Hi lists,
What´s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is
this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page
(http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there´s no
active development on that.
Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ?
I'm
From man vlan:
By now, the list of physical interfaces able of full VLAN processing in
the hardware is limited to the following devices: age(4), bce(4), bge(4),
cxgb(4), em(4), ixgb(4), msk(4), nge(4), re(4), stge(4), ti(4), txp(4),
and vge(4).
On 1/7/09, Edvaldo Silva
On 7/4/08, Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/08, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a solution, but it may well be a great help in diagnosing where
the problem lies: it would be useful to know if the driver is simply
failing to detect the correct
On 7/4/08, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a solution, but it may well be a great help in diagnosing where
the problem lies: it would be useful to know if the driver is simply
failing to detect the correct number of ports, or if the driver
physically cannot use them.
Hi List,
Is anybody running FreeBSD 7 DigiBoard Xem with 2 external 16-port modules ?
I have this at my hands and only the first 16 ports are recognized...
any tricks ??
Any help is very appreciated.
Regards,
Alexandre
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 7/3/08, Gavin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm afraid I can't give you the answer, but there's various bits of
information that I think will be useful to try to help resolve it:
full verbose dmesg
output of pciconf -l (if it is a PCI card)
output of devinfo -v and pnpinfo
On 7/3/08, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-Jul-03 13:08:09 -0300, Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anybody running FreeBSD 7 DigiBoard Xem with 2 external 16-port modules ?
I was unable to get it to work in 6.x and haven't tried with 7.x. My
work-around
Hi list,
Is anybody running 7-STABLE (AMD64) with qmail-ldap ?
I have some FreeBSD+qmail-ldap servers running very wheel, but I'm
having a strange problem with a new setup running qmail-ldap with
7-STABLE(AMD64). Any operation that involves ldap connection result in
a core dumped. The
Hi list,
I found a situation that I can't explain, I have qmail-ldap running
at some FreeBSD 6.2 without any problem. Friday after Installed a new
server this time with 7-STABLE. I stated to get core dumped from
qmail-ldap when they try access the OpenLDAP database.
I compiled/run this simple
On 1/29/08, ZsUM ZsUM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Dump header from device /dev/ad4s1b
Architecture: amd64
Architecture Version: 2
Dump Length: 253394944B (241 MB)
Blocksize: 512
Dumptime: Sun Jan 20 23:51:58 2008
Hostname:
Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump
Version String: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon
On 1/20/08, Gergo Szakal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done everyday work on my ZFS-enabled FreeBSD7 box. It is having
4*250G disks in a RAIDZ array (the base system is on a separate disk).
%uname -a
FreeBSD ginger.apathy.szote.u-szeged.hu 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon
Dec 24 10:10:07
On Nov 16, 2007 11:51 AM, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Before read your message I updated the system again (csup, buildworld,
buildkernel, installkernel, installworld) and now I can reproduce the panic
anymore.
Sorry, just
Hi Robert !
If you run this from single-user mode, do you get the same result? What is
the general network configuration of the system, and what sorts of services
are running?
This is my laptop there is no services running... I use ipfw, natd,
bridge and tap to work with qemu
Could you
Yesterday I updated my system from BETA-1 to BETA2 and after that I'm
getting the following panic after a simple ifconfig.
Follow the panic and trace
# ifconfig bge0 10.5.0.253 netmask 255.255.0.0
panic: Bad list head 0xc444a0c4 first-prev != head
KDB; enter: panic
[thread pid 1142 tid
On 11/9/07, Jeff Royle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a note: This doesn't happen with the em driver in 7-beta2 built
today. Seeing if I have a free machine to build 7-beta2 with bge to
test this.
# ifconfig em1 10.5.0.253 netmask 255.255.0.0
em1:
I've a 6-STABLE (sources from 2 weeks ago) server that is rebooting at
random, I changed memory, cpu, motherboard and the problem persists. This
machine is a firewall, running pf, squid and bind.
Now I recompiled the kernel with debugging bits. Follow the debug session,
dmesg and kernel config
My D610 notebook is panic constantly with this:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x170
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0598199
stack pointer = 0x28:0xe438dc40
frame pointer =
On 8/17/07, Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My D610 notebook is panic constantly with this:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x170
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0598199
stack
Hi list,
We have a backup server Dell Power Edge 1850, One Xeon 3.6 Ghz, 2GB Ram,
attached to one storage PowerVault 220 and one LTO tape drive, running
STABLE from start of June.
This machine basically runs FTP Server, NFS Server, compress directories
using tar and gzip and run some perl
On 6/14/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know ... it was caused by an application, but nothing was freed up
after the application was stop'd ...
In my case the sockets are closed only if I stop the samba processes. When I
just changed the connection mode from Unix Socket
On 6/14/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, June 14, 2007 14:03:27 -0300 Alexandre Biancalana
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know ... it was caused
using samba-3.0.24,1, nss_ldap-1.255, openldap-server-2.3.34_1
I can provide more information if need.
Any Advises/Patches ?
Best Regards,
Alexandre Biancalana
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On 6/13/07, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would advise running truss or ktrace against the process
to see if it's actually attempting to close the descriptor.
this would explain if the leak is in the application, or
maybe libc/kernel.
--
- Alfred Perlstein
Hi !
I change
Anybody tested today released clamav-0.90.1 ??
On 3/2/07, Carlos Horowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anybody tried this additionally in /etc/libmap.conf ?
[/usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1]
libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2
clamav-0.90_2 reduced CPU consumption for me on 6.2-Stable since I
Hi list,
Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512 MB
Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeBSD
6-STABLE. But the performance of the network is worst than before.
The new machine is a Dell PowerEdge 1800 have one quad DLink DFE-580TX,
one
On 9/28/06, Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:57:22 -0300
Alexandre Biancalana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512
MB
Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeBSD
6
26 matches
Mail list logo
