On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After running 'freebsd-update fetch install' on a i386 server, I have
> this situation:
>
> [dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -u
> 12.1-RELEASE-p10
> [dan@gelt:~] $ freebsd-version -k
> 12.1-RELEASE-p9
udit was installed by package
base-audit-0.4
[dan@gelt:~] $
on an amd64 host I have:
[dan@slocum:~] $ freebsd-version -u
12.1-RELEASE-p10
[dan@slocum:~] $ freebsd-version -k
12.1-RELEASE-p10
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
> Hi all,
>
> Wanted to make you aware of an issue I have encountered, sorry if this is
> the wrong list.
>
> I upgraded from FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p3 to p4 using:
>
> freebsd-fetch update
> freebsd-fetch install
>
> and use the GENERIC kernel. Upon reboot the system kernel panics when
>
Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4 compression.
https://plus.google.com/106386350930626759085/posts/PLbkNfndPiM
short link: http://bpaste.net/show/76095
HTH
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable
On Feb 8, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Xin Li wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/08/13 14:29, Dan Langille wrote:
Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4
compression.
https://plus.google.com/106386350930626759085/posts/PLbkNfndPiM
short
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
System in question: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 3 04:52
smartd as daemon and to monitor number
of relocated sectors. If they will grow again - then it is a good time to
utilize this disk.
It is running, but with nothing custom in the .conf file.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:34:41PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
...
Information such as this?
http://beta.freebsddiary.org
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Dan, I will respond to your reply sometime tomorrow. I do not have time
to review the Email today (~7.7KBytes), but will have time tomorrow.
No worries. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
for your experimentation pleasure.
If so, please email me an address offline. You don't have a disk with
errors, and it seems you should have one.
After I wipe it. I'm sure I have a destroyer CD here somewhere
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
ID: 3585934016
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
System in question: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 3 04:52:04 GMT 2011
After a recent power failure, I'm seeing this in my logs:
Aug 19 20:36:34 bast smartd[1575]: Device
On 1/11/2011 11:10 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull
in a
hot spare if one is required
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
* http
happy to run them and include the results. We have lots of time to play
with this.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 1/8/2011 4:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org
mailto:d...@langille.org wrote:
I've been running a ZFS array for about 10 months on a system with
4GB of RAM. I'm about to add another 4GB of RAM.
I think this might
as spares. Whether
they sit on the shelf or in the box is open to discussion.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
are going to tolerate this when deploying numerous machines, especially
when compounded by the complexities mentioned above.
This basically outlines the reason why I do not use ZFS on root.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 12/30/2010 4:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
As Jean-Yves pointed out: upgrade not update. Some word beginning with
'up' anyhow.
# gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot
,
Matthew
This part applies only if you're booting from ZFS drives?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
registers once an hour. If this happens
constantly you might have a DIMM that is dying?
John:
I take it these ECC errors *may* have been happening for some time.
What has changed is the OS now polls for the errors and reports them.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
a panic. But once I
online the log device and do any writes, I get the panic again.
As I mentioned, I have this data replicated elsewere, so I can exper-
iment with the pool if it will help track down this issue.
Any more news on this?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
most recent snapshot
warning: cannot send 'storage/bac...@2010.10.20': Broken pipe
I have no idea why this fails. Clues please?
To my knowledge, the destination has not been written to.
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable
On Wed, October 20, 2010 8:44 am, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Dan Langille typed:
I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
This is my simple proof of concept test:
Create the data
# zfs create storage/a
# touch /storage/a/1
# touch /storage/a/2
On 10/4/2010 7:19 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Dan Langille d...@langille.org (from Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:08:19
-0400):
Overnight, the following appeared in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 21:56:46 kraken root: ZFS: checksum mismatch, zpool=storage
path=/dev/gpt/disk06-live offset
storage 8.08T 4.60T 1.06K185 131M 12.4M
Yeterday's write bandwidth was more 80-90M. It's down, a lot.
