Hi,
> Which explains what's going on. PEAP is really two things: an outer
> TLS session, and inner EAP-MSCHAPv2 authentication. So there are *two*
> streams of RADIUS packets. One that sets up the tunnel, and one that
> does the authentication inside of the tunnel.
yep - so if you only want
Adam W. Sewell wrote:
> I am using PEAP/MsChapv2.
Exactly. There are multiple packet exchanges as part of one PEAP
authentication.
> I am using a perl script to authorize the user access to the network based on
> some information that is pulled out of a database via our perl script. This
> p
NAS-Identifier = "BZRBAS_09614_M80"
Thu Aug 21 12:57:15 2008 : NAS-Port-Id = "fe.0.8"
Thu Aug 21 12:57:15 2008 : Using perl at 0x80116518
Thu Aug 21 12:57:15 2008 : rlm_perl: Added pair Filter-Id =
Enterasys:version=1:policy=CCP_Student
Thu Aug 21 12:57:15 2008
Adam W. Sewell wrote:
> I'm having a couple of issues particularly pertaining
> to the NAS-IP-Address variable that is passed from the
> switch. When a client sends the auth-request, we find
> that the authorize function of our perl script is being
> executed multiple times for the same request.
I'm having a couple of issues particularly pertaining to the NAS-IP-Address
variable that is passed from the switch. When a client sends the auth-request,
we find that the authorize function of our perl script is being executed
multiple times for the same request. I would think that the authoriz
Yes, that worked a charm. Thanks for the help Alan!
--
Harry
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harry J Walsh wrote:
>> Thanks for the swift reply Dekok. I tried what you suggested and it
>> doesn't work.
>
> Sorry... looking at the code again, the Respons
Harry J Walsh wrote:
> Thanks for the swift reply Dekok. I tried what you suggested and it
> doesn't work.
Sorry... looking at the code again, the Response-Packet-Type should go
into the control/check items.
...
> $RAD_REPLY{'Response-Packet-Type'} = "Access-Challenge";
Cha
_REPLY{'Response-Packet-Type'} = "Access-Challenge";
&log_request_attributes;
return RLM_MODULE_HANDLED;
}
else {
# Reject user and tell him why
$RAD_REPLY{'Reply-Message'} = "Denied access by
Harry J Walsh wrote:
> I want to develop some test cases for a radius client I am developing
> and I would like to be able to use rlm_perl to simulate various
> scenarios. The one I am having major problems with is
> Access-Challenge. I really like rlm_perl and the flexibility it
&g
Hi,
I want to develop some test cases for a radius client I am developing
and I would like to be able to use rlm_perl to simulate various
scenarios. The one I am having major problems with is
Access-Challenge. I really like rlm_perl and the flexibility it
provides and I would like to be able to
On Tue, August 12, 2008 11:08 am, Ivan Kalik wrote:
> You haven't got
>
> Auth-Type Perl {
> perl
> }
>
> in authentication section of inner-tunnel virtual server. You probably
> added it just to default one. In default configuration users file is
> common for all virtual servers.
Excellent! Than
L PROTECTED]> piše:
>Greetings,
>
>I'm busy trying out Freeradius 2.0.5 before upgrading from 1.1.0, and so
>far everything looks good. I would like to try out rlm_perl since it
>presents some interesting possibilities, but am having a spot of bother.
>
>I foll
Greetings,
I'm busy trying out Freeradius 2.0.5 before upgrading from 1.1.0, and so
far everything looks good. I would like to try out rlm_perl since it
presents some interesting possibilities, but am having a spot of bother.
I followed the howto here: http://wiki.freeradius.org/Rlm
Bonjour,
je suis actuellement en congés pour 3 semaines.
Je suis de retour le 1er septembre 2008.
En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez contacter Monsieur Tixier au 03 80 24 44 27 ou la
maintenance informatique au 03 80 24 45 84.
Cordialement.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius
Greetings,
I am running into a strange problem with the rlm_perl module.
