>-Original Message-
>From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:22 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Henry Lenzi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>
>On May 16, 2006, at 11
Sorry to be jumping into this late.
On 15 May 2006 at 8:57, "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, you get to vote on the selection of various bits of code changes.
That sounds more realistic to me than assuming committers are also
the sole FreeBSD "esthetic committee" too.
>
On May 16, 2006, at 11:15 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad
Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:08 AM
To: Henry Lenzi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad
>Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
>Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:08 AM
>To: Henry Lenzi
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>
>On Ma
BTW, I entirely apologize for singling out a religious group. Perhaps
I've should've phrased it as "I hope this didn't have to do with any
concern or discomfort related to religious groups". Maybe I'm reading
much too many polls...
Anyways, I still find it hard to believe it...Although I mentione
Henry Lenzi wrote:
It was, I am sorry to say. The core developer that pushed for all
this said he was tired of when presenting FreeBSD to have to field
a bunch of questions by people hung up over the devil image, it
distracted from the presentation of the operating system's features.
Ted
Yo
On May 15, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Henry Lenzi wrote:
It was, I am sorry to say. The core developer that pushed for all
this said he was tired of when presenting FreeBSD to have to field
a bunch of questions by people hung up over the devil image, it
distracted from the presentation of the operatin
It was, I am sorry to say. The core developer that pushed for all
this said he was tired of when presenting FreeBSD to have to field
a bunch of questions by people hung up over the devil image, it
distracted from the presentation of the operating system's features.
Ted
You're kidding, right?
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Birrell
>Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:29 PM
>To: Gary Hayers
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>Those people who want to influence decisions lik
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Hayers
>Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> No, the majority of people who h
John Birrell wrote:
Quite frankly
it is of no importance as the community were not the ones with a say
about it, the FreeBSD management were and they did.
The new logo was selected using a democratic vote of people who have
commit privileges to the various parts of FreeBSD. This was conducted
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 06:14:23AM +0100, Gary Hayers wrote:
> Quite frankly
> it is of no importance as the community were not the ones with a say
> about it, the FreeBSD management were and they did.
The new logo was selected using a democratic vote of people who have
commit privileges to the
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
No, the majority of people who have posted do not like it,
thats not the
whole community. Maybe you should do your research better.
It's probably a revelation to you but you do not have to poll
the entire community to find out if the majority of them don't
like someth
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Hayers
>Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 8:14 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> The community has already spoken, go
(yes...adding to the fire... oh well)
On Sat, 13 May 2006 21:38:56 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is really a great example of why this logo does nothing to help
> the FreeBSD project.
probably true.
> What about the logo makes you think of an
> operating system?
w
On Sun, 14 May 2006 17:34:33 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I don't like the new logo either, but this is a personal opinion
> only.
Agreed.
> I ask hereby the people who are in charge for such decisions to
> make a web page for a poll of the community. Thx.
me too.
--
Best regards,
Cemasko Vik
El día Sunday, May 14, 2006 a las 04:14:17PM +0100, Gary Hayers escribió:
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >The community has already spoken, go back and look at all the
> >posts on this and the other lists on the logo, the majority of
> >them don't like it.
> >
> >Ted
>
> No, the majority of people w
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The community has already spoken, go back and look at all the
posts on this and the other lists on the logo, the majority of
them don't like it.
Ted
No, the majority of people who have posted do not like it, thats not the
whole community. Maybe you should do your resea
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fabian Keil
> >"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
>But to ignoramusus the new logo doesen't look like a devil image,
>it looks like a sex toy.
It similarly to not to horns of a daemon, but female breasts.
Bad idea.
--
Andrew Wingborn
http://andr.ru/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Varuna
>Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 11:13 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Cc: Henry Lenzi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>
>
On Sat, 13 May 2006, Varuna wrote:
On Saturday 13 May 2006 21:57, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry Lenzi
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
I really
On Saturday 13 May 2006 21:57, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry Lenzi
> >Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 9:04 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: New Fr
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry Lenzi
>Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 9:04 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
> I really hope the rationale wasn't something
>like evangelica
-Original Message-
From: David Stanford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 8:11 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
On 5/13/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Your missing somet
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fabian Keil
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:06 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>"Ted Mitt
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:59:59AM -0400, fbsd wrote:
> The point being it was not announced on the questions list.
Oh, where would an announcement go... like, the announcement
mailinglist?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:26:38 +0900
From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
stion? FreeBSD is not a democracy.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
> McAllister
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@fre
>you are attempting to destroy the new logo's image by imaturely
>calling it a "sex toy" and in turn are slowly taking away from those
>precious dollars put into aquiring it.
I'm sorry to say, but it was a bad choice.
The little devil has been with us for a long time. Apple has an apple,
Windows
The community doesen't want the new logo and the majority of the
community
prefers Beastie over the sex-toy.