I'll look closer this evening.
mm
DÅa 4. 10. 2010 4:06, Artem Belevich wrote / napÃsal(a):
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
I'm rerunning my
On 10/4/2010 7:19 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Dan Langille d...@langille.org (from Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:08:19
-0400):
Overnight, the following appeared in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 21:56:46 kraken root: ZFS: checksum mismatch, zpool=storage
path=/dev/gpt/disk06-live offset
On 10/4/2010 2:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:31:07PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mon, October 4, 2010 3:27 am, Martin Matuska wrote:
Try using zfs receive with the -v flag (gives you some stats at the end):
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive -v
On 10/2/2010 10:04 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
After a 'shutdown -p now', it was about 20 minutes before I went and
powered it up (I was on minecraft). The box came back with the missing HDD:
$ zpool status storage
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced
On 10/1/2010 9:32 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/1/2010 7:00 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Langilled...@langille.org wrote:
FYI: this is all on the same box.
In one of the previous emails you've used this command line:
# mbuffer -s 128k -m 1G -I 9090 | zfs
to do a 'camcontrol scan' on this box as
it it froze up the system the last time I tried that:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C78FF01.5020500
Any suggestions for getting the drive back online and the zpool stabilized?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
Overnight I was running a zfs send | zfs receive (both within the
same system / zpool). The system ran out of space, a drive went off
line, and the system is degraded.
This is a raidz2
On 10/2/2010 6:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:09:25PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
Overnight I was running a zfs send | zfs receive (both within the
same system
On 10/2/2010 7:50 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 6:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:09:25PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43
On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
can do.
The system is now running:
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive
On Fri, October 1, 2010 11:45 am, Dan Langille wrote:
On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning
I
can do.
The system is now
On Wed, September 29, 2010 2:04 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
$ zpool iostat 10
capacity operationsbandwidth
pool used avail read write read write
-- - - - - - -
storage 7.67T 5.02T358 38 43.1M 1.96M
FYI: this is all on the same box.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx wrote:
Hmm. It did help me a lot when I was replicating ~2TB worth of data
over GigE. Without mbuffer things were roughly in the ballpark of your
numbers
storage 9.78T 2.90T 1.01K 1.01K 128M 89.3M
storage 9.79T 2.90T962 1.08K 119M 89.1M
storage 9.79T 2.90T 1.09K 1.25K 139M 67.8M
Big difference. :)
--Artem
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Artem Belevichfbsdl...@src.cx wrote
WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/
That looks really good. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length:
0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 8/28/2010 8:30 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or
length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
CC'ing freebsd-acpi. OS
? What is
your view on replacing DRAM? What do you conclude from the summary?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
kernel: MCA
On 8/24/2010 7:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:13:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU
On 8/23/2010 7:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/08/2010 02:43 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105
Aug 22 23:16:43
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
kernel: MCA
: 2000188135936
offset: 1048576
type: freebsd-zfs
index: 1
end: 3906619500
start: 2048
Consumers:
1. Name: ada5
Mediasize: 2000398934016 (1.8T)
Sectorsize: 512
Mode: r1w1e3
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable
On 8/2/2010 7:11 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I recently altered an existing raidz2 pool from using 7 vdevs of about
931G to 1.81TB. In fact, the existing pool used half of each HDD. I then
wanted to go to using [almost] all of each HDD.
I offline'd each vdev, adjusted the HDD paritions using gpart
errors
Another attempt to destroy the array created a panic.
Suggestions as to how to remove this array and get started again?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
Oh... I left this out:
FreeBSD kraken.unixathome.org 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Mar
5 00:46:11 EST 2010
d...@kraken.example.org:/usr/obj/usr/src
or current contents doesn't look like ZFS device.
Can you try moving current files to /tmp/sparsefile[34].img and then
readd them to the pool with zpool replace? One by one please.
I do not know what the above paragraph means.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
On 7/25/2010 4:49 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
25.07.2010 20:58, Dan Langille wrote:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
storage ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk01 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk02 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk03 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk04 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk05 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/sparsefile1.img
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
# zpool status
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is
missing or
invalid. Sufficient replicas exist
; note
that temporary disks 3 and 4 don't have to be 2TB, 1.5TB will do.
The lack of redundancy is noted and accepted. Thanks. :)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 7/22/2010 4:11 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan
On 7/23/2010 7:42 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust
my original plan as follows.
[ ... ]
Since I still have the medium-sized ZFS array
:
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/zfs-with-gpart.php
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'll run -s 2 and -s 5 tests overnight and will post them in the
morning.