I am using some Perl middleware to do additional processing on some
custom vendor accounting attributes and log them to MS-SQL via UnixODBC,
in addition to using rlm_unixodbc for logging the basic accounting
attributes
In src/main/Makefile, added the dynaloader library to the MODULE_LIBS:
MODULE_LIBS = $(STATIC_MODULES)
/usr/local/perl-5.8.3/lib/5.8.3/sun4-solaris/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a
This fixed the make error.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.ht
Am 02.07.2008 um 14:05 schrieb Ubale, Abhishek Amarnath:
Hi,
Im trying to install freeradius 2.0.5 on solaris10 (sparc) and Im
only interested in rlm_perl module. My configure script is
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/radius --with-static-modules=perl --
disable-shared --without-rlm_sql
Hi,
Im trying to install freeradius 2.0.5 on solaris10 (sparc) and Im only
interested in rlm_perl module. My configure script is
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/radius --with-static-modules=perl
--disable-shared --without-rlm_sql --without-rlm_eap --without-rlm_ldap
--without-rlm_krb5
oz wrote:
> A small problem I just had when I recompiled my freeradius-2.0.3 with
Answer: 2.0.5.
> I decided to ignore it, because the symbolic link inner-tunnel
> alread existed from my first compilation an that seems to cause the
> error (is this fixed in 2.0.5 eventually?).
Yes.
Alan D
ower-cased in the auth AND acct packets.
A small problem I just had when I recompiled my freeradius-2.0.3 with
libperl-dev to make rlm_perl available. At the end of "make install"
I've got:
[...]
if [ ! -f /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/inner-tunnel ]; then \
cd /
Sorry, my bad, I upgraded to 2.0.5 and this all started to work fine :-)
-Ken
Begin forwarded message:
Greetings!
I'm using freeradius installed from the freeradius.i386 1.1.3-1.2.el
rpm on CentOS 5 (recompiled RedHat).
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/lis
arrive at their final destination. I need to
rewrite any reference to a username to a unique ID number (long story).
I embarked on using rlm_perl for this task, I have the proxy working,
but when the data arrives at it's destination the Attributes have not
been changed. I'm hoping
> later. I haven't tried this but it works with other modules.
>
> On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:04 PM, oz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:09:09 -0700
> > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks. I'll look at lc.
> >> I was
eeradius-2.0.x. Our database is an historically grown
users-file.
Were you or somebody else able to follow the advice of using
rlm_perl and lc()?
I must admit, I'm not able to program freeradius-perl-plugins :-/, but
would test it if necessary. At the moment I don't even have the
rl
witch to freeradius-2.0.x. Our database is an historically grown
users-file.
Were you or somebody else able to follow the advice of using
rlm_perl and lc()?
I must admit, I'm not able to program freeradius-perl-plugins :-/, but
would test it if necessary. At the moment I don't even have t
On May 17, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2008-05-17 02:09, Chris wrote:
I basically want User-Name to be forced to lowercase for the
duration of the request.
I have done the following:
modules {
perl {
module = my_perl_module.pm
}
}
authorize {
On 2008-05-17 02:09, Chris wrote:
I basically want User-Name to be forced to lowercase for the duration
of the request.
I have done the following:
modules {
perl {
module = my_perl_module.pm
}
}
authorize {
preprocess
perl
...
}
Pertin
I basically want User-Name to be forced to lowercase for the duration
of the request.
I have done the following:
modules {
perl {
module = my_perl_module.pm
}
}
authorize {
preprocess
perl
...
}
Pertinent contents of my_perl_module.pm:
mention it in case someone tries something like that.
Kinetix Tele.com Mailing Lists wrote:
I am using the following command to my authorize function (rlm_perl) :
$RAD_REPLY{'Cisco-Command-Code'} = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
because I want to add more than one pair in the reply packet.
(final_
I am using the following command to my authorize function (rlm_perl) :
$RAD_REPLY{'Cisco-Command-Code'} = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
because I want to add more than one pair in the reply packet.
(final_routing is a perl array containing the desired values)
These pairs are successfully ad
rsg wrote:
> My particular problem is to compare
>
> IP address management(Authorization)
> (1) 'solely' based on PerlVS (2) SQLIPPOOL + unlang
>
> Does it mean that SQLIPPOOL isn't a good choice for large scale
> deployments requiring scalability & faster response time?
No
My particular problem is to compare
IP address management(Authorization)
(1) 'solely' based on PerlVS (2) SQLIPPOOL + unlang
Does it mean that SQLIPPOOL isn't a good choice for large scale
deployments requiring scalability & faster response time?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:3
Hi,
I am using freeradius (rlm_perl) for a VoIP system for a long time now
and today I tried to use it for routing purposes as well.
In my authorize function of my perl script I am assigning the routing info
to $RAD_REPLY :
...
my @final_routing
rsg wrote:
> However my question is about performance and about how fast & scalable
> this kind of a setup compared to a Perl based system.
Perl will almost always be slower, for the simple reason that it has a
lot more work to do in order to set up the interpreter, etc. for every
request.
Th
Hi,
> If things are done mainly using SQL, for eg. IP address management,
> then unlang seems to be doing more or less the same work(easily) a
> sophisticated Perl script could do.
>
> However my question is about performance and about how fast & scalable
> this kind of a setup compared to a Pe
& scalable
this kind of a setup compared to a Perl based system.
Any ideas please?
rg.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > How could one compare between Rlm_perl and Unlang(or any other
> > relevant module) for performan
Hi,
> How could one compare between Rlm_perl and Unlang(or any other
> relevant module) for performance.
>
> I've read in http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/Rlm_perl
>
> that rlm_perl supports muliple instances and threads allowing faster
> processing.
>
> Ho
Hi,
How could one compare between Rlm_perl and Unlang(or any other
relevant module) for performance.
I've read in http://wiki.freeradius.org/index.php/Rlm_perl
that rlm_perl supports muliple instances and threads allowing faster processing.
How is it with policies done using u
Hi,
> client. For the testing purpose I've put this simple script in the perl
> program
>
> if ($RAD_REQUEST{'User-Name'} eq "john")
> {
> $RAD_REPLY{'A message'} = " Accepting John";
> return RLM_MODULE_OK;
>
>}
>
hi,
I am trying to used the rlm_perl for authentication, I've found reading
all the perl modules, but wouldn't able to handle the username from the
client. For the testing purpose I've put this simple script in the perl
program
if ($RAD_REQUEST{'
database), but
I can't find a equivalent of preproxy_user file to the post-proxy phase.
I think that using a perl script with rlm_perl will do this work in
the post-proxy function, but when I try to manipulate attributes
from the home server response, I can't find them in the %R
reply comes
from the home FreeRadius, I have to go through the same kind of
process (add attributes which values are taken from a database),
but I can't find a equivalent of preproxy_user file to the post-
proxy phase.
I think that using a perl script with rlm_perl will do this wo
that using a perl script with rlm_perl will do this work in the
post-proxy function, but when I try to manipulate attributes from the
home server response, I can't find them in the %RAD_REQUEST, %RAD_REPLY
hashes, and I can see this kind of logs :
rlm_perl: Added pair Attribute1 = Value1
...
++[eap] returns noop
++[expiration] returns noop
++[logintime] returns noop
You've removed the PAP module from the sites-available/default
"authorize" stanza, so this happens:
auth: No authenticate method (Auth-Type) configuration found for the
Put the "pap" module back where it was.
-
Lis
mespan "
minimum-timeout = 60
}
}
radiusd: Loading Virtual Servers
server {
modules {
Module: Checking authenticate {...} for more modules to load
Module: Linked to module rlm_perl
Module: Instantiating perl
perl {
module = "/usr/local/etc/raddb/example
John S. Doe wrote:
Hello!
i use freeradiusd 1.7, rlm_perl with thread conf:
thread pool {
start_servers = 100
max_servers = 1500
min_spare_servers = 1
max_spare_servers = 10
max_requests_per_server = 10
}
rlm_sql uses mysql.
All works fine, but
Hi,
> Hello!
>
> i use freeradiusd 1.7, rlm_perl with thread conf:
>
> thread pool {
> start_servers = 100
> max_servers = 1500
> min_spare_servers = 1
> max_spare_servers = 10
> max_requests_per_server = 10
> }
>
John S. Doe wrote:
> i use freeradiusd 1.7, rlm_perl with thread conf:
>
> thread pool {
...
> max_requests_per_server = 10
This should always be zero.
> and radiusd like "frozen", take 99% of CPU time, and not response for
> client's request.
Ru
Hello!
i use freeradiusd 1.7, rlm_perl with thread conf:
thread pool {
start_servers = 100
max_servers = 1500
min_spare_servers = 1
max_spare_servers = 10
max_requests_per_server = 10
}
rlm_sql uses mysql.
All works fine, but sometime, at moment with
Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
...
> I use freeradius-1.1.3 (Debian Etch package). I applied this patch to
> radiusd.c to solve
> my problem. That works. My question : my patch seems good or not ?
It looks fine.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/
Le vendredi 25 janvier 2008 17:01, Alan DeKok a écrit :
> Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
> > Well. I made a lot of tests without success. I'm not yet able to REJECT a
> > request in a post_proxy function, but that works fine in a authorize
> > function.
> >
> > Does someone have ideas ?
>
> In
Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
> Well. I made a lot of tests without success. I'm not yet able to REJECT a
> request in a post_proxy function, but that works fine in a authorize
> function.
>
> Does someone have ideas ?
In 2.0, it looks like this isn't dealt with in src/main/event.c around
line
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Boian Jordanov
> >> SNE
> >> Orbitel - Next Generation Telecom
> >> tel. +359 2 4004 723
> >> tel. +359 2 4004 002
> >>
> >> On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
> &g
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Boian Jordanov
> >> SNE
> >> Orbitel - Next Generation Telecom
> >> tel. +359 2 4004 723
> >> tel. +359 2 4004 002
> >>
> >> On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
> &g
Best Regards,
Boian Jordanov
SNE
Orbitel - Next Generation Telecom
tel. +359 2 4004 723
tel. +359 2 4004 002
On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
I have a question on rlm_perl and RLM_MODULE_REJECT. If in a
function
(post_proxy) I return RLM_MODULE_REJECT I can see this i
gt;
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
>
>> I have a question on rlm_perl and RLM_MODULE_REJECT. If in a function
>> (post_proxy) I return RLM_MODULE_REJECT I can see this in log :
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> ht
ecide to
# cancel the proxy.
#
# Only a few modules currently have this method.
#
Best Regards,
Boian Jordanov
SNE
Orbitel - Next Generation Telecom
tel. +359 2 4004 723
tel. +359 2 4004 002
On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote:
I have a question on rlm_per
Hi,
I have a question on rlm_perl and RLM_MODULE_REJECT. If in a function
(post_proxy) I return RLM_MODULE_REJECT I can see this in log :
modcall[post-proxy]: module "perl1" returns reject for request 1
... but my request is still accepted : Access-Accept not Access-Reject !
How
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> It is, but apple include 1.1.6 not 2.0.0, very few people have attempted
> to build FR 2 on leopard server.
Apple. :)
It should build on a normal system, too, thanks to beta testing from them.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freerad
EAP system in eg latest airport/timecapsule product (though
I may be wrong on that aspect of usage! ;-) )
It is, but apple include 1.1.6 not 2.0.0, very few people have attempted
to build FR 2 on leopard server.
2] Is perl only a build dependency for rlm_perl, or does the module make
run
that aspect of usage! ;-) )
2] Is perl only a build dependency for rlm_perl, or does the module
make
runtime calls to external perl libs?
correct. its only for rlm_perl
3] I've discovered with an install of perl 5.10 that, during
configure (of
freeradius 2), the linker chooses the /Sys
Hi,
several folk run FreeRADIUS on MacOSX already - and Apple even
have added code themselves - I believe FR is the fundamental
EAP system in eg latest airport/timecapsule product (though
I may be wrong on that aspect of usage! ;-) )
> 2] Is perl only a build dependency for rlm_perl, or does
ary... Bug #471 shows this, and an example of my initial attempts
showed much the same:
...
