On 18 Sep 2005 09:39:41 -0400
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Pogrebennyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi! Recently I've bought USB-Bluetooth-adapter and made the
> > following changes to setup it in FreeBSD: added ng_ubt_load="YES"
> > to /boot/loader.conf,
> > cp'ed /usr
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:27:37 -0400
Nicolas Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On September 17, 2005 09:56 am, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> > Good day!
> > My question deals with VESA-patch, which was commited some time ago
> > into CURRENT. I dont' know if it is a known bug or a bad luck of
> > min
On Sunday 11 September 2005 08:49, the author martin hudec contributed to the
dialogue on-
Re: php extensions compile error - another compile bug?:
>Hello David,
>
>On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:50:14AM -0700 or thereabouts, Vizion wrote:
>> Seeing as I am in the process of trying to build a reso
bounced message. I believe there are
some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there
something I can do?
Thank you
Aaron
What you can do to partially combat this problem is publish SPF
Björn König пишет:
Hello,
just a wild guess: do you set noexec on /tmp? Show mount and df -ih.
Hello.
You are right! I forgot that /tmp is mounted as noexec
Thank you!
Björn
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Dear All,
because my laptop is Japanese laptop so I define
keymap="jp.106" on /etc/rc.conf
BUT when I do startx (using XORG 6.8.2)
the keyboard layout back to default (generic english keyboard) !
How to keep keymap="jp.106" still valid on XORG ?
regards,
-dikshie-
~
__
call phone) to our
help desk email and I was _forced_ to close this address with
semi-helpful message after "RCPT TO:" command about new address.
Now I reopened address and we get "normal" number of spam messages at it.
___
fr
; various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have
> > my
> > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there are
> > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
> > avoid changing my domain
various mail servers which have bounced messages I have not sent but have my
> > email address as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there are
> > some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
> > avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone exper
as the originator of the bounced message. I believe there are
> some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
> avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there
> something I can do?
>
It's probably "blowbac
originator of the bounced message. I believe there are
some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there
something I can do?
Spammers do that quite frequently. Unfortunately there's nothing
believe there are
some SPAMers using my email address on their SPAM. I would really like to
avoid changing my domain name. Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there
something I can do?
Thank you
Aaron
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Um. Ok.
first of all, no one will respond with a subject like that.
Secondly in a polite manner, I tried to interprete your questions so
bare with me.
- it looks like youre referring to 2 fat32 partitions that you want to
install freebsd over. I am assuming this is what you mean by "establish
On Friday 22 July 2005 13:37, zick-1 wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently has ordered disks with Free BSD and has decided to establish on
> the computer. At once I shall tell, that with FreeBSD it is familiar
> very little and consequently.
> There were many questions. Before from Unix similar
> establishe
Hello.
Recently has ordered disks with Free BSD and has decided to establish on
the computer. At once I shall tell, that with FreeBSD it is familiar
very little and consequently.
There were many questions. Before from Unix similar
established and started Debian Linux. But in FreeBSD all different
On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
As I understand it Apple is using some of the code from FreeBSD, but
FreeBSD isn't necessarily *getting* anything as an obligation from
them.
Ideally, if businesses give
On Jul 20, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
As I understand it Apple is using some of the code from FreeBSD,
but FreeBSD isn't necessarily *getting* anything as an obligation
from them.
Ideally, if businesses give to them, that's a bonus. Businesses
have always been able to t
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:15 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bart
Silverstrim
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:45 AM
To: Josh Ockert
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Ted Mittelstaedt
Subject: Re: Demon license?
F
is highly not
advisable. You never know what the end of the message will give
to. The message can look like spam at the begining and end-up being
non-spam.
Well, what I meant, was that you process it before you acknowledge
the receipt in the DATA phase but after it is sent so you can
immediate
know what the end of the message will give
to. The message can look like spam at the begining and end-up being
non-spam.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
On Jul 16, 2005, at 6:10 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I've installed Spam Assassin and MIMEDefang with Sendmail however I
would like Spam Assassin to tell sendmail to "Reject" Spam on the
connection.
1) SpamAssassin cannot detect spam until it has received and analyzed
the F
> I've installed Spam Assassin and MIMEDefang with Sendmail however I
> would like Spam Assassin to tell sendmail to "Reject" Spam on the
> connection.
1) SpamAssassin cannot detect spam until it has received and analyzed
the FULL message, so rejecting on connection i
How aout asking this on the spamassassin users email list?
--
Martin
On 7/12/05, Sean Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've installed Spam Assassin and MIMEDefang with Sendmail however I
> would like Spam Assassin to tell sendmail to "Reject" Spam on the
> con
I've installed Spam Assassin and MIMEDefang with Sendmail however I
would like Spam Assassin to tell sendmail to "Reject" Spam on the
connection. Instead of accepting the spam and marking it so users then
can filter on the spam tag. Can Anyone share there code in the
MIMEDefa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
The server is suddenly receiving thousands of email a day, from
postmasters! It appears that some spam lord has decided that my domain
would bea good one for spoofing as the sender address of his garbage.
Every one of his spam messages that generates an error
suddenly receiving thousands of email a day, from
postmasters! It appears that some spam lord has decided that my domain
would bea good one for spoofing as the sender address of his garbage.
Every one of his spam messages that generates an error message (user
does not exist, mailbox full, spam
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:12, Leo Lapousterle wrote:
> Alec,
>
> >> Additional question : In my ports tree, I can find :
> >> > Port: spamcup-1.09
> >> Is this one the correct one to install ?
> >
> > I would recommend against using that as it is
Alec,
>> Additional question : In my ports tree, I can find :
>> > Port: spamcup-1.09
>> Is this one the correct one to install ?
>
> I would recommend against using that as it is a tool to automatically
> report spam without verification. From the
Leo Lapousterle on 2005-06-10 12:50:33 +0200:
> Thank you for your advices. I'll try SpamCop, in manually mode to avoid
> wrong SPAM reports.
>
> Additional question : In my ports tree, I can find :
> > Port: spamcup-1.09
> > Path: /usr/ports/mail/spamcup
>
Alec,
> You may want to investigate SpamCop. [...]
Lane,
> I vote for SpamCop, too! [...]
Olivier,
> Spamcop is a solution, but avoid any automatic tool, as SpamAssassin
> can also make mistakes and classify a valid message as spam.
Thank you for your advices. I'll try SpamCop,
Hi,
>I'm working with SpamAssassin to separate mails from SPAMs and it works
>pretty well. My question is about a spam reporting tool, which can parse
>mail headers and report the SPAMs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I searched on the net
>but I didn't find useful informations.
&g
I vote for SpamCop, too!
You can configure your SMTP server to use their Blocking List and prevent
receipt of most SPAM.
Then you can report the spam that you DO receive and help the WHOLE WORLD
reduce its SPAM!
This on top of any other filtering mechanism you may be using or decide to use
Leo Lapousterle on 2005-06-10 00:29:51 +0200:
> I'm working with SpamAssassin to separate mails from SPAMs and it
> works pretty well. My question is about a spam reporting tool, which
> can parse mail headers and report the SPAMs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
> searched on the net
Hello,
Maybe I'm posting on the wrong mailing-list, if so please tell me and
excuse me.
I'm working with SpamAssassin to separate mails from SPAMs and it works
pretty well. My question is about a spam reporting tool, which can parse
mail headers and report the SPAMs to [EMAIL PR
re Magazine; it's available
online at
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_02/focus_spam_postfix/ .
An associate and I are considering building little FreeBSD anti-spam
appliances to sell to local businesses.
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpA01PvN9EFf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kirk,
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 10:50 -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I recently started rejecting about 99.9% of incoming spam *without* using
> challenge-response or other load-increasing methods. For details, read:
>
> http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/FilterMai
Charles Lamb wrote:
Well I have amavisd and clamav installed and running but they aren't
filtering the viruses I pick up when I do a clamdscan.
There's quite a lot of RTFMming to do on these issues. For
example, a whole boatload of README.foo under /usr/local/share/doc/amavis*.
I've tried a num
eebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Spam/AV filtering
Charles Lamb wrote:
> Would I want to enable milter with clamav? Also does amavisd-new
> actually do the handling? I had clamav installed and it scanned like
a
> champ but that's all it did. It showed me a bunch of viruse
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Warren Block wrote:
Here's something I wrote on that a while back. It needs to be updated, but
it should give an idea:
Okay, I updated it. I also moved it into a directory where it should
have been, so there's an Apache redirect. The old URL should work, but
here's the co
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:37:22AM -0400, Charles Lamb wrote:
> I am using sendmail/qpopper and need a way to do spam and virus
> filtering. There seems to be a number of ports I can use in the ports
> collection. I was hoping to get some advice on which one you prefer. I
> am a bit
Oops, that should be security/clamav. Where my mind is this morning...
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Tony Shadwick wrote:
I'm going to butt my nose in where it doesn't belong and insert my opinion
here. :)
Here's the setup we run, and it works incredibly well.
Sendmail
mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
mail/spam
I'm going to butt my nose in where it doesn't belong and insert my opinion
here. :)
Here's the setup we run, and it works incredibly well.
Sendmail
mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
mail/spamass-milter
mail/spamass-rules
mail/spamass-rules_du_jour
sysutils/clamav (built with miltering)
Add to your .mc fi
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Charles Lamb wrote:
Would I want to enable milter with clamav?
Depending on your needs, maybe. The clamav-milter lets sendmail reject
mail containing viruses immediately, rather than having to receive them
and then filter them later.
You should also investigate greylisting,
Charles Lamb wrote:
Would I want to enable milter with clamav? Also does amavisd-new
actually do the handling? I had clamav installed and it scanned like a
champ but that's all it did. It showed me a bunch of viruses/malware
but did nothing about it. Thanks.
That depends on whether you want to
On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:06:22 -0400
"Charles Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would I want to enable milter with clamav? Also does amavisd-new
> actually do the handling?
amavisd-new works as a sort of in-between tool between the MTA and
clamav
> I had clamav installed and it scanned like
>
wiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Charles Lamb
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Spam/AV filtering
Charles Lamb wrote:
> I am using sendmail/qpopper and need a way to do spam and virus
> filtering. There seems to be a number of ports I can
Charles Lamb wrote:
I am using sendmail/qpopper and need a way to do spam and virus
filtering. There seems to be a number of ports I can use in the ports
collection. I was hoping to get some advice on which one you prefer.
Start with amavisd-new + spamassassin + clamav.
--
-Chuck
Good morning,
I am using sendmail/qpopper and need a way to do spam and virus
filtering. There seems to be a number of ports I can use in the ports
collection. I was hoping to get some advice on which one you prefer. I
am a bit of a novice so something easy to install would be preferable
and I
fied as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" according to the
complaint email. I use phpBB, vBulletin and Awstats.
The spam email entry in the maillog is:
May 14 14:55:03 pang postfix/smtp[46011]: EC0C595C90: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=mail2.iecc.com[208.31.42.98], delay=724, status=sent (250 ok
111
Jerry Bell wrote:
>>web script. The sender was specified as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" according to the
>>complaint email. I use phpBB, vBulletin and Awstats.
>
>
> Most likely the attacker used a flaw in phpBB or awstats. Are you running
> the latest versions of those? Otherwise, it is possible they
> web script. The sender was specified as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" according to the
> complaint email. I use phpBB, vBulletin and Awstats.
Most likely the attacker used a flaw in phpBB or awstats. Are you running
the latest versions of those? Otherwise, it is possible they found a
vulnerability in s
ROTECTED]" according to the
complaint email. I use phpBB, vBulletin and Awstats.
The spam email entry in the maillog is:
May 14 14:55:03 pang postfix/smtp[46011]: EC0C595C90: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=mail2.iecc.com[208.31.42.98], delay=724, status=sent (250 ok
1116100192 qp 2255
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:22:07AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:25:15AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
> >
> >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
>
> ..and -Werror is in effect:
> >>>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:25:15AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
..and -Werror is in effect:
"-Werror
Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after any warning."
As I said, try setting
NO_WERROR=
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:25:15AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>>-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
> >>
> >>..and -Werror is in effect:
> >>"-Werror
> >>Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after any warning."