The -s 2 results are in:
-b 34:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
You may have seen my cunning plan:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=883310+0+current/freebsd-stable
I've been doing some testing today. The first of my tests comparing
partitions aligned on a 4KB boundary are in. I created a 5x2TB zpool
/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 7/22/2010 8:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust my
original plan as follows.
NOTE: glabel will not be used.
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition
going to stay that way.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
lose
all the data.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
records out
0 bytes transferred in 0.25 secs (0 bytes/sec)
$ ls -l /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2147483648000 Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
$ ls -lh /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2.0T Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
On 7/23/2010 10:51 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/23/2010 10:42 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 24/07/2010, at 11:55, Freddie Cash wrote:
It's theoretical as I have not investigated how to create sparse
files on FreeBSD, nor have I done this. It's based on several
posts to the zfs-discuss mailing
runs
only on on my /storage mount point.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci7
atapci1:SiI
On 7/22/2010 3:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:02:33AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0:SiI 3124 SATA300 controller port 0xdc00-0xdc0f
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure
has a spare 2TB HDD I could borrow for the
evening.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
... the smaller size won't mess things up...
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
On 7/21/2010 2:54 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, alan bryan wrote:
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
From: Dan Langille d...@langille.org
Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool
addition HDD
to serve as temporary storage. I will also use them for practicing the
commands before destroying the original array. I'll post my plan to the
list for review.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
of the glabel above?
Thanks
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT ad0
Let's see how much space we have. This output will be used to determine
SOMEVALUE in the next command.
gpart show
Create a new
ONLINE 0 0 0
ad16ONLINE 0 0 0
Of course, always have good backups. ;)
In my case, this ZFS array is the backup. ;)
But I'm setting up a tape library, real soon now
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
:
from=10..etc
appears before the key being used to log in, the message will appear.
Solution: move the from= line to the bottom of the file. Ugly, but it
works.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
)
avail memory = 248524800 (237 MB)
^^^ last thing I see.
I can get to the boot loader screen (which is how I booted from kernel.old)
Suggestions?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On 2/16/2010 6:28 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[...]
Why even bother with the LSI card at all?
That board already has 6 SATA slots - depends how many disks you want
to use of course. (5 HDs + 1 DVD drive?)
Plus two SATA drives in a gmirror
On Tue, February 16, 2010 2:05 pm, Alexander Motin wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On Wed, February 10, 2010 10:00 pm, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/10/10 19:40, Steve Polyack wrote:
I haven't had such bad experience as the above, but it is certainly a
concern. Using ZFS we simply 'offline
Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
Get a dock for holding 2 x 2,5 disks in a single 5,25 slot and put
it at the top, in the only 5,25 bay of the case.
That sounds very interesting. I just looking around for such a thing,
and could not find
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations
Steve Polyack wrote:
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
7. Supermicro LSI MegaRAID 8 Port SAS RAID Controller $118
Dan,
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that great
of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with Dell servers
as the PERC
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Steve Polyack wrote:
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that
great of performance out of the LSI MegaRAID cards that ship with
Dell servers as the PERC. The newest incarnations are better, but I
would try to get an Areca.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1. Samsung SATA CD/DVD Burner $20 (+ $8 shipping)
2. SuperMicro 5046A $750 (+$43
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1. Samsung SATA CD/DVD Burner $20 (+ $8 shipping)
2. SuperMicro 5046A $750 (+$43 shipping
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM other parts are regular SocketAM2+ motherboard, Athlon X4, 8G ram,
DM FreeBSD/amd64
well, not exactly regular - it's ASUS M2N-LR-SATA with 10 SATA channels, but
I suppose there are comparable in workstation mobo
Alexander Motin wrote:
Steve Polyack wrote:
On 2/10/2010 12:02 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
Don't use a port multiplier and this goes away. I was hoping to avoid
a PM and using something like the Syba PCI Express SATA II 4 x Ports
RAID Controller seems to be the best solution so far.
http
Wes Morgan wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at creating a large home use storage machine. Budget is a
concern, but size and reliability are also a priority. Noise is also a
concern, since this will be at home, in the basement
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
DL I'm looking at creating a large home use storage machine. Budget is a
DL concern, but size and reliability are also a priority. Noise is also a
DL concern, since this will be at home, in the basement. That, and cost,
DL
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
