Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:52:59PM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:54:03PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: it just threw me that the thing-that-was-updated didn't update its version information when queried. Absent sources, how can I tell it was updated (apart from

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

uname -aU: FreeBSD t450s.local.lan 12.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p4 GENERIC amd64 1202000 freebsd-version: 12.2-RELEASE-p5 cat /etc/os-release NAME=FreeBSD VERSION=12.2-RELEASE-p5 VERSION_ID=12.2 ID=freebsd ANSI_COLOR="0;31" PRETTY_NAME="FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p5"

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 31/03/2021 12:35 am, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Recently there was > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. > > What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. > Up-to-date 12.1-p5

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:54:03PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > it just threw me that the thing-that-was-updated didn't update its > version information when queried. Absent sources, how can I tell it > was updated (apart from freebsd-version -u) ? Comparing what the SA patch says it is doing at

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:07:41PM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: Ok, that's fair; it DOES show -p5 for the user side. $ freebsd-version -ru 12.2-RELEASE-p4 12.2-RELEASE-p5 So that says my userland is -p5 while the kernel, which did not change (even though if you built from source it would

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: How do I *know*, without source to go look at, whether or not the fix is present on a binary system? Yep, you understand my point exactly. -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 3/30/2021 12:02, Gary Palmer wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: On 3/30/2021 11:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On 3/30/2021 11:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: > > On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Recently there was > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > > >

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 3/30/2021 11:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 30/03/21 17:38, tech-lists wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: No, as you can see in the commit in the official git [1] while for current and stable the new upstream version of openssl was imported for the release the fix was applied

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: No, as you can see in the commit in the official git [1] while for current and stable the new upstream version of openssl was imported for the release the fix was applied without importing the new release and

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:01:20AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: It is not updating; as I noted it appears this security patch was NOT backported and thus 12.2-RELEASE does not "see" it. ok, then I guess I need to post to -security? Because the notice suggests that it was. You cannot go

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 3/30/2021 10:40, tech-lists wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:14:56AM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and CURRENT.. Hi, I'm

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 09:14:56AM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote: Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and CURRENT.. Hi, I'm not sure what you mean by this. In

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via freebsd-stable wrote: Hi, Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.2-p5 ? I'm asking because you refer to both 12.1-p5 and 12.2-p5 (typo?). yes, I meant 12.2-p5, sorry -- J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

freebsd-update fetch and freebsd-update install?? Brian On 3/30/2021 7:18 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: On 3/30/2021 10:14, Doug McIntyre wrote: Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On 3/30/2021 10:14, Doug McIntyre wrote: Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and CURRENT.. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Like the patch referenced in the SA. https://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-21:07/openssl-12.patch Again, it seems like confusion over what happens in RELEASE, STABLE and CURRENT.. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Ruben via freebsd-stable wrote: > Hi, > > Did you mean 12.1-p5 or

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, Did you mean 12.1-p5 or 12.2-p5 ? I'm asking because you refer to both 12.1-p5 and 12.2-p5 (typo?). If you meant 12.2-p5: Perhaps the FreeBSD security team did not bump the version, but "only" backported the patches to version 1.1.1h ? Regards, Ruben On 3/30/21 3:35 PM, tech-lists

possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

Hi, Recently there was https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html about openssl. Upgraded to 12.2-p5 with freebsd-update and rebooted. What I'm unsure about is the openssl version. Up-to-date 12.1-p5 instances report OpenSSL 1.1.1h-freebsd 22 Sep 2020

Re: FreeBSD-EN-21:07.caroot.asc question

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 7:21 PM Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:42:17PM -0600, Greg Balfour wrote: > > After installing the security and errata patches that came out today > > on my 12.2-RELEASE system, I see the following during the "make > > installworld" step. Is this

Re: FreeBSD-EN-21:07.caroot.asc question

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:42:17PM -0600, Greg Balfour wrote: > After installing the security and errata patches that came out today > on my 12.2-RELEASE system, I see the following during the "make > installworld" step. Is this the expected output after removing > certificates from the root

FreeBSD-EN-21:07.caroot.asc question

After installing the security and errata patches that came out today on my 12.2-RELEASE system, I see the following during the "make installworld" step. Is this the expected output after removing certificates from the root certificate bundle or did something go wrong? [...]

Re: question on porting

Am 10.06.20 um 16:51 schrieb Donald Wilde:> Okay, it didn't work, but discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so > ' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked. My mistake, since you posted on the STABLE mail list but replied to a mail that mentioned INDEX-13: It is INDEX-12 for FreeBSD-12.x and INDEX-13 for

Re: question on porting

On 6/10/20, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 10/06/2020 15:51, Donald Wilde wrote: >> Okay, it didn't work, but discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so >> ' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked. >> >> Such an interesting file, INDEX-12. More research needed. Is it not >> INDEX-13 because I did ' make

Re: question on porting

On 10/06/2020 15:51, Donald Wilde wrote: Okay, it didn't work, but discovered INDEX-12 in /usr/ports, so ' grep gcc INDEX-12 | wc -l ' worked. Such an interesting file, INDEX-12. More research needed. Is it not INDEX-13 because I did ' make index' instead of ' make fetchindex ' ? You should

Re: question on porting

On 6/10/20, Donald Wilde wrote: > On 6/10/20, Stefan Eßer wrote: >> Am 10.06.20 um 15:45 schrieb Donald Wilde: >>> On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote: > [snip] x3850-1# grep gcc INDEX-13 | wc -l 3848 >>>

Re: question on porting

On 6/10/20, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Am 10.06.20 um 15:45 schrieb Donald Wilde: >> On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote: [snip] >>> x3850-1# grep gcc INDEX-13 | wc -l >>> 3848 >>> >> Hmmm... tried running that and mine doesn't seem

Re: question on porting

Am 10.06.20 um 15:45 schrieb Donald Wilde: > On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote: >>> (and FreeBSD's port maintainers) reach the point of diminishing >>> returns by supporting GCC >> > > Hi, Mark! LTNT2! > >> All you have to do is fix

Re: question on porting

On 6/10/20, Donald Wilde wrote: > On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote: >>> (and FreeBSD's port maintainers) reach the point of diminishing >>> returns by supporting GCC >> > > Hi, Mark! LTNT2! > >> All you have to do is fix all the

Re: question on porting

On 6/10/20, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:09:21PM -0700, Donald Wilde wrote: >> (and FreeBSD's port maintainers) reach the point of diminishing >> returns by supporting GCC > Hi, Mark! LTNT2! > All you have to do is fix all the ports that have been marked as > depending on

Re: question on porting

On 6/9/20, Donald Wilde wrote: > On 6/9/20, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Donald Wilde wrote: [snip] >> No, it doesn't. >> > It's not processor speed that is the problem now, although if I alter > those parameters what is now 11 hours will become 20. Such is life > with

Re: question on porting

On 6/9/20, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Donald Wilde wrote: > [...] >> On the specific synth crash, If I re-run it, does synth have code that >> reorders failed ports such that it has a better chance of not having >> such swap-space faults/failures happen? > > No, it

Re: question on porting

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Donald Wilde wrote: [...] > On the specific synth crash, If I re-run it, does synth have code that > reorders failed ports such that it has a better chance of not having > such swap-space faults/failures happen? No, it doesn't. However, if you're experiencing

question on porting

a question of linkage than compiling? On the specific synth crash, If I re-run it, does synth have code that reorders failed ports such that it has a better chance of not having such swap-space faults/failures happen? -- Don Wilde * What

Re: Question about bottle neck in storage

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:09 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:46 PM John Fleming > wrote: >> >> Is there anyway to see how busy a SAS/Sata controller is vs disks? I >> have a R720 with 14 Samsung 860 EVOs in it (its a lab server) in raid >> 10 ZFS. >> >> When firing off a

Re: Question about bottle neck in storage

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:46 PM John Fleming wrote: > Is there anyway to see how busy a SAS/Sata controller is vs disks? I > have a R720 with 14 Samsung 860 EVOs in it (its a lab server) in raid > 10 ZFS. > > When firing off a dd I (bs=1G count=10) seems like the disks never go > above %50 busy.

Re: Question about bottle neck in storage

I’d be interested to know what the actual throughput is you are getting. Are the disks SATA 7200RPM? What speed is the disk interface? Do you have just 2 disks or more? Richard [Richard Mackerras - Chat @ Spike](https://www.spikenow.com/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=6bswo) [6bswo] On

Re: Question about bottle neck in storage

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:05 PM Pete Wright wrote: > > > > On 9/24/19 8:45 AM, John Fleming wrote: > > Is there anyway to see how busy a SAS/Sata controller is vs disks? I > > have a R720 with 14 Samsung 860 EVOs in it (its a lab server) in raid > > 10 ZFS. > > > > When firing off a dd I (bs=1G

Re: Question about bottle neck in storage

On 9/24/19 8:45 AM, John Fleming wrote: Is there anyway to see how busy a SAS/Sata controller is vs disks? I have a R720 with 14 Samsung 860 EVOs in it (its a lab server) in raid 10 ZFS. When firing off a dd I (bs=1G count=10) seems like the disks never go above %50 busy. I'm trying to figure

