Re: [Freesurfer] Converting labels drew by freeview to volumeError: coordinate mismatch

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Try adding --invertmtx to the mri_label2vol command On 11/28/2019 4:35 AM, Zoro wrote: External Email - Use Caution Thanks for your reply and sorry to bother you again. The problem is that the volume converted from label which drew by freeview does not match T1. Happy Thanksgiving day!

Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: Regression Analysis accounting for one variable

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
It sounds like it would be a one-group, two-variable situation, like this https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Fsgdf1G2V Is that not correct? On 11/28/2019 5:24 AM, Ferraro, Pilar wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi, I apologize if I did not explain my issue properly. I'm inter

Re: [Freesurfer] fsfast no run directories

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
In the bold directory, it looks like you have one run directory called "1". Change this to "001" On 11/29/2019 1:48 AM, Renew Andrade wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear FreeSurfer experts: I have some issues with "preproc-sess" because I cannot seem to get the setup of the direct

Re: [Freesurfer] about mri_vol2surf and mri_surf2surf

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
On 11/29/2019 4:27 AM, 于倩倩 wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hello, I have some questions about the command of mri_vol2surf and mri_surf2surf 1. For fMRI data, I find previous paper reported that they used standard SPM8 preprocessing routines, no normalize to standard MNI152 templa

Re: [Freesurfer] Problems about registration and tksurfer

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Try using mri_vol2surf to sample your fMRI onto the surface, then load it as a surface overlay in freeview On 11/29/2019 3:35 AM, 朱青 wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear madam or sir, I'm a student in China who use the Freesurfer to analyse my fMRI data and overlay some results

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
That will use the pre-computed ("cached") CSD files distributed with FreeSurfer. This used 10,000 iterations. On 12/1/2019 11:34 PM, Ting Li wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer Expert: I have used the simulation code as show below: mri_glmfit-sim \ --glmdir lh.gende

Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject)

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Can you send the log file for each of the gtmseg runs? On 11/26/2019 1:09 PM, Boris Rauchmann wrote: External Email - Use Caution Thank you! I have a gca for subcortical and two gcs (lh/rh) for cortical structures. I created an annot (rh/lh) and a mgz using mris_ca_label and mri_ca_lab

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Ting Li
External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr. Douglas, Thank you so much for your quick response! You saved my half life. From the introduction of clusterwise correction for multiple comparisons, I have a few questions. 1, What is the null hypothesis here ? 2, What is a z map? Do you me

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
On 12/2/2019 11:58 AM, Ting Li wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr. Douglas, Thank you so much for your quick response! You saved my half life. From the introduction of clusterwise correction for multiple comparisons, I have a few questions. 1, What is the null hypothesis he

Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject)

2019-12-02 Thread Boris Rauchmann
External Email - Use Caution In this example tried it with only the subcortical segmentations from my atlas. Please find the logfile attached. It gives me back: "tissue type is not set" but I set it to 2 in the LUT.txt In principle look the following commands right to you? xcereb

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Ting Li
External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr. Douglas, Thank you so much for your detailed response. The simulation here is to get the probability of a maximum cluster that size or larger in the cached CSD files. It checks the probability of the cluster size but have nothing to do with

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Correct. This is no different than, eg, a t-test. Look in the back of a stats book from the 1950s and you will find a table of t-ratios and corresponding p-values. Obviously, they did not have access to any of the data being analyzed today:), but the tables are still valid. On 12/2/2019 2:03 P

[Freesurfer] Reporting Results in a three group analysis

2019-12-02 Thread cody samth
External Email - Use Caution Hi, I have a statistical question about how to approach reporting results from FreeSurfer analyses containing three groups. I ran a group effect (F-test) and then post-hoc tests looking at pair-wise comparisons between the three groups. My question is

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison using Monte Carlo

2019-12-02 Thread Ting Li
External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr. Douglas, Thank you so much for your explanation. You really helped me a lot! Best regards, Ting On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Correct. This is no different than, eg, a t-test. Look

[Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-02 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution Hello Experts, I ran the PETsurfer pipeline using AV45 pet and performed pvc using pons as reference point. When i looked at the gtm.stats.dat file for one of my subjects, the SUVr for right and left nucleus-accumbens areas were in the negative (left =

Re: [Freesurfer] negative SUVr using PETsurfer

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
It may or may not be something that needs to be fixed. The PVC is just a linear model where the regression coefficients are the uptake in each ROI. As with any model, it adjusts the regression coefs to minimize the error in the fit. If some end up being less than zero when you really expect all

Re: [Freesurfer] Reporting Results in a three group analysis

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
I don't think there is a standard way to do this. A vertex-wise analysis is not the same thing as a averaging over a group of vertices. I guess you could constrain your post-hoc analysis to be within the main effect cluster; that would be most consistent. But I don't think you'd have any problem

Re: [Freesurfer] -qcache and thickness questions

2019-12-02 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
On 12/2/2019 7:12 PM, Joëlle Ismay Rosanne Van Der Molen wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, After running the -qcache option to extract thickness data for every subject, I tried pulling all the data together in order to get a matrix of subjects x vertices c