(cd .libs && rm -f rlm_perl.so && ln -s rlm_perl-2.0.0.so rlm_perl.so)
ar cru .libs/rlm_perl.a /System/Library/Perl/5.8.6/darwin-thread-
multi-2level/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a rlm_per
Hello All
I have spent few days trying to build freeradius with rlm_perl module on
Solaris 10.
Using both last versio 2.0.0 and 1.1.7 I'm getting vary similar problem.
Does anybody get it running ?
recvfrom0x4814
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/sun4-solaris
I have a clue, maybe your client is not able to do more requests or
your configuration on client side is wrong.
Best Regards,
Boian Jordanov
SNE
Orbitel - Next Generation Telecom
tel. +359 2 4004 723
tel. +359 2 4004 002
On Oct 17, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
Apostolos Pantsiopoul
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
> Well, yes that has been my main concern I must admit... because I have
> seen so many replies in the mailing
> list "urging" people to make the backend DB faster (and concentrating on
> that aspect alone when the server performs poorly).
There are many factors to
First of all thanks for your prompt replies
Alan DeKok wrote:
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
I did that. Actually it was the first thing I did. I got the same result.
Also, the server does a LOT more than just running Perl. You are
measuring the time taken to run your Perl scripts.
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
> I did that. Actually it was the first thing I did. I got the same result.
>> Also, the server does a LOT more than just running Perl. You are
>> measuring the time taken to run your Perl scripts. The time taken to
>> process a request can be VERY different.
>
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
"perl_pool total/active/spare [32/0/32]"
Or you have wrong configuration or rlm_perl isn't your bottleneck.
Check your configuration, remove any unwanted module.
Best Regards,
Boian Jordanov
SNE
Orbitel -
Alan DeKok wrote:
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
I am using the rlm_perl module for accounting purposes.
...
The results I get (after 2-3 k requests) are these :
Mean time for acct start : 0.005 secs
Mean time for acct stop : 0.01 secs
Since there is a 1:1 ratio of start/stop
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos wrote:
> I am using the rlm_perl module for accounting purposes.
...
> The results I get (after 2-3 k requests) are these :
>
> Mean time for acct start : 0.005 secs
> Mean time for acct stop : 0.01 secs
>
> Since there is a 1:1 ratio of start/stop
I am using the rlm_perl module for accounting purposes.
I tried to benchmark the whole process by doing something like this :
sub accounting{
start_benchmark();
// acct start code here
stop_benchmark();
send_bench_results_using_udp();
}
sub stop_accounting{
start_benchmark
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:41:21 PM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem
> Subject: Fwd: final rlm_perl question, hopefully...
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ok, after reviewing all the information that was received, I've setup my
> FreeRadius as following:
>
> 1. The authorize and aut
Hi all,
Please disregard, I've solved the thing ;-) Silly typo in the return.
Z2L
- Original Message -
From: "FreeRadius-ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "freeradius-users"
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:41:21 PM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem
Subject: Fwd: fin
Hi All,
Ok, after reviewing all the information that was received, I've setup my
FreeRadius
as following:
1. The authorize and authenticate sections are setup to activate digest and
perl.
2. My rlm_perl script utilizes the following lines in order to return the
unencrypted
user pas
Hi All,
Ok, after battling with OpenSER + FreeRadius digest authentication, I managed
to make it work correctly.
Now, i've decided to try moving to rlm_perl, and I was wondering if any of you
guys may have examples or
code/configuration snips of rlm_perl integration.
I've manag
good. Now, it's time to start thinking about the rlm_perl thingy ;-)
Cheers,
Z2L
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:24:19 AM (GMT+0
to the next request
>Waking up in 6 seconds...
>
>Which as much as I can tell, indicate that the digest
>authentication/authorization process had completed correctly,
>and our users had been successfully authed by the Radius Server. Currently, I
>have an issue indicating that the
&
2l
- Original Message -
From: "FreeRadius-ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:26:38 AM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem
est 18 is rejected. The silly part here is this, there is
only a single
IP Phone on the network, which is using a single OpenSER server. I'm kind'a
struck with a
silly question, where is the second request coming from?
Z2L
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" &l
FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> Now, I'm basically re-learning everything, as the world of OpenSER +
> FreeRadius is a little new to me,
> and sometimes frustrates me. The amount of documentation in the configuration
> files is great, but the lack
> of updated examples is somewhat annoying. Even Asteris
ust fine?
I will follow this and will retry.
z2l
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:12:07 AM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Int
ust fine?
I will follow this and will retry.
z2l
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:12:07 AM (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Int
FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> I can understand now that authorize is working nicely, but the
> Authentication section is wrong.
> I know there's alot of shit in radiusd.conf, however, it shouldn't prevent
> from the basics to work
> correctly, no?
The default configuration works. The "shit" that's
rong.
I know there's alot of shit in radiusd.conf, however, it shouldn't prevent from
the basics to work
correctly, no?
Z2L
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: 21:31:08
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: 21:52:47 (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem יום שלישי 17 יולי 2007
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Integration Issue
On Tue 17 Jul 2007, FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> Ok,
>
> i've modified the users file to say Cleartext-Password, and I've remove
est 14
>
> I've downloaded the code from the OpenSUSE package ftp server as a
> source RPM, and built it on my system.
>
> Z2L
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing
sage -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: 21:31:08 (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem יום שלישי 17 יולי 2007
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Integration Issue
FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> 1. I've removed all the rlm_perl c
FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> 1. I've removed all the rlm_perl configurations from the radiusd.conf file,
> and
>enabled the digest authentication back.
> 2. I've added to my users file the following lines:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth-Type := Digest, User-Password == &
Ok,
Here's what I did:
1. I've removed all the rlm_perl configurations from the radiusd.conf file, and
enabled the digest authentication back.
2. I've added to my users file the following lines:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auth-Type := Digest, User-Password == "101&qu
configuration,
> I'm not that dimwitted.
That's nice. Enabling it is one thing. Telling the server to *use*
it is another.
> Essentially, I need to work with rlm_perl because I don't want to use user
> flat files or an SQL, as my end target is to authenticate to some
Hi Alan,
Well, the perl script is currently setup to return OK on every request.
I had enabled the perl section in the authentication part of the configuration,
I'm not that dimwitted.
Essentially, I need to work with rlm_perl because I don't want to use user
flat files or an
would appear the the autorization portion of the process works
just fine, and is being negotiated
> via the rlm_perl module. However, it would appear that the
authentication portion isn't even transfered
> to the handling of the rlm_perl module for some reason.
Because you didn'
60
NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.2.80
Processing the authorize section of radiusd.conf
modcall: entering group authorize for request 255
perl_pool: item 0xa459b10 asigned new request. Handled so far: 8
found interpetator at address 0xa459b10
rlm_perl: RAD_REQUEST: X-Ascend-PW-Lifetime = 0x313031
rlm_
FreeRadius-ML wrote:
> Well, right now I would like to start of with something really simple. I'd
> like to have OpenSER authenticate
> on FreeRadius, Digest is not a must - for all I care at this point, it can be
> clear-text. I'm currently using
> the perl script example from the FreeRadius web
s.org
>Sent: 14:06:58 (GMT+0200) Asia/Jerusalem ××× ×Š×××Š× 17 ×××× 2007
>Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Integration Issue
>
>I don't know what is your pearl script supposed to do. If you are doing
>digest authentication (looking at that request) you need to uncomment
>the digest
יום שלישי 17 יולי 2007
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL Integration Issue
I don't know what is your pearl script supposed to do. If you are doing
digest authentication (looking at that request) you need to uncomment
the digest entries in authentication and authorization sections od
radiusd.conf.
I
Delaying request 6 for 1 seconds Finished request 6 Going
>to the next request Waking up in 2 seconds...
>
>I think I have a section missing from FreeRadius configuration, is that
>correct?
>
>Zap2Link
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Zap2Link
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:08 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: RLM_PERL integration issue
radiusd -X
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 17/7/2007, &qu
radiusd -X
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 17/7/2007, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
piše:
>Hi All,
>
>
>
> I've followed the rlm_perl information to integrate a PERL based example
>for Radius Authentication.
>
>I basically use
401 - 500 of 812 matches
Mail list logo