Not that I want to upset anything, but I thought Beastie was the logo.
Where might a see a copy of the "sex-toy"? Is it that ugly sphere with
the 2 cones for ears?
__
On 5/13/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Stanford
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:32 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New Fr
>-Original Message-
>From: Greg Barniskis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:36 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: cpghost; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Stanford
>Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:32 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo
>
>
>Why, oh why, would you post this?
>
Figure this may get more attention - LOL !!!
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 07:31:50 +0100
From: "Graham Bentley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ACPI / APM Question
To:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I am running 6.0 on a little rackserver.
Alot o
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
To those taking affront at such answers, no one is saying "oh, fork
you!" in some intentionally rude or belittling way (at least, I'm
not), they're saying forking (process-wise) to the appropriate forum
is the logical thing to do.
I take affront to such answers beca
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
> >
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> On 5/9/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
> >> I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we
Why, oh why, would you post this?
So help me to understand...The FreeBSD Project takes great effort in
not only producing a truly _great_ operating system, trademarked as
being fast, robust, stable and secure, provides it to the world for
_free_, but also takes on the additional chore of attempti
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Axel S. Gruner
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:46 AM
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subje
On Thursday 11 May 2006 00:10, you wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Barniskis
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:07 AM
> >To: cpghost
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Barniskis
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:07 AM
>To: cpghost
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>These are indeed
>-Original Message-
>From: Ceri Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:31 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jonathan Horne; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>On 10/5/06 09:18, "Ted Mittelstae
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Barniskis
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:03 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>The logo issue is a horse t
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DAve
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:15 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>
>To be blunt about it, you and everyone else had their chanc
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Axel S. Gruner
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:46 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: RE: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>Am Mittwoch, den 10.05.2006, 02:05 -0700 schrieb Ted M
Bill Moran wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +
> "Kep Woof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
>> means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
>> users) seem to have ended up with is a f
Ceri Davies wrote:
> On 10/5/06 23:37, "martinko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Ceri Davies wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/5/06 15:57, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
> I have to agree with the original poster. Th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> On 5/9/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
>> I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
>> up with such
On 10/5/06 23:37, "martinko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
>> On 9/5/06 15:57, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use s
Ceri Davies wrote:
> On 9/5/06 15:57, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
>>> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
>>> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of
>>> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At
>> Me Too.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:04:31PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On 9/5/06 11:56, "cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually
> > customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting
> > up a transparent proxy j
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:33:14PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the
>>> developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here.
>>
>> Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-(
>>
>> Fortunately, there *are* developer
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:44PM +, cpghost wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > > Many professional logo design people never even knew about
> > > the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted
> > > to the questions list where everyone read
cpghost wrote:
Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-(
Yes, it explains that some people are too busy to read hundreds of
messages on this list, and would rather do something else like coding.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window
> > open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text,
Good idea. The word "FreeBSD" as it stood at the top of the
freebsd.orgmainpage the day before the release of
6.1-RELEASE was nice.
> There were tens of
cpghost wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:03:04AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote:
No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both
OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not
a beginning, it's a finality.
questions@ is for general user questions. The sex
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:00:49PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all.
> >
> >That's no reason to tell lies.
>
> There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any
> evidence, either.
Statements were made which are prov
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:51:10PM +, cpghost wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
> > >>> This is free software man, if you don't lik
> I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all.
That's no reason to tell lies.
There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any
evidence, either.
Can't wait till you get caught out.
Jeff.
___
freebsd-questions@freeb
Could we please stop this flood??
--
Pietro Cerutti
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
> >>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
> >>> yourself.
> >>
> >> What is the procedure to fi
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > Many professional logo design people never even knew about
> > the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted
> > to the questions list where everyone reads.
>
> Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even al
On 10/5/06 18:24, "cpghost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
>>> This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
>>> yourself.
>>
>> What is the procedure to fix a logo?
>
> use send-pr(1), of course!
>
> Since we're talking about lo
On 10/5/06 15:15, "DAve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pixelhammer.com/aw_jeez.jpg
>
> This has gone too far. Searching shows that the FreeBSD questions list
> had mention of this over a year ago.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2005-February/076063.
> html
>
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:03:04AM -0500, Greg Barniskis wrote:
> No one is belittling the subject, only pointing out that it's both
> OT and done with. The appearance of the logo on the Web site is not
> a beginning, it's a finality.
questions@ is for general user questions. The sex-toy just ap
On 10/5/06 09:18, "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Horne
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM
>> To: freebsd-qu
On 10/5/06 16:42, "Jeff Rollin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
>> IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
>> that I like for a screensaver?
>
>
> I think it's a bigger problem than that. Whe
On 10/5/06 15:25, "fbsd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your negtave comments are foundless.
> A public vote is not an logistical near-impossibility.
