On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 8:36, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:32:39 -0600 (MDT)
> Mike Brown wrote:
>
> > alexus wrote:
> > > ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
> > >
> > > # uname -a
> > > FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon
Eduardo Morras wrote:
> [...] uname -a should give the correct answer. Has uname other utility than
> show information about the operating system implementation? No, and it must
> be accurate.
That's what I thought, but when I asked about it here last year, I was told
that this is the way thing
I used 'freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE' to upgrade a test system.
All went well, until the point at which it said:
Kernel updates have been installed. Please reboot and run
"/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install" again to finish installing updates.
Stupidly, I did NOT reb
Mike Brown:
$ grep ^BRANCH /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
BRANCH="RELEASE-p12"
$
then again, I used freebsd-update and not /usr/src, but it makes sense what
you said with kernel, so I guess I _AM_ on the latest -p12 and kernel is on
-p9 as there was no changes after that to kernel.
thank you.
O
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:32:39 -0600 (MDT)
Mike Brown wrote:
> alexus wrote:
> > ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun 11
> > 19:47:58 UTC 2012
> > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 22:32, Mike Brown wrote:
> alexus wrote:
> > ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
> >
> > # uname -a
> > FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun 11
> > 19:47:58 UTC 2012
> > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/us
On 8 October 2013, at 16:40, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705
alexus wrote:
> ok, I just did fetch & install and got bumped from p5 to p9
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD XX.X.org 7.4-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 7.4-RELEASE-p9 #0: Mon Jun 11
> 19:47:58 UTC 2012
> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
> #
>
> can I take it all the way t
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> I tried downloading the src with:
>>
>> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>>
>> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>>
>> 20130705:
>> hastctl(8)'s `status'
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I tried downloading the src with:
>
> svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
>
> I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
>
> 20130705:
> hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to
__
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
>
>
Hello Doug,
Here is a more recent version of the file on svn:
On 8 October 2013, at 06:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wr
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fr
ill do that)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 14:22, alexus wrote:
>> > bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
>>
>> Just freebsd-update fetch && freebsd-update install is all you
tch again, hoping it will
do that)
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 14:22, alexus wrote:
> > bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
>
> Just freebsd-update fetch && freebsd-update install is all you should
> have
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 14:22, alexus wrote:
> bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
Just freebsd-update fetch && freebsd-update install is all you should
have to run. The -r flag is for jumping major releases (from 7.x to 8.x,
for example).
I can't comment on wh
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:22:17 -0400
alexus wrote:
> bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
> Is there a way to upgrade 7.4-RELEASE-p5 to 7.4-RELEASE-p12 using
> freebsd-update now?
What about:
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
bash-4.2# freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.4-RELEASE-p12
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 7.4-RELEASE from update4.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Inspecting system... done.
The following components of FreeBSD seem to be
ting various checksums,
nothing to do with groups and GIDs. This suggests that your libc.so is
somehow incompatible with your /usr/bin/install. Which really shouldn't
be the case given that you'ld previously used freebsd-update to upgrade
your userland to 9.2-RELEASE.
Things to double ch
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 08:08:42 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 05/10/2013 21:41, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> >> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
> >> be able to do a
> >>
> >> cd /usr/src
> >> make build
On 05/10/2013 21:41, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
>> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
>> be able to do a
>>
>> cd /usr/src
>> make buildworld
>> make installworld
>> reboot
>>
>> and I'll be running up on the
I figured I'd walk through those steps from start to finish and just
correct my main problem and any other little glitches I might have.
I'm on step 6 and when I run mergemaster -p, I get the following error.
*** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot
*** /var/tmp/temproot
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just
> be able to do a
>
> cd /usr/src
> make buildworld
> make installworld
> reboot
>
> and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel and then I'll be all set?
No. You s
world
reboot
and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel and then I'll be all set?
Thanks for the help.
Eric
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> > I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgr
On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote:
> I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
> 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
> doing
>
> freebsd-update fetch
> freebsd-update install
>
> I went righ
I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to
9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by
doing
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
I went right to
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE
freebsd-update install
rebooot
freebsd
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>
>> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> >> The exact sequence was:
> >>
> >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
> >
> > Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.c
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> The exact sequence was:
>>
>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
>
> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
> is definitely part of what should be updated?
System i
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
> The exact sequence was:
>
> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src"
is definitely part of what should be updated?
> Step 2: make buildworld
> Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=LA
On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system u
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses
a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed.
>> Howev
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
>>> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote:
> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
> kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
> noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry stil
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the buildwo
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
http://www.dweimer
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:16:01AM +0200, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> Two options:
> ...
Thanks - helps alot.
-ewald
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
On 25. sep. 2013, at 09.00, Ewald Jenisch wrote:
o) Will upgrading kernel/system using
> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ /usr/src
> bring a 9.2-RC4 installed system up to date once 9.2 final is released?
