Sure, I can do that as well. I will run them with version 6 and upload them. We are pretty pressed on our cluster, but I can hopefully do it over the weekend.On Oct 19, 2017 10:25 PM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:hey melanie,awesome - if you've already done edits, it should be quite straightforward to rer
Dear Dr. Yeo,
Thanks a lot for sending this information. I tried to view the parcels
using colortable but somehow I do not see postfix in FreeView window. Could
you please send me the command line how can I load the parcels on freeview
with associated colortable? I would really appreciate your hel
hey melanie,
awesome - if you've already done edits, it should be quite straightforward
to rerun with freesurfer 6. any chance you can run it through? otherwise i
can send you a filedrop link off the list.
cheers,
satra
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Melanie Ganz wrote:
> Hi Sean, Satra and
Hi Mel
I had forgotten. Sure, upload them and people can grab them
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Oct
2017, Melanie Ganz wrote:
Hi Sean, Satra and Bruce,
We just recently ran them all with v5.3 and did quite a few edits, especially
to the subject ending
in 10. Remember, we asked you for help, Bruce? 5
I h
Hi Sean, Satra and Bruce,We just recently ran them all with v5.3 and did quite a few edits, especially to the subject ending in 10. Remember, we asked you for help, Bruce? 5I had asked before if someone was interested in us uploading the work since we took quite some care in doing it, but there was
hi sean,
i think i ran those in june 2013 at ohbm. however, my recollection of how
it failed is encoded in that mail thread.
it may be worthwhile to just run through those images with freesurfer 6.0.
since it's only 6 brains, we can try running it through again.
cheers,
satra
On Thu, Oct 19,
Hi Seán
I'm not sure. I think Satra posted the original issue, so maybe he knows.
Satra?
cheers
Bruce
On
Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Seán Froudist Walsh wrote:
Hi,
Was the following issue ever solved? (sorry hit send too early!)
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg50297
no, but you can create one using mris_expand or simply sample halfway
through the thickness of the cortex with --projfrac 0.5
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017,
Nicholas Blauch wrote:
Hi Bruce,
That worked great. Thanks.
And for others reading, you might want to specify --surf pial in the
Hi,
Was the following issue ever solved?
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If
Hi,
Was the following issue ever solved? (sorry hit send too early!)
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg50297.html
I tried and, like the previous two people it fails on mri_watershed.
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg50297.html
Best wish
Hi Bruce,
That worked great. Thanks.
And for others reading, you might want to specify --surf pial in the call
to mri_vol2surf, if your activations are expected in cortex. When I did it
with no --surf specified, a face-selective localizer yielded weird results
on the ventral surface. Specifying p
Hi Freesurfer experts,
I have several nifti images (created with another software) in the subjects
original anatomical space (native space) that I want to transform to a
common space (freesurfer version of MNI305 should be fine) using non-linear
transformation.
Reading a previous answer regarding
Hi Freesurfer,
I have two question about the different partial volume correction options.
Basically how is the --mg method different from the --mgx? I cannot seem to
find papers that have compared these methods. Any opinions on this?
Does this have any effect on the region of interest GTM result
13 matches
Mail list logo
