Hi Eric,
Thanks for your explanation!
And I should have known better.
>
> [This is a reply to the question by BAHCL: What if
> DOS\HELP ends up
> to contain several files which are all called
> readme? Answer: This
> does not happen. PG would only be "allowed" to have
> files DOS\HELP\PG
> an
Hi, to answer your question:
> DOS\HELP - all help files
This contains only files which are called "project.*", like
"project" or "project.cn" or "project.es" or "project.htm" ...
Actually the CURRENT way is even simpler:
DOS\HELP\ contains files which are called "project". So for e
Hi,
--- Jim Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的郵件內容：> Alain
wrote:
>
> My thought would be to put them inside C:\DOS as
> subdirs.
>
> For example:
>
> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
> DOS\HELP
Hi!
> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
> DOS\HELP - all help files
> DOS\NLS- national language support files
> DOS\SOURCE\project - source code for 'project'
Sounds oka
Alain wrote:
Steve Nickolas escreveu:
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 3:19pm -0500, togermano.com wrote:
Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names? So like a program
can edit it. And its easyer for people that know msdos file names
instead of like fddos for a directory etc..
Opinions vary but I do
Heh. Ignore that one. We answered this one about a month ago.
Consider Scandisk dropped from the Software List.
-jh
Jim Hall wrote:
What does the list think about Eric's suggestion? Scandisk seems
non-functional at this point - at least for me, it doesn't really do
anything. The entry in t
What does the list think about Eric's suggestion? Scandisk seems
non-functional at this point - at least for me, it doesn't really do
anything. The entry in the "1.0 To-do" list for Scandisk is "use the
interface with CHKDSK code" which seems to be the right thing to do.
Sounds like taking Sc
Sounds like rxcopy is the preferred one, at least a few people have
reported so.
If no objections by morning, I'll deprecate Joe's xcopy, and "promote"
rxcopy to be the FreeDOS xcopy.
-jh
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi, for some odd reason, RXCOPY was not the default for a while.
When we changed to the
Thanks, Aitor, Bernd, Erwin, Jim, Johnson, Steve, and all others who
wrote good words about UDMA, and of course, UDMA author Jack R. Ellis
for his great, innovative and pioneering work on UDMA!
Lucho
Well now let's consider which UDMA or UUDMA to use? I allways understood
that the most up-to-da
>
>Hi, I noticed that I have not yet enabled the MODE LPTn COLS=...
>feature. Reason: Nobody tested / suggested ESC sequences for
>10cpi (80 column) / 15cpi (132 column) printing yet. So please test
>the sequences below, which are Google-educated guesses:
>
>ESC P
>10 cpi printing. Could also be re
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi Johnson, simple answer:
COPY is so simple that it is part of FreeCOM shell. For XCOPY,
you need to have the XCOPY file installed. So COPY is for use
on a boot floppy where you probably do not have XCOPY.
By the way Jim: Somebody asked why we have TWO XCOPY in the
LSM list. I th
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi,
Jim Hall escribió:
Begin3
Title: mode-modecon
Wouldn't it be easier just to call it MODE?
Aitor
Yes. I had just used Eric's package name as the name in the LSM, but
Eric asked me to change it. It's already updated at:
http://www.freedos.org/free
Hi, I noticed that I have not yet enabled the MODE LPTn COLS=...
feature. Reason: Nobody tested / suggested ESC sequences for
10cpi (80 column) / 15cpi (132 column) printing yet. So please test
the sequences below, which are Google-educated guesses:
ESC P
10 cpi printing. Could also be reached by
Hi,
Jim Hall escribió:
Begin3
Title: mode-modecon
Wouldn't it be easier just to call it MODE?
Aitor
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD softwa
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:37:47 -0600, Jim Hall wrote:
Okay, we can stop the discussion now. I've gotten *lots* of email asking to keep UDMA in 'base', and none yet to say it should be in 'util'.
Consider UDMA a new resident of 'base'. :-)
Thanks, Aitor, Bernd, Erwin, Jim, Johnson, Steve, and all
15 matches
Mail list logo
