Aaron Seelye wrote:
Though I haven't used it myself, I've talked to people who've done
well with quagga for BGP.
-Aaron
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:47 AM
Subject: rip2 ospf: freebsd 6.0
hi liste
I'm
hi liste
I'm looking for a dynamic routing (rip2, ospf) solution under freebsd
6.0. currently, I've always known zebra which exists in freebsd ports
collection. do have a better idea?
Though I haven't used it myself, I've talked to people who've done
well with quagga for BGP.
nice,
FreeBSD 6.0-p4. Sharedmem in jail doesnot works. I got Function not
implemented.
Source code:
#include machine/param.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/ipc.h
#include sys/shm.h
int main() {
unsigned int segment = shmget( IPC_PRIVATE, 1 , SHM_R | SHM_W );
perror();
printf( Got
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:32:33PM +0300, Ivan Kolosovskiy wrote:
FreeBSD 6.0-p4. Sharedmem in jail doesnot works. I got Function not
implemented.
It's disabled by default because it's an information disclosure risk.
The manpage tells you how to enable it.
Kris
pgpU97jJ4Tkub.pgp
Description:
Ivan Kolosovskiy wrote:
FreeBSD 6.0-p4. Sharedmem in jail doesnot works. I got Function not
implemented.
Sorry, i found security.jail.sysvipc_allowed sysctl flag =)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 08:26:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Ian Dowse wrote:
Okay, but why did 4.x through 5.x through 6.x (these have all been on
this particular machine) always boot with 115200 until now? :)
They probably used 9600 for the boot blocks, and then switched to
115200
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:26:02PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Ed Maste wrote:
So I suspect that the following happens when you boot:
- your BIOS sets the serial port to 9600
Yes.
- boot0 does nothing with the serial pot
I'm using 'dangerously dedicated' disks, so it's only
Hi!
Thanks for Your help!
I tried Your advice, but i'm in stock anyway.
Because all devices are created when i press Palm Sync. Except of course
/dev/ucom0, which now is replaced by /dev/cua0 in 6.+ version fbsd.
But when i press sync and run command which you have mentioned before, nothing
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
That's why installing 115200 baud boot blocks is still the better
solution for me; my BIOS doesn't have any possibility to set the COM
port speeds...
The best for you would be to add -S115200 in /boot.config, after
reinstalling new boot blocks (bsdlabel -B), and throw
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Okay. I still think it would be wiser to just reinstall them during
installworld, just to be sure there's no incompatibilities...
It's not always possible to do: there can be different boot locations,
the root FS can be a
Hi all
I've a problem to running matlab (using linux_base-rh9) on my FreeBSD
6-stable (PAE kernel).
On my old server (5-stable) everthing work fine but I'v make news fresh install
with
6-stable (using PAE need because I have 4 Go).
On the new server when I launch matlab I've got this message
Albert Shih wrote:
/usr/local/matlab/bin/matlab: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: cannot execute binary
file
/usr/local/matlab-14/bin/glnx86/MATLAB: error while loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/libtermcap.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid
But I've compile the kernel with linux option and maple (other
Le 27/02/2006 à 12:39:13+0100, Dimitry Andric a écrit
Albert Shih wrote:
/usr/local/matlab/bin/matlab: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: cannot execute binary
file
/usr/local/matlab-14/bin/glnx86/MATLAB: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr/lib/libtermcap.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid
Hi List
I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:-
1 mail server with 6.0 running NFS to serve mailboxes in standard unix
format
2 webmail servers running a customised squirrellmail mounting the
mailboxes from the main server
(Yes, i know this is a nasty setup).