Question about bottle neck in storage

Is there anyway to see how busy a SAS/Sata controller is vs disks? I have a R720 with 14 Samsung 860 EVOs in it (its a lab server) in raid 10 ZFS. When firing off a dd I (bs=1G count=10) seems like the disks never go above %50 busy. I'm trying to figure out if i'm maxing out SATA 3 BW or if its

MRSAS - Connected Sata port question

ich is where mrsas comes from (also have mfi disabled)) and seeing da0 speed of 150.000MB/sec in dmesg output is a bit strange. I hacked the source and moved it to 600 and sure enough it now reports 600MB/sec on boot up. I haven't benchmarked old vs new yet because the system in question can't be reboo

Re: Crontab Question

Mackerras > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 11:53 AM > To: Software Info > Cc: Walter Cramer; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Jonathan Chen > Subject: Re: Crontab Question > > In your script put a few commands outputting to a check file > > pwd > /tmp/checkfile > > A

RE: Crontab Question

@freebsd.org; Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Crontab Question In your script put a few commands outputting to a check file pwd > /tmp/checkfile Add a few more like ENV >> /tmp/checkfile Just to make sure it really is in the directory you expect with the environment you expect. If you want it

Re: Crontab Question

dows 10 > > From: Walter Cramer > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 4:40 PM > To: Software Info > Cc: Jonathan Chen; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Crontab Question > >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Software Info wrote: >> >> OK. So although the script is located

RE: Crontab Question

Well thanks for all the input. I just have to tp keep working at it. Again, much appreciated. Regards SI Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Walter Cramer Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 4:40 PM To: Software Info Cc: Jonathan Chen; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Crontab Question

Re: Crontab Question

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:34:49PM -0500, Software Info wrote: > I see. I had however copied the output of env to the etc/crontab PATH line. > Wouldn’t that care for an environment issue though? > > > Regards > SI > The execution search path has no (direct) bearing on the current working

Re: Crontab Question

for Windows 10 > > From: Jonathan Chen > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 4:23 PM > To: Software Info > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Crontab Question > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:14, Software Info wrote: > > > > OK. So although the s

Re: Crontab Question

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:34, Software Info wrote: > > I see. I had however copied the output of env to the etc/crontab PATH line. > Wouldn’t that care for an environment issue though? When I say "environment", I mean it in the generic sense; including working-directory. However, best practise

RE: Crontab Question

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Software Info wrote: OK. So although the script is located in my home directory, it doesn???t start there? Sorry but I don???t quite understand. Could you explain a little further please? Both 'cp' and 'ls' are located in /bin. But if I run the 'ls' command in /root,

RE: Crontab Question

: Crontab Question On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:14, Software Info wrote: > > OK. So although the script is located in my home directory, it doesn’t start > there? Correct. You cannot make any assumptions about the environment. -- Jonathan Chen __

Re: Crontab Question

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 09:14, Software Info wrote: > > OK. So although the script is located in my home directory, it doesn’t start > there? Correct. You cannot make any assumptions about the environment. -- Jonathan Chen ___

RE: Crontab Question

: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crontab Question On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 08:18, Software Info wrote: > > Hi All > I am trying to schedule cron to run a script. The script is in my home > directory and so I added my home directory to the path file in /etc/crontab > below. > PA

Re: Crontab Question

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 08:18, Software Info wrote: > > Hi All > I am trying to schedule cron to run a script. The script is in my home > directory and so I added my home directory to the path file in /etc/crontab > below. >

Crontab Question

Hi All I am trying to schedule cron to run a script. The script is in my home directory and so I added my home directory to the path file in /etc/crontab below. PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:~/bin:/home:/home/me This is the crontab entry for the scheduled

RE: Mailx Question

Fantastic. Works like a charm. Thank you very much. Kind Regards SI Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Miroslav Lachman Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:40 PM To: Software Info; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mailx Question Software Info wrote on 2019/04/09 23:09: > Hi All >

Re: Mailx Question

Software Info wrote on 2019/04/09 23:09: Hi All Since mailx is built into FreeBSD I decided to try asking this question here. I have a text file with about 30 email addresses. The file will change every day. I want an easy commandline way to read the file and blind copy send an email

Mailx Question

Hi All Since mailx is built into FreeBSD I decided to try asking this question here. I have a text file with about 30 email addresses. The file will change every day. I want an easy commandline way to read the file and blind copy send an email to the addresses in the file. So far, I have

Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

On Mar 6, 2019, at 3:58 PM, tech-lists wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:23:49PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: >>> Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : > >>> Basically I'm looking for exclude mask functionality when updating a >>> ports tree with poudriere ports. >>> >>> Do I need to do

Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:23:49PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : Basically I'm looking for exclude mask functionality when updating a ports tree with poudriere ports. Do I need to do this manually or have I missed something? I don’t think it’s easy

Re: poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

> Am 05.03.2019 um 15:09 schrieb tech-lists : > > Hi, > > There are several categories of ports I'd like to avoid for some > architectures. For example, I don't want x11 for mips.mips64. Or astronomy. > But let's say, for this architecture, I want to build everything else. > > I can't see a

poudriere(-devel) ports updating question

Hi, There are several categories of ports I'd like to avoid for some architectures. For example, I don't want x11 for mips.mips64. Or astronomy. But let's say, for this architecture, I want to build everything else. I can't see a way of excluding categories with poudriere ports when updating

Re: possibly silly binmiscctl question

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:50 AM tech-lists wrote: > > Hi, > > If I give binmiscctl the magic for arm6 and then for say mips64, will > this break things? > > Let's say I'm using an amd64 box to cross-compile using poudriere > for arm6 and mips64 ports. Can I do both on the same box at the same

Re: possibly silly binmiscctl question

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 06:53:01PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! If I give binmiscctl the magic for arm6 and then for say mips64, will this break things? Let's say I'm using an amd64 box to cross-compile using poudriere for arm6 and mips64 ports. Can I do both on the same box at the same

Re: possibly silly binmiscctl question

Hi! > If I give binmiscctl the magic for arm6 and then for say mips64, will > this break things? > > Let's say I'm using an amd64 box to cross-compile using poudriere > for arm6 and mips64 ports. Can I do both on the same box at the same > time? Or do I need to let's say the arm6 run to finish,

possibly silly binmiscctl question

Hi, If I give binmiscctl the magic for arm6 and then for say mips64, will this break things? Let's say I'm using an amd64 box to cross-compile using poudriere for arm6 and mips64 ports. Can I do both on the same box at the same time? Or do I need to let's say the arm6 run to finish, then give

FreeBSD-12 build question

1. How I can build release media of FreeBSD-12 on FreeBSD-11 system? Currenly process failed by 'Abort trap'. 585191 121 -rw---1 root wheel 8962048 Dec 5 18:58 ./ldconfig.core 585199 121 -rw---1 root

IP related question..

Hi all, I want to use some cheap chinese TTL-RS232 to Ethernet modules (USR-TCP232-T2) from usriot.com. I've configured them as a TCP server on port 2323 on a local network. The RS232 side is connected to an embeded micro that currently connects to my FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p6 development machine

Re: another question about zfs compression numbers

Hi, On 04.04.2018 12:35, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi all, Am 04.04.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Eugene M. Zheganin : I'm just trying to understand these numbers: file size is 232G, it's actual size on the lz4-compressed dataset is 18G, so then why is the compressratio only 1.86x

Re: another question about zfs compression numbers

Hi all, > Am 04.04.2018 um 09:21 schrieb Eugene M. Zheganin : > I'm just trying to understand these numbers: > > file size is 232G, it's actual size on the lz4-compressed dataset is 18G, so > then why is the compressratio only 1.86x ? And why logicalused is 34.2G ? On > one

another question about zfs compression numbers

Hello, I'm just trying to understand these numbers: file size is 232G, it's actual size on the lz4-compressed dataset is 18G, so then why is the compressratio only 1.86x ? And why logicalused is 34.2G ? On one hand, 34.2G exactlyfits to the 1.86x compresstaio, but still I don't get it.

Re: Question about pmcstat

Am 2017-02-07 18:08, schrieb hiren panchasara: Not sure if it's the mailer or what but it should be '-S' and not '?S'. Yes, it's the mailer. Or the cut and paste. However, I now realize what the problem is: (freebsd11 ) 64 # pmccontrol -L SOFT CLOCK.PROF CLOCK.HARD

Re: Question about pmcstat

On 02/07/17 at 05:55P, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote: > Hi, > > in Brendan Gregg's tutorial: > > http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html > > it says to run > > pmcstat ?S RESOURCE_STALLS.ANY -O out.pmcstat sleep 10 Not sure if it's the mailer or what but it should

Question about pmcstat

Hi, in Brendan Gregg's tutorial: http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2015-03-10/freebsd-flame-graphs.html it says to run pmcstat –S RESOURCE_STALLS.ANY -O out.pmcstat sleep 10 However, I get freebsd11 ) 0 # pmcstat –S RESOURCE_STALLS.ANY -O out.pmcstat sleep 10 pmcstat: [options]

