On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:52:26 PM Michael T. Pope wrote:
> 2. Repos.
>
> When all committers are happy committing to the git
> tree,
We are now at this point.
> we can turn off svn.
Although as discussed elsewhere, I will leave it on line, but move the git
repo to the "Code" label.
Cheers,
Mik
Hi,
So by when could I can check out the code from the repo.
Manish
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> **
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:55:35 PM Stian Grenborgen wrote:
>
> > > 4. Moderation
>
> >
>
> > Great if we could have the same discussion regarding the mailing list
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:55:35 PM Stian Grenborgen wrote:
> > 4. Moderation
>
> Great if we could have the same discussion regarding the mailing list as
> they are currently only moderated by me. Perhaps we should just ignore
> messages posted by non-members although I found that to be a bit too
> h
>> The `upgrade' fallout continues.
>>
>> 1. Website
>>
>> Awaiting action.
>
> I will look into this [...]
The website is working again -- although there's a security issue we need
to fix as the problem was caused by an injection vulnerability (details
will be disclosed directly to project member
Hi!
> The `upgrade' fallout continues.
>
> 1. Website
>
> Awaiting action.
I will look into this. As a temporary solution I have enabled a simple
HTML-file with a link to the SourceForge.net download site.
> 4. Moderation
>
> [...] Just cleaning up the spam in
> the anonymous-allowing "Open Dis
The `upgrade' fallout continues.
1. Website
Awaiting action.
2. Repos.
Svn is obviously OK. Git is switched on but awaits a checkin. I have tried a
couple of times to get a complete git import of the whole svn repo but AFAICT
sourceforge dropped the session. Fortunately trunk is an easier
For those that are on windows you can find git installable if you search
for git for windows. Those on mac I think all that you would need to
install is xcode not sure if git is part of that but for me with xcode
installed git works out of the box no problem.
I find that git is much easier to mana
2013/1/14 Michael T. Pope
> **
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:33:50 AM Pietro Giorgianni wrote:
>
> > couldn't this be taken as a great opportunity to say goodbye to SVN
>
>
>
> You mean like what was decided a few months back and mentioned again as
> recently as last week in the thread with the subj
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:33:50 AM Pietro Giorgianni wrote:
> couldn't this be taken as a great opportunity to say goodbye to SVN
You mean like what was decided a few months back and mentioned again as
recently as last week in the thread with the subject `housekeeping'?
> and to sourceforge and its
Hi everybody,
couldn't this be taken as a great opportunity to say goodbye to SVN, with
its ludicrously eternal times to check in and out, and to sourceforge and
its "twenty clicks for every single simple operation" website, and finally
embrace Git and github or bitbucket?
This is a very big pro
On 13.01.2013 13:36, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 01:17:44 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> So far, I have been unable to check out the repository, as my password
>> isn't accepted. Did you have to jump through any hoops?
>>
> No. My password was OK, although with the ssh+svn
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 01:17:44 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> So far, I have been unable to check out the repository, as my password
> isn't accepted. Did you have to jump through any hoops?
No. My password was OK, although with the ssh+svn style checkouts I have to
enter it more often. Does an https
On 13.01.2013 12:51, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:07:03 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
>> I think I'll wait until the migration is done. Can I check in at this
>> time? I have finished the alpha-blended borders.
>>
> Checking in is working. svn.10464 went in about three hou
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:07:03 AM Michael Vehrs wrote:
> I think I'll wait until the migration is done. Can I check in at this
> time? I have finished the alpha-blended borders.
Checking in is working. svn.10464 went in about three hours ago without
incident. They recommend checking out a fresh t
On 13.01.2013 00:50, Michael T. Pope wrote:
> The repo has stabilized. I have successfully checked out the entire
> svn tree from the new location and it looks OK. I am currently
> pulling down a git tree (trunk only) using git's subversion adapter.
> If anyone wants to jump straight to git at th
The repo has stabilized. I have successfully checked out the entire
svn tree from the new location and it looks OK. I am currently
pulling down a git tree (trunk only) using git's subversion adapter.
If anyone wants to jump straight to git at this point:
git svn clone --username=mpope
svn+ssh:/
> As just noted, the sourceforge upgrade has its problems.
>
> 2. Despite the e-mail to contrary, they still claim to be importing our
> repo
> at least according to: https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/code/
> However if you try a checkout it seems to be live. Pity the URLs they
> supply
> are misl
As just noted, the sourceforge upgrade has its problems.
1. www.freecol.org seems to have reverted to something very basic.
www.freecol.org/administrator is still working and AFAICT the content is still
all there in Joomla, but I could not work out how to get it all published
again. Any chance
18 matches
Mail list logo
