1. Bug: wrong handling for clc/stc in some places (they ignored, because
popf follows, thus caller receives always success):
__O\_/_\_/O__
@@loc2:
[...]
clc ; flag success
@@locret:
Hi!
28-Июл-2006 15:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
1. Bug: wrong handling for clc/stc in some places (they ignored, because
popf follows, thus caller receives always success):
@@loc2:
clc ; flag
Hi!
26-Июл-2006 16:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD Okay, I can get minor XMS free block fragmentation during direct calls to
MD the VCPI/EMS allocator for large blocks. Since the VCPI/EMS allocator
MD directly manipulates the XMS handles,
Hi!
27-Июл-2006 17:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Imre Leber) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
IL Seems that fdisk doesn't allow you to change between FAT16 and FAT32.
IL When you choose FAT32 support on an 800MB image, it will create a FAT32
IL partition automatically.
IL Maybe there should
Hi!
27-Июл-2006 04:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
EA You said that the if no MBR 55aa found, replace ALL code and
EA partition data in the MBR with an empty MBR function in FDISK,
EA which has caused a lot of data loss in the past, would be
EA
At 06:36 PM 7/28/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
MD emmx220.zip, EMM386 version 2.20 memory manager, mostly executable files;
One more place:
7. Code below is buggy (counted not expected bits - should be used SHL
instead SHR) or redundant (result is always zero additions):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
I have testet the version 2.20 of EMM386 under QEMU. The good news is,
that the PS/2 driver of GEOS now works. Unfortunatly, it seems that this
version breaks FDAPM. I use FDAPM to keep the CPU load off QEMU low and
to shut down the QEMU
At 05:03 PM 7/28/2006 +0400, Arkady wrote:
some stuff
I can't tell yet because there's either a missing e-mail on list from you,
or it's just because all your e-mails to the list are mashed together
without any CR's and it's hard for me to parse them out, but it looks like
you're sending me
Hi!
28-Июл-2006 12:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
7. Code below is buggy (counted not expected bits - should be used SHL
instead SHR) or redundant (result is always zero additions):
MD
Hi!
28-Июл-2006 11:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD some stuff
MD I can't tell yet because there's either a missing e-mail on list from you,
But you answer to my email?
MD or it's just because all your e-mails to the list are mashed
At 10:02 PM 7/28/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
MD There! Right there! Whatever you're doing there, keep it up. You
have MD CR's in your e-mail message.
Yes, because I right mailer. :) But, I suggest, most mailers may be
customized
Yargh! Back to the old format. Your's are
I would *very much* appreciateit. I did some tests with it and could not
make it work, nor did I find a suggested configuration anywhere.
BUT: is it working? There was a lot of talk about LFN lately, but I did
not find a final diagnostic, just that 1.0 will have it disabled...
Alain
Florian
Japheth escreveu:
could be DOSLFN included? I think that most people needs the driver!
That would be good, but generally I had to realize that all the LFN things
are
a bit underdocumented in the distribution, someone not familiar with LFN
support in DOS will not know what to do to make
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
EA Several users have lost their boot loader,
You wish to say, that some boot-loaders don't have MBR signature?
Being one that lost it, I can say with 99.999% certainty that my MBR was
ok. I believe that some obscure read error caused it to belive that my
BUT: is it working? There was a lot of talk about LFN lately, but I did
not find a final diagnostic, just that 1.0 will have it disabled...
Yes it works. That means, FreeCOM is aware that such a thing may exist.
- load doslfn.com
- set LFN=Y to make FreeCOM LFN aware
- now use LFN in FreeCOM
Alain M. wrote:
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
EA Several users have lost their boot loader,
You wish to say, that some boot-loaders don't have MBR signature?
Being one that lost it, I can say with 99.999% certainty that my MBR was
ok. I believe that some obscure read error caused it
So the problem was a false read error. Just the thing that programes
believe that never happen!
BTW my problem was a long time ago, so it could have that problem that
has already been fixed.
Alain
Mark Bailey escreveu:
Alain M. wrote:
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
EA Several users have
At 04:41 AM 7/29/2006 +0200, Japheth wrote:
Since low-level changes were made to this version of EMM386, please
keep an
eye out for any problems and report them as soon as you can. While I
don't
The IF bug fix may have disclosed some previously hidden bugs which are
due to
a careless
At 07:48 AM 7/29/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
...but if you not object, I rewrote for you DefragXMS.
You or anyone else can rewrite and submit whatever code you want with my
blessing. The rules are simple:
1) As maintainer, I am the final decision maker if the change goes in. I
At 11:13 PM 7/28/2006 -0500, I wrote:
You or anyone else can rewrite and submit whatever code you want with my
blessing. The rules are simple:
snip
Considering the circumstances, I have a couple of notes to add to the five
rules for code submission -- not new rules, just notes to help avoid
Hi!
28-Июл-2006 19:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AM User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
Do you know, that 1.5.0.5 is released?
AM I had a similar problem with Thunderbird in the past, new versions fixed
AM it along the way. And
21 matches
Mail list logo