Ask a question

Hi, My name is Stephen Joseph, the Business Development Manager at one of the leading email database providing companies. Our area of expertise lies specifically in the major industrial lists like: Agriculture, Business Services, Chambers of Commerce, Cities, Towns & Municipalities,

General question about 1GB vs 10GB NIC's

I want to build a router that has 2 x 500mb/s radio ISP facing, 2 x 500mb/s radio's facing another site, plus a 1gb/s link to the LAN. I plan to plug everything into a switch so I can have redundant routers. So my question is should I go with 5 x 1GB NIC's or 2x10GB NIC's on the motherboard

Re: 11.0 Install Question

; /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg > > >> > > > > > > I think that these instructions should be in the announcement release > > > notes as this question comes up a lot. The notes just say something like > > > "upgrade all your packages&quo

Re: 11.0 Install Question

, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self >> >> /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg >> > > I think that these instructions should be in the announcement release notes > as this question comes up a lot. The notes just say something like "upgrade > all yo

Re: 11.0 Install Question

n't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not >>>>> found, required by "pkg" >>>> >>>> Do not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self >>>> >>>> /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg >>>

Re: 11.0 Install Question

o not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg I think that these instructions should be in the announcement release notes as this question comes up a lot. The notes just say something like "upgrade all your packages". Most people wil

Re: 11.0 Install Question

gt;> Do not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self >> >> /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg >> > > I think that these instructions should be in the announcement release > notes as this question comes up a lot. The notes just say something like > "

Re: 11.0 Install Question

install -f pkg I think that these instructions should be in the announcement release notes as this question comes up a lot. The notes just say something like "upgrade all your packages". Most people will then just try and run pkg upgrade and get that error without knowing how to solve

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Jonathan Haack wrote on 2016/10/19 10:09: Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not found, required by "pkg" Do not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static install -f pkg Miroslav Lachman

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Thanks - worked then reinstalled pkg with force Sincerely, Coach Haack DP Coordinator, Mandela International Magnet School Board of Directors, First Serve NM President, NMCTM www.jonathanhaack.com "It is better to have tried and failed than to have succeeded at doing nothing."

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Try pkg-static. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Jonathan Haack wrote: > Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not found, > required by "pkg" > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Coach Haack > > DP Coordinator, Mandela International Magnet School >

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not found, required by "pkg" Sincerely, Coach Haack DP Coordinator, Mandela International Magnet School Board of Directors, First Serve NM President, NMCTM www.jonathanhaack.com "It is better to have tried and failed

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Hey guys ... I got impatient after so many tries that I decided to step to 10.3 first ... that went perfectly and now it is completed the kernel phase of 11.0 ... not sure why it wouldn't hop to 11 straight from 10.1 ... I found some people with same forum and I assure you I had latest patches

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Hello Jonathan, On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:06:10 -0600, Jonathan Haack wrote: > I am running 10.1 fully update with > > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install > > then, every time I do > > freebsd-update -r upgrade 11.0-RELEASE > > It says it failed an integrity check

Re: 11.0 Install Question

Dear Jonathan, On 19 Oct 2016, at 08:08, Jonathan Haack > wrote: I am running 10.1 fully update with freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install then, every time I do freebsd-update -r upgrade 11.0-RELEASE It says it failed an integrity check and

11.0 Install Question

I am running 10.1 fully update with freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install then, every time I do freebsd-update -r upgrade 11.0-RELEASE It says it failed an integrity check and cowardly refuses … I have followed all forum advise and upgraded pkg, rebooted ran everything again and again

Errata notice for 11.0 -- question

I noted this /after /svn updating my 11.x box to the most-current -STABLE: A bug was diagnosed in interaction of the |pmap_activate()| function and TLB shootdownIPI handler on amd64 systems which have PCID features but do not implement theINVPCID instruction. On such machines,

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds > for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They > had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) >

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) produced. I do not have a context to test powerpc64 or powerpc

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> >>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and > 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were > for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils.

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were for compatibility with pre-2.17.5 versions of binutils. Can you do a test build with the -CFLAGS+= -Wa,-mppc64bridge line removed? -Nathan On

stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

Is the following something that should be updated something like is indicated below for 11.0-BETA1? Is kboot powerpc64 specific? # svnlite diff /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile Index: /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile === ---

ZFS ARC and mmap/page cache coherency question

We are trying to understand a performance issue when syncing large mmap'ed files on ZFS. Example test box setup: FreeBSD 10.3-p5 Intel i7-5820K 3.30GHz with 64G RAM 6 * 2 Tbyte Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 in a ZFS stripe Read performance of a sequentially written large file on the pool is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >