On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After running 'freebsd-update fetch install' on a i386 server, I have
> this situation:
>
> [dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -u
> 12.1-RELEASE-p10
> [dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -k
> 12.1-
Hello,
After running 'freebsd-update fetch install' on a i386 server, I have this
situation:
[dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -u
12.1-RELEASE-p10
[dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -k
12.1-RELEASE-p9
[dan@gelt:~] $
Why did this not get a new kernel?
I ask because:
[dan@gelt:~] $ sudo
> Hi all,
>
> Wanted to make you aware of an issue I have encountered, sorry if this is
> the wrong list.
>
> I upgraded from FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p3 to p4 using:
>
> freebsd-fetch update
> freebsd-fetch install
>
> and use the GENERIC kernel. Upon reboot the system kernel panics when
> attempt
SHOT without any changes to
src.conf or make.conf and it built fine, which was my main worry.
Apparently one of my custom build settings causes the failure and I will see if
I can track it down sometime.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
s. That is the bug that I am raising.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Another data point:
I did the whole experiment with the latest 12-STABLE but for amd64 and
everything builds fine without changes, and runs fine too.
I used the same src.conf and make.conf. So the problem is definitely with i386.
Dan
___
freebsd
down on extra llvm parts that I do not need, or so I am led to believe.
Still puzzled.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-uns
The ifuncs check for buildkernel is identical to the one in
/usr/src/lib/libc/Makefile
and is here:
/usr/src/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
am only building i386, as in I am not building all
targets or amd64.
I edited the two Makefiles that have this check to remove the check and the
builds proceed just fine.
So it appears that these checks are flawed, or I am soon to learn something new
OMPILER=1
WITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES=1
WITHOUT_EXAMPLES=1
WITHOUT_HYPERV=1
WITHOUT_JAIL=1
WITHOUT_LOCALES=1
WITHOUT_PROFILE=1
WITHOUT_QUOTAS=1
WITHOUT_TESTS=1
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To un
-specific headers.
I am rebuilding with MK_CRYPT=no to see if this works around the problem, but
it seems like perhaps just this one aesni module should not be built rather
than all of CRYPT having to be disabled.
This is a post 11.2 BETA3 sync to STABLE as of today, 29 May 2018.
Dan
nks for your help!
Do I have any other takers? ;-)
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On 17 Apr 2018, at 8:49 AM, Kyle Evans wrote:
>
> As "the guy most likely to have broken boot code in stable," may I ask
> what leads you specifically to amd64 boot code? Mostly curious if
> there's something beyond "i386 works well" that lead you to this
> conclusion.
It is partly just a hu
re to go on, but I am happy to off list work with anyone that
wants to pursue this, by testing out stuff or answering more questions.
Dan Allen
Running FreeBSD since 2.2.8
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
FWIW - I had a successful build yesterday on stable/11 r325010; I have
not tried anything newer yet.
Dan
David Wolfskill writes:
> This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running
> stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033:
>
> --- libpro
... 00:00:00 : 00:06:16
>>> stage 4.2: building libraries ... 00:00:19 : 00:06:37
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Jakub Lach writes:
> On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores
> comparing to
> 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about
> 40%).
>
> I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE
> since
> 2008.
Agree; cla
Mike Tancsa writes:
> On 10/2/2017 2:34 PM, Dan Mack wrote:
>>
>> Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining,
>> just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during
>> the various phases of compiler changes over the last
|21 | 1.6 | clang 5.x |
|--+--+---+--+---|
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-s
2017-09-12 1:27 GMT-05:00 Borja Marcos :
>
>
> > On 11 Sep 2017, at 11:25, Borja Marcos wrote:
> >
> >> Since I’ve updated a machine to 11.1-STABLE I am seeing a rather unusual
> >> growth of Wired memory.
> >>
> >> Any hints on what might have changed from 11-RELEASE to 11.1-RELEASE and
> >> 11
ned when transitioning between 317440-stable -> 317906-stable
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ess.
I haven't preseeded /usr/ports/ with svnlite, but I'm wondering if there's any
guidance regarding using svnlite or if there's a pending update to the portion
of the ports documentation regarding svn that reflects svnlite as part
times? clang? additional subsystems?
I'm using the same zpool / disks / memory etc.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stabl
/libzfs_core.so.2 should be added to the
ObsoleteFiles.inc file.
Dan Allen
Building FreeBSD since 2.2.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-s
own as 256MB), but the critical part is running a 64-bit
kernel. ZFS does a lot of kernel malloc/free operations, and address space
fragmentation on a 32-bit system will eventually cause a panic when ZFS
can't malloc a contiguous 128k chunk.
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/08/13 14:29, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4
>> compression.
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/106
Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4 compression.
https://plus.google.com/106386350930626759085/posts/PLbkNfndPiM
short link: http://bpaste.net/show/76095
HTH
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable
I have noticed similar time issues after upgrading from 8.2 to 8.3. I haven't
had time to investigate, but often the time drift "exceeds sanity limit."
So, the problem is present pre 9.x. I never had this problem when running 8.2.
From: Daniel Braniss
To:
ou really want an exportable /tmp, just live with the fact that you'll
get ESTALE errors on all clients when you reboot the server. Maybe giving
the root inode a constant generation number is all that's needed, since I
suppose most clients that have mounted the server don't actual
a Pentium 4 and a tiny Dell Mini 10 Inspiron with an Intel Atom
chip, everything is fine with RELENG_9. It is just this Toshiba, which ran
perfectly for years with FreeBSD 6, 7, but things have declined with 8.0 and
later.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
On 31 Jul 2012, at 2:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:32:45 pm Dan Allen wrote:
>>
>> $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v 1.688.2.31 2012/06/13 15:25:52 jhb
> So to be clear, does that revision work fine, it's a future revision that
> b
on the Toshiba and call it a day.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IOS upgrade for your machine ?
No, the system does not slow down. I am checking on the BIOS upgrade.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
ese messages? What does error 0x40 mean?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Thanks. I'll check this script out.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Dan Daley ; Charles
Sprickman
; Warren Block ; Vincent Hoffman
Sent: Fri, June 8, 2012 2:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options
D
I usually use portmaster to install ports. The options dialogs that pop
up are often for dependencies. The options dialog gives the name of the
port for which the options are being selected, but no description or
indication as to why this is being installed (this could be a dependency
of a de
Maybe their knowledge of Linux drove them to use FreeBSD. Sorry,
couldn't resist ;)
On 06/05/2012 19:42, David Magda wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 20:16, Scott Long wrote:
If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the
OpenConnect web site.
Out of curiosity, giv
I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this info
detailed here:
https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software
From: Benjamin Francom
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, June 5, 2012 11:00:01 AM
Subject: Netflix's New
I haven't had a chance to read through this entire thread yet, but
wanted to post this in case it helps someone.
ntpd was working fine for me for a while, and then I started getting
this exact same error. After a few weeks, I finally started
troubleshooting and it turned out that I had, at
I haven't had a chance to read through this entire thread yet, but
wanted to post this in case it helps someone.
ntpd was working fine for me for a while, and then I started getting
this exact same error. After a few weeks, I finally started
troubleshooting and it turned out that I had, at
Pretty sure I have a brand new, never used floppy drive laying around
that I could send to you :) I don't think I have any discs though.
On 03/27/2012 17:03, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:48:26 -0500, Thomas Laus wrote:
It looks like we both have confirmed that the floppy dis
py with the result. I've
never done it completely remotely, but if you do a trial run or two on a
local machine or VM, you should be able to it confidently remotely.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@free
On 31 Dec 2011, at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> In the meantime: Dan, when you say in your original mail, "I just
> upgraded my Dell OptiPlex GX270 from RELENG_8 to RELENG_9", can you
> please provide uname -a output from the system when it was running
> RELENG_8? I&
ne for your help. Happy New Years!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s until it breaks.
Fair enough. I will see what I can accomplish. Thanks!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
m 2004 machines.
In other words, there is no tree for me.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
if I disable that
(hw.acpi.disable=pci) then the machine cannot find a boot drive.
So I have lost functionality that worked fine in BSD 8.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
t in the dark here, but the only thing I can think of that might
> cause this is software being extremely aggressive with calls to things
> like gettimeofday(2) or clock_gettime(2). Really not sure. ntpd maybe
> (unlikely but possible)? Sort of grasping at straws here.
--
Dan N
hat value changes while the function is executing, it could
cause problems. ui_sbsize is only used by the resource limiting code,
though, so unless you're enforcing an sbsize rlimit, it should be harmless.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
((lwpinfo.pl_flags&(PL_FLAG_SCE|PL_FLAG_SCX)) == 0)
+ err(1,"pl_flags=%x contains neither PL_FLAG_SCE
or PL_FLAG_SCX", lwpinfo.pl_flags);
+ info->pr_why = (lwpinfo.pl_flags&PL_FLAG_SCE) ?
S_SCE:S_SCX;
+ info->curth
if both drives in your mirror were bought at the same time
> from the same place and have similar manufacturing plants/dates on
> them).
I'm happy to send you this drive for your experimentation pleasure.
If so, please email me an address offline. You don't have a disk with
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Dan, I will respond to your reply sometime tomorrow. I do not have time
> to review the Email today (~7.7KBytes), but will have time tomorrow.
No worries. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://langil
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:34:41PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> ...
>>>>
245828 secs (2822954 bytes/sec)
real13m0.256s
user0m22.087s
sys 3m24.215s
> Also i am highly recommending to setup smartd as daemon and to monitor number
> of relocated sectors. If they will grow again - then it is a good time to
> utilize
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> Syst
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> System in question: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 3 04:52:04 GMT 2011
>>
>> After a recent power failure, I'm seeing this in my logs:
>>
>
SyncID: 1
ID: 3585934016
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
grep nfsd
1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:25.79 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:26.65 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:27.67 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:27.04 nfsd: server (nfsd)
--
Da
ely weird. Could you have run a partitioning tool, or some other
program that would have done direct writes to all of your component disks?
Your scrub is also a bit worrying - 24k checksum errors definitely shouldn't
occur during normal usage.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allan
rland. If you run "tcpdump arp", you should be able to see the packet
timestamps as the kernel sees them.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
s/^.*: //p')
echo "$stat"
svn info | grep Revision
svn update
if [ "$localrev" != "$latestrev" ] ; then
echo "Log:"
echo "svn log -v -r $(($localrev+1)):$latestrev $repo"
fi
Sample output:
(root@dan) /usr/src # ./update
M 220902
In the last episode (Apr 12), Dan Nelson said:
> In the last episode (Apr 12), Denny Schierz said:
> > Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> > > Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
> > > > Are you certain you are not somehow run
ersubscribed (common for older
blade switches, or very high-density blades); sometimes there will be
rectangles enclosing groups of 6-8 ports, which means that they are
controlled by a single chip internally. Moving each of your test machines
to a separate group may improve your performan
right in thinking I
could also use this by first upgrading my host and then running this command
to write the /basejail over with the updated files from the host to bring
them into sync? I still don't know how I would then fix the /etc under each
individual jail though.
61588MB (732566646 4096 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 364801C)
>
> According to Hitachi, this is an 512b drive.
Correct. This isn't a 4k drive. Datasheet:
http://www.hgst.com/internal-drives/enterprise/ultrastar/ultrastar-7k3000
Sector size (variable, Bytes/sector)5
there is preliminary code under #ifdef LAGG_PORT_STACKING, but
it claims to be untested.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 1/11/2011 11:10 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull
in a
hot spare if one is req
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
*
On 1/8/2011 4:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dan Langille mailto:d...@langille.org>> wrote:
I've been running a ZFS array for about 10 months on a system with
4GB of RAM. I'm about to add another 4GB of RAM.
I think this might
tings, etc, I'm
happy to run them and include the results. We have lots of time to play
with this.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
I just did a csup of stable, and the build is broken.
In function protopr various struct members are not defined. The build halts.
First compile error is at /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c line 462
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
o use as spares. Whether
they sit on the shelf or in the box is open to discussion.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
o be done by hand. I don't know many administrators who
are going to tolerate this when deploying numerous machines, especially
when compounded by the complexities mentioned above.
This basically outlines the reason why I do not use ZFS on root.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.or
On 12/30/2010 4:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
As Jean-Yves pointed out: upgrade not update. Some word beginning with
'up' anyhow.
# gp
sboot -i 1 ad0
Cheers,
Matthew
This part applies only if you're booting from ZFS drives?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
he machine check registers once an hour. If this happens
constantly you might have a DIMM that is dying?
John:
I take it these ECC errors *may* have been happening for some time.
What has changed is the OS now polls for the errors and reports them.
--
Dan Langille - http://la
ays & reboots now has
been delivering reliable networking such that ntpd always works.
Thanks again to everyone for their help.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
On 14 Dec 2010, at 7:02 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The design model of these daemons is to assume network connectivity is
> working when they start, and netwait
> reliably ensures that.
Thanks Jeremy for the script. It works like a charm on my system, fixing the
prob
extern zio_t *zio_unique_parent(zio_t *cio);
extern void zio_add_child(zio_t *pio, zio_t *cio);
extern void *zio_buf_alloc(size_t size);
+extern void *zio_buf_alloc_nowait(size_t size);
extern void zio_buf_free(void *buf, size_t size);
extern void *zio_data_buf_alloc(size_t size);
extern
ute later and it would work just
fine. Apparently it never tries a second time!
This is something that should just work out of the box, IMHO.
Thanks everyone for your help!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Recently my network connection now is setup AFTER ntpd is launched rather than
before.
So when ntpd starts there is no net connection and it gives up.
I read /usr/src/UPDATING but nothing is mentioned about a change in boot order.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
pool without a panic. But once I
online the log device and do any writes, I get the panic again.
As I mentioned, I have this data replicated elsewere, so I can exper-
iment with the pool if it will help track down this issue.
Any more news on this?
--
Dan Langille - http
rence,
but here's a mention of it from Luigi:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2004-November/008891.html
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
y problem is that I am missing one of my
two Cores with APIC off!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 9 Nov 2010, at 9:07 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Let's see if anybody else can help you with that stuff.
> My jurisdiction (area of expertise) ends here.
Thank you for your help!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:24 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 09/11/2010 17:22 Dan Allen said the following:
>>
>> On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> /boot/loader.conf contents
>>
>> This might be the smoking gun!
>>
>> cat load
On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> /boot/loader.conf contents
This might be the smoking gun!
cat loader.conf:
hint.apic.0.disabled="1"
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> - sysctl machdep.acpi_root
machdep.acpi_root: 983520
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable
On 8 Nov 2010, at 10:30 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Can you please also provide the following output:
> $ kenv | fgrep hint.acpi
hint.acpi.0.oem="TOSHIB"
hint.acpi.0.revision="1"
hint.acpi.0.rsdp="0xf01e0"
hint.acpi.0.rsdt="0x3f7a"
___
freebsd-stabl
ces. My machine at least boots up fine, but still with just one logical
CPU...
Attached is a zip file containing all of the 4 outputs as requested above.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
ou understand this system config?
What next?
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
7;d to today's very latest sources.
2. Installed the patch.
3. Rebuilt and reinstalled the kernel.
4. Boots up fine!
So, will this patch be integrated into STABLE soon?
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On 3 Nov 2010, at 2:01 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> P.S. so will you be trying the patch I proposed?
Yes. I will csup with today's sources and then apply the patch.
Results soon...
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
mend also chopping off an additional hour "just in case".
I did this and the results are as expected, i.e., everything worked just fine.
So we are zeroing in on this...
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
this Intel logical CPU code business is probably the
culprit.
It is hard to believe that I am the only one with a Core Duo machine finding
this problem!
More in a bit...
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 3 Nov 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I still would like to see verbose dmesg, just to be sure what's going on.
Here is the output of dmesg from the last working kerneL, with sources sync'd
Oct 28th:
Dan
---
Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (
r via boot /boot/kernel.old, resync'd today, rebuilt,
and things are still broken.
Any ideas?
Dan Allen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
On Wed, October 20, 2010 8:44 am, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Dan Langille typed:
>> I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
>>
>> This is my simple proof of concept test:
>>
>> Create the data
>&g
fied
since most recent snapshot
warning: cannot send 'storage/bac...@2010.10.20': Broken pipe
I have no idea why this fails. Clues please?
To my knowledge, the destination has not been written to.
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
__
On 10/4/2010 7:19 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Dan Langille (from Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:08:19
-0400):
Overnight, the following appeared in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 21:56:46 kraken root: ZFS: checksum mismatch, zpool=storage
path=/dev/gpt/disk06-live offset=123103157760 size=1024
Oct
1 - 100 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
