On Mon 08 Jan 2007 22:53, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Peter Nixon wrote:
> > Yep. rlm_sqlippool and rlm_sql_postgresql are 2 other modules which have
> > huge changes in them.. Is it worth me spending some time tonight
> > backporting them or should we just wait for 2.0? (sqlippool seems to be
> > getting
Peter Nixon wrote:
>
> Yep. rlm_sqlippool and rlm_sql_postgresql are 2 other modules which have huge
> changes in them.. Is it worth me spending some time tonight backporting them
> or should we just wait for 2.0? (sqlippool seems to be getting quite some
> interest of late)
I think we should
On Mon 08 Jan 2007 16:19, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 01, 1970 at 12:00:00AM +, Alan DeKok wrote:
> >> Version 1.1.4 has been released, with a few notable improvements.
> >
> > Is there good reason for not updating rlm_perl? Version in 1.1.4 is
> > "1.13.4.7 2006/0
Tomas Hoger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 1970 at 12:00:00AM +, Alan DeKok wrote:
>> Version 1.1.4 has been released, with a few notable improvements.
>
> Is there good reason for not updating rlm_perl? Version in 1.1.4 is
> "1.13.4.7 2006/04/27" (same as in 1.1.3 and 1.1.2), even though CVS
> c
On Thu, Jan 01, 1970 at 12:00:00AM +, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Version 1.1.4 has been released, with a few notable improvements.
Is there good reason for not updating rlm_perl? Version in 1.1.4 is
"1.13.4.7 2006/04/27" (same as in 1.1.3 and 1.1.2), even though CVS
contains version "1.45 2006/12/
Santiago Balaguer García wrote:
> But, this version does not still support that the existed realms in
> 'proxy.conf' file was in a DB.
>
> It is useful for me, because I have a lot of roaming partners.
As always, patches are welcome.
If you can't write a patch, there are a number of people a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> * Added preliminary code to support Firebird. (closes: #378)
>> Use at your own risk!
>
> unfortunately this new support breaks the building of the
> FreeRADIUS during the ./confugure stage if you dont
> have the required development libraries/headers pre
But, this version does not still support that the existed realms in 'proxy.conf' file was in a DB.
It is useful for me, because I have a lot of roaming partners.
From: Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: FreeRadius users mailing list To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: FreeRADIU
Hi,
> * Added preliminary code to support Firebird. (closes: #378)
> Use at your own risk!
unfortunately this new support breaks the building of the
FreeRADIUS during the ./confugure stage if you dont
have the required development libraries/headers present.
currently the only work-around is
9 matches
Mail list logo
