Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-06-17 Thread Benjamin A. Shelton
> eManager Notification * > > The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. [snip] > Content filter has detected an e-mail that contains profanity > > *** End of message * Oh my word! If you say somethin

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-03-20 Thread Robert Canary
I got that the other day also, my post never made it to the list, but when I reposted it went through... Dmitry Glushenok wrote: > > What is it? Why i get messages with my domain in From: address? > I've just one post to this list few days ago.. > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:22:46PM -0500, [EMA

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-03-20 Thread Dmitry Glushenok
What is it? Why i get messages with my domain in From: address? I've just one post to this list few days ago.. On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:22:46PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > eManager Notification * > > The following mail was blocked since it contains sensit

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-02-23 Thread Andrew E. Guly
> eManager Notification * > > The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. > > Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Rule/Policy: Profanity > Action: Quarantine to D:\Program > Files\Trend\SMCF\Quaran

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-02-20 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <011401c2d917$0bce4d60$1400010a@infoteckjv>, Joel Vandal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >What is that ?!? :) A non-qualified address in the from-header. >iteckmailx.infoteck.qc.ca is my mail server and all incoming/outgoing mail >are always scanned by our McAfee Webshield e500 and we dont

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-02-20 Thread Joel Vandal
What is that ?!? :) iteckmailx.infoteck.qc.ca is my mail server and all incoming/outgoing mail are always scanned by our McAfee Webshield e500 and we dont have any ScanMail/eManager program on our server... also, the email administrator@... doesn't exist on our server =) I know it's not related t

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-02-10 Thread Emre Bastuz
Hi, Zitat von Gustavo Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Uh? > [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > Why the heck is an email comming from our Domain? I also had [EMAIL PROTECTED] as recipient. Seems this one´s yet another screwed up Windows/Exchange Trend Micro content filter. Don´t bother. Regards, Emre -- Emre

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2003-02-10 Thread Alan DeKok
Gustavo Lozano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uh? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > Why the heck is an email comming from our Domain? You have a broken spam filter installed. It sees the spam from the list, and then bounces an error message back to the list. It should NOT send any notification abou

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-12-19 Thread Vincent_Giovannone
ound."-- Simon Travaglia Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/2002 05:33 AM Please respond to freeradius-users To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-12-19 Thread Simon White
19-Dec-02 at 19:53, Peter Santiago ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Simon... > > I got one too... and I'm definitely not using eManager... Hmm Weird > Second time I got this kind of email... It's not just me then. Your domain was appended to Administrator also, so this is a problem outside

RE: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-12-19 Thread Peter Santiago
.html == -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon White Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action. 19-Dec-02 at 06:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-12-19 Thread Simon White
19-Dec-02 at 06:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > eManager Notification * > > The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. > > Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Rule/Policy: Se

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-11-19 Thread Milan P. Stanic
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and > take action. > X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:17:26 -0500 The message isn't from my site. Header says it is from togethersoft.net It

Re: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-10-30 Thread Daryl Tester
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We could always send a bunch of actual swears to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > see what happens. :) I think you already are - it's probably your signature that's tripping it off. :-) > "So for the IT Manager Role, you want someone who's absolute crap, looks > reasonable on

RE: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-10-29 Thread Vincent_Giovannone
und."-- Simon Travaglia "Gene Parks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/29/2002 10:10 AM Please respond to freeradius-users To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager sett

RE: ScanMail Message: To Recipient Match eManager setting and take action.

2002-10-29 Thread Gene Parks
Somebody want to tell me what idiot is polluting the mailing list with this stupid filter? If you want to filter you own stuff, GREAT! Just don't tell us about because WE DON'T CARE. Gene Parks VIP Direct -Original Message- From: System Attendant [mailto:EXCHANGE-SA@;nrtc.org] Sent: T