On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am not having any problems whith other users,
Then my suspicion grows stronger that something in your own particular pine
configuration is putting your mail in a place where imapd can't s
On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am not having any problems whith other users,
Then my suspicion grows stronger that something in your own particular
pine configuration is putting your mail in a place where imapd can't
see it. So in addition to what I've sugge
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I think that pine is corrupting my inbox, so that it is unreadable by
UW-IMAPD. When using squirrelmail after using pine I see the headers, but
squirrelmail is unable to open the e-mails
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I think that pine is corrupting my inbox, so that it is unreadable
by UW-IMAPD. When using squirrelmail after using pine I see the
headers, but squirrelmail is unable to open the e-mails.
When you read your mail with (al)pine with it
I think that pine is corrupting my inbox, so that it is unreadable by
UW-IMAPD. When using squirrelmail after using pine I see the headers, but
squirrelmail is unable to open the e-mails. I switched over to alpine
since I do understand that pine is no longer supported. If other people
have
I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for
years without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine
moves mail to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap
clients. Has something changed so that I cannot use pine as a local
client? It looks like I
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:39:26 -0700
Chris Maness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for
> years without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine
> moves mail to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap
Chris Maness wrote:
> I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for years
> without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine moves mail
> to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap clients. Has
> something changed so that I cannot use pin
I have been using a local pine client in conjunction with IMAP for years
without issues. However, recently, it looks like when pine moves mail
to the mbox file, it hoses up my ability to use my imap clients. Has
something changed so that I cannot use pine as a local client? It looks
like I
;
> >> Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have
> >> defined and have rules set up for.
> >> ...
> >> If I remove ALL rules from Pine, I have absolutely no issues with
> >> duplicate messages.
> >
> > Are they perhaps del
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 at 18:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have
defined and have rules set up for.
...
If I remove ALL rules from Pine,
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:38:59 + (UTC)
Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Periodically I get duplicated messages in email folders I have
> defined and have rules set up for.
> ...
> If I remove ALL rules from Pine, I have absolutely no issues with
> dupli
use ^T)
Folder List = /home/d.hill/mail/Postfix-Users
I am using Pine version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pine -version
Pine 4.64 built Thu May 24 01:51:36 UTC 2007 on example.com
I am also using Fetchmail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ fetchmail --version
This is fetchmail release 6.3.8+RPA+SDPS+SSL
* Igor Robul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051215 10:50]:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:19PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > The first thing you can do is go out and shoo the crackers
> > off the telephone pole who are tapped into your phone line
> > and sniffing your passwords.
> By the way, is there
* caleb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051215 01:39]:
>Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
> modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
You're welcome, and good luck. I run my own mail server myself,
for very similar reasons.
> P.S - as for hollywood mov
ecember 14, 2005 10:44 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: gwen; RW; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; caleb
>Subject: RE: pine
>
>
>Hi everyone,
>Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
>modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
>switching
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:21:19PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> The first thing you can do is go out and shoo the crackers
> off the telephone pole who are tapped into your phone line
> and sniffing your passwords.
By the way, is there any relative cheap solution to do this?
I mean we can recor
as I can tell), this is
immensely useful & easy to set up. Then you don't have to worry about
picking out the "right" application (Pine or Mutt or Mozilla or
Thunderbird or whatever) to match the settings of your ISP, because
those are abstracted away by your local mail s
gt;> leaves your non-encrypted password open for sniffing:
>>
>> 1) Wireless access, *any* wireless access.
>
> Er, WEP anyone?
That's hardly enough...
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=41
> Do you really think if this poster is smart enough to figure out how
Hi everyone,
Thanks Gwen and Ted for your feedback. I am using an ADSL
modem, basically a POTS network terminal. I am thinkng of
switching ISP's, registering a domain and setting up my own mail server.
The ISP I am using (according to thier 'technical support') does not use
any encry
>-Original Message-
>From: gwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:35 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: RW; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; caleb
>Subject: Re: pine
>
>
>* Ted Mittelstaedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051214 15:22]:
&
* Ted Mittelstaedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051214 15:22]:
>
>
> >> 'Can't do secure authentication with this server'
> >
> >If the server supports neither ssl, nor any form secure
> >authentication, there
> >nothing you can do to protect your password.
>
> Garbage.
>
> The first thing you can do
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
>Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 6:08 PM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Cc: caleb
>Subject: Re: pine
>
>
>> 'Can't do secure authentication with this se
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:12:38PM +1100, caleb wrote:
> Would IPSEC be an option for securing my login
> details or kerberos?
Nope. Unless the ISP's mail server supports some form of encryption,
there's nothing you can do.
