Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-05-05 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 05.05.2013 07:51, Marcelo Gondim wrote: I changed hardware for motherboard Supermicro X9SCM-F and Xeon processor 3.2Ghz E31230 with 8Gb ram ECC. The problem stopped and the server was very stable. The problem could be with the Intel motherboard S5500BC? Because this was installed with

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-05-05 Thread Marcelo Gondim
-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 I'm trying to replace severalMikrotik RouterOS (PPPoE server) for FreeBSD with mpd + freeradius + mysql. All my servers are FreeBSD except PPPoE Server. :( Best regards, ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-05-04 Thread Marcelo Gondim
Em 21/04/13 10:59, Eugene Grosbein escreveu: On 21.04.2013 06:08, Marcelo Gondim wrote: Em 20/04/13 14:33, Eugene Grosbein escreveu: On 21.04.2013 00:26, Marcelo Gondim wrote: You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
http://pastebin.com/nUXGVR3y M You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, M it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 M for workarounds. M Ok :) I will try this: M M - net.isr.bindthreads=1 in /boot/loader.conf; M

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-21 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 21.04.2013 06:08, Marcelo Gondim wrote: Em 20/04/13 14:33, Eugene Grosbein escreveu: On 21.04.2013 00:26, Marcelo Gondim wrote: You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558

Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Marcelo Gondim
Hi all, I'm doing tests with mpdas pppoeserver. Tried to simulate an attack of 1000 connections using an incorrect login and after a certain time can cause a kernel panic in the system. Below the panicgenerated: http://pastebin.com/nUXGVR3y Other equipment I do: # for (( i=0; i 1000; i++

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
Can you provide more information about the configuration of mpd and ppp? the panic is in the dummynet code; can you provide information about your ipfw/dummynet setup? Thanks, adrian On 20 April 2013 06:21, Marcelo Gondim gon...@bsdinfo.com.br wrote: Hi all, I'm doing tests with mpdas

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 for workarounds. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Marcelo Gondim
pppoe #set link enable multilink set link action bundle B set link disable chap pap eap set link mtu 1492 set link mru 1492 set link enable pap load radius create link template igb1 common set pppoe iface igb1 set pppoe

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Marcelo Gondim
the panicgenerated: http://pastebin.com/nUXGVR3y You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 for workarounds. Ok :) I will try this: - net.isr.bindthreads=1 in /boot/loader.conf

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 21.04.2013 00:26, Marcelo Gondim wrote: You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 for workarounds. Ok :) I will try this: - net.isr.bindthreads=1 in /boot/loader.conf

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Marcelo Gondim
Hi, My ipfw rules, pf rules and dummynet: fw=/sbin/ipfw ext_if=igb0 $fw disable one_pass $fw -f flush $fw zero $fw table all flush $fw -f pipe flush ssh_port=4321 $fw add allow all from any to any via lo0 $fw add deny all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any $fw add deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $fw add

Re: Possible DoS in mpd 5.6 pppoe server

2013-04-20 Thread Marcelo Gondim
Em 20/04/13 14:33, Eugene Grosbein escreveu: On 21.04.2013 00:26, Marcelo Gondim wrote: You seem to use dummynet and the problem is not in mpd/pppoe code, it's it the dummynet code. Look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/162558 for workarounds. Ok :) I will try

Re: 8.1R: ppp default route uses wrong Netif (with pppoe)

2010-08-15 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:31:32PM +0400, Michael BlackHeart wrote: As I understand this isn't a bug but a mistype or misunderstand of config ( see man ppp.conf ) I'm running myself 8.0, 8.1 and currently 8.STABLE with pppoe in this way and never have a problem as many peolpe do. Look

Re: 8.1R: ppp default route uses wrong Netif (with pppoe)

2010-08-12 Thread Michael BlackHeart
As I understand this isn't a bug but a mistype or misunderstand of config ( see man ppp.conf ) I'm running myself 8.0, 8.1 and currently 8.STABLE with pppoe in this way and never have a problem as many peolpe do. Look in listing my-provider: set line PPPoE:nfe0 Here's some set line and should

8.1R: ppp default route uses wrong Netif (with pppoe)

2010-08-11 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Hi, I found the following problem with ppp after upgrading to 8.1 I am using ppp -ddial -nat ... over pppoe. The entry in ppp.conf has these lines (plus others not relevant here): my-provider: set line PPPoE:nfe0 ... add default HISADDR Up to 7.2 this sufficed

Re: 8.1R: ppp default route uses wrong Netif (with pppoe)

2010-08-11 Thread Oliver Fromme
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote: Hi, I found the following problem with ppp after upgrading to 8.1 I am using ppp -ddial -nat ... over pppoe. The entry in ppp.conf has these lines (plus others not relevant here): my-provider: set line PPPoE:nfe0

Re: pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)

2009-07-10 Thread Виталий Моисеев
2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24 Is there some reason this does not work ?

Re: pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)

2009-07-10 Thread Виталий Моисеев
2009/7/9 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.172 Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.24 Is there some reason this does not work ?

pppoe on a VLAN interface issues (RELENG_7)

2009-07-09 Thread Mike Tancsa
) status: active vlan: 172 parent interface: em1 However, if I try and bring up pppoe using em1.10 as the PPPoE device, it does not work. Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 ppp[1484]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed - opening Jul 9 14:34:17 fw02 kernel: ng_ether_attach: can't name node em1.10 Jul 9 14

Re: problem with PPPoE STABLE and ADSL 3Com HomeConnect

2005-09-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
FreeBSD versions 3Com mode for ng_pppoe is switched per-node, not via sysctl. You should use ppp(8) option to enable 3Com mode: set pppoe 3Com -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: problem with PPPoE STABLE and ADSL 3Com HomeConnect

2005-09-13 Thread ComteZero _
dial #set login add default HISADDR here is a tcpdump -vv -i xl0 : 18:48:40.808687 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x00E654C1] 18:48:42.807533 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x00E654C1] 18:51:44.010839 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40F195C1] 18:51:46.009639 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40F195C1] Thx

problem with PPPoE STABLE and ADSL 3Com HomeConnect

2005-09-12 Thread ComteZero _
ppp.conf is : default: set log all set ifaddr X.X.X.X/0 10.0.0.2/0 http://10.0.0.2/0 my_isp : set device PPPoE:xl0 set authname MY_USER set authkey MY_PWD set dial #set login add default HISADDR here is a tcpdump -vv -i xl0 : 18:48:40.808687 PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x00E654C1] 18:48:42.807533 PPPoE PADI

Re: pppoe server option

2004-11-29 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
the current comment means '-l'. Otherwise we should change H /etc/rc.network. Don't you think so? H H -- /etc/defaults/rc.conf -- H pppoed_provider=service-pppoe # Provider and ppp(8) config file entry. H --- [ccing Alfred, since cvs

Re: pppoe server option

2004-11-28 Thread Hideki Yamamoto
Hi, From: Gleb Smirnoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pppoe server option Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:12:50 +0300 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: H I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network. H When setting

Re: pppoe server option

2004-11-22 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: H I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network. H When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not H work well. The string service-pppoe is an entry in H /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE server

pppoe server option

2004-11-20 Thread Hideki Yamamoto
Hi, I have found a problem about PPPoE parameter in /etc/rc.network. When setting the following lines in /etc/rc.conf, pppoe server does not work well. The string service-pppoe is an entry in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf for PPPoE server. pppoed_enable=YES # Run the PPP over Ethernet daemon

Re: 4.10-STABLE - ADSL PPPoE

2004-06-04 Thread Rafael R Obelheiro
and everything worked fine at that point in the branch. PPPoE on today's stable doesn't load the netgraph modules: netgraph.ko ng_ether.ko ng_pppoe.ko ng_socket.ko when PPPoE is started. I reverted to sources to 05.27.04 date, did buildworld and PPPoE is working

Re: 4.10-STABLE - ADSL PPPoE

2004-06-04 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:25 PM 04/06/2004, Rafael R Obelheiro wrote: This is the culprit. I was having the same problem (PPPoE stopped working), but recompiling my system with the previous (1.2.2.14) of ng_ether.c solved it. Archie, is it possible to fix this (either by reverting the patch or by applying a new one

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Monday 24 November 2003 15:32, Mike Tancsa wrote: The problem is that LQR is agreed to with the ERX (the PPPoE terminating device on the other end), but it never works. Works for me. I guess there really are many providers with misconfigured equipment out there. Actually, I know people who

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
Tancsa wrote: The problem is that LQR is agreed to with the ERX (the PPPoE terminating device on the other end), but it never works. Works for me. I guess there really are many providers with misconfigured equipment out there. Actually, I know people who cannot use lqr although they're using

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do you see tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR every 10.00 secs or do you see tun0: LQM: deflink:

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:59 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote: On Monday 24 November 2003 16:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: Are you sure you actually connect to an ERX on the other end, and its actually negotiating LQR ? e.g. if you add LQM to the logging section, do you see tun0: LQM: deflink: Will send LQR

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Nottebrock
it's actually doing what it should. :) But is it doing that because its never hearing the LQR reply ? Yes. ppp nicely detects when they're up and fuzzing with the AC again. And for sure its an ERX on the other end ? Actually it's an NRP - it seems Cisco does a better job with their PPPoE

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:25 AM 24/11/2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote: And for sure its an ERX on the other end ? Actually it's an NRP - it seems Cisco does a better job with their PPPoE implementation. OK, thanks. The problem I see is only against an ERX. So either misconfigured ERX or something about Juniper's

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Nottebrock
to RELENG_4? Who is looking after PPP these days anyways ? I guess there is a definite chance, it's not like ppp's pppoe functionality is some rarely-used feature... I myself am only a lowly ports-committer, but if you submit a PR and send me a note, I'll make sure it gets assigned to brian

Re: FTP installation from the floppies through ADSL modem with PPPoE or PPTP protocol.

2002-12-20 Thread Asker
The modem can be configured to use PPPoE or PPTP protocol for making the connection with my Internet Servise Provider. Well if the modem does PPPoE itself (and preusmably NAT) then you need no speical support from the OS. From its poitn of view you are just conencted via ethernet

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2002-10-01 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait : Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection. I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1. This is probably a coincidence. I saw that when France Telecom changed some ADSL

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2002-10-01 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:56 AM 10/1/2002 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait : Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection. I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1. This is probably a coincidence.

Re: ppp(8) v. 3.1 : PPPoE lqr problem.

2002-10-01 Thread Artur Pydo
Hi, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2002-10-01, Artur Pydo écrivait : Since the end of August i had problems running my ADSL connection. I discovered that ppp changed its behaviour regarding lqr after the upgrade from version 2.3.3 to 3.1. This is probably a coincidence. Not really. The old

about PPPoE in 4.6.2

2002-09-23 Thread Vasily
Hi ALL, Is there any specific details in using PPP over Ethernet in 4.6.2-STABLE ? There is an ADSL modem, machine used as gateway with 2 interfaces. How to run PPPoE on it ? Tried to use ppp.conf as it was on machine with 4.1 but it doesn't work. Any help will be kindly appreciated. -- Best

Re: about PPPoE in 4.6.2

2002-09-23 Thread Erick Mechler
:: Is there any specific details in using PPP over Ethernet in 4.6.2-STABLE? The handbook is your friend. Be one with the handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html Cheers - Erick To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: Problem with user-pppoe after upgrade, fixed

2001-07-16 Thread Brian Somers
Hi, Let me make sure I've got things straight. You've upgraded to -stable and removed any ``set mtu'' or ``set mru'' lines that you've got in your ppp.conf. If this is the case, then I'm not sure what's happening. The only way I can reproduce what you're seeing in your log is if I add

Re: Problem with user-pppoe after upgrade, fixed

2001-07-13 Thread Brian Somers
, this will now fail. As seen in the logs? The maximum these can be set to for PPPoE is 1492. That's the physical ethernet limitation, right? That's now enforced by the PPPoE ppp device as it knows the limitations on the physical Ethernet. Shouldn't ppp warn the user or panic

Re: Problem with user-pppoe after upgrade, fixed

2001-07-13 Thread Antoine Beaupre (LMC)
Brian Somers wrote: Hi, I said your ppp.conf was censored because you didn't attach it - you just attached an error message that said it couldn't read it :*P LOL! ok.. I see. Darn mozilla. :) Ok, here goes a url, that should be fine:

Re: panic on -stable during ppp-dial (PPP NETGRAPH PPPoE)

2001-07-11 Thread Jonathan Lemon
panic: I would guess that PPPoE here is attempting to send a packet through the fxp device while it is administratively down, and the fxp driver panics because it is not initialized. This is a bug in netgraph, it should check the status of the interface before queuing a packet

FreeBSD 4.3 stable PPPoE

2001-06-15 Thread echelon
Dear FreeBSD experts, Can you let me know what should I do to provide enough information for the FreeBSD developers to trace/ debug/ fix the PPPoE I experienced with FreeBSD 4.3 stable, please? I tried to upgrade from 4.2 stable to 4.3 stable several times after a cvsup and a clean buildworld

pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-17 Thread Bernd Fürwitt
Title: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics, and i got

Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-17 Thread Tony
Title: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) Can you tell me exactly what options you put in your kernel? - Original Message - From: Bernd Fürwitt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:37 PM Subject: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000

Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics

RE: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-16 Thread Bernd Fürwitt
Title: RE: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17

Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-16 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:34:43AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:59:26AM +0200, Bernd Fürwitt wrote: user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register

Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-16 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
but open the possibility that this could be an existing open problem. - Original Message - From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bernd Fürwitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Kris Kennaway' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:39 AM Subject: Re: pppoe crashes in 4.3

pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000)

2001-05-15 Thread Bernd Fürwitt
Title: pppoe crashes in 4.3-stable (14.5.2000) user-mode ppp crashes when calling pppoe-providers. After starting ppp I get the following error message linker_file_sysinit netgraph.ko failed to register! 17 Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode The kernel panics, and i got

RE: Release 4.3 stable: PPPoE/ PPP problem

2001-04-25 Thread Lee, Jaeho
If you are using the kernel built from make buildkernel/installkernel, the kernel is not built with PPPoE options. That is built with GENERIC. You have to rebuild your kernel with the options for PPPoE. Please refer PPPoE section of handbook. (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi, On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:11PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: Mike Tancsa writes: Not sure why this hasn't been detected before though. Below is a possible patch. It has been at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25478 and discussed a few times in freebsd-net. Here is

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-27 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:30:49AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: Please take a careful look at the frames 6 through 9 of the stack trace in PR#25478, so you may notice that your patch happens to do nothing about the broblem. You are going to add a check for IFF_UP to ether_output_frame() while

Re: Kernel Panic on 4.3-RC #0 using PPPoE

2001-03-26 Thread Archie Cobbs
Archie Cobbs writes: I am receiving kernel panics under 4.3-RC #0 when trying to bring up PPPoE. A copy of the kernel debug, the start up and the actual PPP configuration are attached. It appears to be something in the subroutine called fxp_start of the actual ethernet card (Which

Re: PPPoE

2000-08-01 Thread Chris BeHanna
Ted Sikora wrote: Recently my cable service reduced the bandwidth. Now upstreams average 16k and downstream 400k. There has to be something better. Several users on my node (all BSD/Linux users) have been enjoying our own little private network with speeds up to 900k both ways.(600k

RE: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe
Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. So, having been stuck at one point in this same situation (i live in Toronto, Canada, and the xDSL provided by Bell Sympatico uses PPPoE) i re-post the question: Is there any possibility of PPPoE

Re: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Gary T. Corcoran
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote: Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. So, having been stuck at one point in this same situation (i live in Toronto, Canada, and the xDSL provided by Bell Sympatico uses PPPoE) i re-post

Re: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Dan Ts'o
Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared to direct PPP over ATM

Re: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Ted Sikora
Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe wrote: Ted, I believe that William was requesting a method to do a net install of FreeBSD with PPPoE. Yeah I know. I emailed him earlier. I posted the FAQ in case anyone was having trouble with PPPoe. It would be nice to have the option on the install floppies. All

Re: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Ted Sikora
Dan Ts'o wrote: Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes of PPPoE header), compared

Re: PPPoE

2000-07-30 Thread Ted Sikora
Ted Sikora wrote: Dan Ts'o wrote: Just FYI, Bell Atlantic (I guess they're now called Verizon) is deploying the same junk. I mean, PPPoE is *so* wasteful, with THIRTY extra bytes of overhead per frame (10 bytes of LLC/SNAP header, 14 bytes of Ethernet header, plus 6 bytes

PPPoE

1999-12-21 Thread Marco Paulo Rodrigues
I know this seem like a repetative question, but is there going to be any PPPoE kervel level support for FreeBSD any time soon? Or is there already.. if not is there a package someone can recommend to use temporarily with FreeBSD 3.3 Stable. Thanx! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL