
popular, although I welcome suggestions).
Which window manager is the closest to classic UNIX window managers
(
Mike Hauber writes:
> Found the thread... Have you tried installing an older version?
No, but most of the problems I saw in my research were on 4.x or older
versions. This version (5.3) seems to run fine once it's up; the only
problem is getting the machine to boot it. Also, I'm getting those
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jacob S
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:53 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:24:36 +
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Kinsey
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:04 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Anthony Atkielski
> Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
>
>
&g
On Thursday 24 February 2005 12:46 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Mike Hauber writes:
> > Found the thread... Have you tried installing an older
> > version?
>
> No, but most of the problems I saw in my research were on 4.x
> or older versions. This version (5.3) seems to run fine once
> it's up;
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:26:28 +0100,
> Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> I got the impression that KDE was the one that everyone used.
> Which window manager most closely approximates the GUI of traditional
> UNIX workstations?
That would be twm. It is (I believ
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:24:36 +0100
> > Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Fine. Except that distributors are barely doing anything more
> > > than repac
Sandy Rutherford writes:
> Do you mean multiple X servers or multiple window managers?
I guess I mean window managers. There's only one X server required, right?
Anyway, you answered my question.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
Mike Hauber writes:
> Hmmm... I tend to view a wm about the same way I view win.exe
> (not in the disrespectful way, of course) in the respect that
> it's real purpose is to provide a pretty point and click menu
> system (which I'm not knocking). It's very usefull and
> palletable to some, us
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Mike Hauber writes:
[...]
Well... There's a lot of options available. Personally, I prefer
something like blackbox for administrative logins. It's _very_
lightweight and (like all things should be), you pretty much
build it from the ground up.
What do you mean by buil
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Kinsey
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:04 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Anthony Atkielski
Subject: Re: Different OS's? Marketshare
There are so many other WMs
52 matches
Mail list logo