All servers are
On Monday 27 February 2006 22:45, Albert Shih wrote:
/usr/local/matlab/bin/matlab: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: cannot execute
binary file /usr/local/matlab-14/bin/glnx86/MATLAB: error while loading
shared libraries: /usr/lib/libtermcap.so: ELF file OS ABI invalid
But I've compile the
At 07:26 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
Hi List
I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:-
1 mail server with 6.0 running NFS to serve mailboxes in standard unix
format
I know there have been a number of changes that might help you since
6.0. I would try going to 6.1
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 07:26 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
Hi List
I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:-
1 mail server with 6.0 running NFS to serve mailboxes in standard unix
format
I know there have been a number of changes that might help you since
6.0. I
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:-
I know there have been a number of changes that might help you since
6.0. I would try going to 6.1 first to see if your NFS problems go
away. Also, are you mounting TCP or UDP mounts ? What version of NFS ?
I
At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the
version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe).
Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current
version?
Not really as there are many changes behind the scenes
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:08:21AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:53 +0200
Rostislav Krasny [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rosti Excellent! What about RES_DFLRETRY decreasing from 4 to 2? Does it need
rosti more testing or discussion?
It seems reasonable to me, and
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the
version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe).
Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current
version?
Not really as there are many
I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:-
I know there have been a number of changes that might help you since
6.0. I would try going to 6.1 first to see if your NFS problems go
away. Also, are you mounting TCP or UDP mounts ? What version of NFS ?
I have tried both tcp
At 10:26 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
OK, do the changes affect both server and client and is there any
documentation on the changes?
cvs commits and reading this mailing is the best place to track what
has changed in detail. Unfortunately, there is no middle ground
source for
I'm gonna take a wild guess at ACPI problems. I have one system on
which I have to disable ACPI timer for anything = 6.0-RELEASE.
To disable it, at the boot menu, select 6 to get a prompt, then type
set debug.acpi.disabled=timer
boot
and see if it still locks up.
On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:41
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:26 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
OK, do the changes affect both server and client and is there any
documentation on the changes?
cvs commits and reading this mailing is the best place to track what has
changed in detail. Unfortunately, there is no middle
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
[ ... ]
A similar effect was observed when a `domain' line was specified
in resolv.conf in place of `search'.
Is there a real reason to retry with a different domain when the
nameserver doesn't respond at all?
UDP is lossy, and it may take a nameserver longer to respond
On Feb 25, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Ian Dowse wrote:
They probably used 9600 for the boot blocks, and then switched to
115200 when /boot/loader started, so you didn't notice. Now the
settings from the boot blocks get used by /boot/loader.
Please document this loudly in the UPGRADING file. It
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
Thus, I'm not surprised that you get a 9600 baud console without
an rc.conf setting. The thing that concerns me is your report that
the console does not run at 115200 even if /boot/loader.conf
contains comconsole_speed=115200.
I get a 9600 baud
On 2/27/06, Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 08:26:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Ian Dowse wrote:
Okay, but why did 4.x through 5.x through 6.x (these have all been on
this particular machine) always boot with 115200 until now? :)
They probably used
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:01:08PM -0500, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On 2/27/06, Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 08:26:42PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Ian Dowse wrote:
Okay, but why did 4.x through 5.x through 6.x (these have all been on
this particular
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:01:08PM -0500, Rong-En Fan wrote:
Which way is preferred: setting comconsole_speed, -S in
boot.config, or using harded code BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED in make.conf?
If now the most preferred way is to using -S or
comconsole_speed in loader.conf, please update that in
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
I get a 9600 baud console with the following after upgrade from 5.4:
This is what I'm planning on putting in UPDATING:
The i386 loader(8) now defaults to the serial speed set by the
previous boot stage, if the
On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
I get a 9600 baud console with the following after upgrade from 5.4:
This is what I'm planning on putting in UPDATING:
The i386 loader(8) now defaults to the serial speed set
There was some discussion about improving this situation a bit; i.e., by
permitting an option wherein sysvipc could be per jail.
Did this ever come to fruition?
Ivan: you should be aware that Kris's short disclaimer really means that
enabling the sysctl exposes sysvipc aware processes on the
Hello,
I have some problems with a Titan PCI-800H
serial card. Due to many interrupt-level
buffer overflows I can not use this card
to establish TCP-connections via modem
(initial telnet handshake did work whilst
the card shared its irq with the adaptec-
controller - the card should have its own
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
[ ... ]
A similar effect was observed when a `domain' line was specified
in resolv.conf in place of `search'.