Two options:
base/stable/9 - track 9-STABLE
base/releng/9.2 - track 9.2-security
Hi,
Since I'm about to set up a new system from scratch I'm thinking
whether I should install 9.1 and upgrade it to 9-STABLE or to install
9.2-RC4 right away.
To be specific:
o) Will upgrading kernel/system using
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/ /usr/src
bring a 9.2-RC4
c
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 2
Total Test time (real) = 43.23 sec
===> Installing for png-1.5.17
===> Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if graphics/png already installed
===> png-1.5.17 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'
> It's possible. But again, I've been using -j >1 for years on a variety
> of processors, mostly Intel, without problems. That's with buildworld
> and kernel (which is buildkernel plus installkernel), but not with
> installworld.
>
> Are you using clang instead of gcc? That could be very differe
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, David Noel wrote:
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
buggy kernel. Check your make configuration. Adding a -B, like make -B -j N
buildkernel may work and is fast if -j is set to number or processors, but
it's safer do a make -j 1 buildke
> Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
> buggy kernel. Check your make configuration. Adding a -B, like make -B -j N
> buildkernel may work and is fast if -j is set to number or processors, but
> it's safer do a make -j 1 buildkernel, same for buildworld.
I repl
On 18/07/2013 13:42, Paul Mather wrote:
> I am using pkgng 1.1.4_1 on RELENG_9 (r252725), operating on a local repo I
> maintain using poudriere 3.0.4.
>
> Recently, I wanted to upgrade all packages on a client except two whose
> update I want to defer for now as they potentially
I am using pkgng 1.1.4_1 on RELENG_9 (r252725), operating on a local repo I
maintain using poudriere 3.0.4.
Recently, I wanted to upgrade all packages on a client except two whose update
I want to defer for now as they potentially impact locally-developed
applications. I figured I would use
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 14:37, David Noel wrote:
>
> If this is the case replacing the kernel should have no effect. But
> what then? Any thoughts?
I'd contact freebsd-fs@ and see what they have to say
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On 7/11/13, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras
> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
>>
>> buggy kernel.
>
> This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with
>
> -j>1 we'd not allow you
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Eduardo Morras wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
David Noel wrote:
I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake
of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and
installkernel.
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:00:39 -0500, Eduardo Morras
wrote:
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a
buggy kernel.
This is not true to my knowledge. If buildkernel produced bad kernels with
-j>1 we'd not allow you to do that without jumping through hoops.
_
Ah. That very well might be it. I did call buildkernel with j > 1.
I'll boot an 8.4 memstick and replace the kernel.
Thanks,
-David
On 7/11/13, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
> David Noel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 04:40:38 -0500
David Noel wrote:
>
> I didn't include the make buildworld or make buildkernel for the sake
> of brevity but yes, I executed them prior to installworld and
> installkernel.
Perhaps make buildkernel was compiled with -j >1, it's known to create a buggy
kernel.
On 7/11/13, Alexandre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel
> wrote:
>
>> I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
>> without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
>> between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror an
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, David Noel wrote:
> I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
> without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
> between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and
> the ones that didn't have a 4-disk
I have 4 servers I'm upgrading from 8.3 to 8.4. Two of them went
without a hitch, two of them blew up in my face. The only difference
between the two is the ones that worked have a 2-disk ZFS mirror and
the ones that didn't have a 4-disk ZFS striped mirror configuration
(RAID10). They both use the
On 7/10/13 1:50 PM, "Michael Sierchio" wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
>
># mount -p > /etc/fstab
thanks for answering, michael.
i have now spotted the problem. the zfs_enable line in rc.conf was fubar.
i must have done some bad vi on it around the time i upgraded
a freebsd box doesn't boot normally since upgrading from 9.1-rc3 to
9.1-release. it boots to the point that /usr is mounted, then errors
"mount: /usr: unknown special file or file system"
if i boot to single user, zfs mount -a manually, then it comes up fine.
what function key do i gotta press t
07:55, "Fbsd8" :
Masayoshi Fujimoto wrote:
Hi.
Could you tell me how to upgrade qjail-1.7 to qjail-3.0 ?
I can not start "www". So I have to use qjail-1.7 now. >_>
root@freebsd:/root # pkg_info | grep qjail
qjail-1.7 Utility to quickly de
2013-06-09 07:46, Leslie Jensen skrev:
2013-06-08 17:28, Polytropon skrev:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:20:56 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I've been using XDM as login manager for years. Since the latest Xorg
upgrade, XDM cannot start XFCE4 as it used to.
Strange that this happens aft
2013-06-08 17:28, Polytropon skrev:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:20:56 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I've been using XDM as login manager for years. Since the latest Xorg
upgrade, XDM cannot start XFCE4 as it used to.
