I cvsup-ed 5-stable code today and build world and kernel.
Before today's code only reboot doesn't work, now it can't boot well,
the laptop will hang after kernel loaded.
That maybe the laptop's problem, because in Windows XP the laptop will
also hang often. But the laptop works very well in
Hi,
Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release?
Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination
with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable.
Bye,
Mipam.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Am Montag, 8. November 2004 11:56 schrieb Mipam:
Hi,
Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release?
Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination
with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable.
ULE was disabled and can't be compiled with 5.3, PREEMPTION and
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2004 11:56 schrieb Mipam:
Hi,
Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release?
Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination
with the ule scheduler it didnt work well and wasnt stable.
ULE was
Hi,
sorry, i have forgotten to say, the informations over
the change of the Variables have i found in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Sorry
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:37:14 +0100, Michael Schuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
ich have found an entry in /usr/local/ports/UPDATING, that the
Variable
Hello,
On my laptop i am running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. A few weeks ago i upgraded
it to 5.3 BETA7. After building world i went to single user mode, to
complete the upgrade. After a few seconds running in single user mode,
i got errors about READ_DMA and my laptop was completly frozen.
At that time
Hi!
I was making some tests with 5.3 RC1 and was working fine, so I go ahead and
make a lot of customization and configuration, so the machine is ready to do
its work. But now I want to cvsup the sources of 5.3 and build a new kernel
and userland. In spite of the small differences between the
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 04:16:51PM -0800, Dave Hayes wrote:
/kernel: da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
/kernel: da0: SEAGATE ST336607LW 0007 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
/kernel: da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged
Queueing Enabled
/kernel: da0: 35003MB
I think there is a small issue with the Makefile, although I don't see
exactly what. But I'm no great shakes on Makefiles.
At the very end of the installworld, after completely the makewhatis and
/etc stuff, I got the message that I should not be doing a make world:
WARNING: make world will
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:54:45PM +0100, Richard Arends wrote:
Hello,
ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA = 351
Okay, replaying to my own message, but i found a workaround. If i set at
bootime hw.ata.ata_dma to 0, i can boot the 5.3 STABLE kernel and even
start
Hi,
I'm running several jails on this box and df doesnt seem to report the
filesystems that are mounted within the jail.
When using :
fbsd5# sysctl security.jail.getfsstatroot_only=1
i see :
22:37|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/md0s1a
Dave Hayes wrote:
/kernel: da0: SEAGATE ST336607LW 0007 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
/kernel: da1: SEAGATE ST373307LW 0006 Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
We use a metric boatload of these machines and disks
I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me
continuous calcru messages. I understand is it
probably hardware related, but I could not replicate
the messages using 4.10. I pulled out all the
hardware that I could to no avail. So is it just the
fact that 4.10 is not showing the messages vs.
Hi all,
I just recently joined this list and I am getting more spam than -stable
posts. Is this normal these days? I was on -current and it had its
share of spam, but it wasn't too bad. Since I am tracking RELENG_5, I
jumped lists to -stable
Thanks, Rob
I have a server thats sole purpose for existence is serving a fixed group of
files from a dedicated filesystem. There is a directory tree with about 50K
files that is requested in a random order. I have been trying find the correct
sysctl variable to dedicate more RAM to the filesystem buffer
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote:
Thanks for your reply, okay, then i'd like to enable preemption. I
noticed it's not in the GENERIC kernel config file. So: options
PREEMPTION would suffice to enable it i guess? Any experience with
preemption. noticable changes? So the problem: PREEMPTION
Hi,
I forgot I should be sending this to stable instead of current :)
Thanks for any help,
Mike
- Forwarded message from Mike Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Mike Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE (contrats!) and everything seems to be
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mauricio Brunstein wrote:
I was making some tests with 5.3 RC1 and was working fine, so I go ahead
and make a lot of customization and configuration, so the machine is
ready to do its work. But now I want to cvsup the sources of 5.3 and
build a new kernel and userland. In
Hello!
Today my Soekris 4801 box arrived. I tried to install 5.3-RELEASE
following this document:
http://www.rfc1149.net/freebsd-net4801.html.en
While it works precisely as described with a 5.2-RELEASE or 5.2.1-RELEASE
CD-ROM, it fails with 5.3-RELEASE:
[... Kernel loading and starting
Hi,
I followed the example of mr. Holm and produced backtraces of the dumps.
Hopefully someone in the know finds them useful. I'm sorry I don't have a
debug kernel, but the system in its current state isn't capable of compiling
one.
regards,
Derkjan
0
#0 0xc060bbb6 in doadump ()
#1 0xc060c189
All,
I installed 5.3R on one of my systems, but as soon as I attempt to compile
something (make buildworld), after 10 seconds or so gcc bombs with an
internal compiler error,
and/or the machine crashes with a 'fatal trap 12' error. This seems to
happen at random places.
...
Had *the same*
Zoran Kolic said:
Hi all!
Don't wonna make stupid
quiestions, but this is
something I have to know
to make reclamation if neces-
sary.
After 5-10 minutes of inter-
net connection, when detached,
my pccard modem is hot as fur-
nace. I can barely take it in
my hand. Is it normal beha-
Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote:
Thanks for your reply, okay, then i'd like to enable preemption. I
noticed it's not in the GENERIC kernel config file. So: options
PREEMPTION would suffice to enable it i guess? Any experience with
preemption. noticable changes? So the
On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a server thats sole purpose for existence is serving a fixed
group of files from a dedicated filesystem. There is a directory tree
with about 50K files that is requested in a random order. I have been
trying find the correct sysctl
Hello,
I posted the same text as below to current@ on 20 Oct, but got no answer.
Is there somebody here who knows more about this or can tell me where to
look further?
I got a 'me too' message from somebody who googled my previous question,
so there are more people with this problem.
Ronald.
Ok. I'm building world now. I never compiled anything in this
source tree, From de RC1 sources, I made cvsup with the RELENG_5_3
tag, and I'm building the world and kernel with the following make.conf:
# Begin of make.conf
# -- use.perl generated deltas -- #
# Created: Sat Nov 6 04:24:01 2004
#
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:52:30AM -0800, Dean Patterson wrote:
I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me
continuous calcru messages. I understand is it
probably hardware related, but I could not replicate
the messages using 4.10. I pulled out all the
hardware that I could to no avail.
On Tuesday, 9. November 2004 00:49, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:52:30AM -0800, Dean Patterson wrote:
I have an IBM aptiva, K6/450 and 5.3 gives me
continuous calcru messages.
The kern.timecounter sysctl hierarchy is definitely there on 5.3.
What is
For the benefit of those that are not aware. Can someone please explain what
is meant by 'kernel preemption' and the benefits of it.
Thanks
- aW
0n Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:29:23PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Mipam wrote:
Thanks
if you have a thread A of high priority and a thread B of low priority
then if A is stopped (blocked for some reason) and B is running, then
preemption
controls or describes what happens when A is unblocked..
With no preemption, A is ubblocked and becomes teh highes priority
thread to run
The makefile in /usr/src/share/termcap doesn't honor DESTDIR. Should it?
Later,
Jason C. Wells
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
When I do a mailinglist search and a google on FAST_IPSEC and INET6
with 5.3, I get quite some results that say: the kernel compilation
will fail, because FAST_IPSEC requires exclusion of INET6.
I'm running 5.3-STABLE, and I have compiled a kernel with FAST_IPSEC
and INET6; this compiles fine,
I am trying to use the nvidia driver from the ports on FreeBSD
5.3-STABLE but every time i startup X the system crash
My system:
Laptop: Dell latitud D800
video card: GeForce FX Go5200
I attached a console to the laptop and i got this:
---
NVRM: detected agp.ko, aborting NVIDIA AGP setup!
33 matches
Mail list logo