Problem with freeradius-0.4 on BSDi 4.3

2002-03-08 Thread Kelvin
Okay I downloaded and installed FreeRadius 0.4 I had to make a couple small modifications to the source to get it to compile. Remove INADDR_NONE from one include file and add INADDR_ANY to another No big deal now when I run it I get

rlm_sql Errors

2002-03-08 Thread QCI Internet
I have played around and gotten Simultaneous-Use working with mySQL. One thing I have noticed is I keep getting a lot of error messages wrom my radius log. I keep getting messages like the following when the checkrad program runs: Fri Mar 8 07:12:10 2002 : Error: rlm_sql: Stop packet with zero

rlm_sql: Couldn't update SQL accounting for ALIVE packet

2002-03-08 Thread aw spada
rlm_sql: Couldn't update SQL accounting for ALIVE packet - You have an error in your SQL syntax near 'WHERE AcctSessionTime=0 AND AcctStopTime=0 AND NASIPAddress= '194.69.1.210' AND ' at line 1 rlm_sql: Released sql socket id: 4 I can get auth from LDAP but with Mysql accounting this above error

Re: Problem with freeradius-0.4 on BSDi 4.3

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
"Kelvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Module: Library search path is /usr/local/lib > /usr/local/sbin/radiusd: can't resolve symbol 'fgetgrent' > /usr/local/sbin/radiusd: can't resolve symbol 'fgetpwent' > /usr/local/sbin/radiusd: can't resolve symbol 'fgetgrent' > /usr/local/sbin/radiusd: can't r

Connection ?

2002-03-08 Thread CGI
I would like to implement free radius with mysql and I have few questions. 1. Can I use the same database to authenticate 3 different devices: a Nortel VPN box, a Checkpoint firewall and a 3COM modem chassis. 2. can I add in the database some information regarding what the user is allow it to do

v0.5 coming any time soon?

2002-03-08 Thread Vincent_Giovannone
It's been a while, almost three months. Think it's time for a non-CVS release? :) Vincent Giovannone Network Infrastructure Group Information Services Division Rush - Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center (312) 942-4242 "Monday" is the term used to signify the eighth day of my work week.

Re: v0.5 coming any time soon?

2002-03-08 Thread Chris Parker
At 12:10 PM 3/8/2002 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >It's been a while, almost three months. Think it's time for a non-CVS >release? :) Soon hopefully. A few nasty bugs have just been licked in the CVS version. Once those are confirmed fixed 0.5 should be available. We were waiting on roll

A couple of notes on the current state of FreeRadius (based on 0.4)

2002-03-08 Thread Roy Hooper
- The ChangeLog should have an indication of what the current release versions are and indicate when the releases were made so as not to confuse users. - The ChangeLog should probably enumerate bugfixes instead of one generic statement time (This would work best if there was a bug tracking system

RE: v0.5 coming any time soon?

2002-03-08 Thread Edgard Castro
I found out that last CVS snapshot (yesterdays) was allocating SQL sockets and "forgetting" to de-alocate them. Is this reported yet? This last CVS snapshot fixes the problem that I was having about allocating more than 25 sockets for the SQL server. I don't know what you guys done, but it fixed

op field

2002-03-08 Thread Adam J. Henry
The new 'op' field in the CVS snapshots doesn't seem to be present in 'db_mysql.sql', so I have set it up like this: CREATE TABLE radcheck ( id int(11) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, UserName varchar(64) NOT NULL default '', Attribute varchar(32) NOT NULL

Re: A couple of notes on the current state of FreeRadius (based on 0.4)

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
"Roy Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - The ChangeLog should have an indication of what the current > release versions are and indicate when the releases were made so as > not to confuse users. It does have a version number, but no date. One will be added for 0.5. > - The ChangeLog should

Re: op field

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
"Adam J. Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new 'op' field in the CVS snapshots doesn't seem to be present in > 'db_mysql.sql', so I have set it up like this: Damn. I checked it before committing the updated version, but I missed that. > What I am unsure about is what this new field is f

Re: Found a bug? and have a question .

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
Randy Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that you've shortened the field size for all of the attribute > values fields to 64 or 54 characters. Any reason not to keep them at 253? They should be 253. I've just fixed that. > I don't think I understand keys well enough to predict whic

Re: op field

2002-03-08 Thread Adam J. Henry
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:17:56PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote: > > What I am unsure about is what this new field is for. Answering this > > would tell me which other tables also need this new field. > > It's the operator. '=', '+=', etc. See 'man users' I'm not understanding still. 'man users

Re: op field

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
"Adam J. Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's the operator. '=', '+=', etc. See 'man users' > > I'm not understanding still. 'man users' shows me the man page for > the default users program. Yes, but did you *read* it? It explains what the operators are, and what they mean. The

EAP question

2002-03-08 Thread McNutt, Justin M.
Okay, I "patched" misc.c to get around the gethostbyaddr_r problems in Linux (thanks for the information, everyone!) and now I'm trying to get EAP to work. Preface: The server compiles and runs. Libraries: glibc-2.2.4 openssl-0.9.6a UCD SNMP 4.1.2 (will upgrade soon) Linux-PAM 0.75 We're usi

FreeRADIUS user collision and class attribute on Cisco and PortmasterNAS equipment.

2002-03-08 Thread Darrell Shandrow
Hi all, I am running FreeRADIUS 0.3. It is implemented in multiple POP locations with many different types of NAS equipment. I seem to be having difficulties with 3 specific types of NAS: Cisco 5200 Cisco 5300 PortMaster PM3 The trouble is that this equipment is not returning the class attri

Re: A couple of notes on the current state of FreeRadius (based on 0.4)

2002-03-08 Thread Roy Hooper
> As always, patches are welcome. I'll find some time to work on as many of the things I mentioned as possible. > That's up to the individual modules. Many do, some don't. Urgh. Makes sense, but urgh anyway. > 0.5 defaults to running as 'root.root', due to the large number of > problem

Re: EAP question

2002-03-08 Thread Raghu
>[Date] Error: Received packet from 128.206.95.215 with invalid >Message-Authenticator! >[Date] Info: Sending duplicate authentication reply to client >128.206.95.215:1026 - ID: 63 Looks like Shared secret problem. You might also want to verify if auth & acct have different shared secrets. -R

RE: EAP question

2002-03-08 Thread McNutt, Justin M.
> >[Date] Error: Received packet from 128.206.95.215 with invalid > >Message-Authenticator! > >[Date] Info: Sending duplicate authentication reply to client > >128.206.95.215:1026 - ID: 63 > > Looks like Shared secret problem. > You might also want to verify if auth & acct > have different sha

Re: A couple of notes on the current state of FreeRadius (based on 0.4)

2002-03-08 Thread Alan DeKok
"Roy Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To take this idea even further, one could make all authentication (or > accounting) modules also be subprocesses, allowing a blocking, dying, or > otherwise uncooperative module to continue to be used without crashing the core > radius daemon. See 'open