> Hell just creating a special list to submit an email
> to as your yes or not vote is a simple solution and other
> solutions could be found one way
On 10/5/06 13:13, "fbsd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
> announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
> new logo was made was it talked about on this list
> People were very up set with it them and the ground
> swell over this has only
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
> >This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
> >yourself.
>
> What is the procedure to fix a logo?
use send-pr(1), of course!
Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window
open for a new try? I humbly sugge
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:49:20PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
> What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess
> something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality.
The current logo looks like a FAT bloated Beastie that swallowed
up too much code... [recently compiled 4.11 and 6.1, and it shows...
006 10:35 PM
To: Lawrence Horvath
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
Lawrence Horvath schrieb:
I quite like the new logo, i think the new one is far more
professional then the old one, though i liked them both.
I would say that there isn't an old one. Beastie is
At 17:42 10.05.2006, Jeff Rollin wrote:
Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
that I like for a screensaver?
I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve
Ballmer r
Hi,
> However, where were the other designs?
I was wondering about that myself...
> Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done.
Netbsd logo is very nice indeed.
> The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense
> if you previously understand what
Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
that I like for a screensaver?
I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve
Ballmer responded to a complaint that his shiny ne
s group and I dont care about you.
>
> This is address the the users who like me are out raged by this.
>
> If you dont like the new logo then lets make our combined voices
> make a differance by emailing the new foundation's forming members.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
> means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
> users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that
> has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice
> cream cones
I'm going to put my 2 cents (or at the current conversion rate, 1 (British)
penny!) in here, I think.
I consider myself a new FreeBSD user. I have used it before (around 4.8),
but never really did much with it. I find that I don't very often dual boot
OSes, so I've had nothing but Gentoo on my de
fbsd wrote:
The point being it was not announced on the questions list.
Non-technical announcements are not in the questions@ charter.
The point being the logo affects all the users just not the core
committers.
And it affects you in exactly the same way as thousands of other
choices mad
Hi,
On 5/10/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this.
I'm trying to understand what has happened and why. I'm trying to
take care of this, and you, with your accusations and vitriol are'nt
helping. I want to understand
> Ted
The most interesting time I've had with beastie was setting up servers and
a
website for a Baptist org here in Alaska. I put beastie on the site
thinking
it would never be approved. They were seeking donations and were very
sensitive about the site's image. Not only did the clergy approve
fbsd wrote:
Thank you for making my point.
This should have been announced on all lists.
Just not the announcement list.
Changing the logo is really a big thing.
Yes. But the point of having a announce list is so that important
announcements are not jumbled in with lots of "where can I downloa
y this.
If you dont like the new logo then lets make our combined voices
make a differance by emailing the new foundation's forming members.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
fbsd wrote:
As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
new logo was made was it talked about on this list.
People were very up set with it them and the ground
swell over this has only gotten bigger.
http://pixelhammer.com/aw_jeez.jp
On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +
"Kep Woof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
> means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
> users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that
>
Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
> As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
> announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
> new logo was made was it talked about on this list.
> People were very up set with it them and the ground
> swell over this has only gott
Hi,
thanks for the pointer..
On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the
website
See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/
However, where were the other designs? I think a contest was
potentially a good id
>
> As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
> announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
> new logo was made was it talked about on this list.
> People were very up set with it them and the ground
> swell over this has only gotten bigger.
It was clearly announced with dates
On Tue, 9 May 2006 19:04:49 -0700
jekillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not offended by the new or the old
> logo, accept that there seems to be too much
> of a trend toward cartoon character art. This, I presume is to appeal
> to the child in us all. But seriously when do we
> actually get
As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
new logo was made was it talked about on this list.
People were very up set with it them and the ground
swell over this has only gotten bigger.
Loyal long time users are feeling insulted about
and become accountable for
their collective actions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM
To: Kep Woof
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Horne
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Subject: Re: New
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Horne
>Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:23 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>i dont mind saying that i think i must be about the o
; >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Björn König
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM
> >> To: Lawrence Horvath
> >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
> >>
> >> Lawr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
> hi,
>
> On 5/9/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
>
> I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
> up with such a terrible logo. It seems pe
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke?
The new logo already looks dated, a
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Leigh --
>Shire.Net LLC
>Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:58 PM
>To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>
>On May 9, 2006, at 11:34 PM,
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:05, you wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:41 AM
> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> >Cc: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC; Ted Mittelstaedt
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: Beech Rintoul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:41 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Cc: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Logo
>
>
>That's all well and g
At 08:13 10.05.2006, Björn König wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC schrieb:
And doesn't beastie represent the complete *BSD family, not just FreeBSD?
I think so.
Björn
Please take this to the advocacy mailinglist.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
professional criteria of what
makes a good logo). Beastie has his place.
Chad
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Björn König
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:35 PM
To: Lawrence Horvath
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New F
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo