Before I permanently delete you, are you aware of this spam?
Pat
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Natan Saidon wrote:
> http://www.ribaturia.com/index-rhto25.php
>
>
> --
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Managemen
Hi!
> Anyone having the super editing power needed can please update this one:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/index.php?title=Unstable_Kernel_Branch
Can you mail the text that you want to be added or changed to the list?
I think that would enable people with super editing pow
Em 04-05-2011 16:45, Bart Oldeman escreveu:
>
> I had to use some of the kernel build infrastructure to be able to
> still also build with Turbo C(++). Writing portable DOS makefiles
> causes all sorts of funny restrictions, esp. dealing with Turbo C 2.01
> make: it cannot do command line redirect
On 4 May 2011 15:18, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> FREECOM (updated (in progress ?) or not (from 2003))
>
> Still same one I guess, unless Jeremy, Pat or Blair succeeded in improving
> things like porting to Openwatcom for example.
I just finished porting FREECOM in SVN to OpenWatcom. It seems to work
pr
(retransmit, sf.net mailserver disliked me).
Op 4-5-2011 11:08, dos386 schreef:
As noted somewhere on this list, FreeDOS 1.1 is supposed to
come out now 2011 (same had been previously promised for
2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 too) after kernel 2040 comes out.
Once 2040 is out a new FreeDOS distri
Op 4-5-2011 15:01, Christian Masloch schreef:
> Bret's USBDOS (free& OS, not GPL)
> I'm not sure whether Bret's license would be accepted by the OSI or FSF
> though. The part that I'm concerned about most would be this:
Out of necessity, FreeDOS has usually been distributed together with
various
> Don't forget
> http://www.osor.eu/eupl/european-union-public-licence-eupl-v.1.1 for
> European developers, because it's compatible with GNU GPL v2 and is
> available in 22 languages.
I think you're allowed to use it even if you're no European citizen,
aren't you? Still, isn't it GPL v3 incompa
Christian Masloch wrote:
> [ * Personally (egoistically), I'd rather prefer the programs to be in the
> public domain, or the license to be one of the well-known free software
> licenses (MIT-style, 2/3-clause BSD, etc) that do not cause trouble, or
> even other (common) ones like the GPL. B
As this is about software licensing issues, I want to state here: I'm not
a lawyer and this e-mail does not contain any legal advice. Oh, and if
you're easily annoyed by licensing issues then you might prefer not to
read this thread.
In "FreeDOS 1.1 (again)", dos386 wrote:
> Bret's USBDOS (
Hi
I was just wondering if anyone knows what's happening with PCMOS/386?
Thanks
Wesley Parish
"Sharpened hands are happy hands.
"Brim the tinfall with mirthful bands"
- A Deepness in the Sky, Vernor Vinge
"I me. Shape middled me. I would come out into hot!"
I from the spicy that day was ov
Anyone having the super editing power needed can please update this one:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/index.php?title=Unstable_Kernel_Branch
?
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Ma
As noted somewhere on this list, FreeDOS 1.1 is supposed to
come out now 2011 (same had been previously promised for
2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 too) after kernel 2040 comes out.
Some personal suggestions of mine what should come in:
Base:
KERNEL 2040 (hopefully fixed, if not, the fallback
level i
12 matches
Mail list logo