On the other hand, your desktop machine is probably only about two
hops
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, RW wrote:
If the server supports neither ssl, nor any form secure authentication, there
nothing you can do to protect your password.
Hi RW,
Thanks for your reply. Would IPSEC be an option for securing my login
details or kerberos?
caleb
--
There is no spoon
_
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 01:01, caleb wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am having some problems setting up pine && .pinerc using
> FreeBSD 6.0 - STABLE. My ISP uses POP and I am using thier SMTP for
> outgoing. I spoke to the helpdesk and the POP server does not suppo
Hi everyone,
I am having some problems setting up pine && .pinerc using
FreeBSD 6.0 - STABLE. My ISP uses POP and I am using thier SMTP for
outgoing. I spoke to the helpdesk and the POP server does not support ssl.
Pine was compiled and installed with support for POP3
Try using Cone.
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 12:25 -0500, Joe Auty wrote:
> If you plan to use the Maildir format, while it's possible for Pine
> to support this, it doesn't natively... Mutt does.
>
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
>
> >
&
If you plan to use the Maildir format, while it's possible for Pine
to support this, it doesn't natively... Mutt does.
On Aug 25, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
* Sean Murphy [2005-08-25 08:47 -0700]
We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. W
We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are in the
process of moving to FreeBSD. I installed Pine from an updated ports
collection and received a message about pine not being very secure. Is
anyone using an alternative to pine that can also read pine's folder
* Sean Murphy [2005-08-25 08:47 -0700]
> We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are in the
> process of moving to FreeBSD. I installed Pine from an updated ports
> collection and received a message about pine not being very secure. Is
> anyone using an al
We have been using pine for years on our Sun Solaris box. We are in the
process of moving to FreeBSD. I installed Pine from an updated ports
collection and received a message about pine not being very secure. Is
anyone using an alternative to pine that can also read pine's folders
On Friday 20 May 2005 11:09, the author David Armour contributed to the
dialogue on Re: Pine (Tony Shadwick) & giving in to temptation(s):
& hello,
&
& > I'm getting more and more tempted to start up a wiki for newbies on good
& > package management practices
hello,
> I'm getting more and more tempted to start up a wiki for newbies on good
> package management practices and port management.
get on with that, wouldya?
> The handbook seems to deal well with these things once you know
lots of ways to get yourself into lots of deep water, yes. and
Just a point of curiousity here, how are you trying to fetch pine?
pkg_add -r pine, or pkg_add -r pine4 ?
Only the latter works.
That, and if you'r etrying to retrieve it from the default server, no
shock that it fails. That server gets quite overloaded during the day.
I'm getting mor
On Thursday 19 May 2005 18:37, Charles Lamb wrote:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
The pine distfile is generic unix source code, if you can't fetch it, it's
probably just a temporar
2005/5/19, Charles Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
There's Cone (/usr/ports/mail/cone/). I found it similar to Pine. Much
easier to use than Mutt.
___
On 2005-05-19 13:37, Charles Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
It certainly is available. Where did you look for it?
gothmog:/root# pkg_info | grep pine
pine-4.62 PINE(tm) -- a
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 11:14:47AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Charles Lamb wrote:
> > When I try to fetch pine it cannot find it.
>
> If you want help with that, please be more specific.
>
> Kris
P.S. In future, please do
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0400, Charles Lamb wrote:
> When I try to fetch pine it cannot find it.
If you want help with that, please be more specific.
Kris
pgpEkq5dmj33L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
When I try to fetch pine it cannot find it. Thanks I will check out
mutt
Charles Lamb
Vision Payment Solutions
Senior Helpdesk Technician / IT Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gerzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 1:44 PM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc
Hi Charles,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 7:37:52 PM, you contributed this to our collective
wisdom:
> What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
> available for freebsd?
pine is still possible tu run under FreeBSD, try /usr/ports/mail/pine4
good alternative is mutt
What is a good alternative to Pine? It would seem it is nolonger
available for freebsd?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mar 9, 2005, at 12:09 AM, Joe Schmoe wrote:
Two config options I cannot seem to find in pine, and
wonder if they exist ... if you know what they are:
See the resources at:
http://www.washington.edu/pine
...particularly the Pine-Info list. Discussing problems or reporting
bugs with pine on a
Hi,
Two config options I cannot seem to find in pine, and
wonder if they exist ... if you know what they are:
1. Is there a way to tell pine to QUIT asking me if I
want to "save space by deleting" previous months
sent-mail folders ? No, I don't. Ever. How can I
get it to quit
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, rainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello,
>
> i'm having trouble accessing my mail as 'user'.
