Christian Masloch wrote: > [ * Personally (egoistically), I'd rather prefer the programs to be in the > public domain, or the license to be one of the well-known free software > licenses (MIT-style, 2/3-clause BSD, etc) that do not cause trouble, or > even other (common) ones like the GPL. But of course there's reasons not > to do that, too. ] > > > What do you people think? (And who's responsible for such FreeDOS > project/distribution decisions?)
I totally agree, but I'm probably biased as another member of BTTR Software. ;-) Don't forget http://www.osor.eu/eupl/european-union-public-licence-eupl-v.1.1 for European developers, because it's compatible with GNU GPL v2 and is available in 22 languages. Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.bttr-software.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
