Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-22 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-21 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:32 AM, George Mitchell > wrote: > > > On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote: > > > On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty > > >

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-21 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:32 AM, George Mitchell wrote: > On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty > > wrote: > >> [...] > >> PS Normally I would bisect, but we're converting 2 large

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-21 Thread George Mitchell
On 03/21/18 04:51, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty > wrote: >> [...] >> PS Normally I would bisect, but we're converting 2 large PROLOG applications >> to erlang... (prayers welcome) > [...] What next, converting a FORTH

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-21 Thread Eitan Adler
On 19 March 2018 at 22:59, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Hi Eitan, > Agreed. Unfortunately all I have is that it abruptly shuts down. Both > under load (10,8,?) - during a full package rebuild (~1200 ports); and > during periods of idleness between

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-20 Thread Marek Zarychta
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > (Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed to -stable) > > I haven't seen any issues, but that means very little. Details: > > Two boxes -- one bare metal, one VPS (QEMU): > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD XXX 11.1-STABLE

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-20 Thread Ian Lepore
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:50 +, Pete French wrote: > > On 20/03/2018 01:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > > > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th > > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > > resulted in frequent crashes and our

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
(Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed to -stable) I haven't seen any issues, but that means very little. Details: Two boxes -- one bare metal, one VPS (QEMU): $ uname -a FreeBSD XXX 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r330529: Tue Mar 6 11:36:04 PST 2018

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-20 Thread Pete French
On 20/03/2018 01:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE r329008.  Is anyone actually running a

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-20 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread Eitan Adler
On 19 March 2018 at 18:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks. Our build on the 7th > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD

Re: Stability of 11.1S

2018-03-19 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:05:33PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > resulted in frequent crashes and our reverting to FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE  > r329008.  Is

Re: Stability problems with 7-stable (after 7.1 - 7.2 - 7-stable)

2009-12-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru (from Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:55:44 +0300): Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org writes: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, please CC me on replies. Seems you were not CCed... I'm now subscribed to stable@, thanks for forwarding this. I have a system which was at

Re: Stability problems with 7-stable (after 7.1 - 7.2 - 7-stable)

2009-12-15 Thread Ivan Voras
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Hi, please CC me on replies. I have a system which was at 7.1-pX. After the update to 7.2-p5 it started to exhibit deadlocks after some minutes of uptime. With 7.1 (generic kernel) it was running fine, with 7.2 generic the problems started directly. The system

Re: Stability of ICH7 sata on FreeBSD 6.1 ?

2006-08-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Dominic Marks wrote: Jerome Sobecki wrote: Hi all, We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR (http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm) Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD 6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the

Re: Stability of ICH7 sata on FreeBSD 6.1 ?

2006-08-11 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mike Jakubik wrote: Dominic Marks wrote: Jerome Sobecki wrote: Hi all, We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR (http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm) Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD 6.1 and everything seems

Re: Stability of ICH7 sata on FreeBSD 6.1 ?

2006-08-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Miroslav Lachman wrote: I have same problem on ASUS RS120 with Seagate ST3250820AS/3.AAC drives (disk loses, system reboots, slow read/write speed), but I think this is drive problem - all drives has high Reallocated_Sector_Ct value in SMART (above 130 reallocated sectors after few weeks,

Re: Stability of ICH7 sata on FreeBSD 6.1 ?

2006-08-07 Thread Dominic Marks
Jerome Sobecki wrote: Hi all, We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR (http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm) Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD 6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the third time, on two

Re: Stability problems vith FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14

2005-10-07 Thread Adrian Wontroba
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:54:25PM +0200, Jurij Kovacic wrote: The panic message is ussually somewhere along these lines: panic: kmem_malloc(4096) kmem map too small: 48496066400 total allocated cpuid =0 boot() called on cpu#0 ... A similar problem is described in

Re: Stability problems vith FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14

2005-10-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:54:25PM +0200, Jurij Kovacic wrote: Hello! We are running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14 with SMP kernell on one of our servers and are experiencing stability problems; the server has the tendency to reboot itself for no apparent reason at least once per month. As

Re: Stability problems vith FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14

2005-10-02 Thread David Kirchner
On 10/2/05, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:54:25PM +0200, Jurij Kovacic wrote: Hello! We are running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p14 with SMP kernell on one of our servers and are experiencing stability problems; the server has the tendency to reboot itself

Re: stability nvidia drivers?

2002-12-04 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM +, Tarquin McDowell wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: Anyone getting any better results? Is there something I can do to fix this? The drivers are of no use to me if they are this unreliable. More info available on

Re: Stability

2000-11-08 Thread Marko Cuk
Roman Shterenzon wrote: I've a perfectly good PR about vinum (panics) open. There's no even single follow up (kern/22103). I couldn't stand it any longer, so I'm not able to recreate it since I'm using raid1 on those disks now. I waited for almost one month but aparently nothing was

Re: Stability

2000-11-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Marko Cuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001108 01:52] wrote: Roman Shterenzon wrote: I've a perfectly good PR about vinum (panics) open. There's no even single follow up (kern/22103). I couldn't stand it any longer, so I'm not able to recreate it since I'm using raid1 on those disks now.

Re: Stability

2000-11-06 Thread Roman Shterenzon
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Bosko Milekic wrote: Hi Marko, On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Marko Cuk wrote: Hello !! Can anyone explain me, why is FreeBSD known as powerful sistem with industrial strenghth and rock stability, but I manage to crash it several times. The bridge code in 4.1x is

Re: Stability

2000-11-06 Thread Chris BeHanna
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Marko Cuk wrote: Hello !! Can anyone explain me, why is FreeBSD known as powerful sistem with industrial strenghth and rock stability, but I manage to crash it several times. The bridge code in 4.1x is unstable in conjuction with ipfw, I had several problems with

Re: Stability and versions - was Re: Let 3.x die ASAP?

2000-03-31 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote: "STABLE" refers to the code base, NOT the stability of systems running it. Simple concept, deep meaning. Newbies should understand ... And therein lies the problem. Newbies don't understand much of anything about this (or any other) project. The

Re: Stability and versions - was Re: Let 3.x die ASAP?

2000-03-31 Thread J McKitrick
I think one simple solution is to 'hide' the -current distro, or make it a little less accessible. That seems like a good first step. No one who can't figure it out needs tobe running it anyway, and it certainly won't hurt the development effort. Then, of course, keep whipping 4.x into shape,

RE: Stability problems in 3.3-R?

1999-09-25 Thread Christopher Michaels
Well, I had 3.3-RC on my box and now I have 3.3-RELEASE. I had no problems at all except for one and that I tracked down to what I'll call user error. I also have similar hardware as you do. k6/2-300, 64mb ram, fic 503+ w/ VIA MVP4 chipset. It may help to get a panic and possibly a crash dump