Strange that this happens after an upgrade. What initalization
mechanism d
Masayoshi Fujimoto wrote:
Hi.
Could you tell me how to upgrade qjail-1.7 to qjail-3.0 ?
I can not start "www". So I have to use qjail-1.7 now. >_>
root@freebsd:/root # pkg_info | grep qjail
qjail-1.7 Utility to quickly deploy and manage jails
root@freebsd:/root
Hi.
Could you tell me how to upgrade qjail-1.7 to qjail-3.0 ?
I can not start "www". So I have to use qjail-1.7 now. >_>
root@freebsd:/root # pkg_info | grep qjail
qjail-1.7 Utility to quickly deploy and manage jails
root@freebsd:/root # jls
JID IP Addre
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:20:56 +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> I've been using XDM as login manager for years. Since the latest Xorg
> upgrade, XDM cannot start XFCE4 as it used to.
Strange that this happens after an upgrade. What initalization
mechanism do you use for your X sessi
I've been using XDM as login manager for years. Since the latest Xorg
upgrade, XDM cannot start XFCE4 as it used to.
What happens is that after I've given my password and hit enter, the
screen goes black and after a while it returns to the XDM log in dialogue.
I've att
fddi wrote:
[snip]
>
> so ther is something wrong in my crontab
>
> 0 3 * * * /usr/sbin/portsnap -I cron update && pkg_version -vIL=
See man portsnap, section TIPS - it shows example of correct way:
0 3 * * * root /usr/sbin/portsnap cron
The TIPS section contains more details.
[snip]
-Mike
s telling you that the ports tree has information on new
versions available of programs you have installed.
if I use portmaster to upgrade my ports collection it is telling me all
packages are up to date...
so there is something not working
portmaster installs the binary programs for you. Look i
is telling you that the ports tree has information on new
versions available of programs you have installed.
if I use portmaster to upgrade my ports collection it is telling me all
packages are up to date...
so there is something not working
portmaster installs the binary programs for you.
_1)
sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.14.7 < needs updating (index has 8.14.7_1)
shared-mime-info-1.0_2 < needs updating (index has 1.1)
wget-1.14 < needs updating (index has 1.14_2)
if I use portmaster to upgrade my ports collection it is t
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:05:25 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I come from linux os and I read a lot documentations about freebsd.
>
> I've a doubt: when I've some packages installed and I need upgrade it, I
> need to recompile those packages or there's ano
Hi all!
I come from linux os and I read a lot documentations about freebsd.
I've a doubt: when I've some packages installed and I need upgrade it, I
need to recompile those packages or there's another (fast) way to do this?
thanks!
Pol
Thanks for the replies; I really appreciate it.
Alexandre wrote:
> Have you followed steps described in perl-after-upgrade man page?
> $ man perl-after-upgrade
Yes, except for the last step (deleting old CONTENTS backups), since the
previous steps didn't seem to do what they should
Hi Mike,
Have you followed steps described in perl-after-upgrade man page?
$ man perl-after-upgrade
Regards,
Alexandre
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Mike Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running 8.3-RELEASE and thought I'd update Perl from 5.12 to 5.16.
> Silly
From: Mike Brown
Subject: perl-after-upgrade mistakenly thinks nothing needs to be done
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:08:17 -0600 (MDT)
Hi all,
I'm running 8.3-RELEASE and thought I'd update Perl from 5.
Hi all,
I'm running 8.3-RELEASE and thought I'd update Perl from 5.12 to 5.16.
Silly me. I updated my ports snapshot, and as per UPDATING, ran
portmaster -o lang/perl5.16 lang/perl5.12
This went OK, so I then ran perl-after-upgrade, with and without -f. It scans
the packages
Hello,
is possible to ignore some packages with the 'pkg upgrade' command ?
In particular I don't want the upgrade of the 'conky' package, because
it is compiled with a non-standard options.
Thanks
Maurizio
___
freebsd-ques
hing.
So here is a main problem. If it prints nothing it doesn't work.
Do you have portupgrade or portmaster installed? Did it yield at least
one line? Some errors? If it doesn't that's surely a sign that something
is going wrong.
I use portupgrade regularly to upgrade my ports, and
On 27-3-2013 17:37, Loic Capdeville wrote:
I use portupgrade regularly to upgrade my ports, and usually everything
goes right.
If fails only with that particular operation (or these portupgrade options)
Do I have to install "devel/py-distribute" separately, or should the
"
it doesn't work.
Do you have portupgrade or portmaster installed? Did it yield at least
one line? Some errors? If it doesn't that's surely a sign that something
is going wrong.
I use portupgrade regularly to upgrade my ports, and usually everything
goes right.
If fails only
and still print nothing.
So here is a main problem. If it prints nothing it doesn't work.
Do you have portupgrade or portmaster installed? Did it yield at least
one line? Some errors? If it doesn't that's surely a sign that something
is going wrong.
I use portupgrade regularly
2013-03-27 15:33, Loic Capdeville wrote:
On 27/03/2013 14:27, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
2013-03-27 15:06, Loic Capdeville wrote:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/easy-install.pth:
import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
../setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
../Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
../Babel-0.9
On 27/03/2013 14:27, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
2013-03-27 15:06, Loic Capdeville wrote:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/easy-install.pth:
import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
../setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
../Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
../Babel-0.9.6-py2.7.egg
../MarkupSafe-0.15-py2.7-free
2013-03-27 15:06, Loic Capdeville wrote:
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/easy-install.pth:
import sys; sys.__plen = len(sys.path)
../setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
../Pygments-1.5-py2.7.egg
../Babel-0.9.6-py2.7.egg
../MarkupSafe-0.15-py2.7-freebsd-9.0-RELEASE-amd64.egg
../Jinja2-2.6-py2.7.eg
On 27/03/2013 14:00, Loic Capdeville wrote:
On 27/03/2013 13:50, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
2013-03-27 14:22, Loic Capdeville wrote:
Hi !
I'm trying to update devel/py-setuptools which has been replaced by
devel/py-distribute.
As mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING I did "portupgrade -fo
devel/py-
On 27/03/2013 13:50, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
2013-03-27 14:22, Loic Capdeville wrote:
Hi !
I'm trying to update devel/py-setuptools which has been replaced by
devel/py-distribute.
As mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING I did "portupgrade -fo
devel/py-distribute devel/py-setuptools" since I'm usi
2013-03-27 14:22, Loic Capdeville wrote:
Hi !
I'm trying to update devel/py-setuptools which has been replaced by
devel/py-distribute.
As mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING I did "portupgrade -fo
devel/py-distribute devel/py-setuptools" since I'm using ports, but
nothing happens.
Output of "pkg_v
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:22:19 +0100
Loic Capdeville articulated:
> I'm trying to update devel/py-setuptools which has been replaced by
> devel/py-distribute.
> As mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING I did "portupgrade -fo
> devel/py-distribute devel/py-setuptools" since I'm using ports, but
> nothi
Hi !
I'm trying to update devel/py-setuptools which has been replaced by
devel/py-distribute.
As mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING I did "portupgrade -fo
devel/py-distribute devel/py-setuptools" since I'm using ports, but
nothing happens.
Output of "pkg_version -vIL=" :
py27-setuptools-0.6c11
On 3/16/2013 3:46 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 16), Drew Tomlinson said:
I have an old system happily running 6.4 but am finding that it can no
longer download or build a ports index. Thus I guess it's time to
upgrade.
What "gotchas" do I need
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 16), Drew Tomlinson said:
I have an old system happily running 6.4 but am finding that it can no
longer download or build a ports index. Thus I guess it's time to
upgrade.
What "gotchas" do I need to look out for? In the past my upgra
In the last episode (Mar 16), Drew Tomlinson said:
> I have an old system happily running 6.4 but am finding that it can no
> longer download or build a ports index. Thus I guess it's time to
> upgrade.
>
> What "gotchas" do I need to look out for? In the past
I have an old system happily running 6.4 but am finding that it can no
longer download or build a ports index. Thus I guess it's time to upgrade.
What "gotchas" do I need to look out for? In the past my upgrades have
always been simply downloading new source, reviewing ker
Em Sex, 2013-03-01 às 17:40 +, Graeme Dargie escreveu:
> Hi All
>
> Upgraded 3 machines today from 9.0 to 9.1 all three run ZFS as a storage but
> not as a boot file system. One machine out of the three ended up with a very
> sick looking ZFS pool, not a big deal as this machine is a backup
Hi All
Upgraded 3 machines today from 9.0 to 9.1 all three run ZFS as a storage but
not as a boot file system. One machine out of the three ended up with a very
sick looking ZFS pool, not a big deal as this machine is a backup mirror for
another system. So I did a zpool destroy tank then zpool
In message
CeDeROM wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>> Looking into this issue a bit deeper, I've now learned that all of
>> one's personal settings are stored in a directory having a name which
>> has the following general form:
>> ~/.mozilla/firef
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:13 +, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> Is there a file .mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini? If so it should list
> which profile to use. Just change it to the one you want and it
> should
> just work.
>
> I'm using an older version so don't know how the latest works
Good point C
On 12/02/2013 21:38, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In general, I don't upgrade my ports very often, so up until recently
I was running a fairly old version of firefox (firefox-15.0.1,1).
But over the weekend, I moved everything over to a new drive
containing the latest 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
1 - 100 of 3523 matches
Mail list logo