When you go into pine's setup interface, what value do you have set for
inbox-path? Does it point to /var/mail/{user}? Is there actually any
mail in /var/mail/{user}?
--
David Fle
hello,
i'm having trouble accessing my mail as 'user'.
pine seems to have created a mail folder in /home/user/mail (sent mail
goes there) yet fetchmail insists on dumping my stuff in /var/mail. when i
try to access /var/mail/user i get a 'invalid remote specification'?
Running pine.
Your terminal, of type "ansi", is lacking functions needed to run pine.
I get this message running telnet on windows box. Is there anyway to
make it work other than using
a program like putty?
Dan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
In the last episode (Aug 13), DanB said:
> Running pine.
> Your terminal, of type "ansi", is lacking functions needed to run pine.
> I get this message running telnet on windows box. Is there anyway to
> make it work other than using
> a program like putty?
Windows t
DanB -
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, DanB wrote:
> Running pine.
> Your terminal, of type "ansi", is lacking functions needed to run pine.
> I get this message running telnet on windows box. Is there anyway to
> make it work other than using
> a program like putty?
Telne
Benjamin Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am new with Unix and Free BSD. I am trying to use a mail program within
> free bsd, I figure I should be able to type in pine and have it come up. I
> loaded a version of pine I saw in the extra packages that came with my
> di
pine should live in /usr/local/bin
Try typing:
>whereis pine
If it's installed, try typing in the entire path.
If you are using the C shell be sure to type "rehash" on the
command line.
By the way, if you just type "mail" you get Berkeley mail, which is built int
[Please keep messages on the list]
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:39:33PM -0400, Benjamin Gonzalez wrote:
> Thanks for your help but unfortunately it still says not found.
>
> "/usr/local/bin/pine: not found"
>
> I appreciate the trouble you took in responding, if you can o
I am new with Unix and Free BSD. I am trying to use a mail program within
free bsd, I figure I should be able to type in pine and have it come up. I
loaded a version of pine I saw in the extra packages that came with my
distribution disk of free bsd. I am sure it loaded, but when I type in pine
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
> #alias pico nano
alias pico nano -Rimpwz
for the full effect. If it'd scroll the whole screen for long lines,
it'd be a nearly perfect simple editor.
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
> From: "Danny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:59 AM
> Subject: Updating Pico & Pine
>
> Danny wrote:
>
> On a FreeBSD 4.3R major production system. Recommended steps to
> upgrade *without*
endencies were all messed up, so I
pkg_deleted cclient and the old pine, used pkgdb -F to fix, and then
installed the new Pine from ports. No problems with old mail or
settings, at least that I've noticed.
(Why don't you want to use portupgrade?)
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakot
man pkg_version
man pkg_info
man pkg_delete
"pkg_version -c > file" will produce a file containing a script with the
necessary instructions. You must edit this script and then run as root.
"pkg_info -rR -x pine" will tell you what packages require and are
required by pine
On a FreeBSD 4.3R major production system. Recommended steps to
upgrade *without* 'portupgrade' and do you see any implications? E.g.
address books, config settings, etc.
Current version is 4.21.
Thank you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in th
On 2002-11-26 14:54, Steven Lake wrote:
> I've noticed lately that when doing mail or many other things in
> Pine as of late, it's been very slow. This includes moving between
> screens, into and out of messages, marking and deleting messages,
> closing the program, etc.
&
I've noticed lately that when doing mail or many other things in
Pine as of late, it's been very slow. This includes moving between
screens, into and out of messages, marking and deleting messages, closing
the program, etc.
Not sure if this is related to my SSH sessi
many years.
There are many "recipes" (incremental filtering rules) available on the
Internet. Procmail works on a per-incoming-email basis.
Another option is to use a MUA (emailer) such as Pine which, at least as of
version 4.33, allows the user to process an inbox or other folder in bulk.
> You can cruise over to the freeBSD site and see what the latest port is. The
> version number is in the Makefile, though there's probably some easier way to
> get this information as well.
Yeah, I have 4.44 and I saw that the makefile had 4.44 already so
I wanted to be doubly sure tha
On Saturday 13 July 2002 11:29 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
| Ok, I got a two part question.
|
| 1. I've got pine 4.44 installed. Is there any hot fixes,
| updates, or other upgrades that I need to make or is this the most current
| version?
You can cruise over to the freeBSD site and see
Ok, I got a two part question.
1. I've got pine 4.44 installed. Is there any hot fixes,
updates, or other upgrades that I need to make or is this the most current
version?
2. How do you find out what packages you have installed on a
machine? I thought "pac
65 matches
Mail list logo
