exeflat.c of build 2035a (not 2035) has a problem. The start segment is an
argument so it's a variable and its value - 2 must be loaded into DI
instead of the constant 0x5E. Here's a fix:
--- cvs\kernel\utils\exeflat.c 2004-07-09 04:16:30.0 +0200
+++ src\kernel\utils\exeflat.c
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
exeflat.c of build 2035a (not 2035) has a problem. The start segment is an
argument so it's a variable and its value - 2 must be loaded into DI
instead of the constant 0x5E. Here's a fix:
--- cvs\kernel\utils\exeflat.c2004-07-09
Hallo Bart,
This is against exeflat.c of 2035a-UNSTABLE. Neither 2035a (i.e. CVS
HEAD) nor 2035 have this problem.
I didn't know that there are TWO kernel builds called 2035a... Perhaps you
should call yours 2035b where b = Bart (a = Arkady ;-)
Regards,
Lucho
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
This is against exeflat.c of 2035a-UNSTABLE. Neither 2035a (i.e. CVS
HEAD) nor 2035 have this problem.
I didn't know that there are TWO kernel builds called 2035a... Perhaps you
should call yours 2035b where b = Bart (a = Arkady ;-)
I was just
Hallo Bart,
#define BUILD 2035
#define SUB_BUILD a
#define KERNEL_VERSION_STRING 1.1.35 /*#REVISION_MAJOR .
#REVISION_MINOR . #REVISION_SEQ */
#define KERNEL_BUILD_STRING 2035a /*#BUILD SUB_BUILD */
#define BUILD 2035a
#define SUB_BUILD -UNSTABLE
#define
Hello Bart,
Actually a couple of years ago it was build 1937 for version 1.0.2 ;)
Wow! Well, I hope that it can be 2.0.60 for build 2060 in just a couple of
years ;-)
nor removal of phrases like All Rights Reserved. that are useless now
Pat sent an email to this list -- here's your chance if you
Hello Luchezar,
OK, long live the holy conservatism that saves the FreeDOS world
from the Arkadifying hell ;-G By
100% agreed
tom
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal
Hello Luchezar,
I didn't know that there are TWO kernel builds called 2035a... Perhaps you
should call yours 2035b where b = Bart (a = Arkady ;-)
or call the 'optimized' kernel keUNSTABLExxx or keARxxx,
as the main stream kernel should concentrate on FIXING bugs, rather then
introducing new
Bart Oldeman escribió:
By the way, how is Arkady? Has anybody heard of him recently? I begin to
worry about him!
No idea. A bit silent here indeed.
True. Maybe he is on a vacation?
Aitor
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have
Hello Tom et al,
or call the 'optimized' kernel keUNSTABLExxx or keARxxx, as the main
stream kernel should concentrate on FIXING bugs, rather then introducing
new ones.
100% agreed. Since I use unstable kernel every day in practice, I think
it has no more bugs than the stable one. But during
At 09:19 PM 8/7/2004 +0300, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
Needless to say that these bugs and incompatibilities are only a small
part of the whole picture. You already know the DOS extender compatibility
problems I've reported earlier. Perhaps it's also worth mentioning that
writing files under
Hi Lucho,
Luchezar Georgiev escribi:
100% agreed. Since I use unstable kernel every day in practice, I
think it has no more bugs than the stable one. But during the last
few weeks I noticed several more bugs and incompatibilities present in
both stable and unstable branches, most of them
So, as a prospective user of the kernel, after contributing to it for
more than an year, I can conclude than it's good enough for simpler
tasks not involving writing a lot of long named files on a FAT32
partition. For more complex tasks, however, MS-DOS 7.1, PC-DOS 7.1 and
ROM-DOS 7.1 are more
nor removal of phrases like All Rights Reserved. that are useless now
Pat sent an email to this list -- here's your chance if you really care
about this!
The Buenos Aires Convention (1911) that required this was superseded by
the Universal Copyright and Berne conventions. More on this at
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
[problems with DOSLFN and SMARTDRV and some obscure problems for
nonstandard configurations]
So, as a prospective user of the kernel, after contributing to it for more
than an year, I can conclude than it's good enough for simpler tasks not
15 matches
Mail list logo