Is there a real reason to retry with a different domain when the
nameserver doesn't respond at all?
UDP is lossy, and
OK; I have been following the -stable list (among others), and realize
that there are some outstanding issues with respect to wi(4).
I'm wondering if premature invocation of dhclient with a reason code of
EXPIRE is one of those outstanding issues.
Here's some history behind the query; I'll try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a D-Link AirPlus G+ DWL-G650+ wireless cardbus adapter which I
could use with NDISulator until I cvsup'd to 6.1-PRERELEASE yesterday.
pciconf info:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x3b051186 chip=0x9066104c rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:36:25PM +0100, Holger Kipp wrote:
Hello,
This looks like PR 51982
Yes - I just recompiled my kernel with the suggested
change to sio.c, and the problem goes away... hmm.
Feb 27 21:03:17 dialout kernel: sio12: 24 more interrupt-level buffer
overflows (total 433)
I was unaware of this problem. It may be related to other problems
that have surfaced in some code I recently MFC'd.
Warner
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
M. Warner Losh wrote:
I was unaware of this problem. It may be related to other problems
that have surfaced in some code I recently MFC'd.
Warner
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Le 27/02/2006 à 10:18:07-0500, Mike Tancsa a écrit
At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the
version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe).
Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current
version?
At 06:56 PM 27/02/2006, Albert Shih wrote:
Is there any documentation to explain a newbie like me all (I mean really
all of them) sysctl variable ?
For example what
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
Some have descriptions, some are talked about in man pages. eg.
% sysctl -d
Disableing ACPI timer solved the problem. My Opteron box does not lock
up. Thanks!
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm gonna take a wild guess at ACPI problems. I have one system on
which I have to disable ACPI timer for anything = 6.0-RELEASE.
To disable it,
Hi,
I am keeping in sync with 6-Stable every now and
then. At present I have a problem with the pause
timer of the boot loader. In /boot/loader.conf I
have:
autoboot_delay=3
and as soon as the pause timer is supposed to count
down, it kind of hangs; actually, the cursor seems
to jump as if
I just noticed this in my system logs:
Feb 23 07:14:19 laa kernel: pid 71141 (try), uid 0: exited on signal 10
(core dumped)
Now, I have a very busy box here, but I cannot really tell to which
software the 'try' belongs to, and since it's running as uid 0, this
raises some alarms on my end.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:56:01PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it also
solve the issue for others?
I've seen 0 feedback about this so far. Since a number of
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:21:37PM +0900, Tommi L?tti wrote:
I just noticed this in my system logs:
Feb 23 07:14:19 laa kernel: pid 71141 (try), uid 0: exited on signal 10
(core dumped)
Now, I have a very busy box here, but I cannot really tell to which
software the 'try' belongs to,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Probably part of a port build..the configure scripts sometimes
deliberately induce core dumps to test various things. i.e. nothing
to worry about, if so.
Hmm, thanks. There was actually perl getting updated at that point.
--
br,
Tommi
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:38 , Tommi Lätti wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Probably part of a port build..the configure scripts sometimes
deliberately induce core dumps to test various things. i.e. nothing
to worry about, if so.
Hmm, thanks. There was actually perl getting updated at that point.
Hi,
Are there any issues running FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (i386 or amd64 version)
on machine with ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard? It has NVIDIA RAID option in
BIOS and the system has 4x250GB SATA disks. I would like to use its RAID
feature if possible, otherwise I'll try gmirror.
Please let me know if
Are there any issues running FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE (i386 or amd64 version)
on machine with ASUS A8N-SLI motherboard? It has NVIDIA RAID option in
BIOS and the system has 4x250GB SATA disks. I would like to use its RAID
feature if possible, otherwise I'll try gmirror.
Please let me know if
Hi Kris.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:23:28AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:56:01PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it also
solve the issue
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
the risk.
Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.
Kris
pgpBG7ao7EXg0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
54 matches
Mail list logo