> >>
> >>As I said, try setting
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:50:19PM +0400, Alexander Soldatov wrote:
> Of course not, I need INET
> Is the problem because of a INET support missing? How can I correct it?
Yes, you removed it from your kernel configuration. To fix the
problem of having removed it from your kernel configuration, do
Alexander Soldatov wrote:
I need to make new kernel. So I've make my own config file from GENERIC.
Then standart operations:
1. config CUSTOM (this's my config file)
2. make depend
3. make
and then:
Of course not, I need INET
Is the problem because of a INET support missing? How can I correct it
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:03 PM
To: Alexander Soldatov
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; 'Kris Kennaway'
Subject: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: a problem
withcompiling kernel
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:29:36PM +
Kris Kennaway wrote:
-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
..and -Werror is in effect:
"-Werror
Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after any warning."
As I said, try setting
NO_WERROR= yes
in make.conf.
That's the brainless and probably wrong approach :) More intel
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:02:58AM +0200, Idar Tollefsen wrote:
> Alexander Soldatov wrote:
> >That's the full output of 'make' command:
> [...]
> >-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
> ..and -Werror is in effect:
> "-Werror
> Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:29:36PM +0400, Alexander Soldatov wrote:
> That's the full output of 'make' command:
>
> cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -W
> missing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
> -st
> d=c99 -nostd
Alexander Soldatov wrote:
That's the full output of 'make' command:
[...]
-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../net/if_gif.c
..and -Werror is in effect:
"-Werror
Treat warnings as errors; abort compilation after any warning."
As I said, try setting
NO_WERROR= yes
in make.conf.
- IT
___
n Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 11:43 AM
To: Alexander Soldatov
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; 'Kris Kennaway'
Subject: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: a problem with compiling
kernel
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:38:49AM +0400, Alexander Soldatov wrote:
&
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:38:49AM +0400, Alexander Soldatov wrote:
> I need to make new kernel. So I've make my own config file from GENERIC.
> Then standart operations:
> 1. config CUSTOM (this's my config file)
> 2. make depend
> 3. make
>
> As a matter of fact that problem occurred on the st
it's hard to resolve this problem by myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:13 AM
To: Alexander Soldatov
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: a problem with compilin
Robert wrote:
got a message from my ISP saying that my email address
was sending out spam, possibly from a trojan on my pc that was
allowing a remote program to access my SMTP server and send email
without my knowledge. I was shocked since I'm running ZoneAlarm and
don't remember g
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:29:03 -0400 "Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
||>got a message from my ISP saying that my email address was sending out
||>spam, possibly from a trojan on my pc that was allowing a remote program
||>to access my SMTP server and send email wi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:29:03AM -0400, Robert wrote:
> my email address was sending out spam,
[snip]
>IP address 204.152.184.73 was trying to send emails and make a connection with
>my mail server, which of course I blocked. 204.152.184.73 resolves to
>freebsd.isc.org
got a message from my ISP saying that my email address was sending out spam,
possibly from a trojan on my pc that was allowing a remote program to access my
SMTP server and send email without my knowledge. I was shocked since I'm
running ZoneAlarm and don't remember getting any aler
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
You know, I'm no longer sure that's true. I think that spam will
stick around as long as stupid business owners continue to get
suckered into thinking that it's a legitimate means of marketing.
One of my associate's cu
>>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>> Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
>>>
>>
>>> You know, I'm no longer sure that's true. I think that spam will
>>> stick around as long as stupid business owners continue to get
>
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Doug Hardie wrote:
On Mar 10, 2005, at 18:30, Warren Block wrote:
milter-greylist works great with sendmail. Here's a somewhat-dated article
I wrote about using it and clamav-milter with sendmail:
http://www.wonkity.com/greylist.pdf
I am getting a no such file back on that.
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
> Actually, there is. Spam is what I object to. Non-spam is what I don't
> object to.
Find a way to code that in C, and you can become a billionnaire.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:37 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:42 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
You know, I'm no l
On Mar 11, 2005, at 1:34 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
Atkielski
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 3:25 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
There'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug Hardie
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:40 AM
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
>
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2005, at 01:49, Ted Mittelsta
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kirk Strauser
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:42 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
>
> You know, I'm no longer su
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony
> Atkielski
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 3:25 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
>
>
> There's no
&g
On Mar 10, 2005, at 18:30, Warren Block wrote:
milter-greylist works great with sendmail. Here's a somewhat-dated
article I wrote about using it and clamav-milter with sendmail:
http://www.wonkity.com/greylist.pdf
I am getting a no such file back on that.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
me a hint on this?
Consider greylisting, amavisd, Sp
it openly or silently throw it away.
Can't say then. However we are a fairly small ISP and Time-Warner
takes our mail. I doub't size is the issue.
I know we have its MTA blocked because of the unresolved
spam complaints over the years. I suspect thats the same for others
also.
What a
> I know we have its MTA blocked because of the unresolved
> spam complaints over the years. I suspect thats the same for others
> also.
What about the millions of legitimate subscribers using this ISP?
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@free
re referring to
wanado.fr. I know we have its MTA blocked because of the unresolved
spam complaints over the years. I suspect thats the same for others
also.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Doug Hardie writes:
> Spam will only go away when people no longer respond to it. When there
> is no revenue generated to cover the cost of spamming then it will end.
Exactly. A surprising number of people _do_ respond to spam--more than
enough to justify sending it.
Ironically, I seem
Luciano Musacchio wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
me a hint on this?
thanks
# sudo ipfw add 1 deny ip from any to me 25
:-)
Should do the trick.
Actually, it's
un by the
> organizations that are pushing SPF.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Could you elaborate?
> Spam will only go away when people no longer respond to it.
You know, I'm no longer sure that's true. I think that spam will stick
around as long as stupid business owners
going to address one form of spam distribution.
Unfortunately it does nothing for the spammers who get their own domain
and establish their own SPF records. They can continue to spam away at
will. Likewise SPF will not close any of the open relays run by the
organizations that are pushing SPF
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 21:53, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
> I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
> I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
> me a hint on this?
I just wrote an article for Free Software Magazine on
On Mar 9, 2005, at 11:54 PM, Mike Hauber wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 10:53 pm, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam?
:), I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one
here give me a hint on this?
thanks
heh... I&#x
On Mar 10, 2005, at 6:44 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
FreeBSD 4.EIGHT came with Sendmail 8.12.8 out of the box. OK, so now
your not too lazy to understand Sendmail, you just have a gigantic
chip on your shoulder against it so your going to ignore the most
popular MTA on the planet and pretend it do
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Horsfall
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:42 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: how to deal with spam for good?
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Ted Mittels
LM> Hi,
LM> I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
LM> I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
LM> me a hint on this?
LM> thanks
Spamers are too lazy to subscribe freebsd-questions, so they can't post here :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 2:17 AM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions list
> Subject: Re: how to deal with spam for good?
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2005, a
.
Which, of course, will do nothing to stop spam, but only forgeries. This
issue has been dealt with many times upon the anti-spam lists.
-- Dave
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 2005-03-10T01:49:20-0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
[snip caustic commentary]
[snip real-life facts]
> The only long term solution that is going to work is modding the
> DNS records to designate an official SMTP server for each domain, such
> a plan has been in the works for a while among the st
mails at a time.
Let them retry more. There is more than one way to deal with UCE, and
shifting the burden to the spammers, making them consume lots of time
for minimal resources is amoung those ways.
It's just one more anti-spam filter that is utterly dependent on
nobody else on the Int
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:53:58 -0300
Luciano Musacchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
> I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
> me a hint on this?
mail/dspampd and
rely need to construct a server that stores 5
million mails for a set period and then retries. The server never has
to store more than 5 million mails at a time.
It's just one more anti-spam filter that is utterly dependent on
nobody else on the Internet doing it. Typical bright idea from some
On Mar 9, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
I need to set some filter on my mail server, can some one here give
me a hint on this?
Consider greylisting, amavisd, SpamAssassin, and a virus scanner of
y
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Luciano Musacchio wrote:
> I'm wondering, how does this mailing list doesn't get any spam? :),
It does, and I report it (but not the mailing list itself).
-- Dave
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
501 - 600 of 898 matches
Mail list logo
