Pete French wrote:
I did some benchmarking, and load gives me a bit better performance than
round-robin so I've elected to use that. Haven't tried prefer as
syncing all the drives backwards and forwards to get the preferences set
seems a bit too much like hard work!
I use this patch for
Hello!
We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server
with address 192.168.42.1)
One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP
server for thin clients.
So we installed the second network interface card with the address
192.168.0.254 and our
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:09:06PM +0200, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote:
Hello!
We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server with
address 192.168.42.1)
One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP
server for thin clients.
So we installed the
Miroslav Lachman a écrit :
Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
[...]
Geom_raid5 is (unfortunatly ?) not part of Freebsd base.
You'll have to download and install the module and utility binaries
and follow the (simple) instructions from this website :
http://home.tiscali.de/cmdr_faako/graid5-howto.html
At 05:57 PM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hi,
How long does it take for the problem to show up ?
Less than an hour in general (running the same client script
simultanuously on a 100Mbps linux box and 1Gbps bds6-x86)
I am running my nic at gig speeds only... I recompiled the kernel
Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
Hello!
We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server
with address 192.168.42.1)
One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP
server for thin clients.
So we installed the second network interface card with the address
Hello,
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 05:57 PM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hi,
How long does it take for the problem to show up ?
Less than an hour in general (running the same client script
simultanuously on a 100Mbps linux box and 1Gbps bds6-x86)
I am running
At 01:38 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I'm out of office tomorrow but will try to find time tommorow evening
to test with another NIC.
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
---Mike
Hello,
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:30:48PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
NB, (CC to kris@ for this) why is memtest86 port marked as i386-only?
Basically because it's a bootable i386 binary image.
yop, but building it could be allowed on more archs
On Saturday 19 April 2008 07:38:27 am Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 19/04/2008, at 3:14 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 06:33:40 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/1.jpg
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/2.jpg
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/3.jpg (this
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 01:38 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I'm out of office tomorrow but will try to find time tommorow evening
to test with another NIC.
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
At 02:00 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
OK, and it is the latest RELENG_7 ? Or just the if_nfe.c file has
been manually updated ? Also, you are using ULE or the 4BSD scheduler
re,
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 02:00 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
OK, and it is the latest RELENG_7 ?
from saturday (but I didn't see any RELENG_7
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete French wrote:
I did some benchmarking, and load gives me a bit better performance
than
round-robin so I've elected to use that. Haven't tried prefer as
syncing all the drives backwards and forwards to get the
Hello,
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Apr 22 17:32:02 UTC 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MX1
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz (2666.63-MHz K8-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x6fb Stepping = 11
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:11:13PM -0700, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0xd060-0xd067,0xd050-0xd053,0xd040-0xd047,0xd030-0xd033,0xd020-0xd02f irq 17
at device 31.2 on pci0
ad4: 238475MB WDC WD2500KS-00MJB0 02.01C03 at ata2-master SATA150
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:07:43PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Every now and then people are complaining about the bug in ab2 that makes
it unusable for benchmarking from FreeBSD (as a client). ab2 is a HTTP
benchmark that's bundled with the Apache web server. I found the apparent
solution and
On 22/04/2008, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:00 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
OK, and it is the latest RELENG_7 ? Or just the if_nfe.c file has been
I've got a jail server (FreeBSD 6.3/amd64) which runs a bunch of web
site development environments. There is an apache or lighttpd running
in each jail as user httpd (same UID on base system and each jail).
On the jail host, I counted 231 processes owned by httpd.
If I try to start an
At 02:35 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Also, you are using ULE or the 4BSD scheduler ? I
still have 4BSD on the box I am testing on.
Interesting, this is with ULE. I didn't really test 4BSD on this
box (I believed those who said SMP needs ULE *and* am quite
satisfied with overall
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
I use this patch for sbin/geom/class/mirror/geom_mirror.c
Change:
md.md_priority = i - 1;
To:
md.md_priority = i - 1 + 100;
I hate to ask for the right solution, but shouldn't we be patching
the gmirror userland to accept a priority argument to
At 04:13 PM 4/22/2008, pluknet wrote:
Hi, I have the same problem with data corruption (with nfe on nfs
server side),
particularly when transferring large files.
Maybe this is somehow associated with the topic.
My simple test case:
truncate -s 1000m bigfile
^^ here I get zero-filed file
cp
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:13:44AM +0400, pluknet wrote:
On 22/04/2008, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:00 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
23 matches
Mail list logo
